Log in

View Full Version : Vancouver - Soapbox style agitation in the lead up to Mayday and the Federal Election



Eastside Revolt
13th April 2011, 00:58
In the spirit of Mayday and soapbox style agitation, a small pamphlet has been made for mass distribution throughout the Lower Mainland. It is intended to be handed out as much as possible until May1st (International Workers Day) and May 2nd (the Federal Election). It deals with the issues of Mayday, the Federal Election, and Anarchy.

A pdf of the pamphlet can be found here (http://anarchistagitation.wordpress.com/)


If you have the time and resources to help out, please feel free to hand these out on campuses, at busy intersections, and wherever you feel comfortable giving these out for the next few weeks.

Body:

*Mayday 2011, the Federal Election, and Anarchy*

*An Anarchist Primer*

*Mayday, Mayday!*

On May 1st, 1886 American labour unions organized a general strike in
support of the 8 hour workday. A march of 80,000 people went down Michigan
Avenue in Chicago, led by two Anarchists, Albert and Lucy Parsons. A couple
days later, as the general strike continued, there was a demonstration
outside of the McCormick Harvesting Machine co factory. Workers, who had
become enraged by scabs just finishing their workday, were fired upon by
police.

The act of police repression was followed up by a demonstration at Haymarket
Square, organized by Anarchists. Following an explosion, a massacre took
place as countless workers were murdered, and only eight police officers
were killed. A show trial later ensued as eight Anarchists were later hanged
for murder. “The Haymarket Affair”, as it has become known, is widely
considered to have been an important influence on the origin of
international May Day observances for workers.

May 1st, 2011 is 125 years since that fateful general strike in Chicago. The
fight for the eight-hour work day was fought, died for, and won. May 1st has
continued annually to be recognized as International Workers Day all over
the world. But what of today?

*The Federal Election*

May 2nd, 2011 is the date of the next federal election, if you are reading
this today there is a high chance that you don’t participate in elections
and won’t be voting. Perhaps you don’t feel that you know enough about this
countries’ electoral system or politics to make an informed decision.
Perhaps you rightly refuse to trust the government and recognize that your
vote could never count, perhaps you are like us and recognize the spectacle
that is created around mainstream politics, and don’t wish to take part.
Perhaps you choose instead to interact with society at your own level, to
make yours and your peers’ actions rather than your votes, count.

On another hand, perhaps you are terrified at the way that this society is
going. Perhaps you’ll take any chance you can get, no matter how
insignificant to get that fascist scumbag Harper out of office. Perhaps
you’re a strategic voter and you’ll even vote for the Liberals if it helps
to deny Harper’s party another seat. Perhaps you’re a diehard NDP voter, or
whatever else. Perhaps you are mildly or extremely patriotic and passionate
about your “right to have your voice heard.” Perhaps you are even planning
to vote for the Conservatives, allowing a bunch of rich mostly white men in
suits to tell you that they have your interests at heart, while they play on
your irrational fears from years of watching too much television and
Hollywood. “Victims matter” they say, as the crime rate drops, surveillance
cameras go up everywhere, and prisons continue to be built.

What really are our issues in Vancouver? Wherever you live, from the
Downtown Eastside to the North Shore to Surrey, condominiums are being built
that you could probably never hope to live in, even if you wanted to. Rents
are being driven up and it may not have occurred to you yet that you could
actually do something about it. Food prices are continually rising. Parents
have little or no time to relate to their children, neighbors have little or
no time to relate to each other, and the television becomes a babysitter for
all of us. Employment is tough, wages are low, there is war, racism,
homophobia, homelessness, violent and sexual attacks on women and children,
police brutality and harassment, nuclear threats and radioactive pollution
the list goes on, and on. These issues are all in some way tied to, and a
result of the capitalist system.

Do any of the parties have a need, or interest to get rid of the capitalist
system, and hence get rid of these problems? Hell no! Of course the NDP will
have their usual futile token demands for a national housing strategy along
with other (un)initiatives, while it is clear that all over the world social
welfare and workers rights are being rolled back as the only way to save the
faltering capitalist system. The Conservatives will use their usual
fearmongering in the form of cleverly veiled bigoted hatred. The Liberals
will of course continue to be the purest of political parties, blowing with
the wind, echoing and copycatting, but at the same time distancing
themselves from the rhetoric of whichever party they deem to be their
biggest threat. Like the Greens in the US, the Green Party of Canada
recognizes people’s concerns toward the state of the environment, and their
disdain for the political process. The Greens then volunteer for the
position of restoring people’s faith in the democratic system, that it can
be reformed or improved, or that capitalism can be nicer on the environment,
all impossible; under capitalism the people and the environment will always
be nothing more than money, and under the democratic system the population
can be nothing more than a mass to be manipulated.

