Log in

View Full Version : Should "Israel" attack Syria



REDRESIST67
7th October 2003, 05:53
these last days have been crucial for Syria which deserved nothing from "Israel" and was attacked for supporting Palestinian resistance groups which have a right to protect themselves from evil zionist schemes .

Alejandro C
7th October 2003, 06:00
it was sick to see all the news about that today...


bush praises israel for defending itself.

israel today bombed a terrorist camp in Syria.


those were the headlines. the side notes to those that were said quickly were- this reopens a war that had been settled for 30 years. also places the 'roadmap' to peace back at square one. no one pointed out the connection between bush praising the destruction of peace in the middle east or israel declaring war with Syria which cannot be good for anyone. i fucking hate american media.

REDRESIST67
7th October 2003, 06:03
Your rite my comrade,

Bush and Sharon dont want to give Palestinians a state after nearly 60 years of fighting for their own land !!!

(*
7th October 2003, 06:07
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2003, 01:53 AM
attacked for supporting Palestinian resistance groups
Syria cannot defend herself (militarily). So, the Israelis don't have to worry about retaliation.

To answer your question. Israel should not attack Syria (again). Nobody should attack anyone.

Alejandro C
7th October 2003, 06:07
yeah, its not so much that though. i doubt if Bush could even find palastine on a map. he is more interested in protecting our lackey Israel. its a blind mutual support between the two countries. i don't know how many times in the UN when the vote comes it every against the two of us.

so i guess Israel is a whore. Giving its vote away for the protection of the US its pathetic.

DynamicOpinions
7th October 2003, 06:23
yea this is getting damn pathetic. How can anyone support the zionist israelis, and this attack in syria just shows how israel has no intentions of peace and could care less about what the other arab countries think of them. I hope this doesn't turn into a huge middle eastern war, and if it does I fear the rest of the world could join in the mayhem. Can you imagine north korea, china, iran, and perhaps russia all joining into one alliance against the US and its allies. I know the US is bringing it on themselves, but i feel the american public still has a chance to think for themselves again. Hopefully the propaganda will have so many loopholes and lies that the people will be able to realize the truth. Maybe all will go well and the israelis will back off, the US and the other imperialists will stop stealing other nations lands, and the propaganda will stop. yea that'll be the day :(

BuyOurEverything
7th October 2003, 06:53
evil zionist schemes

:lol: Hahaha. And since they control the media, nobody can oppose them, right?


Syria cannot defend herself (militarily). So, the Israelis don't have to worry about retaliation.

Exactly, they have no real opposition so they can just blow shit up wherever they want.


so i guess Israel is a whore. Giving its vote away for the protection of the US its pathetic.

Well I guess when you've got enemies and really only one ally, you can't really lose their support.

Firestorm
7th October 2003, 07:00
Sad shit! Those Israeli fools are going to throw the whole region into chaos. What a bunch of fuck ups! The wheel is re-invented yet again....will they ever learn?

BuyOurEverything
7th October 2003, 07:10
The wheel is re-invented yet again....

What do you mean?

FabFabian
9th October 2003, 01:47
No country should attack another country. The Israeli gov't has been spoiling for a fight with Syria for a while now. This whole action is so damn predictable.

Zombie
9th October 2003, 02:33
i dont get it. why start a thread about israel and sysra, when they is already ONE in Politics?

RED CHARO
9th October 2003, 15:18
Even If Syria was suporting Palestinian freedom fighters ......
The world shouldn't of let the situation arise all those years ago......

Zombie
10th October 2003, 01:05
The world shouldn't

the world? what world? the rich bastards' world? the proletariat's world? whose world are you talking about? the big 5? the US? capitalism? do you think they gave a fuck all those years ago? do you they give a fuck now? seriously! what world are we talking about? a world that turned it's back on slavery? aids? women and child abuse? that kind of world? the i-just-care-about-my-personal-wellbeing world?

and why say shouldn't? what makes you say they could have?

El Brujo
10th October 2003, 03:09
NO. And I think that is pretty self-explanatory.

Marxist in Nebraska
10th October 2003, 16:48
Should Israel attack Syria...? Ummmm... no? How about... not attacking other countries?

Why are there quotation marks around Israel in the name of the thread?

Danton
10th October 2003, 16:54
Let them all blow eachother to shit....

Zombie
10th October 2003, 22:44
Originally posted by Marxist in [email protected] 10 2003, 12:48 PM
Why are there quotation marks around Israel in the name of the thread?
Israel doesn't exist.

Red Flag
10th October 2003, 23:10
Israel has the most military might in the middle east :angry:

The UN condemned their attacks on Syria, and now they are planning to do it again? WOW! Israel is the U$'s pawn in this game, better believe the U$ is out for IT'S OWN INTRESTS and NOTHING MORE!

Sensitive
10th October 2003, 23:52
Israel is basically just a Middle-Eastern version of the United Kingdom - a weaker, imperialist country that is Washington's junior partner.

Marxist in Nebraska
12th October 2003, 22:42
Originally posted by Zombie+Oct 10 2003, 05:44 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Zombie @ Oct 10 2003, 05:44 PM)
Marxist in [email protected] 10 2003, 12:48 PM
Why are there quotation marks around Israel in the name of the thread?
Israel doesn&#39;t exist. [/b]
OK... I can understand that now.

I agree with Comrade Sensitive identifying Israel as a junior partner of the U.S.