Log in

View Full Version : Obama to unveil Arab economic plan



freepalestine
19th May 2011, 13:10
Obama to unveil Arab economic plan
Published today (updated) 19/05/2011 14:16







http://www.maannews.net/images/345x230/130100_345x230.jpg
Egyptian demonstrators hold a giant flag made up of Arab nation states' colors
in Tahrir Square, Cairo during a protest calling for national unity across the
country. [AFP/Khaled Desouki]



WASHINGTON (AFP) -- US President Barack Obama will Thursday unveil a multi-billion dollar economic plan to spur and reward democratic change in the Arab world, modeled on the evolution of post-Soviet eastern Europe.

The comprehensive US scheme, initially targeting Egypt and Tunisia, will serve as an incentive for other states currently rocked by "Arab Spring" turmoil, to embrace people power and turn towards democracy, officials said.

Obama will lay out the initiative in a long-awaited major speech sketching Washington's response to the historic wave of change sweeping across the Middle East and North Africa, at the State Department at 3:40 p.m Washington time on Thursday.

A senior official said the administration had asked: "how do we take some of the successful efforts in Eastern Europe and apply them in countries that are transitioning to democracy in the Middle East and North Africa?

"It is the beginning of a long term effort. These transitions will play out over a period of years -- Egypt and Tunisia are at the forefront because they have already taken these steps.

"It is our hope that there are other transitions to democracy that follow in the years to come," the official said on condition of anonymity, perhaps referring to states like Syria that has launched a crackdown on protests.

Specifically, the plan will seek to reorient the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which helped rebuild market economies in post-communist Europe, to play a similar role in the Middle East.

To help Egypt meet critical development following the fall of president Hosni Mubarak, Washington will develop a new mechanism to cancel debt to provide cash and investment funds, a program worth a billion dollars..

It will also guarantee up to a billion dollars in borrowing to finance infrastructure development and to support job creation through the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

The White House, which already sends billions of dollars of aid, including military support to Egypt's way, will also seek authorization from Congress to establish a US-Egyptian enterprise fund.

The United States will also work with the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the African Development Bank to unlock more funding and financing guarantees to encourage democratic reform in the Arab world, officials said.

The plan was unveiled following calls for an initiative similar to the Marshall Plan, which rebuilt shattered Europe after World War II and checked the spread of communism.

The rationale of Obama's Arab plan appears to be an attempt to tackle the economic deprivation and miserable prospects of vast swathes of Arab population, which, along with repression of basic rights, triggered a wildfire of protests.

US officials said they would also seek to support better economic management in transitioning nations, try to improve economic stability by easing deficits and spurring growth and would support economic modernization and reform.

Trade will also be used as a lever, in an attempt to help nations help themselves.

"If you take out oil exports, (in) the countries of this region, 400 million people export about the same amount of goods as Switzerland does, with eight million people," another senior official said.

"The countries are not terribly well integrated with each other nor are they terribly well integrated with the global economy."

Obama will seek Thursday to sketch a plausible policy response to the sudden, complex and often contradictory demands thrown up by revolts that started in Tunisia, and spread to nations including Egypt, Syria, Yemen.

But it was unclear whether the president would use the speech to relaunch his stalled drive for Israeli-Palestinian peace.

The breathtaking speed, historical scope and complexity of change sweeping the region caught Washington, like the leaders it challenged, unawares.

For many Americans, the most significant foreign event of the year is the US killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, a fact pointing to a key domestic audience for Thursday's speech.

The president is also expected to have harsh words for US foes Syria and Iran.

On Wednesday, Obama imposed direct sanctions on President Bashar al-Assad and six top aides over Syria's deadly crackdown on protests, telling Assad to move to democracy or step down.

"It is up to Assad to lead a political transition or to leave," a document accompanying the sanctions declaration said.


http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=389243

Ned Kelly
19th May 2011, 13:27
leave arab economic plans to the arabs

Obs
19th May 2011, 13:36
WASHINGTON (AFP) -- US President Barack Obama will Thursday unveil a multi-billion dollar economic plan to spur and reward democratic change in the Arab world, modeled on the evolution of post-Soviet eastern Europe.
Oh no.

RedSonRising
19th May 2011, 15:20
Oh no.


Oh fuck that, seriously. At least this time we can see it coming. I don't think the populations would take kindly to this.


Reward, wtf is that shit. "Good job installing Western republicanism, here's a billion dollar biscuit!"

Tommy4ever
19th May 2011, 18:36
Oh fuck that, seriously. At least this time we can see it coming. I don't think the populations would take kindly to this.


Reward, wtf is that shit. "Good job installing Western republicanism, here's a billion dollar biscuit!"

Most people are going to want the biscuit though. A pretty clever move on the US's part. This essentially guaruntees that the new governments will be friendly (they'll be wanting their monetary rewards) and tries to put the US in a friendlier light in front of the people. Not sure if it will work with the public, I'd imagine that it will work with the governments though.

redhotpoker
19th May 2011, 18:44
The imperial counsel is dictating to the provinces.

freepalestine
20th May 2011, 11:38
Robert Fisk: President's fine words may not address the Middle East's real needs

In a keynote speech today, Barack Obama will try to redefine America's relationship with the Arab world. Our writer is sceptical

Thursday, 19 May 2011



http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/dynamic/00607/Pg-20-obama-getty_607880t.jpg (http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-presidents-fine-words-may-not-address-the-middle-easts-real-needs-2286077.html?action=Popup)
GETTY IMAGES

In a keynote speech today, Barack Obama may discuss recent events in the Arab world



OK, so here's what President Barack Obama should say today about the Middle East. We will leave Afghanistan tomorrow. We will leave Iraq tomorrow. We will stop giving unconditional, craven support to Israel. Americans will force the Israelis – and the European Union – to end their siege of Gaza. We will withhold all future funding for Israel unless it ends, totally and unconditionally, its building of colonies on Arab land that does not belong to it. We will cease all co-operation and business deals with the vicious dictators of the Arab world – whether they be Saudi or Syrian or Libyan – and we will support democracy even in those countries where we have massive business interests. Oh yes, and we will talk to Hamas.

Of course, President Barack Obama will not say this. A vain and cowardly man, he will talk about the West's "friends" in the Middle East, about the security of Israel – security not being a word he has ever devoted to Palestinians – and he will waffle on and on about the Arab Spring as if he ever supported it (until, of course, the dictators were on the run), as if – when they desperately needed his support – he had given his moral authority to the people of Egypt; and, no doubt, we will hear him say what a great religion Islam is (but not too great, or Republicans will start recalling the Barack Hussein Obama birth certificate again) and we will be asked – oh, I fear we will – to turn our backs on the Bin Laden past, to seek "closure" and "move on" (which I'm afraid the Taliban don't quite agree with).

Mr Obama and his equally gutless Secretary of State have no idea what they are facing in the Middle East. The Arabs are no longer afraid. They are tired of our "friends" and sick of our enemies. Very soon, the Palestinians of Gaza will march to the border of Israel and demand to "go home".



We got a signal of this on the Syrian and Lebanese borders on Sunday. What will the Israelis do? Kill the Palestinians in their thousands? And what will Mr Obama say then? (He will, of course, "call for restraint on both sides", a phrase he inherited from his torturing predecessor).

I rather think that the Americans suffer from what the Israelis suffer from: self-delusional
arguments. The Americans keep referring to the goodness of Islam, the Israelis to how they understand the "Arab mind". But they do not. Islam as a religion has nothing to do with it, any more than Christianity (a word I don't hear much of these days) or Judaism. It's about dignity, honour, courage, human rights – qualities which, in other circumstances, the United States always praises – which Arabs believe they are owed. And they are right. It is time for Americans to free themselves from their fear of Israel's lobbyists – in fact the Likud Party's lobbyists – and their repulsive slurs of anti-Semitism against anyone who dares to criticise Israel. It is time for them to take heart from the immensely brave members of the American-Jewish community who speak out about the injustices that Israel as well as the Arab leaders commit.