Voting day is yet another symbolic day where people who lust for power, play
on your fears and hopes. An expensive and captivating project that serves as
little more than a conquest and distraction, kind of like the Olympics.
Democracy is a system of control by which the ruling class maintains its
interests. Dictatorships are roughly the same thing although the control is
generally more obvious, and widely understood.

How in all of this do we assert our own control? Workers in the 1800’s and
at the turn of the century didn’t vote, make an ethical consumer choice, or
take part in a public opinion poll to shorten their working hours or
assemble in the streets, they got together and did it, without asking for
permission from anyone. One of the major things that stopped them from
taking it any further and ending their exploitation, was when they decided
to rely on representatives, whether from a union, or political party.

This pamphlet is being handed out in the hopes that you share in at least a
few of these concerns. It is being handed out in the hopes that you might at
least think twice about why you are voting, and if you aren’t voting perhaps
you might think about getting together with your friends, classmates,
neighbors, or coworkers, and actually doing something about the problems
that effect you. This pamphlet has probably been handed to you by an
Anarchist. Perhaps you’ve never heard of an Anarchist before. Or perhaps
you’ve heard a lot of things about us in the news that you don’t like or
understand. Perhaps you’re certain (although were not sure how) that we are
somehow magically able to survive, for years, in a capitalist world without
having to work a job. Perhaps you’re also certain that even though we manage
to get together in large numbers and make the news every so often, that we
must somehow not have any lives or friends. What do you know about
Anarchists other than our vendetta against plate glass, or our tendency to
make all hell break loose when a major event comes to town?

The author of this text can say for sure that you won’t be finding many
people that identify as Anarchists at the voting booths on May 2nd though
you may find us in the streets on May 1st. We generally don’t recognize the
legitimacy of governments or nation-states, and we certainly reject
patriotism, as it is and always will be blind. In the context of Vancouver
we recognize that Canada is founded upon genocide and theft of the land from
native people, and it would be pretty shameful for us to support in any way
a government that presides over such a legacy.

What follows next is a basic description of Anarchism, taken from the
introduction to the book “Anarchy Works” written by Peter Gelderloos, and
altered to fit this pamphlet, (Anarchists don’t believe in intellectual
property) if interested you can download a copy of the book for free at this
location:
http://www.flirp.net/posts/e-books-and-tutorials/295/Anarchy-Works-by-Pe... (http://www.flirp.net/posts/e-books-and-tutorials/295/Anarchy-Works-by-Peter-Gelderloos.html)

*Anarchy would never work!!*

Anarchism is the boldest of revolutionary social movements to emerge from
the struggle against capitalism-it aims for a world free from all forms of
domination and exploitation. But at its heart is a simple and convincing
proposition: people know how to live their own lives and organize themselves
better than any expert could. Others cynically claim that people do not know
what is in their best interests, that they need a government to protect them
that the ascension of some political party could somehow secure the
interests of all members of society. Anarchists counter that decision-making
should not be centralized in the hands of any government, but instead power
should be decentralized: that is to say, each person should be the center of
society, and all should be free to build the networks and associations they
need to meet their needs in common with others.

The education we receive in state-run schools teaches us to doubt our
ability to organize ourselves. This leads many to conclude anarchy is
impractical and utopian: it would never work. On the contrary, anarchist
practice already has a long record, and has often worked quite well. The
official history books tell a selective story, glossing over the fact that
all the components of an anarchist society have existed at various times,
and innumerable stateless societies have thrived for millennia. How would an
anarchist society compare to statist and capitalist societies? It is
apparent that hierarchical societies work well according to certain
criteria. They tend to be extremely effective at conquering their neighbors
and securing vast fortunes for their rulers. On the other hand, as climate
change, food and water shortages, market instability, and other global
crises intensify, hierarchical models are not proving to be particularly
sustainable. An anarchist society can do much better at enabling all its
members to meet their needs and desires.

