Dogs On Acid
1st July 2011, 18:33
Here is the new Christmas Subsidy Tax in in force from 2011 onward:
http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7348/imposto.png (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/696/imposto.png/)
- The first column is the amount of money the subsidy is in €.
- The second column is the amount of tax.
- The third column is the third is the % the tax is comparing to annual salary.
- The fourth is the variation of the % from the previous
Ok as we can see the tax starts progressive, the lower subsidies get taxed far less, now the problem lies here:
As the subsidy rises in amount, the variation of the tax gets lower and lower at a incredibly fast pace. It will get to a point where a person that is allowed say 80.000€ in subsidy will pay the same percentage as someone getting 40.000€, the difference will be so small it's not worth writing down.
It's meant to benefit the rich while giving the illusion of a progressive tax.
They think I'm stupid :star:
http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7348/imposto.png (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/696/imposto.png/)
- The first column is the amount of money the subsidy is in €.
- The second column is the amount of tax.
- The third column is the third is the % the tax is comparing to annual salary.
- The fourth is the variation of the % from the previous
Ok as we can see the tax starts progressive, the lower subsidies get taxed far less, now the problem lies here:
As the subsidy rises in amount, the variation of the tax gets lower and lower at a incredibly fast pace. It will get to a point where a person that is allowed say 80.000€ in subsidy will pay the same percentage as someone getting 40.000€, the difference will be so small it's not worth writing down.
It's meant to benefit the rich while giving the illusion of a progressive tax.
They think I'm stupid :star: