Log in

View Full Version : Dialectical, 'Intra-Dual' Design of Democratic Communist Constitutions



Miguel Detonnaciones
12th May 2011, 02:46
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

The Equitist Advocacy group has just published -- circa the May 5th, 2011 anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx -- a detailed NON-"New-Dark-Ages" solution to the "Hell-On-Earth" horrors that are now diarrhoeally deluging daily, globally, before our traumatized eyes: the totalitarian, "HUMANOCIDAL" self-degeneration of the global capitalist system.

An interesting aspect of this proposed solution is that it was apparently derived via the Equitist Advocacy group's "special solution" of the F.E.D. "Psycho-Historical Dialectical Equations" for the meaning of the "self-reflexive function" of the Capitalist System, and for the new "social relations of production ontology" which that "self-reflexion" would be expected to "irrupt".

That is, the Equitists apparently solved for the meaning of this self-aufheben self-transcending self-operation of the "Capital-relation" [Marx] upon itself, in the F.E.D. Model of the Meta-Evolution of the Human-Social Relations of Human-Social Relations Self-Re-Production, that is, for the "Delta-K" term of its K-squared component, clarified by a "simultaneous solution" for the probable meaning of the "Delta-h" term of the h-squared component in the F.E.D. "Dialectical Theory of Everything", "Dialectic of Nature" [as Totality] Equation-Model of the Universe as a whole.

For more on this solution of the Psycho-Historical Dialectical Equations, see the fourth of the "[RE-]SOURCE" links listed below, and --

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Primer_files/4_F.E.D.%20Intro.%20Letter,%20Supplement%20B-1,%20v.2_OCR.pdf

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Primer.html

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome.html

-- pages B-24+.


The text of the Equitists' latest, most-detailed specification of their proposed solution, in the form of a major constitutional amendment, or “sub-constitution”, is reproduced below.

It aims, to my reading, to explicate -- on the basis of the dialectical human social science discoveries of Karl Marx -- the solution to "The Dialectic of Capital", i.e., to the self-destructive phase of the "Capital-relation" as predominate social relation of human-society-production, in its "real subsumption" of all past, previously-elaborated human social relations of production.

It aims, to my reading, to describe a model solution to what the Equitists see as the core "internal contradiction", or "self-contradiction", of capital/capitalism/the Capital-relation.

Using the '#' sign -- the doubly-slashed, doubly-negated equals sign -- as a sign for dialectical self-contradiction, that core self-contradiction, or "self-duality", of capital can be expressed as --

'Self-Expanding [Capital-]Value # Self-Contracting [Capital-]Value [due to "techno-depreciation"]'

-- in its dynamical [social-evolutionary] and 'meta-dynamical’ [social-revolutionary] “interconnexion” with the related --

'Expanding Human-Social Reproduction # Contracting Social Reproduction' intra-duality of the capital-epoch.

[Per the Equitists,"techno-depreciation", "moral depreciation", or "self-devaluation of capital-value" due to the higher productive force embodied in each succeeding vintage of fixed capital plant and equipment vis-a-vis its predecessor vintages, drives a secular decline in prices and in the rate of profit on industrial capital [U.S.: post-Civil-War to ~ 1913], until fiat-currency central banking, and managed chronic inflation, disguise and socialize [shift to the working class] losses otherwise due to techno-depreciation-induced write-offs of unamortized fixed capital, and until capitalist-core-installed comprador dictatorships in the capitalist periphery, suppressing low-wage competitive capitalist industrialization there, that would otherwise have used the latest/most advanced fixed capital vintages, fetter the growth of the productive forces].

Their "Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights" version of Marxian "Associationism", that is, of "Association(s) of Producers" as the core of the new, leading, "democratic communist" human-social relation of production, with its "real subsumption" of the Capital-relation, as of the present survivals of all past, previously-elaborated human-social relations of production, is, to my reading, designed to facilitate the universal innovative entrepreneurship of self-organized, democratically self-governing collectives of citizens, as potential "collective self-employers".

It proposes to do so by supplying what has heretofore been missing for the manifestation of that innovative entrepreneurship to become broadly possible, namely, collective access to collective-ends-directed means of social production for the vast majority, i.e., for we, the "modern proletarians" [who do not own any -- or any substantial -- capital with which we might otherwise buy access to such means of social production], the supply of which to us, e.g., via the "Citizen Stewardship Equity" Right, would render us "proletarians" no longer, establishing us in [a key aspect of] a new, subsuming, successor social relation of production.

I suspect that the overall context of that solution-component -- the "Citizen Stewardship Equity" social relation of production -- owes a lot to David Schweickart's books "Against Capitalism", and "After Capitalism".

Their "Democratic Ecological Management" solution-component, i.e., their "Citizen Externality Equity Rights" component, set out in Sections 2 and 3, below, is a solution-approach that I have never encountered the like of anywhere else. If the "Citizen Stewardship Equity" Right carries forward the revolutionary tradition of workplace "workers' councils" [at the point of production], then the "Citizen Externality Equity" Right can be seen as carrying forward the revolutionary tradition of point-of-residence/territorially-based "community councils".

Their "Citizen Birthright Equity Rights" solution-component, set out in Section 4, below, actualizes what the capitalist state can only pay lip service to, and, then, only some of the time [and, it now seems, no longer ever again]: that governments should be constituted for the benefit of all citizens, not just for profit and power benefits to a tiny minority of citizens who, in late capitalism, own the vast preponderance of capital property, to the acceleratedly deepening disadvantage of all other citizens; to the increasingly deadly detriment of the vast majority.

Why should government taxes, that are, predominantly, deductions from workers' wages and salaries [given the tax loopholes for big capitalist corporations, engineered by legislators who are nothing but those corporations' abject whores], go mainly to corporate welfare, to "defense" spending -- i.e., to rapacious invasions of other peoples' countries, and to deliberate "collateral damage" stealth genocides against their citizens, thus recruiting more enemies who wish to avenge their tortured, raped, and murdered relatives, thereby "justifying" keeping these unnecessary, contrived wars going, to fight those newly-manufactured enemies -- and to bailouts of the big corporations who engineer "Designer Depressions", leaving the worker-taxpayers holding the vast debts that these corporations create in that process, while anything that may ever benefit the vast majority of working families -- Medicare, Social Security, Education grants, etc. -- are all repealed "because" those 'governmentized' corporate debts have left too little tax revenues [stolen wages, taken back "in stealth" by the bourgeoisie, i.e., by a government controlled by the bourgeoisie] for anything else?

The Equitists apparently believe that benefits to each and every citizen, equitably administered by new, popularly controlled governmental institutions, e.g., starting with their Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds -- should have first priority.

I find a lot to quibble with in the details of their solution-text, below, but its very capability to "out" such quibbles may be one of its greatest services.


Some [RE-]SOURCES:

equitism org Equitism Equitism-entry htm (http://equitism.org/Equitism/Equitism-entry.htm)

equitism org Equitism AmendmentCoverLetter AmendmentCoverLetter pdf (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentCoverLetter/AmendmentCoverLetter.pdf)

equitism org Equitism AmendmentXXVIII AmendmentXXVIII pdf (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf)

equitism org Equitism Theory PoliticalEconomicDemocracy PoliticalEconomicDemocracy htm (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm)

equitism org Equitism Theory PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion htm (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion.htm)



Regards,

Miguel




Proposed Amendment XXVIII to the U. S. Constitution,
Draft #6, 05 May 2011:
Constitutional Establishment of the Equitarian Reform


Section 1. [Stockholder Equity Rights and Constraints] All Enterprises under Joint-Stock ownership, and operating within the sovereign territory of the United States of America, shall be operated in accord with the principles of Capital Equity and of Stockholder Democracy.

Sub-Section 1.a [Stockholder Referenda] Contributors of money, or of other capital property, for the purchase of shares of the common stock of a Joint-Stock Enterprise, shall have the constitutional right to nominate, elect, and recall/replace Directors to the Board of Directors of that Enterprise, to promulgate and to vote upon owner resolutions, and to vote upon other important matters, including compensation, for Directors, and for Senior Management, and donations of Enterprise funds to political candidates, and/or to political causes, on the basis of one vote per share of common stock owned. All such matters shall be decided by majority vote of the owners of record of the common stock, except for political donations. Motions for the latter shall require at least a three-quarters favorable majority vote of the owners of record to carry. The results of such owner referenda shall be binding upon Enterprise Management, who shall be civilly and criminally liable for violations thereof.

Sub-Section 1.b [Tribunals for Stockholder Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Stockholder Equity. The specific function of these Tribunals shall be with regard to Stockholder Equity Rights and Constraints: to adjudicate actions, brought by one or more Citizens, alleging that the Management, or one or more Directors, of a Joint Stock Enterprise have acted in violation of Stockholder Equity Rights and Constraints.

Sub-Section 1.c [Countervailing Citizen Rights] Citizens are empowered, by constitutional right, hereby granted, to organize and enact, using their own resources, Boycotts of the products and/or of the services offered for sale by Joint Stock Enterprises that said Citizens deem to have intervened in the Legislative, and/or Judicial, and/or Executive, and/or Economic-Democratic processes of the United States of America as a whole, or in that of any Region, State, County, or Municipality thereof, in a manner or manners that they, in their own individual, and/or collective, judgment, deem to be inimical to the General Welfare.


Section 2. [Citizen Externality Equity Rights and Constraints] Citizens who suffer the infliction of External Costs upon themselves, in their places of residence, by a local operating unit of an Enterprise, shall acquire thereby Externality Equity in said Enterprise, as a Collective Property, Social Property constitutional Right.

Sub-Section 2.a [Election and Recall/Replacement of Public Directors] This Property Right shall be exercised as a voting right in the nomination, annual election, and potential recall/replacement, of Public Directors, to an Enterprise Board of Public Directors, constituted as a Second House of the co-management committee of each such local operating unit. Each local operating unit Public Director nominee, to be nominated, must reside in the geographical area of the Electorate of that unit, and, to be elected, must receive a majority of the votes of the Electorate for that unit. The apportionment of Public Board Electorate geographical areas, and the determination of the number of Citizens of local operating unit Electorates to be represented per Public Director, shall be re-determined annually by majority vote of the Citizen-elected County legislative body within whose jurisdiction the local operating units reside. Public Boards shall consist of odd numbers of Public Directors to preclude tie votes. Each Public Board Director shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 5% or greater of their Electorate, and shall be replaced if a majority of their voting Electorate so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes.

Sub-Section 2.b [Mitigation of External Costs and Optimization of External Benefits] Each co-management committee Second House is hereby constitutionally empowered to co-manage the Externalities Budget of the Annual Operating Plan of its Enterprise local operating unit, in mutual cooperation with the First House of that unit's co-management committee. The Second House shall negotiate with the First House thereof for the mitigation of the External Cost burdens generated by that unit, for the optimization of any External Benefits generated by that unit, and regarding the rate of taxation for the External Cost generation still permitted to that unit. The Negotiating Position(s) of each Public Board shall be framed and modified by that Board by majority vote of its Directors.

Sub-Section 2.c [Funding of Public Board Operations] The Permitted-Externalities Taxes shall, in part, fund the special operations of their Public Board regarding the remediation of those specific External Costs. General operations of Public Boards shall be funded by a Potential External Costs Tax, paid by each Enterprise local operating unit, levied to offset the public hazard of Potential External Costs Production created by its existence. Rates of local operating units Potential External Costs taxation shall be re-determined annually by majority vote of the Citizens-elected County legislative body in which the local operating units reside, along with rules for External Cost taxes assessment and Tax Credit determination for External Benefits generated by said local operating units. Monthly salary compensation of Public Directors from these funds shall be set by the Citizen-elected legislative body of the County in which the Electorates of said Public Directors reside.

Sub-Section 2.d [Externality Identification] Each Citizen member of the local Externalities Electorate of a given Public Board shall have plaintive standing to bring one or more complaints before that Board, alleging External Costs suffered by that Citizen individually, by a part of the Electorate to which that Citizen belongs, or by the entirety of the Electorate to which that Citizen belongs, and alleging that those External Costs are produced by one or more Enterprise local operating unit or units co-governed by that Public Board. Confirmation of said allegations by majority vote of that Public Board shall empower it to Negotiate with the First House of its co-management committee for that local operating unit, for preventive mitigation, or for remedial taxation, or for a combination of both, regarding so-confirmed External Costs Production.

Sub-Section 2.e [Tribunals for Externality Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Externality Equity. The specific function of these courts shall be to adjudicate cases where Externality Production and/or Externality Taxation negotiations between the two Houses of the co-management committee of a local operating unit have deadlocked. Such cases may be brought by the First House of that co-management committee, by its Second House, or by both Houses together.


Section 3. [Associations of Public Directors: Powers and Constraints] The Citizen Externality Equity Public Directors of the local operating unit level shall organize Associations of Public Directors at the Municipal, County, State, and Regional levels, one Association per Municipality, County, State, and Region, and one National Association of Public Directors, and may also, given (re-)authorization by majority favorable vote in an annual Public referendum, participate in Continental and Global Associations of Public Directors.

Sub-Section 3.a [Associations of Public Directors: Purpose] All such Associations shall be constituted for the purpose of coordinating Policy, and of expressing the will of their Publics, regarding larger-scale economic geography, and societal morphology, beyond the scale of the Enterprise local operating unit, by means of Policy Resolutions.

Sub-Section 3.b [Associations of Public Directors: Election and Replacement] Each Association Director of each such Association of Public Directors shall be empowered to propose, and to vote upon, proposed Policy Resolutions. Each shall be nominated for election by a Citizen or Citizens residing within the geographical unit of jurisdiction of the Association, and shall be annually elected or re-elected, for up to ten consecutive terms, by majority vote of the combined Public Directors Electorates of the geographical unit represented, on a one Citizen, one vote basis. Each Association Director shall be subject to special elections for Recall / Replacement, by petition of 5% or greater of their Electorate, and replaced if a majority of the Electorate voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes. Each Association of Public Directors shall consist of an odd number of Association Directors, to preclude deadlocks due to tie votes.

Sub-Section 3.c [Policy Resolution Compliance] Policy Resolutions adopted by majority vote of Municipal, County, State, Regional, National, Continental, and/or Global Public Directors Associations shall be offered to all included lower-scale Associations of Public Directors, and to all included local operating unit Boards of Public Directors, on a non-binding, advisory basis, with respect to actions in response required of included Associations and Boards of Public Directors. Compliance or non-compliance with Policy Resolutions of a higher scale of Association, by act of a lower scale of Association, or by act of a local operating unit Public Board of Directors, shall be on a voluntary basis, determined by majority vote of said Association, or Board, of Public Directors.

Sub-Section 3.d [Funding of Association Operations] Operating expenses of each Association of Public Directors shall be funded by dues paid by all Public Boards of Directors included in the geographical unit represented by that Association, in an amount re-determined annually by majority vote of all included Public Board Directors. Monthly salary compensation of the Association Directors of each Association from these funds shall also be set annually by majority vote of all Public Board Directors included in the geographical unit represented by that Association.


Section 4. [Citizen Birthright Equity Rights and Constraints] Congress shall endow, for every Citizen child born from the date of ratification of this Amendment, a lifetime Social Trust Fund, equal, in initial real value, to all other such individual Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds, sufficient to support, in whole, or, at least, in then-affordable part, as determined, and as re-determined annually, by Congress, the expected lifetime healthcare, education, work-life career, unemployment insurance, home purchase, retirement pension, and other social-baseline life necessities of that Citizen, and such that part of those funds, as allotted by Congress, may be applied, by court order, to pay reparations in the event of one or more criminal convictions of that Citizen.

Sub-Section 4.a [Social Trust Funds: Abuse/Moral Hazard Mitigation] Each Citizen's disposition rights over the Social Trust Fund assigned to that Citizen shall be constrained so as to militate against its misuse. Congress shall enact statutes governing the disposition of Social Trust Fund assets. The national Electorate shall elect, to four year terms, limited to three consecutive terms, in elections coinciding with Presidential elections, eleven Commissioners to a national Commission for Citizen Birthright Equity, which shall promulgate, by majority vote, rules and regulations for the exercise of Citizen Birthright Equity, and which shall manage a national Social Trust Funds Administration. Said rules and regulations shall be administered by said Social Trust Fund Administration, whose operations shall be funded by Congress. Each Commissioner shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 1% or greater of the national Electorate, and shall be replaced if a majority of the Citizens voting so vote, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes. The Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Fund of each Citizen so endowed shall remain Social Property unless or until its assets pass into the Personal Property of that Citizen through their lawful expenditure.

Sub-Section 4.b [Social Trust Funds: Sources of Funding] Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds shall be funded, in part, by a portion of the proceeds of the Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Property Rents, paid for the usufruct of Production Plant and Equipment Social Property held in Stewardship by Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises of all kinds, as well as by general Federal tax revenues, as budgeted annually by majority vote of the Congress.

Sub-Section 4.c [Tribunals for Birthright Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Birthright Equity. The specific function of these courts shall be to adjudicate actions brought, by any Citizen, or Citizens-class, disputing a decision or decisions regarding requested disposition of Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Fund assets, by the Social Trust Funds Administration.


Section 5. [Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights and Constraints] Each adult Citizen is hereby empowered with a Citizen Stewardship Equity constitutional Right to participate in initiating the formation of, and in the democratic self-governance of, Associations of Producers, in the form of Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, whose Boards of Directors, and whose local operating unit co-management committee First Houses (if any), shall be nominated, elected, and potentially recalled and replaced, by majority vote of their Citizen Steward Members, on a one Citizen, one vote basis.

Sub-Section 5.a [Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives: Compensation of Citizen Stewards] Each Citizen Steward member of such a Qualified Cooperative Enterprise shall have the right to contingent annual compensation in the form of an equal share in the annual net profits (if any) of that Cooperative Enterprise, and also to job-performance-based monthly, semi-monthly, or weekly compensation, per an hourly rate set by the Enterprise Board of Directors, and not necessarily equal in value to that of other Citizen Steward Members who perform under different job categories.