The many stories, past and present, that demonstrate how anarchy works have
been suppressed and distorted because of the revolutionary conclusions we
might draw from them. We can live in a society with no bosses, masters,
politicians, or bureaucrats; a
society with no judges, no police, and no criminals, no rich or poor; a
society free of sexism, homophobia, and transphobia; a society in which the
wounds from centuries of enslavement, colonialism, and genocide are finally
allowed to heal. The only things stopping us are the prisons, programming,
and paychecks of the powerful, as well as our own lack of faith in
ourselves. Of course, anarchists do not have to be practical to a fault. If
we ever win the freedom to run our own lives, we'll probably come up with
entirely new approaches to organization that improve on these tried and true
forms.

*What exactly is anarchism?*

Volumes have been written to answer this question, and millions of people
have dedicated their lives to creating, expanding, defining, and fighting
for anarchy. There are countless paths to anarchism and countless
beginnings: workers in 19th century Europe fighting against capitalism and
believing in themselves instead of the ideologies of authoritarian political
parties; indigenous peoples fighting colonization and reclaiming their
traditional, horizontal cultures; high school students waking up to the
depth of their alienation and unhappiness; mystics from China one thousand
years ago or from Europe five hundred years ago, Daoists or Anabaptists,
fighting against government and organized religion; women rebelling against
the authoritarianism and sexism of the Left. There is no Central Committee
giving out membership cards, and no standard doctrine. Anarchy means
different things to different people. However, here are some basic
principles most anarchists agree on.

Autonomy and Horizontality
All people deserve the freedom to define and organize themselves on their
own terms. Decision-making structures should be horizontal rather than
vertical, so no one dominates anyone else; they should foster power to act
freely rather than power over others. Anarchism opposes all coercive
hierarchies, including capitalism, the state, white supremacy, and
patriarchy.

Mutual Aid
People should help one another voluntarily; bonds of solidarity and
generosity form a stronger social glue than the fear inspired by laws,
borders, prisons, and armies. Mutual aid is neither a form of charity nor of
zero-sum exchange; both giver and receiver are equal and interchangeable.
Since neither holds power over the other, they increase their collective
power by creating opportunities to work together.

Voluntary Association
People should be free to cooperate with whomever they want, however they see
fit; likewise, they should be free to refuse any relationship or arrangement
they do not judge to be in their interest. Everyone should be able to move
freely, both physically and socially. Anarchists oppose borders of all kinds
and involuntary categorization by citizenship, gender, or race.

Direct Action
It is more empowering and effective to accomplish goals directly than to
rely on authorities or representatives. Free people do not request the
changes they want to see in the world; they make those changes.

Revolution
Today's entrenched systems of repression cannot be reformed away. Those who
hold power in a hierarchical system are the ones who institute reforms, and
they generally do so in ways that preserve or even amplify their power.
Systems like capitalism and white supremacy are forms of warfare waged by
elites; anarchist revolution means fighting to overthrow these elites in
order to create a free society.

Self-Liberation
“The liberation of the workers is the duty of the workers themselves;” as
the old slogan goes. This applies to other groups as well: people must be at
the forefront of their own liberation. Freedom cannot be given; it must be
taken.

(Back Cover)

*Voting day is yet another symbolic day where people who lust for power,
play on your fears and hopes. An expensive and captivating project that
serves as little more than a conquest and distraction, kind of like the
Olympics. Democracy is a system of control by which the ruling class
maintains its interests. Dictatorships are roughly the same thing although
the control is generally more obvious, and widely understood.*

*For further information and inspiration:*
*Interview with an Anarchist (in England)*: http://vimeo.com/21575286
*Video about struggles in Greece*: http://vimeo.com/20879536
http://anti-politics.net/distro/
http://anarchistnews.org/
http://news.infoshop.org/
http://vanarchive.wordpress.com/
http://warriorpublications.wordpress.com/
http://wiinimkiikaa.wordpress.com/
http://vancouver.mediacoop.ca/olympics
http://submedia.tv/stimulator/

*In hopes that we meet again:*
http://vancouver.mediacoop.ca/
http://12thandclark.wordpress.com/
http://vancouversolidaritynet.wordpress.com/
http://antiprisonvancouver.wordpress.com/
http://noii-van.resist.ca/
http://stopthepave.org/