Log in

View Full Version : Axis of 'evil'



El Commandante
10th October 2003, 21:25
The label of the Axis of 'Evil' is being spread to contain more countries - Libya (won't go down well with Blair - diplomatic relations are being repaired), Syria (support for Israel) and Cuba (exile bastards) ... because they are developing WMD. Iraq was invaded on this pretext and nothing has been found - what the hell is going on.



US extends axis of evil to Syria, Libya and Cuba
By Michael Evans, Defence Editor, and Richard Beeston, Diplomatic Editor



SYRIA, Libya and Cuba are to become new members of Americas axis of evil. John Bolton, the US Under-Secretary of State, said all three were intent on developing weapons of mass destruction and were a threat to the United States and its allies.
The original so-called axis of evil states were named by Mr Bush in his State of the Union speech in January last year as Iraq, Iran and North Korea.

Speaking at the US Embassy in London, Mr Bolton made it clear that in Washingtons view the axis was expanding. Were now turning our attention to Iran, Syria, Libya and Cuba, he said. Iraq had now been dealt with, he added. Weapons of mass destruction had not yet been found, though a clear intent and potential capability had been uncovered.

When he made the speech naming the original three countries, some had criticised it as the words of an unsophisticated American. However, in the past 18 months, Mr Bolton said, everything Mr Bush had warned about had been corroborated. North Korea was now under diplomatic pressure to dismantle its nuclear weapons programme, and Iran was clearly trying to develop the bomb and long-range ballistic missiles before the end of the decade.

Mr Bolton accused Libya of making increased efforts to purchase components for biological and chemical weapons after United Nations trade sanctions were lifted last month, but his most serious concerns centred on Syria, indicating that the high-pressure diplomatic efforts aimed at Damascus in the past two years had failed.

America already has sanctions in place against Iran, Libya and Cuba, and soon is expected to bring into force a set of punitive measures against Syria, which it accuses of backing terrorist groups, building weapons of mass destruction and occupying neighbouring Lebanon.

Mr Bolton said the level of co-operation the US was getting from Syria was not satisfactory, and he issued a warning that the US Congress was poised to vote in favour of sanctions against Damascus.

On Wednesday the Syria Accountability Act was passed by the Congressional International Relations Committee after the White House signalled that it had dropped its longstanding opposition. The Act would ban the sale of dual-use equipment to Syria and give President Bush the choice of imposing two of six possible sanctions aimed at limiting diplomatic contacts, cutting off trade and halting air links.

Although trade between the two countries is limited, the political impact could have serious ramifications in the region. America has maintained close diplomatic ties with Damascus for decades. For a brief period, after the September 11 attacks on America, Damascus appeared to be co-operating with Washington in the war on terrorism and rapprochement between the two countries seemed possible.

Since then, however, relations have deteriorated sharply, with Washington accusing Damascus of allowing fighters to cross the border into Iraq to attack US forces. Syrias support for militant Palestinian groups responsible for suicide attacks in Israel has also hardened attitudes in Washington.

Imad Mustafa, the Syrian charg daffaires in Washington, said: This is a blatant double standard that can rarely be met in international diplomacy. Syria is already greatly concerned about the presence of tens of thousands of American troops across its border in Iraq and the bombing raid by Israeli jets on Sunday against a target north of Damascus. The raid was the first in three decades and appeared to have the tacit approval of the White House.



I would post a link ... but I don't have one - I just picked it up from Times Online if you want to have a look there for it - in the search line type 'Axis of Evil' - it's the top link


Times Online (http://www.timesonline.co.uk)

Jesus Christ
10th October 2003, 21:35
lol youll probably see France on there soon cuz they dont support the war lol :lol:

Red Flag
10th October 2003, 23:02
throwing cuba in there just seems fucking rediclous.. it astounds me that american people buy into that shit.. Syria is evil for 'occupying' lebanon, how bout the U$ occupying Iraq as we speak???

WTF When did the US become a world 'democracy' delivery service.. this is outragous!!! Somthing needs to be done to protect our Cuban comrade's from imperialism!

Hitman47
11th October 2003, 02:29
REVOLUCION!!!!


BOMB THE WHITE HOUSE, LETS ALL SURROUND THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!! :unsure: :rolleyes: ;)

UnionofSovietSocialistRepublics
11th October 2003, 10:29
Cuba, syria and libya were added ages ago now, almost straight after the initial 3-DPRK, Iraq, Iran.

Marxist in Nebraska
12th October 2003, 22:40
The Bush administration needs a new axis of evil...

Iraq is being colonized, North Korea is still too dangerous to be worth invading, and Iran is strong enough that Americans would die in unacceptable numbers forcing "regime change" there.

I get the feeling, though, that Bush wants to fight another war. His lies are starting to be addressed in the media. He needs a war to get people off of his case and solidify his poll numbers in time to get elected for the first time (or at least make it close enough for him to steal another one). Enter the weaker anti-American states of Syria, Libya, and Cuba.

As long as Bush can free up enough troops, I expect him to set up another war stomp in one or more of those countries. That will probably involve cutting a deal with the imperialists on the UN Security Council, so they will take on the grunt work of occupying Iraq. Bush has not been willing to share the spoils to this point, but I suspect he will come around if his poll numbers really fall into a tailspin.

Jesus Christ
13th October 2003, 01:53
by the time elections roll around, Bush will have the "terrorism" meter jacked up to its highest state, so he could declare a state of emergency and thus abolish the 2004 elections
its not that far fetched and could possibly happen

Funky Monk
13th October 2003, 14:55
Do you think if i ask nicely i can be included, i have a mightily sharp kitchen knife

El Commandante
13th October 2003, 20:36
Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2003, 01:53 AM
by the time elections roll around, Bush will have the "terrorism" meter jacked up to its highest state, so he could declare a state of emergency and thus abolish the 2004 elections
its not that far fetched and could possibly happen
I disagree - elections were still held during WWII and that was far more wrenching on the American population with large numbers of service men deployed abroad - they still managed to vote in the elections. With increased technology today I do not see it as being impossible for service men to vote.

Also the constitution is clear that an election will be held every 4 years on the second Tuesday after the first Monday of November - this would be very difficult to break and Supreme Court and Congress would do all they could to reject it because it would set an unwelcome precedent.

Zombie
14th October 2003, 00:49
give peacea a chance man :wub: :wub:

CompadreGuerrillera
14th October 2003, 22:22
Originally posted by [email protected] 11 2003, 02:29 AM
REVOLUCION!!!!


BOMB THE WHITE HOUSE, LETS ALL SURROUND THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!! :unsure: :rolleyes: ;)
dude your stupid, i bet the FBI is onroute to your haus even as we speak! ;)