Log in

View Full Version : Tea Party: reinstate DADT and we accept debt raise



Sasha
10th May 2011, 00:43
Tea Party Leader: We'll Take The Debt Ceiling Hike If You Put Gay Troops Back In The Closet

Evan McMorris-Santoro (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/evan_mcmorris-santoro/2011/05/08-week/) | May 9, 2011, 1:05PM



20digg

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2011/05/william-temple-new-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg
William Temple, Chairman of the Tea Party Founding Fathers

Read More

Debt Ceiling (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/debt-ceiling/), Don't Ask, Don't Tell (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/), Tea Party (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/tea-party/)
Share

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/twitter-button.png (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/twitter_share.php?url=http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/tea-party-leader-well-take-the-debt-ceiling-hike-if-you-bring-back-dadt.php) http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/FarkItButton2_16x16.gif (http://www.fark.com/cgi/farkit.pl?u=http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/tea-party-leader-well-take-the-debt-ceiling-hike-if-you-bring-back-dadt.php&h=Tea%20Party%20Leader:%20We%5C%27ll%20Take%20The% 20Debt%20Ceiling%20Hike%20If%20You%20Put%20Gay%20T roops%20Back%20In%20The%20Closet) http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/reddit-button.png (http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/tea-party-leader-well-take-the-debt-ceiling-hike-if-you-bring-back-dadt.php&title=Tea%20Party%20Leader%3A%20We%27ll%20Take%20T he%20Debt%20Ceiling%20Hike%20If%20You%20Put%20Gay% 20Troops%20Back%20In%20The%20Closet) http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/sendtofriend-noicon.gif


The two sides of the debate over whether the tea party is at heart a socially conservative movement or a fiscally conservative one smashed together Monday morning at a press conference in Washington, where a tea party leader told reporters he'd be willing to accept a bump in the debt ceiling if Republicans promise to put an end to "military effeminzation."
Speakers from the Cato Institute's Dan Mitchell (http://www.cato.org/people/daniel-mitchell) to a man dressed as George Washington (http://twitpic.com/4vi5cn) to Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) -- who sent a written statement that was read aloud -- told a small crowd of reporters that House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and his GOP leadership team were ignoring their tea party mandate by supporting an increase in the federal debt limit. They called on Republicans in the House to attach strict spending riders onto any deal they make with an Obama administration desperate to avoid government default.
For Bachmann, no less than the "complete defunding of Obamacare" would do. For others, a total spending freeze and a small, short-term limit increase was acceptable, provided it came with guarantees of deep spending cuts. For Tea Party Founding Fathers chairman William Temple, a reinstatement of Don't Ask, Don't Tell and keeping women out of combat roles would also be acceptable.
Temple, who addressed the audience in his trademark colonial garb, is organzing the Tea Party Freedom Jamboree (http://www.freedomjamboree.com/) this fall in Kansas City. He railed against Boehner and the GOP leadership in his speech, calling them "wimpy RINOs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_In_Name_Only)" and even attacked Rep. Paul Ryan's (R-WI) Medicare-destroying plan (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/house-republicans-pass-plan-to-erode-medicare-medicaid.php) passed by the House last month as a "so-called 'courageous' budget"
Temple is 100% opposed to raising the debt ceiling, and said that how members vote on the issue will be the sole item on the tea party scorecard when it comes to rating candidates in 2012. Vote for the increase, you get a zero. Vote against it, you get a 100. Apparently it's that simple.
But even Temple said he understood a compromise might be coming. So he offered a long list of things the Republicans could do that would lead the "tea party movement as a whole" to "possibly forgive Boehner and the House Republicans a small bump in the debt limit."
On the list was keeping the front lines of America's wars as free of openly gay people and women of any sexual leaning as possible.
Temple said that "if the House Armed Services Committee and the Pentagon slow down on injecting open homosexuality and females into forward combat roles," tea partiers might be able to put up with their new Republican House voting to ensure American government services are paid for with more borrowed cash.
Temple's line of reasoning:

When the Pentagon's own studies show that military effeminization may have an extremely costly impact on recruiting and retention, when Islamists have shown their willingness to sexually brutalize American female reporters, why would John Boehner's House Republicans be caving to political correctness? Why would House Republicans who know better be fostering inappropriate attractions in the intimacy of tents, bunks, barracks, platoons, subs, tanks, convoys, cockpits, latrines, showers, toilets and locker rooms when we are fighting wars in three Muslim nations? The speakers spent most of their time talking debt limit, but Temple wasn't the only one to bring up DADT. Rev. C.L. Bryant, a Louisiana tea party chapter founder, former Garland, TX NAACP president and filmmaker (http://www.runawayslavemovie.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=130&Itemid=430), also connected his attacks on Boehner and company to DADT. He said the repeal of the policy banning gays and lesbians from serving openly was "not prudent," according to military leaders (in fact, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was a proponent (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-6166493-503544.html) of ending the policy before it was repealed last year.)
"What is the point of having the stick that we gave you if you're not going to protect the interests of the American people?" Bryant said. "Also, we send this message to those who have in fact spoken about changing the very nature and the very reason our Army protects this country and the principles that have guided it."
Bob Vander Plaats, who ran hard for tea party support in his failed bid for the Republican gubernatorial nomination in Iowa last year and has tried to emerge as a presidential kingmaker (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/01/2012-gopers-lining-up-for-iowa-conservative-lecture-series.php) since, said in response to a question from TPM that it made sense to tie DADT repeal to the debt ceiling fight.
"It's a ripple effect," he said. "When you start going away from core value issues, the ripple effect leads right to economic issues as well."
"If you tell me where you're at, say on the sanctity of marriage or on some core value issues," Vander Plaats explained, "I'll tell you where you're at on economic policy."



source: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/tea-party-leader-well-take-the-debt-ceiling-hike-if-you-bring-back-dadt.php?ref=fpb

agnixie
10th May 2011, 01:01
The tea party, as everyone knows, stands for freedom. Freedom and bread ;)

I'm thoroughly unsurprised that they would gamble the world economy for culture wars bullshit.

Sasha
10th May 2011, 02:10
Ah well, if they think people hate homos more than debt they haven't been paying attention to the polls recently. More than 50% of us citizens support gay marriage, more than 80s the end of dadt.
But Yeah, an bigot always stays an bigot.

Os Cangaceiros
10th May 2011, 02:18
Certainly puts the lie to the claim that there isn't a strong social conservative streak to the Tea Party. :rolleyes: Right, it's all just about debt and spending...

Ocean Seal
11th May 2011, 01:11
I thought that these guys stood for freedom, especially in such free loving entities like the American military? Freedom for who exactly?

thesadmafioso
11th May 2011, 01:42
Well, he is dressed in what appears to be a revolutionary war era colonist costume, which certainly adds to his legitimacy as a speaker.

GPDP
11th May 2011, 02:01
Well, he is dressed in what appears to be a revolutionary war era colonist costume, which certainly adds to his legitimacy as a speaker.

Yeah, say what you will about tankies with a Soviet paraphernalia fetish, but at least those costumes look kinda cool.

agnixie
11th May 2011, 04:20
Well, he is dressed in what appears to be a revolutionary war era colonist costume, which certainly adds to his legitimacy as a speaker.

Not enough wig, not enough makeup ;)

Tim Finnegan
12th May 2011, 04:16
Not enough wig, not enough makeup ;)
Actually, early bourgeois Americans (and those who aspired to be bourgeois Americans) garnered a reputation for frequently going wigless, to the shock and horror of the European nobility. It was seen as pretty much the 1790s equivalent of Che going about with a scruffy beard and long hair. ;)

agnixie
12th May 2011, 04:28
Actually, early bourgeois Americans (and those who aspired to be bourgeois Americans) garnered a reputation for frequently going wigless, to the shock and horror of the European nobility. It was seen as pretty much the 1790s equivalent of Che going about with a scruffy beard and long hair. ;)

Shocking!

I admit it's easier to look sharp in soviet uniform than in a crappy imitation of 18th century clothes though :p