Sub-Section 5.b [Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives: Rules of Democratic Self-Governance] The Board of Directors of each Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise, and the First Houses of each of its local operating unit co-management committees (if any), shall consist of odd numbers of voting members, to avert tie votes. The electoral base for the Board of Directors shall consist of the totality of the Citizen Steward Members of the Cooperative Enterprise as a whole, and, for the First House of the co-management committee of each local operating unit (if more than one such exists), shall consist of all of the Citizen Steward Members who regularly perform full-time work in that local operating unit. Candidate Board Directors, and candidate co-management committee First House voting members, shall be nominated by the Citizen Stewards forming their respective electoral bases, from among those respective electoral bases. Such voting Members, including the Enterprise General Manager, and the local operating unit General Manager (if any), who shall chair their respective Boards or co-management committees, respectively, shall be elected by said electoral base on a one Citizen Steward Member, one vote basis, by majority vote of the respective electoral base Citizen Steward Members, for each candidate voting Member, to the limit of the number of voting members of the governing body to be so elected. Each elected Board Member, or First House co-management committee voting Member, shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 5% of their electoral base Citizen Steward Members, and replaced if a majority of that electoral base voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes. Congress shall, by statute, set forth the detailed rules for Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise democratic Self-Governance.

Sub-Section 5.c [Citizen Allocational Equity Rights Regarding Social Property Assets] The Office shall allocate financial assets Social Property to each Qualified Social Bank Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise in accord with an equal per capita availability of such Social Property financial assets by State, pursuant to the principle of Citizen Allocational Equity. If unequal per capita allocations are permitted by majority vote in a referendum of all voting-qualified Citizens of the United States of America, then such allocations shall be permitted only on a temporary and remedial basis, e.g., for the purpose of the remediation of the social consequences of past allocational inequities. The terminal date of any referendum-stipulated unequal geographical, per capita allocation of Social Property asset-values shall be stipulated in the terms of any such referendum presented to the voters. That terminal date shall be no later than twenty years from the date of the last day of the voting on that referendum. The principle of Citizen Allocational Equity includes the constitutional Right, established hereby, for collectives of Citizens, organized as candidate Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative Enterprises, or as candidate Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank Cooperative Enterprises (given that their By-Laws and business launch plans/expansion plans meet Congressional, statutory criteria, and meet Office regulatory criteria) to be granted access to the quantities of Social Property financial assets requisite to launch, or to expand, their operations. Any Citizen collective, which is candidate for Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise formation, shall have standing to bring suit in the Tribunals of Allocational Equity against one or more Social Bank, and/or against the Office of the Custodian of Social Property, if a majority of its Members deem that either or both have violated the constitutional Rights established for it by this Section. The principle of Citizen Allocational Equity also includes prohibition of operation of any Enterprise in any branch of product/service supply as State Property, if any mixture of four or more Citizen Collectives, Qualified for provision of Social Property to operate in that branch by one or more Social Banks, or Joint-Stock Ventures, are extant as potential mutually competing Citizen Stewardship Equity and/or Joint Stock Enterprises.

Sub-Section 5.d [Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity] Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of federal circuit courts, the Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity. The specific function of these Tribunals with respect to upholding Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights shall be to adjudicate legal actions alleging violation of said Rights by any Actionable Party. The specific function of these Tribunals with respect to upholding Citizen Allocational Equity Rights shall be to adjudicate legal actions brought by one or more Citizens alleging violation of said Rights by one or more Social Banks, and/or by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property.

Sub-Section 5.e [Office of the Custodian of Social Property] Congress shall institute a national, Federal Office of the Custodian of Social Property. The general function of this Office shall be to manage Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Property assets, maintaining and updating, as appropriate, an Office Standard Design for same for each international standard product/service category, and endeavoring to maintain a competitive market, served by multiple Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises and/or Joint Stock Enterprises, in the markets for each such product/service category, as a matter of Constitutional Public Policy. The special function of this Office shall be to procure, via competitively-bid contract, from Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative suppliers, or, but only in the absence of competing such suppliers, to directly produce, under its own management, and using its own Social Property production assets, Standard Design Plant and Equipment Means of Production assets, for each competing Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative which Qualifies for Stewardship of said assets, and which formally applies to the Office for Provision of such assets.

Sub-Section 5.f [Custodian of Social Property: Function, Election, Compensation, and Recall] The national Electorate shall elect, to four year terms, limited to three consecutive terms, in elections coinciding with Federal Presidential elections, a national Custodian of Social Property. This elected Officer shall oversee the promulgation of regulations, and the implementation of Congressional statutes, for the exercise of Citizen Stewardship Equity; shall oversee the promulgation of Office Standard Designs for each international standard product/service category, shall oversee the updating of Office Standard Designs for which competitive technological obsolescence, advances in safety features, and/or advances in Social Best Practices otherwise, in this Officer's judgment, or per injunction of a Tribunal for Stewardship and Allocational Equity, calls for their updating, and shall manage all national Social Property assets. The compensation of the Custodian of Social Property shall be budgeted annually by Congress, and shall be maintained in equality with that of the President of the United States. The national Custodian of Social Property shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 1% or greater of the national Electorate, and replaced if a majority of that Electorate voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes.

Sub-Section 5.g [Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives: Stewardship of Social Property] Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperatives, lawfully granted usufruct of Means of Production Social Property assets, shall not be construed as collectively or personally owning said assets. Each Stewardship Cooperative Enterprise shall retain its Stewardship Equity Rights of socially-productive disposition of said assets, while remaining in good standing in regard to the statutes of Citizen Stewardship Equity Self-Governance, of Solvency, and of use of such assets, in compliance with their Provider-approved, Board-approved, and local operating units co-management committees approved Annual Operating Plans, and in accord with the statutes of Citizen Externality Equity. Otherwise, Social Property asset Stewardship Qualification may be revoked, by action of the Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise which had been the direct Provider of Social Property assets to the thus disqualifiable Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative.

Sub-Section 5.h [Stewardship Cooperatives: [Self-]Provision of [Non-]Standard Production Assets] Each Qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative shall have the right to procure Office non-standard Means of Production from the Office, given the endorsement of their Office non-standard Production Plant and Equipment Designs by the Social Bank Stewardship Enterprise which is the direct Provider of the Social Property component of its financing. Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative shall have the right to procure its own Production assets, Office Standard in Design, or of its own, Office non-standard Design, directly, from Provisioners other than the Office, such as from other Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative Enterprises, or from Joint-Stock Enterprises, by means of its own resources, only if approved by the Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise that is the direct Provider of the Social Property component of its financing. Assets so acquired shall be deemed the Collective Property of the Stewards of the Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise so-acquiring, rather than as Social Property, as their Private Property, or as their Personal Property.

Sub-Section 5.i [Stewardship Cooperatives: Social Rents in Return for Use of Social Property] Each Stewardship Cooperative Enterprise, receiving Provision of Means of Production, Social Property assets, Office Standard, or non-standard, from the Office, shall remit a monthly Social Property Rent to society, in return for the usufruct of the Social Property held in Stewardship by it, proportionate to the value of those Social assets, and paid via the Office. These Social Property Rent revenues shall help to support Social Self-Investment in the form of production of Means of Production Social Property, and in the form of Public Infrastructure Social Property, as well as in the form of the income of Social Bank Cooperative Enterprises, and in the form of the funding of Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds.

Sub-Section 5.j [Gratis Replacement of Insured Cooperatives' Obsolescent Social Property] The Office shall duly Re-Provision Insured Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises who formally apply for this Service, if they hold, in Stewardship, assets no longer of Office-Standard Design. The no longer Office-Standard Plant and Equipment assets shall be replaced with new, Office-Standard such assets, whenever the relevant Office's Standard Designs change, given the return of the previous, now non-standard Provision to the custody of the Office by that Cooperative. This Re-Provisioning Service shall be provided at no added charge to such Cooperative Enterprises. This Re-Provisioning Service shall be provided in return for periodic premiums, paid to the Office, by such Cooperative Enterprises, for Insurance against changes in Office Standard Designs that result from technological/competitive obsolescence of the previous Standard Designs, and/or from advances in safety features, and/or from advances in national or international Social Best Practices otherwise (Social Depreciation, Moral Depreciation, Non-Physical Depreciation Insurance).

Sub-Section 5.k [Provision of Social Property Assets to Producers' Cooperatives: Eligibility] Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperatives shall be Eligible for Provisioning and Re-Provisioning Services, if Qualified for the granting, in Stewardship, of Office Standard Design Social Property. Operations to determine such Qualification shall be delegated, by the Office, to specialized, competing, democratically self-governing Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, certified by the Office, per Congressional statutory criteria, and per Office rules and regulations, to be Qualified to function as competing, self-governing Social Bank Cooperatives. Each such Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise shall be restricted, by the Office, by Charter, to operate within a specific geographical locus. Each shall be granted Stewardship of Office financial assets Social Property, allocated to it in accordance with the principle of Citizen Allocational Equity, for use in the purchase of Office-Standard-Design Production assets from the Office, for transfer to the Stewardship of non-bank Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperatives under its credit administration. Each such Receiver of Office-Standard Design Production Plant and Equipment Social Property must be further Qualified for such Provision by means of the approval of their Annual Operating Plans/Budgets by the Citizen Steward Members-elected Board of Directors of that Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise which is the direct Social Property Provider to said Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperative. The income of each Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise shall be limited to a percentage, re-determined annually by Congress, of the Social Property Rent revenues actually received by the Office from the Citizen Stewardship Equity Producer's Cooperatives who receive Social Property in Stewardship via that Social Bank, under its credit administration, and shall be remitted to that Social Bank in monthly payments by the Office. A given month's Social Rent share payment to a given Social Bank for a given Producers' Cooperative under its credit administration shall be withheld in the event of a default of that month's Social Rent payment by that Producers' Cooperative. Social Rent share payments to a given Social Bank for a given Producers' Cooperative under its credit administration shall cease permanently in the event of the Insolvency of said Producers' Cooperative.

Sub-Section 5.l [Stewardship Equity Social Banks: Stewardship of Financial Social Property] Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank, lawfully allocated partial usufruct of Social Property financial assets by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property, shall not be conferred any ownership of said assets, on behalf of its Citizen-Steward Members, either collectively, or personally. Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Bank Cooperative Enterprise shall retain its Stewardship Equity Rights of socially-productive disposition of said financial assets, only while remaining in good standing in regard to the statutes of Citizen Stewardship Equity Enterprise Self-Governance and Solvency, as well as in regard to its co-promulgation and co-administration of the Annual Operating Plans and Budgets of its Providee Citizen Stewardship Equity Producers' Cooperatives, in accord with the statutes governing Citizen Externality Equity Rights, and Citizen Allocational Equity Rights, per its Charter. Otherwise, its Stewardship Qualification Certification, and its Social Property allocation, shall be revoked by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property.

Sub-Section 5.m [Citizen Externality Equity Constraint of Citizen Stewardship Equity Powers] Each member of the First House of the co-management committee of each local operating unit of each Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative, as a democratically self-governing Enterprise, shall be nominated by, elected by, and potentially recallable by, the Citizen-Stewards who are the collective self-employees of that local operating unit, on a one self-employee, one vote basis. The Second House of each such local operating co-management committee shall be its Citizen Externality Equity Rights-based, publicly-elected Board of Public Directors. If a Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise consists of only a single local operating unit, its employee-elected Board of Directors shall constitute the First House of its co-management committee, and its publicly-elected Citizen Externality Equity Board of Public Directors shall constitute the Second House thereof.

Sub-Section 5.n [Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement] Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise, or any class thereof, shall be empowered to petition the Office of the Custodian of Social Property for an update of the Office Standard Design of Production Plant and Equipment for one or more product/service categories. Congress shall provide, by statute, for a system of courts, the Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement. The specific function of these Tribunals shall be to adjudicate cases wherein petitions to said Office for update of one or more Standard Designs, for one or more standard product/service categories, are in dispute among Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, or wherein one or more Standard Design update decisions are in dispute between the Office of the Custodian of Social Property and more than one Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise.

Sub-Section 5.o [Stewardship Enterprise Insolvency] The insolvency of a Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise shall require the dissolution of that Enterprise, and, therefore, in likelihood, the temporary unemployment of its former Citizen Steward Members, and, as a result thereof, draws upon their Citizen Birthright Equity Social Trust Funds for unemployment insurance payments during their periods of unemployment. In the event of such Insolvency, the Social Property held in Stewardship by that Cooperative Enterprise shall be returned to the custody of the Office of the Custodian of Social Property. The civil liability of an Insolvent Citizen Stewardship Cooperative Enterprise to its creditors shall be limited to the value of the totality of its collectively owned, non-Social-Property assets, and shall not include any of the Personal Property assets, or any of the Social Trust Fund assets, of its former Citizen Steward Members.

Sub-Section 5.p [Political Contributions by Citizen Stewardship Equity Enterprises] Each Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise may contribute to political candidates, and/or to political causes, but only out of funds deducted from the net profits of that Enterprise, and only by at least a three-quarters majority favorable vote of its entire electoral base of Citizen Stewards.

Sub-Section 5.q [Countervailing Citizen Rights] Citizens are empowered, by constitutional right, granted hereby, to organize and enact, using their own resources, Boycotts of the products and/or of the services offered for sale by one or more Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises that said Citizens believe to have intervened in the Legislative, and/or Judicial, and/or Executive, and/or Economic-Democratic processes of the United States of America as a whole, or in that of any Region, State, County, or Municipality thereof, in a manner or manners that they, in their own individual and/or collective judgment, deem to be inimical to the General Welfare.


Section 6. [Constitution of the Tribunals Established under this Amendment] The Citizen Equity Rights Tribunals established under this Amendment -- the Tribunals for Stockholder Equity, the Tribunals for Externality Equity, the Tribunals for Birthright Equity, the Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity, the Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement, and the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity – shall be governed by the following provisions, as elaborated by Congress, and the Executive, in statute and regulation.

Sub-Section 6.a [General Function of Said Tribunals] The general function of each court shall be to hear law suits brought by one or more Citizens/other constitutional entities, alleging violation of the Citizen Equity Rights of its jurisdiction.

Sub-Section 6.b [Actionable Parties] Parties against whom complaints of violation of Citizen Equity Rights can be brought, in the Tribunal of Jurisdiction for each such Right, shall include Congress, and one, or more, of the following: The President, or agency of, the Federal Executive Branch, State Government, County Government, Municipal Government, Joint Stock Enterprise Board of Directors, Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprise Board of Directors, House of a local co-management committee of a Stewardship Equity Cooperative or Joint Stock Enterprise, Public Director, Association Director, and/or individual Citizen.

Sub-Section 6.c [Standing] Any one or more Citizens shall have standing to bring legal action(s) before any of these courts.

Sub-Section 6.d [Jurisdictions of Tribunals] The jurisdiction of each Tribunal established by this Amendment shall be restricted to the upholding of the specific Citizen Equity Right or Rights chartered herein to its protection, adjudicating actions brought before it alleging violation of that Right, or of those Rights, by any one or more of the Actionable Parties stipulated herein. Legal actions alleging the violation of a Citizen Equity Right must originate in the Tribunal of Jurisdiction for the Right or Rights whose violation is alleged, and not in any other, or general, Federal, State, or Municipal court, civil or criminal, of law or of equity, and may, after adjudication in its Tribunal of Jurisdiction, be appealed solely to the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity.

Sub-Section 6.e [Rights of Appeal to/from the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity] Legal actions originated and decided in a Tribunal of Jurisdiction for a given Citizen Equity Right may be appealed, by the losing, or partially losing, Party or Parties of that action, to the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, if the grounds of appeal set forth in statute by Congress are met by said appeal per the Citizen Jury of said Appellate Court. Any appeal from any ruling of the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity shall be solely to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Sub-Section 6.f [Modes of Redress Provided via Tribunal Citizen Jury Award to Prevailing Plaintiffs] Injunctive relief, payments of value in compensation for civil damages, and sanctions against criminal conduct (fines and/or imprisonment) in cases for which the specific convicted violations of Citizen Equity Rights have been placed under criminal penalty by Congress, in statute, shall be available for imposition by Citizen Juries of the Tribunals for Citizen Equity Rights, and/or by the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity.

Sub-Section 6.g [Functions of Justices] Each individual circuit court for Citizen Equity Rights, and the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, shall be convened by a single advisory justice. Justices shall serve as moderators of the court proceedings, and in an impartial advisory and expert consultative capacity regarding relevant laws and regulations history, precedent, and procedure, to plaintiffs, to defendants, and to Citizen Juries, in the proceedings brought before them, and shall have authority to require compliance, in the court room, with legal procedure and judicial order, on the part of the Parties to the legal action, and/or on that of their representatives.

Sub-Section 6.h [Constitution and Functions of Citizen Juries] Citizen Juries shall serve in a deciding capacity with regard to the legal actions brought before them. Citizen Juries shall decide the legal actions brought before them by majority vote. Citizen Juries shall consist of an odd number of Jurors, to help minimize the frequency of Jury deadlock.

Sub-Section 6.i [Selection of Citizen Jurors Pools] All able-bodied adult Citizens shall make themselves available to serve, on a standard salary basis, and on a one month per year basis, in Citizen Jury Pools from which the Citizen Jurors of the Citizen Equity Rights Tribunals, and of the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, shall be selected, by random lot.

Sub-Section 6.j [Allocation of Costs of Adjudication] The losing party in any legal action brought before a Citizen Equity Rights Tribunal or before the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity -- or all parties to any such action, in proportion set by its Citizen Jury, in the event of a mixed decision -- shall pay the costs of that action, per general court costs schedules set by the justices.

Sub-Section 6.k [Term Limits, Justices] Justices shall serve four year terms, with a limit of three consecutive terms.

