Was Hilter a Marxists?

[Mad Dinero]

Hitler was in favor of state control of resources. Plus the Nazis had the best healthcare during WW2 in all of Europe (for non-Jew, white Germans) (historychannel.com). Still not to cancel the murders of all those innocent people

[synthesis]

http://home.att.net/~Resurgence/L-hitler.htm

There have been innumerable Jewish Marxists over the years, by the way. Lenin, Marx, Engels, and Trotsky were all Jewish, among others.

[(*]

If you even remotely think Hitler was a Marxist, then you sir have no idea about history

[UnionofSovietSocialistRepublics]

dumbass!cos hitler loved commies dint he. fool

[Urban Rubble]

I know guys, it's not as if he murdered communists on a massive scale !

Oh wait, he did. Nevermind.

[Bianconero]

Was Hilter a Marxists?

He sure was, cowboy. Didn't you know? That is why they call it National Socialism by the way.

All pretty easy, isn't it, 'Mad Dinero' ?

[Goldfinger]

Just like North Korea calls themselves a Democracy. Because we all see what wonderful freedom the people of "The Democratic People's Republic of North Korea" enjoy.

[Comrade Ceausescu]

ahahahahahahaahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahaahahaha.what a stupid question.

[ComradeRobertRiley]

Marxists are totally against racism you prick, Hitler tried to wipe out the Jews, I think that was just a little racist! you know nothing of either marxism or Hitler, maybe you know nothing of both

[Guest1]

Hitler and Moussilini also referred to their brands of fascism as "Corporatism". They defined it as the blurring of the line between the state and the corporation beyond recognition. They believed in bringing all of the state's resources to support the corporation, and vice versa. They believed in making the corporation into the state. So sure, they nationalized, but in favour of the rich.

Marxists believe in eliminating both state and corporation. They believe in replacing both with cooperatives. Democracy at the workplace, and in the state, all workers being treated as equals. Their goal is not for the state to own the means of production, but the workers. Nationalization is a half-way process to achieve that, until we can eliminate the middle-man in the form of the state.

[synthesis]

Originally posted by Che y [email protected] 12 2003, 09:29 PM
Hitler and Moussilini also referred to their brands of fascism as "Corporatism".
Actually, I believe that was just Mussolini.

[Guest1]

Yeah, you're right, sorry. I was working off of memory :) But it applies to fascism in general.

[the SovieT]

Originally posted by Mad [email protected] 10 2003, 05:02 AM
Hitler was in favor of state control of resources. Plus the Nazis had the best healthcare during WW2 in all of Europe (for non-Jew, white Germans) (historychannel.com). Still not to cancel the murders of all those innocent people..


that is probably the stupidest, most ignorant, idiotic etc etc thing i have ever heard...



you know, there is a certain difrence betwen "socialism" (expecially national-socialism) and marxism, any idiot can call himself a socialist, without even having the smallest idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat, or the nationalization of economy, or any notion of the need for a agrarian reform etc etc




about Corporatism, no it wasnt just Mussolini, Salazar and even Franco did it i think...

but then again those were not "nationalizations" in the really sense of the word, they were more of "statual privatizations", since the economy was still runned by the select few....

[Non-Sectarian Bastard!]

Originally posted by Mad [email protected] 10 2003, 05:02 AM
Hitler was in favor of state control of resources. Plus the Nazis had the best healthcare during WW2 in all of Europe (for non-Jew, white Germans) (historychannel.com). Still not to cancel the murders of all those innocent people
I suggest that you take a dictionary and read what facist means and read the entire Manifesto.