Log in

View Full Version : Venezuelan left divided over arrest



redhotpoker
26th April 2011, 03:12
By TAMARA PEARSON - VENEZUELANALYSIS(dot)COM


Colombia-Venezuela Relations
FARC
Mérida, April 25th 2011 (Venezuelanalysis(dot)com) – At the request of the Colombian government, the Venezuelan government has arrested and says it will soon deport a supposed ex-FARC leader and alternative journalist, Joaquin Perez Becerra, despite opposition to the deportation from many groups on the Venezuelan left.

The Venezuelan government said in a statement that it detained Perez, a presumed leader of the guerrilla group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) when he tried to enter the country through the Caracas international airport on Saturday, and will deport him to Colombia today, following a request by the Colombian government.

According to Venezuelan government press, a commission of the Colombian National Police will travel to Caracas to assist with the deportation process.

Perez is wanted by the Colombian legal system, and the Venezuelan and Colombian governments say there is a red alert for him with Interpol, for supposedly financing terrorism and administering resources related to terrorist activities. He is said to be part of the international commission of the FARC and coordinator of the news agency, Anncol. The site, the New Colombia News Agency, is an alternative news site based in Sweden, and was founded in 1996 by Latin American and European journalists, with its stated aim of “being a voice for the voiceless sectors of Colombia”. It is said to politically support the FARC.

Colombian President Juan Santos thanked the governments of Venezuela and Ecuador yesterday in a press conference, saying, “This collaboration with our neighbours is very important... It’s further demonstration that this cooperation is increasing, it’s effective.”

He also explained that on Saturday he talked with Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez by telephone to request the arrest of Perez, as Perez had taken a flight from Germany that was headed to Venezuela.

He included Ecuador in his thanks because the country’s government had helped to capture a supposed head of a criminal gang last week.

According to Santos, Perez was responsible, for many years “for all this bad propaganda that the FARC has put out about Colombia from Europe”.

The Venezuelan government’s press release stated the details of the arrest and that “The Bolivarian government ratifies its unshakeable commitment in the struggle against terrorism, crime, and organised crime, in strict compliance with ...international cooperation, under the principles of peace, solidarity, and respect of human rights.”

Venezuelan left objections

Many groups in the organised Venezuelan left, all of which support the Bolivarian revolution, have criticised the government’s handling of the situation, and have called for Perez’s freedom.

According to Venezuelan movement site, Aporrea, Perez has political asylum in Sweden. The Coordinadora Simon Bolivar (CSB), a pro-government organisation that is based in the well-organised Caracas barrio 23 de Enero and aims for grassroots organisation, called on the government to “comply with its international agreements, which include respecting political refugee status”. The CSB called for Perez to be freed “immediately” and to not be extradited.

The Venezuelan-based alternative website Patria Grande questioned if there was an Interpol red alert, given that Perez was not detained in Sweden, where he was living, or in Germany, where he changed flights.

Further, an editor of pro-government newspaper Ciudad Caracas, Ernesto Villegas, wrote that Perez survived during the mass murder of leaders of the Patriotic Union (UP), which was the legal political party for a range of social actors, including the FARC and the Colombian Communist Party, and for this, he was able to get political asylum in Sweden.

Some 5,000 members of the UP have been killed since 1984, including Perez’s first wife. Perez was a leader of the group during the 1990s.

Villegas questioned if Perez was a “terrorist” and expressed his concern that “tomorrow or the day after this label could be applied to anyone”. He also pointed out how the international press have automatically labelled Perez a “terrorist” but other confessed terrorists, such as Luis Posada Carriles, the mastermind behind the bombing of a Cuban plane, are labelled as “anti-Castro” rather than terrorist.

Villegas called on the Venezuelan president to “not fall into Santos’ trap”.

The Venezuelan Communist Party’s newspaper, Tribuna Popular, reported that a delegation consisting of some of its own members, United Socialist Party of Venezuela leader Amilca Figuerora, leaders of the Bolivarian Continental Movement, and a representative of the International Solidarity Committee visited the office of the Venezuelan intelligence agency, SEBIN, to try to talk to Perez. They were unable to.

Also, according to Tribuna Popular, Perez came to Venezuela to learn about the Bolivarian revolution and to combat the misinformation about it that is common in the mainstream press.

Left-wing Swedish journalist Dick Emanuelsson also criticised the capture of Perez in an article published by Kaos en la Red. Emanuelsson wrote about Perez’s “intense political activity in Europe in favour of peace and the struggle of the Colombian people”.

Kaos en la Red also said that the Swedish consul in Caracas and Swedish ambassador Lena Nordstrom in Bogota, had carried out procedures to try to prevent the extradition of Perez.

Finally, the pro-Chavez union federation UNETE wrote in a statement that it too rejected “the arbitrary detention by Venezuelan government authorities, against the revolutionary journalist of Colombian origin and Swedish nationality, Joaquin Perez Becerra”. UNETE also opposed Perez’s extradition and demanded his freedom.