Sub-Section 6.l [Recall of Justices] Each justice of a Citizen Equity Rights Tribunal, and of the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity, as established by this Amendment, shall be subject to special elections for Recall/Replacement, by petition of 1% or greater of the Federal Electorate, and replaced if a majority of that Electorate voting so votes, by the Replacement Candidate receiving the largest plurality of votes.


Section 7. [Fourth Branch of Government: Countervailing Power Intent] The new institutions established hereby -- the Tribunals for Stockholder Equity, the Boards of Public Directors, the Associations of Public Directors, the Tribunals for Externality Equity, the Commission for Birthright Equity, the Social Trust Funds Administration, the Tribunals for Birthright Equity, the competing and democratically self-governing Citizen Stewardship Equity Cooperative Enterprises, the Office of the Custodian of Social Property, the Tribunals for Stewardship and Allocational Equity, the Tribunals for Social Productivity Advancement, and the Appellate Court for Generalized Equity -- shall together constitute the Economic-Democratic Fourth Branch of social self-governance of the United States of America, under the Constitution of the United States of America. This Fourth Branch is hereby established explicitly with the intention to benefit each Citizen, regardless of the scale of that Citizen's Personal Property ownership, including, especially, by countervailing against the lethal corruption of the democratic processes of the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches, by the otherwise unchecked power of ownership-concentrated, oligopolized or monopolized private economic wealth, to which the initially more competitive private-capital based economy inexorably gives rise.

FINI

Miguel Detonnaciones
16th May 2011, 00:44
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

The basic idea of the Equitist-Communist Reform/Revolution, as I understand it, is to sprout the "seed" of economic democracy that is already internal to the Capital-relationship, into a full-blown political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, i.e., into Democratic Communism, via the four new species of generalized equity rights, which are "generalized" in the sense that they are not limited to capital owners, as is the old, Capital equity right, but which are universal rights of all Citizens.

Equitism is based, to my understanding, upon a dialectical "immanent critique" -- i.e., a critique based upon the internal logic of the object of critique itself, and, thus, in fact, a self-critique of that object -- of "Bourgeois Right" in general, and of Bourgeois economic "Right" -- "Capital Right" -- in particular.

"Capital Equity Right" -- "Stockholder Democracy" -- will, due to the immanent dynamical law of the capitalist political-economic system, the law of the consolidation, concentration, and centralization of Capital-ownership, eventuate in concentrating virtually all effective economic power in a tiny minority of human society, which will not only render the majority of human beings economically essentially powerless, but will also subvert the civil and political dimensions of "Bourgeois Right" -- civil liberties, representative democracy, equality before the law, the rule of law, etc. -- by enabling that tiny minority of concentrated Capital-owners to prostitute all three branches of political government, legislative, executive, and judicial, thus destroying constitutional political-only checks and balances, and leading to a totalitarian, [state-]capitalist police state, featuring a total loss of Bourgeois "liberty".


Marx wrote about the immanent "seed" of democratic communism within the Capital-social-relation-of-production in some of his earliest notes toward an outline of his critique of capitalist political economy, that became the three volumes of Das Kapital, in these words --

"Capital is divided into four sections.

1. Capital en général (This is the material of the first brochure).

2. Competition or the reciprocal action of the many capitals.

3. Credit, where capital appears as the general element in opposition to the
many capitals.

4. Share capital as the most perfect form (assuming the character of communism), together with all its contradictions."

[Marx to Engels; April 2, 1858; in MEW 29; page 312; reproduced in Rubel on Marx: Five Essays; Cambridge University Press (NY: 1981); page 216, emphasis added].


-- and, in some of his last notes on that critique, that became part of volume III of <<Das Kapital>>, with words, many of which may seem to have been copied out of today's newspaper --



"The general remarks, which the credit system so far elicited from us, were the following: ...

III. Formation of stock companies. Thereby: ...

3) Transformation of the actually functioning capitalist into a mere manager, administrator of other people's capital, and of the owner of capital into a mere owner, a mere money-capitalist. Even if the dividends which they receive include the interest and the profit of enterprise, i.e., the total profit (for the salary of managers is, or should be, simply the wage of a specific type of skilled labour, whose price is regulated in the labour-market like that of any other labour), this total profit is henceforth received only in the form of interest, i.e., as mere compensation for owning capital that is now entirely divorced from the function in the actual process of reproduction, just as this function in the person of the manager is divorced from ownership of capital. ...

In stock companies the function is divorced from capital ownership, hence also labour is entirely divorced from ownership of means of production and
surplus-labour.

This result of the ultimate development of capitalist production is a necessary transitional phase towards the reconversion of capital into the property of producers, although no longer as the private property of the individual producers, but rather as the property of associated producers, as outright social property.

On the other hand, the stock company is a transition toward the conversion of all functions in the reproduction process which still remain linked with capitalist property, into mere functions of the associated producers, into social functions.

This is the abolition of the capitalist mode of production within the capitalist mode of production itself, and hence a self-dissolving contradiction, which prima facie represents a mere phase of transition to a new form of production.

It manifests itself as such a contradiction in its effects.

It establishes a monopoly in certain spheres and thereby requires state interference.

It reproduces a new financial aristocracy, a new variety of parasites in the shape of promoters, speculators, and simply nominal directors; a whole system of swindling and cheating by means of corporation promoting, stock issuance, and stock speculation.

It is private production without the control of private property. ...

The co-operative factories of the labourers themselves represent within the old form the first sprouts of the new, although they naturally reproduce, and must reproduce, everywhere in their actual organization all the shortcomings of the prevailing system.

But the antithesis between capital and labour is overcome within them, if at first only by way of making the associated labourers into their own capitalist, i.e., by enabling them to use the means of production for the employment of their own labour [The Equitists call this transitional hybrid form 'workers' capital[ism]' — Miguel].

They show how a new mode of production naturally grows out of an old one, when the development of the material forces of production and of the corresponding forms of social production have reached a particular stage.

Without the factory system arising out of the capitalist mode of production there could have been no co-operative factories.

Nor could these have developed without the credit system arising out of the same mode of production.

The credit system is not only the principal basis for the gradual transformation of capitalist enterprises into capitalist stock companies, but equally offers the means for the gradual extension of co-operative enterprises on a more or less national scale. ...

The capitalist stock companies, as much as the co-operative factories, should be considered transitional forms from the capitalist mode of production to the associated one, with the only distinction that the antagonism is resolved negatively in the one, and positively in the other. ...

The credit system appears as the main lever of over-production and over-speculation in commerce solely because the reproduction process, which is elastic by nature, is here forced to its extreme limits, and is so forced because a large part of the social capital is employed by people who do not own it, and who consequently tackle things quite differently than the owner, who anxiously weighs the limitations of his private capital in so far as he handles it himself.

This simply demonstrates the fact that the self-expansion of capital based on the contradictory nature of capitalist production permits an actual free
development only up to a certain point, so that in fact it constitutes an immanent fetter and barrier to production, which is continually broken through by the credit system.

Hence, the credit system accelerates the material development of the productive forces and the establishment of the world-market.

It is the historical mission of the capitalist system of production to raise the material foundations of the new mode of production to a certain degree of perfection.

At the same time credit accelerates the violent eruption of this contradiction — crises — and thereby the elements of disintegration of the old mode of production.

The two characteristics immanent in the credit system are, on the one hand, to develop the incentive of capitalist production, enrichment through the exploitation of the labour of others, to the purest and most colossal form of gambling and swindling, and to reduce more and more the number of the few who exploit the social wealth; on the other hand, to constitute the form of transition to a new mode of production.

It is this ambiguous nature, which endows the principal spokesmen of credit from Law to Isaac Pereire with the pleasant character mixture of swindler and prophet."

[Karl Marx; [I]Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. III [as worked-up by Engels from drafts written by Marx between 1863 and 1867], '''The Shapes Taken-On by The Reproductions-Process of/by Capitals Overall''', Chapter XXVII,"The Role of Credit in Capitalist Production"; International Publishers Co., Inc. (NY: 1967); pages 435-441, emphasis added by M.D.].



Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
17th May 2011, 01:33
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

What I mean by "Dialectical Intra-Dual Design of Democratic Communist Constitutions" is descriptive of the content of the Equitarian Amendment proposal given in my post here, and based upon the F.E.D. [FoundationEncyclopedia Dialectica] concept of "self-duality", "intra-duality", or "indivi[sible]-duality", which the Equitists seem to have adopted.

It is, in the F.E.D. system, a "self-reflexivity" concept, in perhaps a very subtle and unexpected way, which I haven't got time to make explicit here [will do so on another occasion].

"Intra-duality", or "Self-Duality", is a characteristic of Natural "self-formations" which are "complex unities" or "dialectical syntheses".

Their very internal "self-opposition", or "self-antithesis", is what [I]constitutes their existence; what creates their very capability to persist through time for any substantial interval at all [and, even then, for a finite interval of time only].

For example, a star is a "complex unity" of the mutual regeneration of a gargantuan self-gravitational self-IMplosion, confronting, at every position within this star's physical body, a tendentially equal in magnitude, but oppositely-directed, colossal thermo-nuclear fusion self-EXplosion.

If a star were ONLY a one-sided, internally unresisted gravitational self-IMplosion, then a star's existence would be momentaneous at best: e.g., it would collapse immediately into a "black hole".

If a star were only a one-sided, internally unresisted thermonuclear self-EXplosion, then a star's existence would also be momentaneous at best: e.g., it would fly apart in a supernova-like explosion in an instant.

The temporal extension of a star -- its capability of reproducing itself through time, of persisting for millions and millions of years, e.g., on the "Stellar Main Sequence" per the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram, is a result of the star's internal co-existence and co-generation of these two opposing tendencies, of simultaneous self-IMplosion and self-EXplosion.


When it comes to human social institutions, what I mean by "intra-Dual Design" is getting away from the naive, fairy-tale presumption of absolute harmony, of no conflict.

I mean ASSUMING internal conflicts, designing for them, and designing with them -- paradoxically -- to hold the institutional structure together, rather than to have it tear itself apart.

"Self-Dual" constitutional and institutional design means: to establish one [or more] explicitly-stated constitutional constraint(s) for every constitutional right established; to establish a countervailing constitutional power opposing and limiting every constitutionally-granted power.

Reading the Equitists' draft amendment appended to my post, I think that you will see what I mean; you will see such a design principle in action in their work.

Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
19th May 2011, 06:27
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Below is my brief summary of the Equitists' programme as I understand it [not a quotation of an official writing by them] --

In order to overcome the tendentially totalitarian, "humanocidal" tyranny of the capitalist plutocracy, the Capital Equity principle of STOCKholder democracy Rights must be, first, fully enforced from the constitutional, not even just from the statutory level, as they are NOT enforced today, and, even more importantly, that principle of incipient economic democracy must be extended, to comprehensive STAKEholder democracy, by constitutionally establishing four new, unprecedented, additional species of CITIZEN Equity Rights that will provide ECONOMIC checks and balances against the wholesale prostitution of the POLITICAL government -- Legislative, Executive, and Judicial -- that we see today, by the Big Money of Big Capital, and so as to provide a comprehensively democratic way of life for the people as a whole.

These four new species of ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY and of STAKEholder Equity are named, by the Equitist Advocacy group, as follows --

1. Citizen Externality Equity

2. Citizen Birthright Equity

3. Citizen Stewardship Equity

4. Citizen Allocational Equity


Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
25th June 2011, 22:44
The "Techno-Depreciation" Dynamic: "Achilles Heel" of the Capitalist System.


RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

This post is intended to provide more amplitude regarding the "techno-depreciation dynamic" immanent in the capitalist system, because, to my observation, it is not very well-known among Marxians, and because it so vastly illuminates the many mysteries of Marx's Capital, volume III. "Law of the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall" in its external, "surface of society" manifestations, and because it also so vastly lays bare the sources and the goals of the strategy of the "descendant-phase" capitalist ruling class, in its secret war against any further real growth of the human-social forces of production.


Consider how the "techno-depreciation" dynamic appears from the point of view of a capitalist ruling-class.

This dynamic is an ineluctable, "self-reflexive", self-dis-accumulating action of the "growing edge" of accumulating fixed capital back upon itself as a whole, one which is immanent in the very nature of the Capital-social-relation-of-production, as that relation grows the social forces of production, as it inherently does for a time, and one which must be unavoidably ever-worsening in its impact upon the most ownership-concentrated components of total social capital in the normal course of the "lawful" self-organization and self-development of the self-globalizing Capital-centered human social-political-economic system.


Capitalism itself -- its very essence -- becomes the enemy of the power of the capitalist ruling class, and threatens to depose that class from power, replacing it, at the very least, with a new capitalist faction, rising on the wave of that new, latest fixed capital / technical composition of capital core innovation, that has "de-valued" and "de-capital-ized" the old.

Any further real growth in the social forces of production themselves becomes the mortal enemy of the power-to-rule of the capitalist ruling class.

Consider, for example, what would if happen, to the socio-politico-economic power of the present capitalist ruling class, if some "upstart" inventor were invent a nuclear fusion reactor using the Hydrogen-Boron fuel-cycle [virtually radioactivity-free, releasing essentially only electrons], thus inducing the rapid obsolescence depreciation, to near zero, of the capital-value that the ruling faction of the capitalist ruling class has invested in the vast global capital goods infrastructure -- vast fields of producing oil wells, oil-tanker shipping infrastructure, refineries, distribution systems, etc, etc.

If they allowed this to occur, it would put an end to their global "Dictatorship of Petroleum" [and of Finance-Capital Debt], by which they now subjugate and vampirize the whole world.

Perhaps that is why every scientist/inventor/etc. who has demonstrated, or championed, a successful fusion reactor design -- Philo Farnsworth, Dr. Eugene Mallove, Dr. Robert Bussard, etc. -- have died suddenly, within months of their demonstrations or championings.


The following link contains an argument that the advent of fusion power represents a quantity and quality of fixed-capital-value-evaporating growth in the social forces of production that no "historically-legacied" global capitalist system could "contain": a force that would self-negate not only various vintages of fixed capital, but the capitalist system itself as a whole [though whether this would lead to a Global Renaissance of political-economic-democratic expanded social reproduction, or to the "mutual ruin of the contending classes" [Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto], would presumably depend upon the actions/inactions of the world working class] --

http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/Crises-by-Nature/Crises-by-Nature.htm#Citations

http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/Adventures-In-Dialectics-entry.htm

-- [Click on the "Citations" section/link in the Table of Contents, and scroll to citation c43].


Below are links to a massive trove of research on the "techno-depreciation" key to the turn from the "ascendant phase" to the "descendant phase" of the capitalist self-organizing system/self-dis-organizing system, and to the key to the "mystery" of Marx's "law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall" --


http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/TechnoDepreciation/TechnoDepreciation-partA.pdf

http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/TechnoDepreciation/TechnoDepreciation-partB.pdf

http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/Adventures-In-Dialectics-entry.htm


Another good source on the consequences, for the capitalist system, of its immanent "techno-depreciation dynamic" is the following --

The Incompatibility of Prolonged Technical Change and Competition (http://www1.fee.uva.nl/pp/bin/642fulltext.pdf)
http://www1.fee.uva.nl/pp/bin/642fulltext.pdf [academic paper]


Regards,

Miguel

Hit The North
25th June 2011, 22:49
Miguel,

Are these lengthy missives supposed to stimulate a discussion or are you just posting articles? If the latter, then you need to submit them to the proper forum. If the former, they need to be much more succinct and reader-friendly.

Cheers,

Bob

Lenina Rosenweg
25th June 2011, 22:51
There's a lot in there, what I've seen does not appear to be Marxist but closer to Prodhoun. We don't want everyone to have "equity" in the system, we need a different system in which the capitalist law of value no longer operates.

Miguel Detonnaciones
26th June 2011, 01:15
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Dear Bob The Builder,

My whole intent is to stimulate discussion, by which we may all gain [yours-truly included].

Am moving toward greater succinctness.

Am also trying for reader-friendliness.

Your suggestions toward the latter would be much appreciated.

Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
26th June 2011, 01:38
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Dear Lenina,

Of course, the Equitists are not calling for everyone to own capital-equity, but, on the contrary, to establish whole new species of citizen-equity, inherent to each citizen as a matter of birthright, and not contingent upon the ownership of capital by that citizen -- new species of equity that constitute, in their totality, they argue, a new social relation of production, a new social relation that is foundational to "democratic communism".

Their proposed system of "political-economic democracy", to my reading, would supersede the capitalist law of value, though it does <<aufheben>>-conserve competition, among Citizen Stewardship Equity socialized producers' cooperatives, for customers for their consumer goods and their consumer services output.

Capital's "law of value", and the entire capital / wage-labor social relation of production, is, however, overcome by the provisions regarding the production, allocation, and distribution of access to the means of production, and regarding the obviation of the fatal, internal-to-capital, law-of-value problem of "techno-depreciation".

To see this, consider the contents of section 5.a, 5.b., and 5.g., as well as that of sections 5.h and 5.j., of their proposed constitutional amendment.


Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
26th June 2011, 01:54
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Dear Lenina,

Regarding the "Proudhonism" issue that you raised in relation to the "Equitist" model of "political-economic democracy", consider the resonance of the Equitist concept of "Citizen Stewardship Equity Social Property" to the description, by Karl Marx -- an enemy of Proudhonism if there ever was one! -- in Capital, volume III., of the nature of the successor system to capitalism, and of the transition thereto --


''The general remarks, which the credit system so far elicited from us, were the following: ...

III. Formation of stock companies. Thereby: ...

3) Transformation of the actually functioning capitalist into a mere manager, administrator of other people's capital, and of the owner of capital into a mere owner, a mere money-capitalist.

