Log in

View Full Version : David Puke's Indian Odyssey debunked



Naren1987
28th April 2011, 15:23
First of all,
I have to confess that I am an Indian Right winger(Center Right, not the Far right RSS).

I will, however, debunk a ridiculous theory used by White Nationalists.

Any Indian who's read David Duke's Indian Odyssey will come to the realization that this man is not a scholar.

Any one who reads that racist rubbish also needs to hear from some one who's lived in this country for 23 years.

David Duke tries to explain how the Great civilization of India has degenerated to destitute country due to 'Race Mixing'


There are a lot of things that need to be set straight here.


Aryans, or Indo-European Caucasians created the great Indian, or Hindu Civilization. Aryans swept over the Himalayas to the Indian sub-continent and conquered the aboriginal people. The original term "India" was coined by the Aryan invaders from their Sanskrit word Sindu for the river now called the Indus. Sanskrit is perhaps the oldest of the Indo-European languages, having a common origin to all the modern languages of Europe. Composed in about 1500 BC, the Hindu religious texts of the Rig Veta tell the story of the long struggle between the Aryans and the aboriginal people of the Indian subcontinent. Sixteen Aryan states were partitioned by the sixth century AD, and Brahmanism became the chief religion of the India. After the conquest, the conquering race initiated a caste system to preserve their status and their racial identity. The Hindu word for caste is "Varna," which means color. Today the word is usually associated with occupation or trade; but the occupations evolved originally on the basis of ethnicity. The palest of skin were called the Brahmin, the warrior-priest class, the top of the social ladder. Untouchables, or Pariahs, the racially mixed, or "raceless ones," were at the bottom. Please note that this man does not mention the Indus valley civilization of the natives, who unlike the illiterate Aryans had their own script, and built great cities like Mohenjo Daro, Harrapa and Lothal.
If you check up on these cities in Wikipedia, you'll find that they were actually very well planned.
If you check up this culture in Wikipedia, you'll find that it was very advanced, more advanced than any culture in Northern Europe.

If anything, the caste system that Duke admires is the biggest Hindrance to India's economic growth, It has created a tribal society which is exploited by corrupt politicians.


Perhaps one of the problems of the Indian civilization, I reflected, (and of every one since) is that the most creative, most intelligent and most-successful people have had many distractions from sex and family, while the lower classes find sex a much more important form of recreation and fulfillment, in fact it is the one highly enjoyable pastime the poor can always afford. Every civilization has a lower average birthrate among its most talented elements while its less intelligent and unproductive tend to proliferate, India was no exception. True, but it is not the Fair skinned descendants of the Aryan invaders that have issues controlling their Birth rate.
It is South India, the Southern Darker Dravidian South Indian states that have the lower fertitlity rates.

If you also compare the literacy rates, GDP per capita and the HDIs, you'll find that, as an average, they're doing better than the fairer skinned Aryans.
The only universally literate state is none other than Kerala, again a Dravidian state.

You may also check up on our Science Nobel Laureates in the past century.
C. V. Raman(Tamil)

Venkatraman Ramakrishnan(Tamil)
Subhramanyan Chandrashekar(Tamil)
Har Gobind Khorana(Punjabi)

You'll find that 3 out of the 4 are dark skinned Dravidians, and only one fair skinned Aryan.
If you still have any doubts on their appearance, you can use Google.

Please also check up on Jagdish Chandra Bose, he is known as one of the fathers of radio science, and though his other tongue was Bengali, his appearance will tell you that he was no fair skinned Europid.

I would also like to know, why the Southern part of my country has had very little communal tension as compared to the North.

I would be grateful to you if you could post what I have to say on this White supremacist bullshit.

ComradeMan
28th April 2011, 19:58
^^^^^^^^^^ It's hard to decide who's more bigotted.:crying:

Che a chara
28th April 2011, 20:46
Milk Sheikh's alter ego ?

My Milk Sheikh brings all the boys to the yard, and they're like it's better than yours.

Kronsteen
28th April 2011, 21:32
David Duke is a liar?!

The man who's autobiography tells of how he gradually came to realise there's a Jewish Conspiracy running the world? The Klansman who says black and white are different subspecies? The womaniser who's big on family values...and has the usual obsession with gay male sex.

Surely not.

#FF0000
28th April 2011, 21:37
I don't think what OP's saying is bigoted at all. In India today, people who are lighter skinned are seen as more attractive and superior and all that. Skin color, I believe, is also kind of reflected in the caste system.

What OP's trying to say is that this obviously isn't the case, and gives examples of successful people from southern India.

So yeah, I think I see what you're saying, OP.

And yeah, David Duke's history is ridiculously confused. I mean, the biggest players in India way back then were the Mughals, and they were Muslim, not Hindu, weren't they? And either way, it's not as if "races" and ethnic groups were ever kept from intermingling back then either.

Jesus. Duke's shit is so confused that I literally don't even know where to begin.

Pretty Flaco
28th April 2011, 21:41
Puke is a very unfortunate last name.