Log in

View Full Version : My Weapons of Mass Destruction Paper



commieboy
7th October 2003, 01:09
The purpose of this paper is to support the contention that there are positive results from the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) the United States holds in it’s military arsenal. Although there is a compelling argument to make regarding the negative impact of such devastating weapons on the earth and it’s occupants, there are some singular, important aspects to their existence.


The first and foremost direct benefit revolving around the existence of WMDs in modern society is the concept of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). This concept, based on the ability of more than one nation-state possessing effective quantities of WMDs, represents the basis for modern, strategic deterrence. Basically, “if you nuke me, I’ll nuke you and no one will survive.” This crude, but effective strategic theory has been the basis of contemporary superpower balance since the late 1940’s. The results have been a period of relative peace compared to the tragic toll of human life taken in war in the first half of the 20th Century.


The second benefit associated with the existence of WMDs effects the research and scholarship spin-offs that grew out of the billions of dollars and thousands of man-hours dedicated to the development of WMDs. Quick examples can be illustrated by significant advancements in the fields of medicine, space travel and computer technology.


A third benefit has to do with a deeper spiritual relationship among thinking men and women around the world. With the existence of WMDs, man for the first time, had the ability to destroy his environment. Until this time, that ability was reserved for a higher power. This realization, among enlightened individuals, also leads to the conclusion that man can remake or improve his environment into anything he desires. Questions related to man’s ultimate purpose in the universe take on a new relevance.


The fourth and final benefit of WMDs has to do with the existence of life beyond our planet. Shortly after Western Civilization began testing nuclear weapons, hundreds of reports of unidentified flying objects sighted around the world began to filter into the mass media. This phenomenon, although disputed by many as being kind of weird, is responsible for one of two things. First, either the earth has been visited by extra terrestrials interested in our common development or, second, at a minimum it is responsible for some of the finest science fiction books and films ever made.


Based on the previous four benefits derived from the existence of WMDs, it is clear that their position in our world and culture contribute to many more outcomes than the potential end of civilization, as we know it.

suffianr
8th October 2003, 12:56
Ah, a first draft, no?

You launch straight into the facts. Are you trying to be serious, or bellicose?

What's your hook?

Where are your sources? Quotes? Reference style? (APA OR MLA - ultimately necessary if this is a college paper)

The fourth point is inane. There is no conceivable benefit to believing in aliens. But it's a nice touch.

And your conclusion is not only weak, but leaves the reader "High & Dry". ;)

(pardon my use of the "Lecherous Smiley")

Other than that, it is good!

You are direct, focused and the "voice" of your essay carries a certain air of confidence and, perhaps, conviction in your belief that there are always two sides to a coin, WMDs notwithstanding.

'Needs a little polishing, here and there, but bless my cotton socks, you're probably on the right track, there.

commieboy
9th October 2003, 01:33
thanks....you can be as honest as you want...i couldn't put my heart into this...it's a paper i had to write for the Model UN.....i hate WMDs and i dont think anyone should have them...I really couldn't think of anything else about the WMD so i added the alien thing for laughs, i also forgot the resolution so here it is...



To prevent nuclear and biological weapons from falling into the wrong hands, both rouge nations and terrorists, these instruments of destruction should be totally controlled by the United Nations wherever they may be found. To accomplish this, the world’s nuclear and biological weapon stocks should be limited to one thousand active warheads. This is more than enough to vaporize or contaminate the entire world and would help control proliferation. The advantage of having a UN international force control, maintain and guard these WMDs will ensure that no single country will be able to unleash the awesome power of these ultimate weapons.

Those countries that refuse to accept the mandate of the UN will need to be convinced by the creation of economic and political pressure placed on their economies. The veto power of the permanent members of the UN Security Council will best balance the individual failings of misguided foreign policy conducted by overly aggressive nation-states. And if the UN feels threatened they shall use necessary force to disarm the country. Never under any circumstances will one country or one person be in control of WMDs. This is to insure that the weapons are never to be used just to further one’s political position.