Even if the dividends which they receive include the interest and the profit of enterprise, i.e., the total profit (for the salary of managers is, or should be, simply the wage of a specific type of skilled labour, whose price is regulated in the labour-market like that of any other labour), this total profit is henceforth received only in the form of interest, i.e., as mere compensation for owning capital that is now entirely divorced from the function in the actual process of reproduction, just as this function in the person of the manager is divorced from ownership of capital. ...

In stock companies the function is divorced from capital ownership, hence also labour is entirely divorced from ownership of means of production and surplus-labour.

This result of the ultimate development of capitalist production is a necessary transitional phase towards the reconversion of capital into the property of producers, although no longer as the private property of the individual producers, but rather as the property of associated producers, as outright social property.

On the other hand, the stock company is a transition toward the conversion of all functions in the reproduction process which still remain linked with capitalist property, into mere functions of the associated producers, into social functions.

This is the abolition of the capitalist mode of production within the capitalist mode of production itself, and hence a self-dissolving contradiction, which prima facie represents a mere phase of transition to a new form of production.

It manifests itself as such a contradiction in its effects.

It establishes a monopoly in certain spheres and thereby requires state interference.

It reproduces a new financial aristocracy, a new variety of parasites in the shape of promoters, speculators, and simply nominal directors; a whole system of swindling and cheating by means of corporation promoting, stock issuance, and stock speculation.

It is private production without the control of private property. ...

The co-operative factories of the labourers themselves represent within the old form the first sprouts of the new, although they naturally reproduce, and must reproduce, everywhere in their actual organization all the shortcomings of the prevailing system.

But the antithesis between capital and labour is overcome within them, if at first only by way of making the associated labourers into their own capitalist, i.e., by enabling them to use the means of production for the employment of their own labour [call this transitional hybrid form 'workers' capital[ism]' — M.D.].

They show how a new mode of production naturally grows out of an old one, when the development of the material forces of production and of the corresponding forms of social production have reached a particular stage.

Without the factory system arising out of the capitalist mode of production there could have been no co-operative factories.

Nor could these have developed without the credit system arising out of the same mode of production.

The credit system is not only the principal basis for the gradual transformation of capitalist enterprises into capitalist stock companies, but equally offers the means for the gradual extension of co-operative enterprises on a more or less national scale.
[with, e.g., the Mondragon producer cooperatives conglomerate, this has reached the international scale -- M.D.] ...

The capitalist stock companies, as much as the co-operative factories, should be considered transitional forms from the capitalist mode of production to the associated one, with the only distinction that the antagonism is resolved negatively in the one, and positively in the other. ...

The credit system appears as the main lever of over-production and over-speculation in commerce solely because the reproduction process, which is elastic by nature, is here forced to its extreme limits, and is so forced because a large part of the social capital is employed by people who do not own it, and who consequently tackle things quite differently than the owner, who anxiously weighs the limitations of his private capital in so far as he handles it himself.

This simply demonstrates the fact that the self-expansion of capital based on the contradictory nature of capitalist production permits an actual free development only up to a certain point, so that in fact it constitutes an immanent fetter and barrier to production, which is continually broken through by the credit system.

Hence, the credit system accelerates the material development of the productive forces and the establishment of the world-market.

It is the historical mission of the capitalist system of production to raise the material foundations of the new mode of production to a certain degree of perfection.

At the same time credit accelerates the violent eruption of this contradiction — crises — and thereby the elements of disintegration of the old mode of production.

The two characteristics immanent in the credit system are, on the one hand, to develop the incentive of capitalist production, enrichment through the exploitation of the labour of others, to the purest and most colossal form of gambling and swindling, and to reduce more and more the number of the few who exploit the social wealth; on the other hand, to constitute the form of transition to a new mode of production .

It is this ambiguous nature, which endows the principal spokesmen of credit from Law to Isaac Pereire with the pleasant character mixture of swindler and prophet."

[Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (vol. III), '''The Shapes Taken-On by The Reproductions-Process of/by Capitals Overall''', Chapter XXVII, "The Role of Credit in Capitalist Production", International Publishers Co., Inc. [NY: 1967], pages 435-441, bold, italic, colored, and underlined emphasis added].



Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
30th October 2011, 02:33
Dear RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

The Equitist Advocacy Group has issued an open letter/leaflet to "Occupy Wall Street" and the Global People's Assemblies Movement, entitled "Diagnosis & Prescription".

Here is the text of that open letter, as transcribed from the leaflet handed out at an "Occupy Wall Street" demonstration in which I participated --


"GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES:

The Capitals-System No Longer Works, Even to the Extent It Once Did

DIAGNOSIS

&

PRESCRIPTION --

The Global Failure of the Present System &
The Emergence of a Successor System

DIAGNOSIS: The self-continuation of the capitals system predictably concentrates predominant capital ownership, & therefore predominant monetary power, & therefore predominant political power, in ever fewer hands.

This concentration of money-power has concentrated real political power in a handful of plutocratic, humanocidal crime-families -- power that escapes all existing democratic-constitutional, merely-political checks & balances -- as these plutocratic families prostitute the executive, legislative, & judicial branches of government at all levels to their “Big Money”, & assassinate those leaders who they cannot prostitute.

Example: The international political machine of those serial mass murderers, the "Eugenicist"-humanocidal Rockefeller Mega-Crime Family, which conducts their global “invisible dictatorship” s[/B], the Federal Reserve, the American Medical Association, the Baptist Church, the New York Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, etc., etc.].

These ruling plutocratic families then apply their concentrated political-economic power to attack a growing threat to that power inherent in the later competitive capitals-system itself: that of an accelerating technological obsolescence depreciation. "Techno-depreciation" destroys the capital-value of their capital plant and equipment, & of its products, in industries they directly own [e.g., oil], & induces defaults on their banks’ humongous loans for capital plant & equipment to other industries’ owners, whom they control, in part, by such debt. The improved products/productivity that this "techno-depreciation" process reflects betters life/reduces life-cost for most of humanity, but is anathema to the "1%".

Example: The advent of zero-radioactivity fusion power generators would soon essentially zero-out the capital-value of the Rockefeller Exxon-Mobil corporation's global plant & equipment investments, & of their product: oil.



Plutocracy’s Reaction to the Above-Defined “Techno-Depreciation” Threat to their Power:

(1.) In the “periphery” of the core capital-based countries , the plutocracy moves to –



Create the “Third World”. They set up military/comprador dictatorships throughout the not-yet-industrialized “periphery” -- in Latin America, Asia, & Africa -- to suppress the technological depreciation threat of low-wage/latest capital plant & equipment rapid industrialization there [which “worked”, until the post-WWII industrialization-renaissance of Japan, then the recent resurgence of China/Brazil/India. Japan's ongoing national depression, ever since 1989, via "Bubble Engineering", starting in real estate, was a "dress rehearsal" for the global asset bubble/collapse, also engineered by the "Rocke-Nazis"/"Rothe-Nazis", & manifest since 2008].




[I]Impose a “Meta-Nazi” Regime there. This plutocracy imposes, internationally, their “meta-dictatorship", based upon their heterogeneous multiplicity of national military/local-oligarchy servant-dictatorships in the thus-impoverished nations of the resulting “Third World”, in Latin America, Africa & Asia.




Propagate Genetically-Engineered, “Population Reduction” Designer Diseases there. Example: AIDS.



(2.) In the core capital-based countries [US/UK/Europe], the plutocracy moves to –



Impose the Income Tax to make the working class, and the smaller, weaker capital-owners, pay the military arms-supply & invasion/“intelligence”/secret police costs of maintaining the “Meta-Nazi” regime in the “Third World” [Example: U.S. 16th Constitutional Amendment, adopted in 1913].




Impose “fiat money” central banking regimes [Example: The U.S. “Federal Reserve”, created in 1913].




Impose “Permanent Inflation” via fiat currency central banks, to make the working class and the small capital owners pay for the ongoing "techno-depreciation" that the plutocratic “invisible dictatorship” can’t otherwise suppress. Example: http://oregonstate.edu/cla/polisci/faculty-research/sahr/pl1665.htm --


8447




Cripple / assassinate technological innovators. Examples: Preston Tucker, John DeLorean, Philo Farnsworth, Dr. Eugene Mallove, Dr. Robert Bussard, Steve Jobs.




Massively fund “population reduction” ideologies/policies/practices. Examples: Rockefeller/Nazi “Eugenics” [pre-WWII]; anti-technology, neo-Malthusian, pro-humanocide “people are pollution” ideologies [today].




Bring the “Third World” Home via plutocracy-captive government policies of middle class impoverishment – Examples: job-theft, home-theft, pension-theft, planned Social Security/Medicare repeal, destruction of access to higher education, medical costs hyperinflation [Note: It was John D. Rockefeller himself who orchestrated the ascendancy of the American Medical Association, the suppression of naturopathy, etc.], setting the stage to “bring home” the “Third World” periphery-style open/visible dictatorships to the “First World” core. Their [U]Goal: make life increasingly impossible for the majority, including by making life increasingly unaffordable for the majority.



(3.) Overall – Engineer a Global Depression to enable Global Totalitarian, Humanocidal Dictatorship. Examples:

· 1930s -- Global Great Depression I.: The Rockefeller/Morgan/Rothschild plutocracy created the 1930s Global Great Depression via their technology of “Capital Asset Bubble Engineering”, imposed their totalitarian, genocidal servant-dictatorships in Spain [Franco], Portugal [Salazar], Italy [Mussolini], Hungary [Horthy], Argentina [Castillo/Peron], Japan [Hirohito/Tojo], China [Chiang Kai Shek], Russia [Stalin], and Germany [Hitler], & attempted a military coup in the U.S. . Hitler’s “Franken-Dictator” turn against that plutocracy, aiming to “take their place” of global dictatorship for himself, aborted this, their first attempt at a global “meta-Nazi” meta-dictatorship. "Second World", Stalinist/Maoist state-capitalist totalitarian/genocidal dictatorships in Russia and China, vying with the “Rocke-Nazis”/“Rothe-Nazis” for world dictatorship after WWII, blocked any “Rocke-Nazi”/“Rothe-Nazi” Great Depression 2nd try, until after 1989.

· The Present -- Global Great Depression II.: Rockefeller banks -- J. P. Morgan Chase/Citibank/Bank of America/Goldman Sachs – concocted fictitious capital derivatives, fraudulently foisted as “high return/low risk” assets, aided by capital asset rating agency fraudulent triple-A ratings of these "assets", duping other banks world-wide to fork over their liquid actual capital to buy these mortgage-backed pseudo-assets. These "assets'" values/returns were then collapsed, using the usual "bubble-engineering" tech., crashing stock markets world-wide; rendering millions of workers job-less, home-less, 401(k)-less, & pension-less; plunging capital reserve ratios of duped buyer-banks to insolvency levels. Central banks & governments in US/UK/Europe responded, per plan, transferring this private bank/corporation fictitious capital debt to taxpayers, handing trillions of taxpayer dollars to these criminal/dupe banks & other corporations. This converted a private debt crisis into a public, sovereign debt crisis in the US/UK/Europe, to "justify" repeal of pensions/social safety nets , & to impose hyper-contractionary “austerity” against the working class, with escalation of education & medical costs, etc., in the US, UK, Iceland, Greece, Ireland, Spain, Italy, etc. Such "austerity" induces drastically deepened global economic collapse, now targeted by the plutocracy for ~ 2012, to impose state-capitalist, totalitarian rule, & catastrophic “population reduction”, against all working classes, once the plutocracy consolidates their global “meta-dictatorship". Worldwide Police-state, state-capitalist
dictatorships, dealing out [U]humanocide to the working/“middle” class globally, is now the only way that the“Rocke-Nazi”/“Rothe-Nazi” plutocrats see to preserve their global power against middle-class/democracy expansion & accelerating technological progress. The time has come for we the people to end the plutocracy’s power, globally, before they "end" us! The only power that can save our lives now is our own collective power.



PRESCRIPTION: Political-[U]ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, via --



International boycotts of the products & “services” of global corporations who prostitute government policies.




Equitarian Constitutional Reform / Equitarian Non-Violent Social Revolution -- Constitutional establishment, via global ‘‘‘populist’’’ up-rising, of new, Universal Citizen Equity Rights, creating ECONOMIC checks-&-balances, to resuscitate the existing, political-only checks-&-balances, vitiated by concentrated economic power:


1. Citizen Externality Equity Rights – Popularly-elected, Boards of Public Directors in all localities, constraining the production of pollution, etc., “externalities” by enterprise local operating units’ private boards of directors / management committees. Popularly-elected Associations of Public Directors at the local, regional, national, &, eventually, continental & global levels reshape the geography of human society.

2. Citizen Birthright Equity Rights – A Social Trust Fund for each newborn Citizen, by right of birth, to help defray lifetime costs of education, re-training, health care, housing, etc., with legislated expenditure rules.

3. Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights – Competing, Citizen self-organized producers’ cooperatives, rated as having qualifying business plans, & democratic internal self-management, are granted, in return for a monthly rent, payable to the National Office of the Custodian of Social Property, stewardship of the plant and equipment assets needed to launch their cooperative enterprises, & to conduct their business plans, with two income streams for each stewardship cooperative member: an equal share in net profits of each stewardship cooperative for each of its members, & a job-based, skills-based competitive salary for each of its members.



By: The Equitist Advocacy Group.



See draft Constitutional Amendments at www.equitism.org (http://www.equitism.org)"




Nice to see such a brief "Prescription" section, that is nevertheless so pregnant with so many profound social-revolutionary implications, No?

Regards

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
3rd November 2011, 01:37
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,





PRESCRIPTION: Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, via --



International boycotts of the products & “services” of global corporations who prostitute government policies.




Equitarian Constitutional Reform / Equitarian Non-Violent Social Revolution -- Constitutional establishment, via global ‘‘‘populist’’’ up-rising, of new, Universal Citizen Equity Rights, creating ECONOMIC checks-&-balances, to resuscitate the existing, political-only checks-&-balances, vitiated by concentrated economic power:


1. Citizen Externality Equity Rights – Popularly-elected, Boards of Public Directors in all localities, constraining the production of pollution, etc., “externalities” by enterprise local operating units’ private boards of directors / management committees. Popularly-elected Associations of Public Directors at the local, regional, national, &, eventually, continental & global levels reshape the geography of human society.

2. Citizen Birthright Equity Rights – A Social Trust Fund for each newborn Citizen, by right of birth, to help defray lifetime costs of education, re-training, health care, housing, etc., with legislated expenditure rules.

3. Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights – Competing, Citizen self-organized producers’ cooperatives, rated as having qualifying business plans, & democratic internal self-management, are granted, in return for a monthly rent, payable to the National Office of the Custodian of Social Property, stewardship of the plant and equipment assets needed to launch their cooperative enterprises, & to conduct their business plans, with two income streams for each stewardship cooperative member: an equal share in net profits of each stewardship cooperative for each of its members, & a job-based, skills-based competitive salary for each of its members.

By: The Equitist Advocacy Group.

See draft Constitutional Amendments at www.equitism.org (http://www.equitism.org)"




Per the draft constitutional amendment details, the monthly social rent paid by each stewardship cooperative for its use of means of production social property goes, in part, to fund the Citizen Birthright Equity trust funds.


Regards,

Miguel

Rafiq
5th November 2011, 14:59
Translation: Welcome. silly Humans. I. am. Rosa. Lichistein. 2.0.

Miguel Detonnaciones
12th November 2011, 08:14
Revleft Theory Forum Participants,

Why does the Equitist Advocacy Group call their their version of "democratic communist society", or of "political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY", "Equitism", instead of just "Communism", or "Democratic Communism", or something else?

Having read their material, I will offer my guesses as to the answers to these questions. Please let me know if you agree, disagree, etc.

Why the name "Equitism"?

Maybe they think that the term "Communism" has been tainted by the fraud of the [actually anti-]"Soviet" Union and "Communist" China -- i.e., by these versions of semi-autarkic/semi-state-capitalist ["national super-corporation competing in world market"] nation-states.

I don't think that they chose the term "Equitism" because equity in the sense of "equalitarianism", "equality", or "equal rights", is the primary means of their proposal, although I would grant that their "equitarian" society, in practice -- if it were to come into being --would become, if it succeeded in expandedly reproducing itself, an "equalitarian" society, a "one class", or "classless", society; a society characterized by an extraordinary degree of social equality and equitability, given its founding institutions.

More likely -- since the EAG professes that the new "social relation of production", that they predict will succeed the present, capital-relation "social relation of production" characterizing capitalism state-capitalism"] -- they call it "Equitism" because their name for its core "social relation of production" is "Generalized Equity."

That is, "Equitism", per the EAG, is characterized by the social institution of three new species of social equity, beyond the historically original species of equity, "capital equity" ["shareholder/stockholder democracy"], namely --



Citizen Externality Equity
Citizen Birthright Equity
Citizen Stewardship Equity

Unlike "capital equity [stock]" [shareholder "economic voting", etc., rights], which is a "private property" right, Citizen Externality Equity is a global collective property right, related to Coase's theorem.

Citizen Birthright Equity is a socially-constrained "individual property" right.

Citizen Stewardship Equity is a hybrid, individual/collective property right, exercised via collectives of citizens in the form of "citizen-steward producer cooperatives", including the manager/management board election/recall and other economic voting rights of each Steward-member of each such cooperative, and the dual income right of each such Steward -- to an equal share in the net profits of their cooperative, and to a potentially unequal, skills-based share of that cooperative's expenses in terms of their compensation for hours worked.

Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
21st November 2011, 00:20
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

This post is to share an excerpt from a recent dialogue on the proposed "Equitist" -- i.e., the Democratic-Communist -- constitution.

Regards,

Miguel




Query. "Thank you for answering the question Miguel. I see that it's been thought out. I didn't look too deeply into it to compare it with what I've been advocating. The access by workers to tools of production is an area of commonality. I don't know what your organization's position on this is, but as far as I'm concerned the present tools of production as far as industrial plants and other equipment goes, do not need to be expropriated from the current owners. With technology advancing, industrial equipment is outmoded in just a short amount of time, so instead I would have the workers demanding upfront financing from the govt. for new up to date equipment."