“We make a fraternal but energetic call to President Chavez to correct the situation, so that our Bolivarian process can continue being, without any doubt, the hope of the peoples of the world”.

“Those who fight against the pro-Yankee and criminal oligarchy of Colombia aren’t our enemies but rather brothers of the Bolivarian, freedom, and anti-imperialist struggle,” the UNETE statement concluded.

The stakes: part of changing Venezuela-Colombia relations

Recently, Santos also promised to extradite Venezuelan wanted drug trafficker Walid Makled to Venezuela, even though Colombia’s close ally, the United States, had requested Makled be extradited there.

And last month the Venezuelan government deported two supposed guerrillas of Colombia’s National Liberation Army (ELN), Carlos Tirado and Carlos Perez, who were captured in Apure state along the border with Colombia.

Santos and Chavez met earlier this month in Colombia, and among the range of bilateral agreements discussed and made, they agreed to better coordinate confronting drug smuggling groups that operate along the borders of both countries, and to exchange intelligence information.

Following Santos’ swearing-in in August last year, Chavez met with him for the first time and the two countries agreed to restore diplomatic relations. Venezuela ended relations with Colombia under President Alvaro Uribe after Uribe accused Chavez of protecting illegal Colombian guerrillas at a meeting of the Organisation of American States (OAS) a month before.

PUBLISHED ON APR 25TH 2011 AT 6.19PM

pranabjyoti
26th April 2011, 05:40
I am requesting Venezuelan people and workers to stand against Chavez at least in this matter. If Perez will be deported to Colombia, that will be darkest spot on the picture of Chavez.

Rusty Shackleford
26th April 2011, 06:45
chavez isnt infallible. and this is one of those moments of fallibility.

Ligeia
26th April 2011, 07:12
I am requesting Venezuelan people and workers to stand against Chavez at least in this matter. If Perez will be deported to Colombia, that will be darkest spot on the picture of Chavez.
He has already been deported...some hours ago.

But I can assure you that I haven't read a single piece by Venezuelan Individuals or Groups that don't condemnthis kind of politics, they all want it to stop.
This is a dark stain and great failure already, whatever happened after Santos got elected...who knows but it's not going to get them anywhere at all.

Obs
26th April 2011, 07:13
chavez isnt infallible. and this is one of those moments of fallibility.

Of course, these 'moments' would be less frequent if he had a revolutionary bone in his body, instead of being hell-bent on using reformist means - to the point that he'll persecute citizens of other countries for trying to make a revolution. I, for one, can't wait for either the PSUV to get some new, better leadership... or at least Chavez to grow a clue.

Rusty Shackleford
26th April 2011, 07:14
Of course, these 'moments' would be less frequent if he had a revolutionary bone in his body, instead of being hell-bent on using reformist means - to the point that he'll persecute citizens of other countries for trying to make a revolution. I, for one, can't wait for either the PSUV to get some new, better leadership... or at least Chavez to grow a clue.


Though the PSUV and Chavez have been very progressive, it is a reformist movement. I wholly agree that it needs to be radicalized.

Obs
26th April 2011, 07:19
Though the PSUV and Chavez have been very progressive, it is a reformist movement. I wholly agree that it needs to be radicalized.

If only Obama was stupid enough to pull a Bay of Pigs on 'em...

redhotpoker
1st May 2011, 22:40
By FRANKLIN ROSALES - VENEZUELANALYSIS(dot)COM

Mérida, April 29th 2011 (Venezuelanalysis(dot)com) – Over the course of this week, many in the Venezuelan and international left have condemned the Venezuelan government’s detention and deportation of independent media activist Joaquín Pérez Becerra – a Colombian-born media activist granted political asylum by Sweden in 2000.

On Monday, as demonstrators gathered to protest Becerra’s illegal detention at the Caracas headquarters of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Intelligence Service (SEBIN), the Venezuelan government was already in the process of deporting Becerra to Colombia without granting him access to legal counsel or representatives of the Swedish embassy in Caracas. The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry has defended its decision.

The “Becerra Case”

In what is now being widely referred to as the “Becerra Case” by leftist social movements and political parties in Venezuela and abroad, the detention and deportation of Joaquín Pérez Becerra – director of The New Colombia News Agency (ANNCOL) and a source of re-published communiqués of the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC-EP) – has caused unrest among many of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez’s most staunch supporters.

While some protests against Becerra’s deportation have been held in downtown Caracas this week, a demonstration on Thursday outside of the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry involved over 300 people from a diverse array of leftist movements and political parties, according to Venezuela-based independent media center ABPnoticias.

