Log in

View Full Version : take a look



revolutionary spirit
25th October 2001, 21:10
Now let us look at terrorists the U.S hjave helped create-[just 3 of the many]

Saddam Hussein-He got to power in 1963 in a coup with his party Ba'ath.The west backed this coup as he was overthrowing the independent-minded Iraqi regieme that had over thrown the british backed monarchy.Now why else whould the U.S want to back Saddam Hussein,is it because they backed his anti-communist crusade in which he displayed by public executions of iraqi communist brothers.I thought America believed in freedom of speech but the U.S never raised an eye brow over this act of murder.Oh well.Then the West labelled Saddam ''as a bastion against the spread of radical islamism'' after Saddam went to war against Iran after the pro Western governement was overthrown by a Islamic revolution in 1979.Even when he used posion gas to kill 5,000 kurds at a village at Halabja the west showed no sorrow,or disagreement with hussien.It wasn't until the Iraqis invaded Kuwait,where oil companies intrest was at stake did the West act against Hussien and then use the excuse of protecting the Kurds for bombing Iraq daily.

General Noriega-He was a Panamanian DICTATOR which got in power with the help of the C.I.A-in 1972[11 years before he took power in Panaman] U.S officals had hard evidence that he was involved in the Drug trade but the then Head of C.I.A George Bush Snr protected him as he rose to power as the head of the secret police.In the 80's Noriega helped his fair headed northern friends by telling the Reagan administration intelligence on the activites of opponets to the American policy in central America.This helped Regan to get his other dictator buddies in who the Trade Unionists and Socialists were so they could murder them.Only in 1989 when domestically in the U.S when Noriega's Drug exploits were found out did the U.S invade to overthrow him,killing thousands of Panamanian civilans in the meanwhile.

Nicaragua-The US backed a right wing Contra force that invaded Nicaragua in the 1980's.The Contra's were funded by drug money that was channelled by many of the U.S leaders now in the white house today.The Contra's raped,slaughtered civilans along their way across Nicaragua.America also intervened in the civil war with El Salavador backing murderous paramilitary groups and death squads.In all 75,000 civilans died.

Well i'm fucking tired from typing all that,but i'll leave u wit this little quote---

''America has no friends,only intrests''-John F Kennedy

Chief Rebel Angel
25th October 2001, 23:29
do u know the full name Saddam's party?? take a deep breath:

the SOCIALIST Ba'ath Party

oh the irony...

Moskitto
25th October 2001, 23:38
The US even backed a nice person called "Pol Pot" and a bunch of people called the "Khmer Rouge" to draw attention away from the Vietnam War. Then Pol Pot decided to kill everyone and then the US refused to call it a genocide for 20 years and then blamed "communists" and got people to spread propaganda against communists using Pol Pot as an example. Still Harry Kissinger remains free.

Bring Kissinger to trail, don't give him the Nobel Peace Prize he's a mass murderer.

AgustoSandino
26th October 2001, 08:35
I don't even know why I'm bothering with this one, but here we go. On an earlier post by vox, I believe the one regarding Chomsky, our esteemed pointed out the US' intervention in Cambodia. He referred his readers to a statment by william blum
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Cam...ambodia_KH.html (http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Cambodia_KH.html)
Notice how this statment ignores the Khmer Rouge? Notice how this statement says that the US supported the government which was overthrown by the Khmer Rouge?
You see the statement ignores the Khmer Rouge because Blum obviously does not want to sully the name of communism. Well despite the Khmer Rouge's appalling death toll, he was already millions of deaths to late from saving the name of communsim. Secondly the fact that the US supported the forces that were oppossed to the Khmer Rouge disproves your claim, Moskitto, that we supported them. In fact I'd like to know where you got that information. If you are referring to the fact that we neglected the Khmer Rouge it wasn't because we liked them, or coddled them, the Chinese did that. It was because:
a) we did not have public support for intervention in S.E. Asia, yes the public in the US does count, it is not only the opinions of rabid right-wingers that is heeded.
b)because the Khmer rouge was at odds with the vietnamese, do I have to explain why we found that ironic?

To note yet another irony, if we had deposed of the Khmer Rouge, today people such as yourself would have been decrying the US for interferring in a third world country.