Response. "To my understanding, what the Equitist Advocacy Group is advocating jibes with your statement, above.

Per the proposed Equitist Constitution, each self-organized collective of adult citizens --each [candidate] free "associations of producers" -- with the aim of constituting themselves as a new Citizen Stewardship Equity Rights-based stewardship producers' cooperatives, would present their proposed business plan to one or more competing Social Banks [each one also a -- financial -- citizen stewardship cooperative].

If one or more of the Social Bank cooperatives found that proposed business plan to be sound -- likely to contribute a net profit, to be divided equally among all members [collective self-employees] of the Social Bank cooperative, and if the by-laws and practices of the candidate citizen stewardship cooperative that submitted that business plan were certified, by the Office of the Custodian of Social Property examiners, as meeting the constitutional and statutory norms and standards of collective democratic self-management internally, then that one of the approving Social Bank cooperatives -- the one that the new stewardship producers' cooperative selected -- would grant the funds required by that business plan, from out of the "grant-able" taxpayer-derived/social-rents-derived funds allocated to that Social Bank by the national/federal Office of the Custodian of Social Property, per the popularly-elected national legislative body.

The thus-inaugurated new stewardship cooperative would then apply part of those funds, per its business plan, to the fresh, new construction of the means of production required per that business plan.

The cooperative would have options to construct these means of production by itself, via the skills of its own members/citizen-stewards, to contract with the Office of the Custodian of Social Property to manage the construction of those means of production, per the specifications stated in the cooperative's business plan, to contract with another citizens stewardship cooperative, e.g., one specializing in the production of means of production of the kind(s) required per the business plan, to construct those means of production, or to contract with a private-capitalist firm [to the extent such would continue to be competitive with stewardship cooperatives, since member-managed [producers-managed] stewardship cooperatives would tend to treat their citizen-steward members -- i.e., themselves -- much better than private capitalist firms usually treat their waged and salaried workers] to construct the required means of production.

The Equitists are "anti-confiscationist" -- "anti-expropriationist" -- when it comes to private capital, and do not advocate the "il-legalization" of private
capital ownership, but, on the contrary, advocate the constitutional legal requirement that the capital-owner-democratic-principles of capital equity stock "shareholder democracy" be adhered to, as stipulated in the very first section of the Equitist Constitution, and in all of the Equitists' writings that I have read.

However, I also gather that the Equitists believe that the private capital-relation / wage-labor-relation will tend to "wither away" over time, in the face of
competition from democratically-self-managed citizen-stewardship producers' cooperatives -- producers' cooperatives that are granted means of production and start-up working funds by their governments even though their stewards/members typically do not own substantial private capital.

Efficiency in the construction and use of means of production would be encouraged by the social rent paid by stewardship cooperatives on each unit of means of production social property that they hold in stewardship, thus removing those socially-owned means of production from any other uses, by any other citizens/members of society.

Of course, stewardship producers' cooperatives, competing with one another for customers, will be motivated to innovate ever-improving means of production to reduce the social rents that they pay on those means of production, and to reduce the operating costs of those means of production, and their replacement costs when they wear out, and the labor-time requirements of the use of their means of production, so as to keep their prices for their output competitive with the output prices of other, competing stewardship cooperatives, and so as to reduce the number of work-hours their members must work per working-day, and so as to reduce "externalities" [e.g., pollution] production, etc..

Therefore, obsolescence depreciation of capital equipment would continue -- indeed, should accelerate.

However, the Equitist Constitution contains a mechanism to avert the adverse effects of this "techno-depreciation" -- i.e., the adverse effects of the "self-contracting value" moment of the self-contradiction of capital, by which the capitalist system is killing itself.

[I.e., a mechanism to avert the effects that form the "law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall", and that therefore drive the "enfetterment" of the further "growth of the social forces of production", e.g., by the vicious policies of the [state-]capitalist ruling class in reaction to techno-depreciation-driven
fixed-capital write-offs and consequent tendential profit-rate-declines, therefore also driving the monstrous, totalitarian, "humanocidal" degeneration of that ruling class, with its ideologies of "capitalist anti-capitalism", and of "human anti-humanism", e.g., its "back to nature", "Small is Beautiful", "Zero Economic Growth", "people are pollution", "99% Population Reduction", Neo-Eugenicist perversion of the ecology movement, etc., etc.].

Regards,

Miguel



P. S. You referred to "your organization" in reference to myself and to the Equitist Advocacy Group in your reply. I AM following the activities of the Equitist Advocacy Group very closely, because their perspective jibes with mine very closely, so far. But I cannot claim ownership of, or membership in, the Equitist Advocacy Group. Indeed, the Equitist Advocacy Group's published internal operating principles prohibit their members from publicly claiming membership therein, so you will not find any member-in-good-standing of that Group publicly avowing their membership.

http://www.equitist.org/Equitist/InternalAffairs/InternalAffairs.htm "

Miguel Detonnaciones
28th November 2011, 07:59
Principles of Social Equity: Citizen Externality Equity [as propounded by the E.A.G., the Equitist Advocacy Group]

SOLUTION TO CAPITALISM'S "MARKET FAILURES", OF POLLUTION, ETC. "EXTERNALITIES": CITIZEN EXTERNALITY EQUITY



RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Below, I have made some emphases and edits of my own to an excerpt from one of the Equitist Advocacy Group's texts, to render it more forthcoming .



Definition.

"CITIZEN EXTERNALITY EQUITY =

The social principle, and social policy, of 'Citizen Externality Equity' Rights is both a collective-property, public(s)-property, social-property instantiation of the so-called "Coase Theorem", and an ultimate fruition of the '''equity''' or '''equitable jurisprudence''' tradition of Anglo-American law, in contradistinction to the common law and statutory law traditions.



Elaboration.

"Externalities" are "market failures" of the markets of Capitalism, as recognized, and as named as such, by capitalist economists, constituting a major aspect of theimmanent critique of capitalism officially admitted — however much these immanent failures of 'capital-ism' may be officially downplayed — by capitalist economics.

"Externalities" comprise the "external costs", and, sometimes, the "external benefits", that are imposed, by the operations of capitalist enterprises, upon those '''publics''' which are neither the owners, the employees, the customers, nor the suppliers of those enterprises, and which impose upon those '''publics''' without any intrinsic provision for consent by, or compensation to, said '''publics'''.

The life-threatening toxic pollution of the air, water, and soil of residential communities by proximate industrial plants forms a classic spectrum of examples of such "external cost" imposition.

The "Coase Theorem" is the name given to the proposition, asserted by Nobel-laureate capitalist economist Ronald Coase, to the effect that externalities do not give rise to '''diseconomies''', '''distribution sub-optima''', or '''resource mis-allocations''', provided that well-defined and enforceable property rights exist, such as to create a market incentive for the externality-producer to '''internalize''' the cost of the "externality".

The "equity" tradition, or "equitable jurisprudence" tradition, of Anglo-American law originally emerged as a system of law/courts, parallel and dual to the common law/statutory system/courts of law, in the English chancery, and which came to comprise a settled and formal body of substantive and procedural rules and doctrines that supplement, aid, or override common and statutory law. "Equity" in this context connotes '"justice according to fairness, especially as distinguished from mechanical application of rules"'.

The equity principle at work in the 'externality equities' '''second «species»''' of 'generalized equity', is the principle that publics, which suffer the '''external costs''' imposed upon them without consent or compensation by private-capital enterprises, thereby, in effect, '''purchase''' shares of a new, to-be constitutionally established and mandated class of equities – a publics', collective form of equity-property – whose disposition must therefore be by means of collective, democratic decision, arrived at by vote of the publics, i.e., of the 'externality-equity' owners -- non-capital-owning '''shareholders''', or '''stakeholders'''.

'Externality Equity' implies an immanent-/self-expansion of joint-stock-company stockholder democracy principles, inherent in the capital-relation, to encompass the constitutional, legislative, and regulatory 'institution-ization' of generalized, comprehensive, non-capital-owning '''stakeholder democracy'''.

'Equitism' begins with constitutional recognition of a new, universal 'socio-ontological category' of all-citizens' equities: 'citizen externality equities'.

'Externality Equity' generalizes core, capital-equity logic to encompass economic democracy, starting with public, democratic econo-political governance of the core of capitalism's '''market failures''' – its production and accumulation of an ever-mounting burden of the '''externalities''' that it foists upon its publics, publics who may be "third parties" – neither customers of, nor employees of, nor [capital-equity-stock-]owners of, nor suppliers of the capital-entity producing the deleterious "externalities" in question.



Envisioning the Transition

We expect to find — given a protracted and appropriate, including «samizdat», preparation of the majority social conscience — the emergence of a majoritarian, popular movement for the 'Equitarian Reform', an 'economic-democratic extension' of the "representative-democratic", '''political-democratic''' constitutions of the nations of the capital-system's global market core.

We expect this movement to develop in response to the accelerating '''political-economic immiseration''' and degradation of those societies in the accelerating on-rush, by their ruling classes, into the multi-genocidal, state-capitalist totalitarian destiny engendered by the unresisted decadent-phase depredations of the capitals-system, in the desperate efforts of the concentrated-capital-owning ruling class to avert the "self-contracting-value-dominant", "techno-depreciation-dominant" phase immanent in the law-of-motion of the capitals-system.

The 'Equitarian Reforms' are envisioned as a 'constitutionalization' and 'juridicalization', into social law, of an immanent critique, or self-critique, of the "capital-relation" — of capital: a critique both theoretical and practical.

The institutional infrastructure of the 'Externality Equity' «species» of 'generalized equity' is a scaled self-similarity structure, a 'synchronic meta-fractal', of economic governance bodies, based in publicly-elected, base-elected public directors, serving in the new, constitutionally-mandated, '''second houses''' of local, newly bi-cameral boards of directors: the public stakeholders' «camera», or 'externality-equities' «camera», of that newly bi-cameral governance.

Per this programme, these "second house", 'public boards of directors', or 'boards of popularly-elected, public directors', are to be constitutionally required in all local enterprises with sufficient externalities impact, in accordance with a constitutionally-stipulated externalities-impact metric, and a threshold stipulated in terms of that metric.

These new, public boards, would co-manage, in continuous negotiation with the traditional, 'internality-equities' board, and/or its local "management committee", or "executive committee" delegates, the annual 'externalities budgets'/operating plans of each such enterprise, with constitutionally and legislatively ceded co-authority to do so, 'adjudicate-able' via the judiciary branch of social governance in cases of deadlock.

Arising therefrom — possibly, at first, as extra-constitutional "NGOs", prior to their full constitutional institutionalization — we anticipate the accelerating emergence of local/municipal, state/provincial, regional, national, continental, and, eventually, global, associations of public directors.

All levels of these associations of public directors must be constitutionally-required to be base-elected, so that it is not the members of a more local-scale association that elect the members of the next-less-local-scale association.

It must be the combined base of all of the more local associations addressed by a given next-scale association that elect the members of that next-scale
association.

The function of these associations is to coordinate externalities social management policy at 'meta-enterprise' levels.

We expect that these would increasingly constitute – at first, «de facto», and, later, by sovereign, popular institution and constitutional amendment, «de jure»
— a fourth, 'econo-political', branch of government, in sustained 'quadruple-power' with «aufheben»-conserved/-transformed executive, legislative, and judicial branches, with checks-and-balances between every pair of these four branches.

A key effect of the actions of these associations would be a human-geographical 'de-abstractification' / 're-determination / containment' of abstract capital;
an «aufheben»-conserving /-negating '''real subsumption''' of the capital-equity, or 'internality-equity', relation, its markets, and its '''market failures''',
within the democratized human-social relations of production of the generalized-equity-relation, including all of the new socio-ontological classes
of 'non-internality-equity' emergent from their 'externality-equity' «arché».



The 'Intra-Duality' of the "Capital-Relation" and the Emergence therefrom of the Social-Relations-of-Production 'Socio-Ontology' of 'Generalized Equity': Some Conjectures Regarding 'Equitism'

An 'essence-ial' operation of the «Kapitals»-system, that it applies externally, to its surrounding pre-capitalist hinterland [as it converts that hinterland into new socio-geographical increments to itself, to its own geographical domain], as it does also internally, to its own already-converted internal terrain, is one of expropriation — expropriation of small-holder peasant producers on the land and of self-employed urban artisans, etc., to form/expand the wage-labour class; expropriation of smaller capitals by larger, expropriation of surplus-labor and of surplus-value, etc.

«Kapital» is also, 'essence-ially', an operation of bursting-asunder all barriers to the quanto-qualitative advance of social self-productivity [of the "social self-re-productive self-force", cf. Marx].

As the «Kapital»-conversion of the pre-capital hinterland nears completion, as the «Kapitals»-system comes to surround the last remnants of the social-systemic '''other''' that once surrounded it, we move toward that moment in the history of the «Kapitals»-system in which that system will 'surround' and confront only itself worldwide.

That approaching [extended] historical moment means that the operations which that system hitherto applied to the predecessor social formations that surrounded it, or 'environmented' it, in the past – namely, the operations of expropriation and of social-barrier-dissolution — will be applied to the «Kapitals»-system itself, by
the «Kapitals»-system itself, as its own only remaining human-social environment, in its final confrontation: in its confrontation with itself.

With regard to the expropriation operator, this would mean an expropriation of the expropriation [operation] itself, which operation is «Kapital». Marx --

"What does the primitive accumulation of capital, i.e., its historical genesis, resolve itself into?

In so far as it is not immediate transformation of slaves and serfs into wage-labourers, and therefore a mere change of form, it only means the expropriation of the immediate producers, i.e., the dissolution of private property based on the labour of its owner. …

as soon as the capitalist mode of production stands on its own feet...the further expropriation of private proprietors takes a new form.

That which is now to be expropriated is no longer the labourer working for himself, but the capitalist exploiting many labourers. This expropriation is accomplished by the action of the immanent laws of capitalistic production itself, by the centralisation of capital.

One capitalist always kills many.

Hand in hand with this centralisation, or this expropriation of many capitalists by few, develop, on an ever-increasing scale, the cooperative form of the labour-process, the conscious technical application of science, the methodical cultivation of the soil, the transformation of the instruments of labour into instruments of labour only usable in common, the economising of all means of production by their use as the means of production of combined, socialised labour ['the objective socialization of the means of production' – M.D.], the entanglement of all peoples in the net of the world-market, and, with this, the international character of the capitalist régime. ...

The monopoly of capital becomes a fetter upon the mode of production, which has sprung up and flourished along with, and under it.

Centralisation of the means of production and socialisation of labour at last reach a point where they become incompatible with their capitalist integument.

This integument is burst asunder.

The knell of capitalist private property sounds.

The expropriators are expropriated."

[Karl Marx, Capital, vol. I, Chapter XXXII, "Historical Tendency of Capitalist Accumulation", International Publishers [NY: 1967], pages 761-764, emphasis added by M.D.]

Marx foresaw, in The Grundrisse, that, in this 'self-environment' or 'self-surroundment' and 'self-envelopment' of the «Kapitals»-system, it would find in its own nature a barrier to the further development of the social '''self-forces''' of self-expanding societal self-[re-]production, and act upon itself accordingly, unstoppably, whatever to the contrary its partisans and beneficiaries might wish:

"... capital has pushed beyond national boundaries and prejudices, beyond the deification of nature and the inherited, self-sufficient satisfaction of existing needs confined within well-defined bounds, and the reproduction of the traditional way of life.

It is destructive of all this, and permanently revolutionary, tearing down all obstacles that impede the development of the productive forces, the expansion of needs, the diversity of production and the exploitation and exchange of natural and intellectual forces.

But because capital sets up any such boundary as a limitation and is thus ideally over and beyond it, it does not in any way follow that it has really surmounted it, and since any such limitation contradicts its vocation, capitalist production moves in contradictions, which are constantly overcome, only to be, again, constantly re-established [and, on an ever-larger 'meta-fractal' scale – M.D.].

Still more so.

The universality towards which it is perpetually driving finds limitations in its own nature, which, at a certain stage of its development will make it appear as itself the greatest barrier to this tendency, leading thus to its own self-destruction."

[David McLellan, The Grundrisse, Karl Marx, Harper & Row [NY: 1971], pages 94-95, emphasis added by M.D.]


Vastly more needs to be said about the historical dynamics and 'meta-dynamics' of the «Kapitals»-system, and about the mechanisms and 'organisms' of its
'meta-finite self-conversion / self-bifurcation self-singularity', as especially about the immanent tendency of accumulating capital-value to [I]de-value itself,
and of the rate of capital value-accumulation to decelerate itself, both as expressions of the growth of the society-re-productive forces within capital.

However, the above-excerpted intimations must suffice for the present purpose.



Averting, via Social[-Relations] Revolution, the Otherwise Pre-Destined '''New Dark Age''' Denouement of Decadent Capitalism: Towards a Strategy for Humanity

The Fight for Human Liberty is Now a Life-and-Death Struggle Against Decadent Capitalism – Against the Unchecked Power of the Totalitarian, Humanocidal Capitalist Plutocracy of the Advanced Capitalist Core of the World-Market System.

The «Kapitals»-systems of national and global political economy have engendered liberal political constitutions, with internal checks and balances limiting the
abuse of political power, which have, as a result, proven relatively so successful at growing social productivity / '''the social forces of production''', that their economic and social success is now rapidly turning into its opposite — catastrophic economic, political, social failure.

Their power of their economies have, at length, outgrown the power of their political constitutions, and of their exclusively political checks and balances, to avert
the accumulation of unchecked power and the species-lethal abuse of that unchecked power, in the formation of a pro-totalitarian, humanocidal capitalist plutocracy.

Their market competition, which provides economic checks and balances limiting abuses in the pricing and quality of goods, services, and in customer service quality in general, becomes, and must become, successful competition.

Successful competition becomes, and must become, the [partial] negation of competition, namely, monopoly [or oligopolistic, etc., near-monopoly].

Thus, competition leads to and becomes its opposite, monopoly and oligopoly.

The process of the competition of capitals thus leads to the formation of agglomerations of capital so gargantuan that they can take over the mass media
of public communication, and buy-out the political system — legislative, executive, and judicial; lock, stock, and barrel.

Thereby, the political checks and balances among those branches of the public, political government are obviated and subverted.

The houses of legislature become houses of prostitution.

The executive and judicial branches of government are, over time, likewise bought-out and prostituted.

Increasingly, only those candidates for public, political, elected office who sell themselves to the plutocracy can acquire the vast funding necessary to buy
access to the plutocracy-dominated mass media sufficient to achieve electoral victory.

Thus, successful advanced capitalist democracies are characterized by a seemingly irresistible tendency to plutocratic totalitarian degeneration.

The horrific dictatorships of Hitler and Stalin, precisely because they arose in nations whose capitalist development was in some ways retarded, have provided a
prevenient, disfigured prefigurement of the hellish future of demise that humanity faces in the further, advanced-decadence development of this plutocratic totalitarian, and humanocidal, self-degeneration of capitalism.

Only the addition of constitutional economic checks and balances can overcome this economic subversion of once-partially-effective but exclusively political checks and balances.

Only the emergence of political-economic democracy, of a democratically 'politicized' political economy, can check this tendency to plutocratic totalitarian political degeneration, a degeneration which has arisen from the economy; from the 'economic side' of the political-economy; from the economy's production of a prostitute-government, prostituted most-abjectly to the economic plutocracy.



The Capital Equity Stock Shares-Principles of 'Internality Equity' and the Capital-Governance Norm of Stockholder Democracy

The share-principle, the capital-equity-principle, the one-share-unit-of-capital-owned = one-vote-for-the-election-of-directors-to-the-board-of-directors governance principle of stockholder democracy immanent within the 'socio-ontological category' of capital, is a principle of economic-democratic enfranchisement for the owners of capital, but also a principle of total economic dis-enfranchisement for the non-owners of capital.

The principle of 'Equitism' outers the latent, immanent dual of that capital-principle, a principle of enfranchisement also for the non-owners of capital.

It does so in the form of the moral recognition and juridical formation, initially, of a new class of property-equities, that of 'externality-equities', in part via the "equity" tradition of 'precedentary', case-law jurisprudence, as well as from the generalized-equity-enabling 'Equitarian' constitutional amendments — amendments to be proposed in detail under separate cover.

[M.D.: The details have since been posted to -- http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf ].
. . .

The term 'Externality Equity' herein denotes a form of non-stockholder stakeholder equity which arises from principles extending those already extant and precedented in the "equity" tradition of case law.

It arises, in particular, from the principle that the ownership of capital, however legitimately acquired, does not convey to the owner the unlimited right to inflict harm and damage upon other citizens and upon society as a whole.

It arises also from the further principle that the best locus in which to adjudicate and mitigate the externalities generated by the operation of capitalist enterprises — the external costs or costs imposed upon third-parties whose interests are not represented in the traditional institutions of private capital governance — is the locus of their origination: the very heart of capital governance itself.

External, governmental regulatory bureaucracies, legislatively chartered and overseen, are subject to the plutocracy's bribery of the legislatures and to the
"revolving door" bribes of later industry-employment offered to the regulating bureaucrats by the regulated industries.

Lawsuits, brought before the judiciary, against the personal and social damages inflicted by those industries, are generally too delayed, and too costly, for the citizen litigants, who face the ultra-deep-pockets of their plutocratic, mega-corporate adversaries.

Such exclusively litigious actions for redress are also exposed to the gradual corruption of the judiciary by the plutocracy's bribery that increasingly controls the legislature and the executive branches, which share the power to appoint the central judiciary.

On the other hand, nationalization of industry, and state-monopoly of all capital, threatens to resurrect the unchecked, absolute, absolutely-corrupt, and soon-totalitarian dictatorship of Stalinoid or Fascistic state-capitalist bureaucracies, and must therefore count as another non-solution, and as, in reality, either an acceleration of, or a prevenient attainment of, the very «telos» of the totalitarian «taxis» of advanced/decadent capital.


* The dictatorship of a state-bureaucratic ruling class, whose grip on power and whose tenuous ruling-class-collectivist economic «de facto» 'ownership' claim on
the means of production is political-only, and totally vulnerable to political assault tends to totalitarianism as the only effective defense of its ruling power.

It does so because any successful political challenge to such a ruling class would mean its political replacement, and thus its total loss of ruling power.

If deposed politically, it is deposed totally.

Political totalitarianism is thus the "natural" form of political and economic class self-defense for this kind of ruling class.


* The motive to multi-genocidal global totalitarianism aimed at by the decadence-phase capitalist plutocracy, formed in the core regions of advanced/decadent private-capital, is quite other than the motive described above.

It arises with the decision of that plutocracy to reverse the historical growth of the human-social forces of production, as its only defense against its overthrow by the 'obsolescence depreciation' of its principal capital assets, and by the formation of an educated, tendentially prosperous, and therefore "ungovernable", "middle class" proletariat world-wide, which much-further growth of the productive forces would bring.

This power-jeopardy of the advanced/decadent capitalist ruling class is epitomized, in particular, by the prospect, for this petroleum/banking plutocracy, of the advent of the zero-radioactivity fuel regimes of controlled nuclear fusion atomic power, as a superior and, thus, oil-obsolescing alternative to its core power-asset in fossil-fuel-based molecular power.

It is epitomized, in general, by the way that rising, global, "middle-class" levels of workers' living standards, health, education, and new, including producers' cooperatives entrepreneurial wealth, threaten the overthrow of this plutocracy's exclusive power to rule.



The Econo-Political Institutional Infrastructure of the Initial Phase of '[I]Externality-Equities' Equitism

The 'Externality-Equities' initial phase of 'Equitism' envisions the constitutional-amendment provision and partially courts- and legislatures-regulated operation of 'bicameral' boards of directors in all capitalist enterprises of sufficient size and social impact, with a 'second house' of local-community-elected public directors in all local operating units of such enterprises.

These 'publics' boards' would have constitutionally- and legislatively-ceded authority over the 'externalities budgets', the 'quanto-qualitative', externalities-production local annual operating plans of these enterprises — thus representing, at the very heart of corporate governance, the 'externality-equities' owned collectively, in a collective property-rights, public property-rights, or social-property-rights application of the "Coase Theorem", by each such local-community's citizens, as public stakeholders, in virtue of this, their new and special kind of [social]-property right.

The traditional board of directors and its delegates, representing the ownership of 'internality-equities' by the traditional stockholders, would continue to have authority over the dollar-/other-denominated, financial annual operating plan.

Discrepancies between the two operating plans would have to be negotiated between the two "houses" in accord with the constitutionally and legislatively mandated rules, with constitutionally and legislatively prescribed and regulated judicial review and/or arbitration in the event of deadlock/negotiation-failure.

Any effort by the plutocracy to bribe the thousands of grass-roots public directors elected in local communities all across the landscape would face prohibitive costs and risks of exposure because of their vast multiplicity.

Such massive bribery would be rendered more difficult also by the base-level, the radically "town-hall"-, "grass-roots"-democracy-restorationist character of the institution of 'externality equities'; by the fact that the locally-resident citizens eligible to be elected as public directors would be fighting to defend their families, their homes, their local communities, and their very lives — e.g., from local toxic pollution, lethal to the lives of their children and of their other loved ones, produced, typically, by nearby capitalistic firms, or even produced by nearby 'stewardship-equity' producers-cooperatives, those in which human decency is outstripped by desire for monetary earnings [hopefully less typically] — in a way and from a vantage which would be very non-abstract, very direct and personal, compared to the vantage of the traditional long-distance central government legislator.

In any case, attempts by the plutocracy, and/or by their subordinate lower-capitalist-class elements — elements technically termed 'the drooling greedies'
in our social-scientific nomenclature — to buy-off the vast number of citizen-directors nationwide, and, eventually, worldwide, would break the bribery budgets of even the super-richest of the super-rich.



The Emergence of a Global 'Association of Public Directors'

It is expected that Associations of Public Directors, coordinating 'meta-enterprise' level policies at the local, regional, national, and eventually, at the international levels, will "naturally" tend to emerge over time, perhaps initially as a new kind of NGO [Non-Governmental Organization], and to eventually become institutionalized, 'constitutionalized', and legally 'electorialized'.

This will create a situation of "dual power" between these new, political-economic 'Associations of Associations', and the traditional, political branches of capitalist social governance.

But this should not be posed as one of unstable "dual power", leading inevitably to the monolithic "total victory" of one of the 'duals', and the "total annihilation"/"abstract negation" of the other, «a la» the typical Leninoid day-dreams in theory, and totalitarian nightmares in practice.

Rather, it should be grasped as the basis for a new, fourth branch of government — of a partially democratized economic-governance branch — and of a dialectical, «aufheben» conservation/elevation/transformation of the earlier three branches of political government, leading to a government constituted by sustained quadruple power, i.e., by the sustained mutual conflicts of all four branches.

The new, democratic-economic governance branch would then exist in a higher, stabilized, ongoing — and partially conflicts-conserving, conflicts-appropriating, and conflicts-harnessing — dialectical 'uni-thesis', or complex unity, with the three earlier branches, thereby supplying economic checks and balances that the political branches cannot supply, and that help to block the path, otherwise irresistible, toward those three earlier branches' total prostitution and plutocratic totalitarian, humanocidal degeneration.



'Containment' and '''Real [Self-]Subsumption''' of the "Capital-Relation" within the New Human-Social Relation of Production of 'Generalized Equity'

These Associations of Public Directors would supply a geography-based externalities 'container' and 'constrainer' for the many individual capitals operating within a given locality or region — capitals otherwise relatively '''abstracted''' and geographically indifferent; indifferent to the deleterious impacts of the externalities they generate upon their local portions of humanity.

These Associations would thus constitute the «monads», or units, of a 'Meta-Capital' entity, with each such «monad», or unit, of democratic-economic
governance, 'made up out of' a heterogeneous multiplicity of "individual capitals" within its geographical locus-of-authority, in a democratic-jurisdictional sense.

These Associations would geo-demographically 'contain' and 'internalize/subsume' the many capitals operating within their geographical jurisdictions, in terms
of, and placing checks and balances upon, the otherwise unlimited production of externalities which the combination of gargantuan oligopolist agglomerations of capital, their monopolized/prostituted mass media of communication, and their prostitute, increasingly '''plutocracy-owned''' political governments would otherwise unleash, and have already begun to unleash.

The "pure" private capital principle is a principle of private profit maximization at any human social/externality cost.

It is limited, within the epoch of the «Kapitals»-system, only by political checks, i.e., by economically-exteriorized, government legislature/bureaucracy regulation, and by litigation-triggered judicial intervention, in a context where these branches of government are increasingly prostituted to a few, dominant agglomerations of internationalizing, plutocratic capital-ownership.



The Historical and Human-Social-Reproductive 'Terminality' of the 'Un-Contained' Capital-Principle

Thus, the capital principle, when in its full development, at zenith, in the sub-epoch of its decadence — if not integrated within a higher socio-economic principle, i.e., as it moves to become the organizing principle of global society as a whole; of the human-social-reproductive totality, will become a principle of monopolistic, omni-ravenous, socially-cannibalistic rapacity and parasitic, vampiric malignancy; of unchecked, "absolute", and therefore "absolutely corrupt" power, which will ravage and destroy the totality of human society, the human species, and the planetary biosphere as a whole.

That capital-principle, as personified in the capitalist plutocracy, so becomes in a vain attempt to defend its power-prerogatives.

That plutocracy sees those prerogatives as mortally threatened by the further growth of the productive forces, as materialized in, and immanent in, the
improvement of majority [proletarian] standards of living, including standards of [scientific and technological, etc.] education, world-wide, as required by the growing "technical composition" [Marx] of capital -- and, therefore, the growing "technical composition" of labor as well, and by the accelerating exposure of the fixed capital owned, or financed, by that plutocracy to technological obsolescence depreciation as the [fixed-]constant capital composition of total capital rises.

That plutocracy therefore, in the decadent phase of capitalist development, begins to systematically attack those standards, and that technological development.

The capitalist plutocracy attacks those working-class standards-of-living, and that technological progress, via the various 'socially-atavistic', neo-feudaloid, "back-to-nature" ideologies that this plutocracy concocts, aiming to dupe the producing majority into acquiescence in a catastrophic, multi-genocidal -- humanocidal -- contraction of global human social reproduction, as if "the survival of the biosphere" required such a massacre of humanity that, in reality, the plutocracy requires, in its vain attempt to hold-on to its rapacious power.



The «Aufheben» Historical [Self-]Negation of the Capital-Relation as Predominant Social Relation of Production, Pre-Constructed by Analogy with Historically Earlier Social Relations of Production Self-Revolutionizations

This 'meta-model' . . . predicts no undialectical, abstract negation of the «Kapitals» social relations ontology.

It predicts no 'Jacobinoid-Leninoid' "absolute abolition"; no 'convolute' extinction/total de-manifestation, and no fantasy, utopian de-materialization of the "capital-relation".

The 'social praxis ontology' of the 'Raw Appropriation of Nature's products', or of "predation", did not vanish with/was not abolished by the emergence of that of Goods / intra-tribal Gifts, although the former was partly '''subsumed''' by the latter.

The Goods/Gifts 'socio-ontology' did not vanish with/was not abolished by the emergence of that of Commodity-barter [although the former was partly '''subsumed''' by the latter].

The bartered-Commodity 'socio-ontology' did not vanish with/was not abolished by the emergence of that of Money-Commodities [although the former was partly '''subsumed''' by the latter].

'The Monies social relation of production ontology' did not disappear with/was not abolished by the emergence of that of «Kapitals» [although the former was partly '''subsumed''' by the latter].

On the contrary —

The 'multi-Appropriation', or 'cross-Appropriation' socio-ontological category of '''human production of fit[ted]-for-humans-by-humans use-values from "raw"
materials produced by pre-/extra-human Nature''', i.e., of human-Goods / intra-tribal-"Gifts" production . . . first emerged as merely a new «species» of
the «genos»; of the 'human Appropriation of Nature's products in "Raw"/virtually unimproved [for humans] form' «genos».

But this new ... «species» — its burgeoning population, or «arithmos», of ... «genos»-«monads», or '''units''', of "Goods" — soon out-self-reproduced & dominated
the population, or «arithmos», of the «monads» ['''units'''] of the "Raw" Appropriation... «genos», at such a rate, and to such an extent, that the new ... Goods" «arithmos» became, 'psycho-historically' — in the minds, in the memes — of the humans who animated it, ever since, a new «genos»-«arithmos» in its own right; a [new, higher, qualitatively different, socio-ontologically-different] 'gen'-eralization of the '''Raw Appropriation of extra-human Nature''' «genos».

Indeed, this irruption of the new 'meristemal' Goods «genos» [re-]acted back upon, 're-fluxed' upon, its predecessor «genos», initially only subsuming that
predecessor «genos» '''formally''', by virtue of ... having become the new, 'meristemal', leading paradigm of human social-relations-of-production, and of
human social-forces-of-production, praxis.

But, eventually, that new «genos» '''really''' subsumed its predecessor «genos»; it largely '''appropriated'' and '''hybridized with''' that predecessor «genos»,
yielding a "complex unity" 'socio-ontology', as exemplified in that of a tool-equipped [weapons-equipped -- M.D.] [i.e., '''Goods'''-equipped] hunting
praxis, and in that of a tool-equipped digging/plant-appropriating/'''mining''' praxis, and in other such new human social phenomena, which are denoted,
collectively, in the [I][U]Encyclopedia Dialectica notation, by the "hybrid term"/'socio-ontological qualifier' ... .

Likewise, the 'exchange-use', or 'exchange-use-value' socio-ontological category of [pre-Money] Commodity barter, ... first emerged as merely a new «species» of the ["Goods" -- M.D.] «genos»; of the '''human production of fit[ted]-for-humans-by-humans use-values, from "raw" materials produced by the pre-/extra-human Nature''' "Raw" Appropriation «genos».

But this new, ... «species» — its burgeoning population, or «arithmos», of ... «monads», or '''units''', of 'barterables'; of '''Commodities''' — soon out-self-reproduced & dominated the population, or «arithmos», of the «monads» ['''units'''] of the ...["Goods" --M.D.] «genos», at such a rate and to such an extent that the new ... ["bartered Commodities" -- M.D.] «arithmos» became, 'psycho-historically' — in the minds, in the memes — of the humans who animated it, ever since, a new «genos»-«arithmos» in its own right; a [new, higher, qualitatively different, socio-ontologically-different] 'gen'-eralization of the Goods, value «genos»; a new kind of value: '''exchange-value'''.

Indeed, this irruption of the new 'meristemal' bartered-Commodities «genos» [re-]acted back upon, 're-fluxed upon', its predecessor «gene», initially only subsuming
those predecessor «gene» '''formally''', by virtue of ... [Commodities-barter -- M.D.] trading having become the new, 'meristemal', leading paradigm of human
social-relations-of-production, and of human social-forces-of-production, praxis, initially at the boundaries where distinct, otherwise warring, tribal communities met.

