New Empirical Evidence for the Christianity Theory of Income

[Zanthorus]

For quite some time there has been controversy surrounding the so-called 'transformation problem' of transforming Christianity levels into income levels. Marx believed that there was a tendency for the formation of a uniform rate of income and Hegelian mystics and script-readers have for quite a long time attempted to defend this dogma. However, recent research by Andrew 'Dave' Kliman purports to demonstrate that the problem which so troubled Marx is illusory. Strong empirical evidence which is in no way spurious or questionable exists to show that Christianity is a perfectly good predictor of income and therefore a properly scientific theory and now we can all start doing proper hard science instead of messing around with all that Hegelian theoretical-dialectical rubbish. More on all that here (http://tinyurl.com/3pwpw4w).

Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to start formulating hypotheses in preparation for carrying out tests to see what I would like for lunch today, and perhaps later I'll start trying to develop a theorem which can predict with a 93% rate of success my chances of getting slapped in the face if I start chatting up any given girl at a bus stop.

[ZeroNowhere]

I once knew an economics student who started reading Capital, but then put it down after the third chapter because it didn't have enough graphs. Que sera sera.

I've already stated that I like this piece elsewhere, but, for reference, it is great. All things considered, perhaps all of the plenteous labour-time expended upon justifying the theory of value empirically is really just an attempt to subvert it. Incidentally:


The oblateness of the earth was theoretically established by Newton. The Cassinis and other Frenchmen maintained a long time afterwards, on the basis of their empirical measurements, that the earth is ellipsoidal and the polar axis the longest one.