Log in

View Full Version : The Pilgrims in America tried communism, failed miserably, and turned to capitalism?



Lokomotive293
22nd July 2011, 21:11
I'm having a debate with a right winger, and he just asked me to read this (It's from a website called nocommunism.com, just to warn you ;))


Pilgrims’ Failed Communist Experiment

Americans are often surprised to learn that the pilgrims experimented with a communist system when they first arrived in what would later become the United States.

Governor William Bradford, whose memoirs are available to confirm that this happpened, established a socialist/communist system when the pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. Everyone would “share” in the crops, food, clothing, etc. It sounded like a great idea.

But human nature soon prevailed. As many of the pilgrims learned, on such a system if one chose not to work, they would still eat because someone else would work to bring in what was needed.

So why go out in the heat or cold to work when someone else would do it? But this system proved to be unsubstainable.

More and more of the pilgrims chose the path of sitting around or faking illness until the nonworkers outnumbered the workers. Women resented the idea of cooking for someone because his wife chose to be a nonworker and, according to Governor Bradford’s memoirs, considered it a form of slavery. It became so bad that at one point each person was rationed to 3 to 4 pieces of corn per day. You read that right – PIECES (or kernels) of corn. They were starving.

It was at that point that Governor Bradford knew that such a system would not work and even in a best case scenario would be at the mercy of a human’s nature to be lazy. So he assigned each family or single person a piece of land and told them that whatever they produced off that land would be theirs to do with as they wished. They were free to keep, sell, give away or invest whatever was produced from their land or its products and no one else would have rights to it. This gave people motivation to work and be productive because if they didn’t, they weren’t entitled to the work of anyone else’s hands. They had to work for themselves.

The number of hands working increased tremendously to the point that the pilgrims had abundance. So one family member could work and the others could keep the house, prepare meals, hire help or take some time off to enjoy life. It was a pure free market and it led to the resurgance of the pilgrims and the feast that we now call Thanksgiving where they shared what they had with the Native Americans.

We must not forget the lesson that the pilgrims learned the hard way.

Of course I could argue that you can't really have communism without there first being capitalism, but this article is full of the age-old human nature argument, which is also what he is focusing on. My question is now, does anyone here know anything about this "communist experiment" that does not come from some dubious right-wing source? Any help would be great :)

RichardAWilson
23rd July 2011, 00:11
How is that Scientific Socialism?

Tim Cornelis
23rd July 2011, 00:15
It had a governor, so it was not communist.

Also, say that when we implement communism and we find out people are naturally lazy and won't work we simply (re-)introduce labour credits. Tada, problem solved. The more one works, the more one receives. Argument gone.

"He who does not work, neither shall he eat"

Rafiq
23rd July 2011, 00:44
Maybe because Capitalism as a system is more productive and efficient than some bullshit Pilgrim Utopian hogwash? Capitalism is a necessary stage, to achieve communism, you know. And I doubt the problems were "Human Nature" as that is totally bullshit. The social and material conditions they grew up in were in Europe, so they were already religious fundie madmen. What do you expect, for it to work? Not to mention the countless communes on planet Earth that actually did work, so what if this one didn't?

Also, such a system was not necessarily Capitalism, considering no one had to rent their labor to stay alive.

And, the very fact that the family was structured that way means it wasn't socialism from the start.

Actually, read this article: http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2010/12/the_myth_of_the_communist_pilg.php

RGacky3
23rd July 2011, 01:00
Well funny enough that did'nt happen other places where communism was tried, but oyur right, any time you attempt top down communism it won't work.

You have examples like the diggers, who were successfull, the early christian congregation (first century).

Anyway thats just one example, and its a flawed example.

Rafiq
23rd July 2011, 01:04
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2010/12/the_myth_of_the_communist_pilg.php

Gacky, read this

Ocean Seal
23rd July 2011, 01:08
No what they tried was a collectivism. Collectivism was more efficient than capitalism in the sense that it allowed them pilgrims to get settled. However, after excess production began they moved onto individual producers and hence a type of proto-capitalism. Also realize that communism could not have been attempted at that time because the means of production had not created an abundance. All communal models either fail or don't expand because they are based on idealism and not materialism. Communism doesn't just come out of the blue, after socialism is built and creates the sufficient resources necessary then communism can be created through the disestablishment of the bureaucracy. That being said the pilgrims followed a bureaucratic collectivist model.

CommunityBeliever
23rd July 2011, 01:20
The religious nut jobs in America tried something that wasn't communism and then turned to something that wasn't capitalism either.