But, eventually, with the growth of its «arithmos», or population, reflecting the further growth of the human-social forces of production, that new «genos» of in[I]ter-tribal Commodity-barter '''really''' subsumed its predecessor «gene»; it largely '''appropriated'' and '''hybridized with''' those predecessor «gene», yielding "complex unity" 'socio-ontology', as exemplified in the emergence of the 'praxes' of barter-trading in "raw" goods, as well as in "finished" goods; in the emergence of intra-tribal barter, supplanting the intra-tribal '''Gift''' ethic and praxis, as extension of a barter praxis which, in its beginnings, was restricted to [predominantly war-like, or '''humans-hunting-and-gathering-other-/"foreign"-tribe/alien-humans'''] 'inter-tribal' relations, and in other such new human social phenomena, which are denoted, collectively, in the [U]Encyclopedia Dialectica notation, by "hybrid terms"/'socio-ontological qualifiers' such as ... .

Again, the 'general-exchangeables', or 'general-equivalents' socio-ontological category of Money-mediated Commodity exchange, herein denoted by ..., first
emerged as merely a new «species» of the ... '''barterable Commodity''' «genos» — as that new Commodity-«species» known, in the Marxian tradition, by the name
'''Money-Commodity''' — a socio-ontological category which tends, over historical time, for 'praxical' reasons, to devolve upon a precious-metal Commodity, such as silver, or gold; the Commodity «species» of '''specie'''.

But this new, ... ["Money-Commodities" , or "Privileged-Commodites" -- M.D.] «species» — its burgeoning population, or «arithmos», of ["Money-Commodities" -- M.D.] «monads», or '''units''', of 'gen-eral equivalents'; of the '''Money-Commodities''' — soon out-self-reproduced & dominated the population, or «arithmos», of the «monads» ['''units'''] of the ["baterable Commodity" -- M.D.] «genos», in perceived economic "value", at such a rate and to such an extent that the new ... ["Money-Commodities" -- M.D.] «arithmos» became, 'psycho-historically' — in the minds, in the memes — of the humans who animated it, ever since, a new «genos»-«arithmos» in its own right; a [new, higher, qualitatively different, socio-ontologically-different] 'gen'-eralization of the bartered-Commodity exchange-value «genos».

Indeed, this irruption of the new 'meristemal' Monies «genos» [re-]acted back upon, 're-fluxed upon', its predecessor «gene», initially only subsuming those predecessor «gene» '''formally''', by virtue of ...[Monies -- M.D.]-mediated circulation of Commodities having become the new, 'meristemal', leading paradigm of human social-relations-of-production, and of human social-forces-of-production, praxis.

But, eventually, that new «genos» '''really''' subsumed its predecessor «gene»; it largely '''appropriated'' and '''hybridized with''' those predecessor «gene», yielding "complex unity" 'socio-ontology', as exemplified in the emergence of the 'praxes' of the sale of "raw" extractions from pre-/extra-human Nature in exchange for Monies, instead of via Commodities-Barter, as well as the exchange of "finished" goods for Monies; in the emergence of "dues" & "tithes" and / '''redistributive
Gifting"' of Monies to the temple/state, in the emergence of in[U]tra-tribal Monies-mediated exchanges of Commodities, at least partially supplanting the earlier-emergent intra-tribal Commodities-Barter praxis, of inter-tribal, inter-city-state, etc., tributes "paid" in Monies form, as well as in "in-kind Goods and/or Commodities" forms, and in other such new human social phenomena, which are denoted, collectively, in the [U]Encyclopedia Dialectica notation, by "hybrid terms"/'socio-ontological qualifiers' such as ... .

Finally, to-date, the 'Money-Making-More-Money', or 'auto-catalytic exchange-value' socio-ontological category of «Kapitals», herein denoted by ..., first emerged as merely a new «species» of the ... [Monies-mediated Circulations of Commodities -- M.D.] «genos»; of the '''universal-equivalent Money''' «genos» — as the circulation-based, non-production-based, quasi-parasitic Money-«species» known theoretically, in the Marxian tradition, as the "'antediluvian «species» of Capital'" — e.g., as '''merchants' money-capital''', as '''usurers money-capital", if also as «latifundia» slave-worked plantation agricultural productive capital, etc.

But this new, ... [«Kapitals» -- M.D.] «species» — its burgeoning population, or «arithmos», of ...[«Kapitals» -- M.D.] «monads», or '''units''', of '''Money-Capitals''' — soon out-self-reproduced & dominated the population, or «arithmos», of the «monads» ['''units'''] of the ... [Monies -- M.D.] «genos», at such a rate and to such an extent that the new ...[«Kapitals» -- M.D.] «arithmos» became, 'psycho-historically' — in the minds, in the memes — of the humans who animate it, ever since, a new «genos»-«arithmos» in its own right; a [new, higher, qualitatively different, socio-ontologically-different] 'gen'-eralization of the Monies exchange-value «genos».

Indeed, this irruption of the new 'meristemal' «Kapitals» «genos» [re-]acted back upon, 're-fluxed upon', its predecessor «gene», initially only subsuming
those predecessor «gene» '''formally''', by virtue of ...[«Kapitals» -- M.D.]-mediated, mercantile, Money-buying and Money-selling of '''Commodity-Capital''', and the extraction of ['''usurious''' rates of] interest as the "price" for borrowing Money, mercantile Capital, having become the new, leading, 'meristemal' paradigm of human social-relations-of-production, and of human social-forces-of-production, praxis.

But, eventually, that new «genos» '''really''' subsumed its predecessor «gene»; it largely '''appropriated'' and '''hybridized with''' those predecessor «gene», yielding "complex unity" 'socio-ontology', as exemplified in the emergence of the 'praxes' of the mercantile offering of products produced in non-household production facilities, owned and provisioned by merchant/manufacturer capitalists, buying labor-capability as if '''just another''' Commodity-supply for their production facilities, from labor-capability sellers/'''alienators''', just as they bought, as Commodities, raw materials and tools for those same production facilities, from other merchant/manufacturer capitalists; in the emergence of 'praxes' of the production of "raw" extractions from extra-human Nature as Commodity-Capital on the same basis, by merchant/manufacturer capitalists, instead of by, e.g., family-producers, seeking merely supplementary Monies for their own consumption-needs, needs not met by their own household production directly, but not seeking self-expanding «Kapital»-value, ever-expanding via profit, by means of exchange of their '''mere''' Commodities for Monies, and in other such new human social phenomena, which are denoted, collectively, in the [U]Encyclopedia Dialectica notation, by "hybrid terms"/'socio-ontological qualifiers' such as ... .


Therefore, we also expect that, immediately after its irruption from out of ...[the <<Kapitals arithmos>> -- M.D.], that the new «species» of equity of the human-social-relations-of-production ontology of 'generalized equity', denoted herein by ..., will enter into a "formal subsumption" of the entire predecessor, already partially «Kapitals»-subsumed ... 'socio-ontology', due to its new, ...[Generalized Equity -- M.D.] 'social-relations logic' having become the new leading, 'meristemal' paradigm of human-social relations-of-production, and of human-social forces-of-production, praxis.

However, with time, later, we expect this new, now ...[Generalized -- M.D.] «genos» of '''generalized equity''', developing as a new, higher, qualitatively different, socio-ontologically-different 'gen'-eralization of the «Kapital»-equity «genos», to '''really''' subsume all of its predecessor «gene», especially the «Kapital»-subsumed «gene»; to largely '''appropriate'' and '''hybridize with''' those predecessor «gene», yielding new, "complex unity" 'socio-ontology', as epitomized by the Encyclopedia Dialectica notation "hybrid term"/'socio-ontological qualifier' for the 'culminant' socio-ontological category, ... .

The latter denotes the 'real subsumption' of the entire, decadent, '''real domination of «Kapital»''', «Kapitals»-system by the new human-social relation-of-production of 'gen-eralized equity', as denoted by ...:

...

That is, this ... 'meta-model' anticipates, in "meta-fractal" analogy with, and in continuity/consistency with, all of these earlier 'meta-evolutionary' and 'meta-system' transitions identified in this 'meta-model', the dialectical, «aufheben» 'annulment-cum-elevation-cum-conservation' of the "capital-relation", via an appropriate 'containment' of, or 'self-internalization' by, and [self-]subsumption / "real domination" of Capital within, the 'meta-monadologically' higher social principle of 'Generalized Equity', as sketched above.



The Emergence of a Fourth, Economic Branch of Democratic Econo-Political Social Governance, in Sustained Quadruple Power with the Earlier Three, Political Branches

This 'meta-model' envisions the retention and conservation / transformation of the three traditional branches of political government, into a complex, conflictual, and conflicts-conserving unity of sustained quadruple-power with, and «vis-a-vis», the new, 'economic-democratic' fourth branch, thus yet further generalizing the stabilized, conflicts-conserving, checks-and-balances-delivering complex unity of the earlier-emerged, three, political branches.

It also envisions the subordination, but not the absolute dissolution, of the capital-principle.

Thus, is the plutocratic, oligopoly/monopoly-capital-principle expected to be blocked, by popular power, from any longer attempting to organize, and to subjugate, the global social totality.

A higher and democratic, humanistic, 'justitial' principle of social ordering supersedes Capital in that role: the principle of 'Generalized Equity'.

But the latter principle allows the capital-principle, e.g., of price-competition and competition for customer-adherence, to persist in operation where it best orchestrates the extant hybridization, or complex unity, of genomic and/with '''phenomic''' human nature, providing vitally neededeconomic checks & balances that private-monopoly and state-monopoly economic governance so devastatingly lack. . . . [this connects to another of the proposed "Generalized Equity" institutions, that named "Citizen Stewardship Equity", by which the non-capital-owning majority gain democratic access to the means of [social re-]production]."




For full article, see –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm


For more about the proposed detailed workings of 'Citizen Externality Equity' Rights, see Section 2 in –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf)

(http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm)




Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
2nd December 2011, 06:00
Principles of Social Equity, II.: Citizen Birthright Equity [as propounded by the E.A.G., the Equitist Advocacy Group]

CITIZEN BIRTHRIGHT EQUITY: A KEY ELEMENT IN THE POLITICAL-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY SOLUTION TO THE PRESENTLY-UNFOLDING GLOBAL CRISIS OF HUMANITY.



RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Below is my edited version -- edited for clarity -- of an E.A.G. text on the topic of their proposed Citizen Birthright Equity human-social-constitutional principle:






"CITIZEN BIRTHRIGHT EQUITY.

The principle of the human-social generalization, or humanity-wide “universalization”, of equity-holding, to all social citizens, and of an “onto-dynamasis” beyond the kinds of such equity presently in existence, to birth new kinds -- e.g., including “Externality Equity” — the heart and «arché» of the new “human-social-ontology” whose totality the E.A.G. denotes by E successor[/B] human-social system to the present, globally-failing [state-]capitalist system: the successor system that is founded upon what the E.A.G. calls the “Generalized Equity” social relation of production -- M.D.], denoting the new, Capital-transcending social relation of [social re-]production — does not end with the collective, public-democratic “property-ization” of “externality equities” as described in my previous post.

It extends as well to the social generalization of the proprietorship, [I]initially, of “internality equities” – capital equity stock and other traditional capital assets -- by all citizens, by means of a policy of “Citizen Birthright Equity Endowments” per an amended, expanded, “constitutionalized” Bill of Social Rights & Responsibilities.

This new «species» of equity – Citizen Birthright Equity -- also flows from principles of “human-social risk management”, of “economic-systemic-risk management”, and of “human-social self-investment”.

It means that every child born into “Equitarian Society”, is granted, «ipso jure», at birth, by virtue of fundamental constitutional right, a taxes-funded/social-rents-funded equal sum of capital equity stock, comprised, initially, of small portions of all publicly-issued stocks, bonds, and other capital assets meeting legislated standards, as well as, more and more, of extant social property income streams, designed as an integrated social/individual risk management trust-fund, and as a unified, “omni-portable”, globally-portable “social safety net”, as a socially-constrained individual property of every new-born citizen.

This new constitutional right, in this sense, makes every baby born into human society a ‘‘‘trust-fund baby’’’.



[The slavish mentality drummed into the minds of many people by the capitalist plutocracy's mass media, and by their general ideologies-manufacturing operations, and by their submissiveness-maintenance operations, preconditions the response, to this proposal, and to any similar proposals, for many, to: "WE JUST CAN'T AFFORD" any such principle.

Only crumbs from the Lords' Tables go to the commoners!

Well, "we" can apparently "afford" TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS in unlimited bailouts for the Big Pig Wall Street Banks!

“We” evidently can “afford” handing over the U. S. Taxpayers’ U. S. Treasury – the wages and salaries repossessed via taxes by the ruling class from their workers’ incomes -- to the very swine who carried out the plutocracy's planned global economic collapse, to help these swine to consolidate even further their concentrated ownership of U. S. banking, by buying-out – with taxpayer dollars – their former, smaller competitors, who they also bankrupted via their collapse-engineering, as their reward for service to that plutocracy; the very swine who confiscated the home-purchase down-payments of millions of Americans, and who drove millions of Americans out of their homes, and on to the streets, who robbed millions of Americans of their life savings, of their pensions, of their 401(k) assets; who shipped our factories and our jobs overseas -- all so that they can use the money we pay in taxes to pay for their flagrantly-exorbitant bonuses, and to lobby BRIBE[/B]] Congress and the Executive branch to pass no laws or regulations that would prevent them from committing the same massive crimes, and the same massive theft, all over again, next time on an even larger scale, and to lobby BRIBE[/B]] the judiciary to render no rulings or convictions that would hold them accountable for their massive crimes against humanity, as well as to pay for the elephantiasis of the "Defense" Budget, so that Halliburton and the rest of the Oil/Military-Industrial Complex can continue useless, stealthy-genocidal wars, to rape both the U. S. Taxpayers, and the peoples of the "Third World" -- a "Third World" that they and their hired servant-dictators created as such in the first place!

"We" can apparently “afford” TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS to finance such utter waste and such utter social toxicity and criminality.

BUT – NO! –“WE” CAN NEVER “AFFORD” TO DO SOMETHING TRULY OMNI-BENEFICIAL WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS -- like use part of them to give every child born a real chance in life!

The trouble with slaves, in terms of their own good,[I] is that they tend to develop a slave mentality: the only thing that they ever think can be "afforded" is more "caviar" for their slave-masters.

Such slaves may go ahead and “live” on their knees, kissing slave-master-butt, for all of their "lives", if that is their masters' "preference" -- thus “validating” the “marginal utility” of their slave masters' “theory of marginal utility”.

Others would rather “kick slave-master butt”, and “throw the baggage out”! -- M.D.]



Citizen Birthright Equity means per capita citizen [I]net [I]assets, in place of today's plutocracy-mandated, malignantly growing per capita citizen net liabilities; the share of each citizen in plutocracy-incurred public debt [a way by which the plutocratic minority finances its destructive imperial enterprises and their required '''permanent war economy''' via taxes – in fact, by legislatively-coerced consumption, foisted upon the non-super-rich majority by the plutocracy and its abject prostitutes, the “politicians” who serve that plutocracy’s every whim, and who never wittingly serve the public, the majority of the electorate, as they are pledged to do].



* Moral Hazard Mitigations. The mitigation of the massive "moral hazard" potential of this proposed Citizen Birthright Equity social policy will require that there be many "strings attached", restricting the uses of this public investment in each citizen-person by that person, and by various parents or guardians and heirs of that person, at various stages of that person's expected life-history, and beyond. Each social equity-endowment trust-fund must therefore remain a partially-social property; a legislatively-constrained, “statutorially”-constrained, only-partially-individual/-personal/-private property.



* Principles of Universalized Inheritance and of Universalized Birth-Advantage. This policy of “universal advantage” / “universal inheritance” / “social inheritance” -- of the “universalization” of capital/equity ownership / social property ownership / inheritance as a partial remedy for the viciously self-amplifying hyper-inequalities of plutocratic-minority capital-advantage and capital-privilege; a ‘‘‘social risk management’’’ policy designed to achieve an «aufheben»-negation of some of the socially-recognized systemic risks of the predecessor, «Kapitals»-system -- envisions a unification of the fragmented and otherwise inadequate – inadequate in quality and in quantity -- «Kapital»-epoch legacy of “social safety net” provisions.



If not, in the beginning, birthing every baby with a “golden spoon”, or even with a “silver spoon”, in her or his mouth, every baby would be born with at least a “stainless steel spoon in his or her mouth".

These unified provisions would address the management of the risk of the «aufheben»-“contained” but also of the «aufheben»-“retained” elements of capital-profit-based economics, plus of the new, Equitarian system, as well as of the universal risks of which human social life is, generically, in all human epochs, the heir.



Under the constitutional requirement of Citizen Birthright Equity, human society’s collective portion of equal initial social investment in each individual citizen, by social right of birth [as distinct from the presently persisting, vastly unequal family investment in / inheritance of each child, resulting from, e.g., the unequal fruits of achievements, and/or of “robber-baron” robberies, by that child’s ancestors], and the partially age-based, and tests-of-knowledge-based, constitutionally- and legislatively-restricted allocation of each child’s birth-right equity trust-fund to use-access for that citizen, would be legislatively designed to meet the expected, standard costs of foreseeable life-history events, including --

* Basic Education -- primary school, trade-school, college, professional, and basic ‘‘‘life-long learning’’’/ re-training in the event of radical skills-obsolescence/skills-“techno-depreciation”, etc.;

* Major Medical Care -- for "normal", plus for at least some classes of "catastrophic", illnesses;

* Initial Home Purchase -- down-payment assistance for young adult first home acquisition;

* Entrepreneurship Opportunity -- public “venture capital” funding for first small business launch [for businesses launching below the legislated threshold employee-count at which Citizen Stewardship Equity requirements begin to apply], or for first producers-cooperative launch [for those aspects of such launch costs that are constitutionally, or “statutorially”, not fundable by social bank grant -- whether social-rent-payment-requiring or not -- to qualified Citizen Stewardship Equity producer cooperative start-ups];

* Unemployment Insurance -- for cases of economic downturns, producers-cooperative bankruptcies, etc.;

* Re-Training -- for redressing “techno-depreciation”, or “technological obsolescence-depreciation”, of ‘‘‘human capital’’’, or for funding acquisition of that minimum level of “human skills-negentropy” needed to qualify for Citizen Stewardship Equity producers’ cooperatives opportunities;

* Retirement -- partially replacing [the increasingly plutocracy-gutted] employer pension, employer 401(k), personal IRA, and Social Security programs.