But will our favourite President say anything like this today? Forget it. This is a mealy-mouthed President who should – why have we forgotten this? – have turned down his Nobel Peace Prize because he can't even close Guantanamo, let alone bring us peace. And what did he say in his Nobel speech? That he, Barack Obama, had to live in the real world, that he was not Gandhi, as if – and all praise to The Irish Times for spotting this – Gandhi didn't have to fight the British empire. So we will be treated to all the usual analysts in the States, saying how fine the President's words are, praising this wretched man's speechifying.

And then comes the weekend when Mr Obama has to address the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the biggest, most powerful lobbyist "friend" of Israel in America. Then it will be all back to the start, security, security, security, little – if any mention – of the Israeli colonies in the West Bank and, I feel sure of this, much mention of terrorism, terrorism, terrorism, terrorism, terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. And no doubt a mention of the killing (let us not use the word execution) of Osama bin Laden.

What Mr Obama doesn't understand however – and, of course, Mrs Clinton has not the slightest idea – is that, in the new Arab world, there can be no more reliance on dictator-toadies, no more flattery. The CIA may have its cash funds to hand but I suspect few Arabs will want to touch them. The Egyptians will not tolerate the siege of Gaza. Nor, I think, will the Palestinians. Nor the Lebanese, for that matter; and nor the Syrians when they have got rid of the clansmen who rule them. The Europeans will work that out quicker than the Americans – we are, after all, rather closer to the Arab world – and we will not forever let our lives be guided by America's fawning indifference to Israeli theft of property.

It is, of course, going to be a huge shift of tectonic plates for Israelis – who should be congratulating their Arab neighbours, and the Palestinians for unifying their cause, and who should be showing friendship rather than fear. My own crystal ball long ago broke. But I am reminded of what Winston Churchill said in 1940, that "what General Weygand called the battle for France is over. The battle of Britain... is about to begin."
Well, the old Middle East is over. The new Middle East is about to begin. And we better wake up.


http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-presidents-fine-words-may-not-address-the-middle-easts-real-needs-2286077.html

Rafiq
20th May 2011, 12:02
Fuck no, they already fucked up eastern Europe, now they are going for the middle east.

Jeraldi
20th May 2011, 22:25
It's more like they want to keep it fucked up.

Osama = CIA puppet
Sadam = CIA puppet
Ayatollah = CIA's fault
the list goes on

Johnny Kerosene
21st May 2011, 06:42
I think it'd be funny if they took the billion then declared war on the US with a bunch of fancy toys that they bought with a billion dollars. Can't think of any good reasons why they would do this, but it'd be funny.

Thirsty Crow
21st May 2011, 09:51
It's fucking priceless that the first dictator to go, the head of the police state in Tunisia, was in fact responsible solely to the international financial institutions (alongside the police chiefs who had it going for them on the parallel market) with one aim: the implementation of the structural adjustment program. And guess what, that "program" has many a thing to do with the mentioned "evolutionary" model of post-socialist Eastern Europe and Russia.

Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk
21st May 2011, 10:12
so we've seen the us opportunistically dominate egypt and tunisia's uprisings and drive them in post-soviet hell hole economic directions, which will no doubt completely shaft these people. i wonder how the pro-libyan rebels make of this, given that the people they cheerlead wanna open up libya in the same way.

we can only hope that northern african workers build a movement of resistance to this blatant hijacking of their revolution.

Tablo
21st May 2011, 10:31
Interesting move. If this is maneuvered correctly they could have some middle eastern nations strongly aligned in their favor. I do think that their cold war strategies will be a bit too simplistic in the new world of global politics. I think, while the Chinese and American economies are completely tied together, I do believe they will lead to the development of some type of new coldwar. That or they will align together in opposition of new proletarian uprisings. Hard to tell what the future will bring. I do see some level of future conflict between China and the US in the future. Could never escalate beyond proxy wars though.