Aspiring Humanist
8th May 2011, 02:34
(This wasn't recent but I found it today and thought it was interesting)
http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/15200739657.htm
Prosecutors said the company made the payments in exchange for protection for its workers. In addition to paying the AUC, prosecutors said, Chiquita made payments to the National Liberation Army, or ELN, and the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, as control of the company's banana-growing area shifted.
Chiquita was formerly the United Fruit Company until 1985 when it was bought out and changed name. Yes, thats the same United Fruit Company that mercilessly raped the economies and culture of the Latin American countries and islands for decades. Why then would marxist groups accept payment and act as thugs for this company? Especially when you think about the Banana Massacre in Colombia in 1928 when the UFC called the Colombian army in to end a strike and killed hundreds if not thousands of workers.
I may be wrong I just think it's really inconsistent for a so-called workers army to collaborate with the former face of capitalist imperialism
http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/15200739657.htm
Prosecutors said the company made the payments in exchange for protection for its workers. In addition to paying the AUC, prosecutors said, Chiquita made payments to the National Liberation Army, or ELN, and the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, as control of the company's banana-growing area shifted.
Chiquita was formerly the United Fruit Company until 1985 when it was bought out and changed name. Yes, thats the same United Fruit Company that mercilessly raped the economies and culture of the Latin American countries and islands for decades. Why then would marxist groups accept payment and act as thugs for this company? Especially when you think about the Banana Massacre in Colombia in 1928 when the UFC called the Colombian army in to end a strike and killed hundreds if not thousands of workers.
I may be wrong I just think it's really inconsistent for a so-called workers army to collaborate with the former face of capitalist imperialism