Costs of social failures by the individual -- e.g., of welfare livelihood-support in the cases of extended, perhaps non-economic-downturn-induced unemployment, or of incarceration costs in cases of criminal conviction(s) -- would be borne out of that citizen’s Citizen Birthright Equity trust fund, up to its near-exhaustion, thus also forming a further dis-incentive to such failures.

[Economic downturns may continue to occur, irregularly, during the period of the ‘‘‘formal domination’’’, or of the merely ‘‘‘formal subsumption’’’, of the capital social-relation-of-production by the rest of the emergent social-relation-of-production of “Generalized Equity”. However, any immanent social processes described in terms of a ‘‘‘social dynamical law’’’ of such downturns is expected to be increasingly ‘‘socio-ontologically’’ distinct from the immanent social process which drives the iterated irruption, with ever-escalating amplitude, of escalating-duration periods of contracted social reproduction within the “descendant-phase” sub-epoch of the ‘‘‘real domination’’’ of, and of the more or less exclusive social rule of, the “capital-relation”, and of its agents and personifications, the concentrated-capital-owning plutocracy.].



This unification, with each citizen as cost-concerned customer, given the “voucher-like” personal stake of each citizen in the conservation, and expansion, of the principal of each one's Citizen Birthright Equity social trust-fund, would “re-marketize” social welfare provision, and “re-competitivize” the pricing of medical and other social welfare services, and, thus, “re-incentivize” the exercise of cost-efficiency and cost-discipline in their production, de-incenting the “take it for granted” moral hazard of present, “free-of-charge”, state-bureaucracy-produced, or state-bureaucracy-subsidized, ‘‘‘social welfare’’’ provisions.



The policy of “Citizen Birthright Equity Endowment” of every citizen-child raises questions of the disposition of such endowments in the event of termination of pregnancy, averting the birth of a new citizen, by right of the mother.

Parents must not be “ incentivized” to ‘‘‘profit’’’ monetarily from their children’s social trust-funds, though, even so, the financial worries and burdens of parenthood would be significantly mitigated by this policy, even countervailing against the extreme amplification of the “demographic transition” presently evident, in part, in advanced capitalist nations’ growing tendency toward negative rates of human population growth [as one moment of their growing tendency of “contracted social reproduction”].

The “Citizen Birthright Equity” policy would not constitute a direct financial incentive to never abort a fetus.

However, the high social valuation of each and every life implicit in social adoption of this Citizen Birthright Equity policy suggests a certain social resolution to the prevailing “right-of-choice” versus “right-of-life” social conundrum, a conundrum which presently forms an apparent antinomy, but which we see, rather, as yet another dialectical “self-antithesis”, or “self-duality”, within the prevailing social concept of right, one which cries out for immanent critique.

This “intra-duality” has been opportunistically exploited, manipulated, and amplified — in anti-dialectical, rigid, frozen, mutually-absolutist “either-vs.-or” fashion — by the “Meta-Nazi” plutocracy’s “ideologies-engineering” operations, so as to foster and reinforce the protracted social strife of both sides of a diametrically opposed, antagonistic, seemingly “irreconcilable” social antithesis, thus serving as yet one further tool for the “Meta-Nazis’ ” ideology-based divide-and-conquer subjugation of the majority -- of the “producer-class”: the public. ...".



For full article, see –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm


For more about the proposed detailed workings of 'Citizen Birthright Equity' Rights, see Section 4 in –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf)



Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
4th December 2011, 18:01
Principles of Trans-Capitalist, Social Equity, III.: [I]Citizen Stewardship Equity [as propounded by the E.A.G., the Equitist Advocacy Group]

CITIZEN STEWARDSHIP EQUITY: A KEY FEATURE OF THE POLITICAL-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY SOLUTION TO THE GLOBAL CRISIS OF HUMANITY, NOW UNDERWAY




RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

Below is my edited excerpt – edited for greater clarity – from a text by the Equitist Advocacy Group [E.A.G.] on their proposed new constitutional principle of Citizen Stewardship Equity.


CITIZEN STEWARDSHIP EQUITY

"Citizen Stewardship Equity, supersedes the "wage-labor", '''sold labor-power''', or '''alienated labor[-power]''' relation of/that is the core of, real-dominant] capital.

It encompasses the constitutional rights of each working adult, to membership in, and 1-person/1-vote 'economic suffrage' within, the 'producers' councils', or 'stewards' councils', democratically managing the socially-/legally-/constitutionally-favored producer's cooperative enterprises, and including the right to share in the profits-of-enterprise of any producers' cooperative in which that citizen works, with partial rights of use / disposition over the socially-owned means of social reproduction ceded, in stewardship, but not in local ownership, to these producers' cooperatives / local producers' associations, under the collective/democratic control of their base-elected 'stewards' councils', in continuous negotiation with these enterprises' own 'externality-equities' property-holding 'publics' boards', as part of Equitarian Society's «aufheben»-negation / conservation / elevation of market-based checks-and-balances regarding the pricing and quality of the goods/services supplied to the citizen-consumers by these enterprises, using equitably-allocated, socially-owned means of social reproduction.



This newly-emergent 'Stewardship-Equity-relation' is expected and intended to increasingly supplant the likewise «aufheben»-conserved/constrained '''wage-labor''' / private-capital social-relationship-of-production [cf. the model of "Economic Democracy" comprehensively constructed and defended by David Schweickart in his book Against Capitalism [Cambridge University Press, NY: 1993], as well as in his book After Capitalism [Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., NY: 2002], to which we are indebted, in part, for key aspects of the conceptual derivation of this crucial sub-principle, and 'socio-ontological «species»', or 'social relations of production «species»', of 'generalized equity'].
. . .



Marx : Joint-Stock Capital-Equity as the Perfected Form of Capital, Transitional to 'Democratic Communism'

In the context of this subject-matter, it is profoundly informative to see what Marx actually had to say, in the very core of his written works, about the immanent emergence — from out of the heart of the capital-relation itself — of the core social relation of production of 'democratic communist' society, in the transition from capital-relation-based society to 'democratic communist' society, in Capital, volume III. --

"The general remarks, which the credit system so far elicited from us, were the following: ...

III. Formation of stock companies. Thereby: ...

3) Transformation of the actually functioning capitalist into a mere manager, administrator of other people's capital, and of the owner of capital into a mere owner, a mere money-capitalist.

Even if the dividends which they receive include the interest and the profit of enterprise, i.e., the total profit (for the salary of managers is, or should be, simply the wage of a specific type of skilled labour, whose price is regulated in the labour-market like that of any other labour), this total profit is henceforth received only in the form of interest, i.e., as mere compensation for owning capital that is now entirely divorced from the function in the actual process of reproduction, just as this function in the person of the manager is divorced from ownership of capital. ...

In stock companies the function is divorced from capital ownership, hence also labour is entirely divorced from ownership of means of production and surplus-labour.

This result of the ultimate development of capitalist production is a necessary transitional phase towards the reconversion of capital into the property of producers, although no longer as the private property of the individual producers, but rather as the property of associated producers, as outright social property.

On the other hand, the stock company is a transition toward the conversion of all functions in the reproduction process which still remain linked with capitalist property, into mere functions of the associated producers, into social functions.

This is the abolition [one-sided translation of the German core-"dialectical" word «aufheben» -- M.D.] of the capitalist mode of production within the capitalist mode of production itself, and hence a self-dissolving contradiction, which «prima facie» represents a mere phase of transition to a new form of production.

It manifests itself as such a contradiction in its effects.

It establishes a monopoly in certain spheres and thereby requires state interference.

It reproduces a new financial aristocracy, a new variety of parasites in the shape of promoters, speculators, and simply nominal directors; a whole system of swindling and cheating by means of corporation promoting, stock issuance, and stock speculation.

It is private production without the control of private property. ...

The co-operative factories of the labourers themselves represent within the old form the first sprouts of the new, although they naturally reproduce, and must reproduce, everywhere in their actual organization all the shortcomings of the prevailing system.

But the antithesis between capital and labour is overcome within them, if at first only by way of making the associated labourers into their own capitalist, i.e., by enabling them to use the means of production for the employment of their own labour [the E.A.G. names this transitional form 'workers' capital[ism]' -- M.D.].

They show how a new mode of production naturally grows out of an old one, when the development of the material forces of production and of the corresponding forms of social production have reached a particular stage. Without the factory system arising out of the capitalist mode of production there could have been no co-operative factories.

Nor could these have developed without the credit system arising out of the same mode of production.

The credit system is not only the principal basis for the gradual transformation of capitalist enterprises into capitalist stock companies, but equally offers the means for the gradual extension of co-operative enterprises on a more or less national scale. ...

The capitalist stock companies, as much as the co-operative factories, should be considered transitional forms from the capitalist mode of production to the associated one, with the only distinction that the antagonism is resolved negatively in the one, and positively in the other. ...

The credit system appears as the main lever of over-production and over-speculation in commerce solely because the reproduction process, which is elastic by nature, is here forced to its extreme limits, and is so forced because a large part of the social capital is employed by people who do not own it, and who consequently tackle things quite differently than the owner, who anxiously weighs the limitations of his private capital in so far as he handles it himself.

This simply demonstrates the fact that the self-expansion of capital based on the contradictory nature of capitalist production permits an actual free development only up to a certain point, so that in fact it constitutes an immanent fetter and barrier to production, which is continually broken through by the credit system.

Hence, the credit system accelerates the material development of the productive forces and the establishment of the world-market.

It is the historical mission of the capitalist system of production to raise the material foundations of the new mode of production to a certain degree of perfection.

At the same time credit accelerates the violent eruption of this contradiction — crises — and thereby the elements of disintegration of the old mode of production.

The two characteristics immanent in the credit system are, on the one hand, to develop the incentive of capitalist production, enrichment through the exploitation of the labour of others, to the purest and most colossal form of gambling and swindling, and to reduce more and more the number of the few who exploit the social wealth; on the other hand, to constitute the form of transition to a new mode of production.

It is this ambiguous nature, which endows the principal spokesmen of credit from Law to Isaac Pereire with the pleasant character mixture of swindler and prophet."

[Karl Marx; Capital: A Critique of Political Economy [vol. III], '''The Shapes Taken-On by the Reproductions-Process of/by Capitals Overall''', Chapter XXVII, "The Role of Credit in Capitalist Production", International Publishers Co., Inc. [NY: 1967], pages 435-441]


In a letter to Engels [Marx to Engels; April 2, 1858, in MEW 29, page 312, reproduced in Rubel on Marx: Five Essays, Cambridge University Press [NY: 1981], page 216, emphasis added by M.D.], Marx writes of the planned structure of his critique of the political economy of the system of «kapitals», with even greater explicitude regarding the transitional character of the emergence of the "share capital" «species», i.e. the "capital equity stock" «species», of the social relation of [social re-]production called "capital" --

"Capital is divided into four sections.

1. Capital en général (This is the material of the first brochure).

2. Competition or the reciprocal action of the many capitals.

3. Credit, where capital appears as the general element in opposition to the many capitals.



4. [I]Share capital as the most perfect form (assuming the character of communism), together with all its contradictions."


What are we to make of these positings, by Marx, of capital equity stock, and of its '''shareholder democracy''', or '''stockholder democracy''', as a close kin to '''the associated mode of production''', and to "communism"?



An Historical Helix of Human-Social Democratization, Spanning the Epoch of Capital as Dominant Human-Social Relation of Production

The incipient political democracy and civil liberty that early, competitive, ascendant-phase capitalism asserted, initially against its feudal and Absolute-Monarchical rivals, can only be restored in a higher form, and preserved from otherwise total destruction by the late, decadent-phase form of that same capitalism, by means of advancing that initially merely political democracy to a politically-and-economically democratized, actualized democratic political-economy.

We hold that the way to achieve this begins with an extension and generalization of "stockholder democracy" into '''stakeholder democracy''', in a "publics" sense; that is, by way of a constitutional institutionalization of Equitarian, externality-equities-based economic democracy; a public and popular economic democracy that was absent as such throughout the capital epoch, seeded only in that democracy among capitalists — among the holders/owners of 'internality-equity' — immanent in the principles and practices [however often honored in the breach] of joint-stock company "stockholder democracy"."



SUMMARY OF 'STEWARDSHIP EQUITY', ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.

'Citizen Stewardship Equity' is designed to gradually supplant and supersede the capital-relation, by superseding the wagéd-labor and salaried-labor relationships, the latter, forming the core of the capital-relation.

This new «species» of social equity rights entails the constitutional empowerment of each citizen to participate in the co-formation of, and the democratic, 'one steward, one vote' co-conduct of the production and of the democratic self-management of, localized, enterprise-level, associations of producers on a 'one citizen, one vote' basis.

This means that each such citizen-producer would be empowered to act as a co-steward of that part of the total social property — in the form of, e.g., production plant and equipment — granted, and '''rented''', to that citizen's
 qualified producer-association, as collective self-employer, by a local, public, social bank, itself also a[I] 'Citizen Stewardship Equity' co-stewardship association/cooperative, democratically self-managed by its own citizen-producers, as collective self-employees.

This 'Citizen Stewardship Equity' right would include the right of each such citizen co-steward of such social property in-use to an equal share in the net profits of enterprise generated by that cooperative association of producers, as well as to a — perhaps unequal — base-salary in return for the collectively required productive participation in, and contribution to, that association for production, as democratically decided by the assembly of the co-stewards of that cooperative enterprise.

Payment of those profit-shares and base-salaries to themselves by those co-stewards, would depend upon their productive contribution, and also upon their collective success in finding fellow-citizen customers for their product/service output, fellow-citizens/customers willing to pay a price sufficient to fund that salary and that profit-sharing, and for whose patronage they would face competition from other socialized stewardship cooperatives, as well as from remnant capitalist enterprises."




For full article, see –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm


For more about the detailed workings of 'Citizen Stewardship Equity' Rights, see Section 5 in –

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf (http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf)




Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
8th December 2011, 20:17
Principles of Political-Economic Democracy, IV.: Citizen Allocational Equity

CITIZEN ALLOCATIONAL EQUITY -- KEY COMPONENT OF EQUITARIAN NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONS



RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

CITIZEN ALLOCATIONAL EQUITY

Via unison with the new constitutional principles, rights, and properties, of --

(1.) CITIZEN EXTERNALITY EQUITY,
(2.) CITIZEN BIRTHRIGHT EQUITY, and
(3.) CITIZEN STEWARDSHIP EQUITY,

-- the new constitutional equity principle of --

(4.) CITIZEN ALLOCATIONAL EQUITY

-- constitutes a key component of the proposed new political-economic system -- of the system of POLITICAL-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY --
that is the predicted successor system to the present, self-destroying Capital-Equity-Only system of increasingly anti-democratic political economy.


This proposed constitutional principle of "CITIZEN ALLOCATIONAL EQUITY" may be summarized as follows --

"Citizen Allocational Equity, social principle, and the social policy, of equitable regional-geographical allocation of social property — of socially/publicly-owned means of social reproduction resources/funding — on a «per capita», or per human person, basis."


Some greater detail regarding this principle follows [edited for clarity by M.D.] --


"Truly equitable distribution of, e.g., the public assets ceded, from the stock of global social property, in stewardship, to local andregional [I]Citizen Stewardship Equity producers' associations, may involve, especially initially, from the point of view of the internationally base-elected A.I.D.P. [«Association Internationale des Directeurs Publiques»], compensatory and reparative elements, until the injustices of past capitalist-imperialist social auto-cannibalization of the capital-hinterland and former "Second World" and "Third World" regions of the globe has been adequately redressed .

Such allocative equity, in any case, involves the solution of presently unsolved — and hardly even posed — problems of 'social-negentropy accounting' in the context of a 'meta-market' social system, in which mere monetary-valuations provide an even more inadequate metric of 'social-reproductive use-value' than they do now, still within the integument of the "capital-relation".

The nature of [I]'Citizen Allocational Equity' is thus that of an historical equity-principle, which targets an "ideal" of equal «per capita» regional allocation of socially-owned social negentropy, but which entails recognition that such an ideal standard becomes relevant only once an "equipotential" among all regions of the globe has been achieved with regard to life-opportunities.

There will be a role for the constitutionally and juridically regulated and monitored 'Declarations of Peace and Prosperity' — replacing, and hopefully preempting and obviating the whole history of "Declarations of War", up to today — adopted by one global region, with respect to another, as part of the process of achieving the necessary compensatory and reparative allocations that constitute '''the correction of the past''' in terms of wealth- and resource-sharing.

Such 'Declarations', and, even more so, their implementation, involves subtle applications of a mastery of human-social science — of the science of the catalysis of accelerated human-social self-development — that are all but beyond the ken of our current, capital-compromised and capital corrupted civilization.

These 'Declarations' might involve something of what Marx envisioned, with respect to Russia, and with respect to the Russian Mir [village community], '''given a successful proletarian revolution in the West''', in his Preface to the Russian edition of Capital (volume I), and in his draft letters of response to Vera Zasulich."



For a fuller definition and discussion, see --

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion.htm

[especially Sub-Sections 5.c. & 5.d. in]. --

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf




Regards,

Miguel

Miguel Detonnaciones
26th April 2012, 15:49
RevLeft Theory Forum Participants,

The Equitist Advocacy Group has recently added a "Preamble" to their proposed "Constitutional Annex" for the establishment of Equitist "Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY" --

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/AmendmentXXVIII/AmendmentXXVIII.pdf

-- and have also updated their "Open Letter to Occupy Wall Street and the Global Movement of Assemblies" --

http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/OpenLetter-NumberOne/OpenLetter-NumberOne.pdf


Regards,

Miguel