Log in

View Full Version : David Hume vs. Immanual Kant


Lardlad95
17th October 2003, 21:08
David Hume: Knowledge comes through Experience. Everything we know is put together out of resemblances and associations



Immanuel Kant: Experience comes from our Ability to know. Our ability to know makes it possble for us to have and understand our experiences


So which it? Is hume right? Is kant right? Or is it some odd mixture of both?


If I couldn't know things then how could I comprehend experience? However if I didn't experience things how could I learn?


Your thoughts?
Soviet power supreme
23rd October 2003, 20:27
Kant was thinking a syntes between rationalism and empirism. he had these words a priori and a posteriori.
Lardlad95
26th October 2003, 21:33
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 23 2003, 08:27 PM
Kant was thinking a syntes between rationalism and empirism. he had these words a priori and a posteriori.
...And to Hume???
Soviet power supreme
27th October 2003, 19:59
Well hume was pure empirist.Personally i think his causalite thought is right. "One thing follows another, but we can't notice a relation between these two". Right, where is this sense perception? :huh:
Lardlad95
8th November 2003, 18:24
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 27 2003, 08:59 PM
Well hume was pure empirist.Personally i think his causalite thought is right. "One thing follows another, but we can't notice a relation between these two". Right, where is this sense perception? :huh:
YOU DON"T LIKE kant
Soviet power supreme
8th November 2003, 18:33
YOU DON"T LIKE kant

What? :huh:

Why I can't like Kant if I like Hume?
Lardlad95
8th November 2003, 18:38
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 8 2003, 07:33 PM

YOU DON"T LIKE kant

What? :huh:

Why I can't like Kant if I like Hume?
The are in two rival gangs

Idealists vs. Empiricists
Soviet power supreme
8th November 2003, 18:39
Kant wasn't pure idealistic.
Lardlad95
8th November 2003, 18:42
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 8 2003, 07:39 PM
Kant wasn't pure idealistic.
True, but he wore the gang colors.

I'm just joking.

It's just you asserted Hume was right
Soviet power supreme
8th November 2003, 18:51
Kant agreed with Hume on causalite subject.

"We can't notice the causalite but we can make causalite in our minds"

Kant was thinking like that
Lardlad95
9th November 2003, 01:22
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 8 2003, 07:51 PM
Kant agreed with Hume on causalite subject.

"We can't notice the causalite but we can make causalite in our minds"

Kant was thinking like that
Good point...but is that all you believe Kant was right about?
Soviet power supreme
9th November 2003, 12:59
Good point...but is that all you believe Kant was right about?

"Thoughts without cognition are nothing.
Perceptions without concepts are blind"

(I'm not sure are the words right?)

But yeah.

I'm sure that you can't be a truly idealistic or empiristic.
Lardlad95
15th November 2003, 18:00
Originally posted by Soviet power [email protected] 9 2003, 01:59 PM

Good point...but is that all you believe Kant was right about?

"Thoughts without cognition are nothing.
Perceptions without concepts are blind"

(I'm not sure are the words right?)

But yeah.

I'm sure that you can't be a truly idealistic or empiristic.
I bet redstar would disagee..atleast on being an empiricist.

damn it I wan't more argumentation here
Soviet power supreme
16th November 2003, 00:16
Well you have to admit that epistemology isn't a fascinating subject.

I'm pretty sure that only few here in Che-Lives have studied it.