Thursday’s protest brought together representatives from numerous pro-Chávez social movements, including the Coordinadora Simón Bolívar (CSB), the Simón Bolívar National Communal Front (FNCSB), the “Clara Zetkin” Women’s Movement, the Front for the Detained and Disappeared of the Continent, and the Revolutionary Tupamaros Movement. Also in attendance were former Venezuelan Trade Minister Eduardo Samán, current Venezuelan lawmaker Oscar Figueras Yul Yalbur, and investigative journalist Eva Golinger.

Protestors chanted slogans critical of the government’s decision to deport Becerra, including “a true revolution doesn’t turn in revolutionaries” and “the middle-of-the-road comes right before treason.”

On Tuesday, Pedro Eusse, of the Venezuelan Communist Party’s (PCV) Political Bureau, said that the PCV’s “confidence” in the government of President Hugo Chávez has been “fractured” by the decision to deport Becerra to Colombia and described his deportation as a “concession” to counterrevolutionary forces in the region.

“We believe that this is a concession that the [Venezuelan] government has made to the imperialist forces, to the reactionary and counterrevolutionary forces of the continent. And it is a dangerous concession because it goes against the very values and principles that have been expressed to guide and orient this Bolivarian process,” said Eusse.

Internationally, a number of well known defenders of the Chávez administration and Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution joined their voices to the condemnations.

Argentina’s Carlos Aznárez, Chief Editor at web-based Resumen Latinamericano, referred to Monday’s deportation as “the day in which the most elementary principles of international solidarity were thrown into the garbage” by the Chávez administration.

Lack of Legal Clarity

According to Teo Zetterman, spokesperson for the Swedish foreign ministry, Sweden on Tuesday “asked Venezuela to explain why Swedish authorities were not informed when they arrested a Swedish citizen and extradited him to Colombia."

Speaking to the AFP, on Wednesday Zetterman explained that Becerra was granted Swedish citizenship in 2000 and insisted that Sweden should have been informed by the Venezuelan government before sending Becerra to Colombia.

According to Hugo Martínez, one of Becerra’s three attorneys, Article 7 of Venezuela’s Law on Refugees prohibits the deportation of a person to a country they fled for political purposes. Venezuela’s Association of Bolivarian Communicators (ABC) added to Martínez’s arguement, affirming that international law “stipulates that nobody can be returned to a country where his/her life, physical integrity, or freedom is at risk.”

In a press release issued on Friday, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolás Maduro defended the Chávez government’s handling of the Becerra Case and reiterated its overall defense of “just causes.”

“They have sent their note and we are reviewing it,” said Maduro in reference to the Swedish request for clarification in the Becerra Case. “But now it’s up to them to explain why – if this person [Becerra] has an international INTERPOL code out against him – why he was allowed to leave their country? And all the other countries in which this person traveled should explain why they did nothing in response to the INTERPOL code,” he said.

With respect to the legalities of the Becerra Case, Maduro affirmed the Venezuelan government has “acted in a transparent way, in accordance with our own laws and in line with the responsibilities we have as the Venezuelan state.”

Defending the Bolivarian Revolution’s overall foreign policy, Maduro went on to say that “when nobody was willing to repudiate, willing to raise the valiant voice, Venezuela and the Bolivarian Revolution denounced the United Nations Security Council decision [to authorize armed intervention against Libya.”

Who is Joaquín Pérez Becerra?

During the first half of the 90’s, Joaquín Pérez Becerra represented Colombia’s Patriotic Union (UP) political party on the municipal governing council in municipality Corinto, state of Valle del Cauca, Colombia. After the murder of two UP presidential candidates, eight UP congressmen, 11 UP mayors, 13 UP deputies, 70 UP councilmen, and thousands of UP activists, Becerra fled Colombia and sought political asylum in Sweden, according to Aporrea.

In Sweden, Becerra helped establish the online news source The New Colombia News Agency (ANNCOL), the self-proclaimed “voice for the voiceless sectors of Colombia” including numerous armed and unarmed social forces involved in Colombia’s political reality. Over the years, ANNCOL has become a hub for denunciations of human rights violations by the Colombian state and paramilitary organizations.

For his work at ANNCOL, the Colombian government has accused Becerra of being the “FARC’s ambassador in Europe” and “conspiring in and helping finance terrorism.”

According to Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, Becerra “has been responsible for many years for all of this evil propaganda that the FARC have done to Colombia in Europe."

On arrival at Colombia’s Paloquemao judicial detention center in Bogotá, Becerra denied allegations he was a member of Colombia’s FARC. “I’m nobody’s ambassador. This is an attack on freedom of expression, against independent media,” he said on Monday night.

PUBLISHED ON APR 29TH 2011 AT 7.09PM

RedSonRising
1st May 2011, 22:46
The Colombian government only needs to yell "they have ties to the FARC" to completely remove a dissenter from the political space within Colombia. It's really horrid.

☭The Revolution☭
2nd May 2011, 01:20
ter·ror·ist ˈtɛrərɪst]
n.
1. One that does not support the regime of the United States. See, "Logic"