Log in

View Full Version : The New American Fascism and the Tea Party



Dimmu
6th April 2011, 19:31
Commenting on how the German working class movement could have stopped his debased regime from gaining power, Hitler once exclaimed, “Only one thing could have stopped our movement - if our adversaries had understood its principle and from the first day smashed with the utmost brutality the nucleus of our new movement.” Today, as capitalism breaks apart, the working class is left with the historical task of organizing itself as a force. Not only against capitalism, but against a radical right-wing that will also attempt to constitute itself as an alternative to the current state of affairs. A storm is coming...
Today a new movement in the U.S., commonly known as the “Tea Party,” is finding its place in the back rooms of community centers, in the pews during Sunday church service, and the offices of corporate elites and business owners. And, it is time for its adversaries to respond in kind. Fascist movements, however skewed and modernized, are alive and well in present times. It is foolhardy not to take note of their mobilizing, however juvenile it may look to people aware of the issues. The Tea Party Movement is a neo-fascist movement.
The Tea Party movement has metamorphosed into more than an anti-stimulus campaign; it’s more than a couple of protests demanding no taxes. It is taking over through culture and technology and it won’t be stopped until all the gains made by the working class have been beaten back into the dustbin of history.
There are several qualities which constitute a fascist movement. They include:
• Fear, a xenophobic hatred of “the other,” and/or foreigners
• Hatred of multiculturalism
• Base of support from the middle class, yet also taking from the disillusioned working class
• Adoption of populism
• Use of left-wing slogans and rhetoric for hard-right policies
• Belief that both free-market capitalism and socialism are bad
• Belief in a supreme leader whose word is truth
• Mythology of “better times,” and how the present time should emulate the righteous past
• Merging of state and corporate power
• Extreme patriotism and nationalism
Past fascist regimes, as well as current parties throughout Europe have varied traditions and histories, but for the most part, prevailed due to a certain set of persistent conditions including: industrially-advanced economies hard hit by the recession, a discredited Left alternative, dissatis13action with an inefficient or corrupt parliamentary system, an end of consensus politics, racism provoked by “job stealing” immigrants, a respectable Right, and nostalgia for a strong state. (Source: Fascism by Stuart Hood)
What has set the Tea Party apart from just your average run-of-the-mill patriarchal, right-wing, racist political party made up of mostly bourgeois exploiters, is that the Tea Party is transformable. It includes an infinite turn-style of participants, where groups are created, formed, and then disbanded within a few months, only to crop up in the next town over whenever a scratch against undocumented workers, social programs, or gay marriage needs to be itched.
However, many people involved in the Tea Party are blatant megalomaniacs, unapologetic for their extremist views. For example: Tom Tancredo, an anti-immigration former representative and speaker at the Tea Party National Convention talking about the “cult of multiculturalism,” and how Obama is a socialist. While equating the current president with socialism has become common place, Tancredo has become one of the most outspoken critics of the administration, stating Obama was elected by “people who could not even spell the word ’vote’ or say it in English” and that Obama is “...the greatest threat to the United States today, the greatest threat to our liberty, the greatest threat to the Constitution of the United States, the greatest threat to our way of life; everything we believe in. The greatest threat to the country that our founding fathers put together is the man that’s sitting in the White House today.” He has publicly called for impeachment charges against Obama in an editorial for The Washington Times. He is the honorary chairman of the Youth for Western Civilization, a nonprofit far-Right group against multiculturalism that has ties to white supremacist organizations.


But beyond keeping ill company, Tea Partiers are some of the biggest liars and corporate whores around. While claiming to be grassroots, in fact the movement is heavily funded by Koch Industries, one of the world’s biggest energy corporations. This multi-billion dollar company has been working with Republican politicians and far-right activists for the last half century. It is a never-ending supply of corporate-money to throw into the machine of democratic government. Once candidates backed by Koch are in power there will be military, weapons, technology, and manufacturing contracts for the corporation’s loyalty. Its credentials and those of its founders and many of its well-known followers are widely documented by the AFL-CIO in the New York Times, Atlantic Monthly, and other publications.
Yet most of its “regular folk” followers turn a blind eye to the fuel that created the fire, because acknowledging Koch Industries and other corporations’ cooperation would discredit its stance as being born out of a grassroots anger for the current state of American politics. No one wants to side with corporations, and most Tea Party followers like any wily *****, will bite the hand that feeds them.
The Tea Party also twists its own projected image of the working class to bolster its stance as an “everyman’s party.” It places “the worker” as an idealized, independent, courageous individual with an explorer’s mentality and family values at its core. It makes the lowly, God-fearing farmer, circa 1785 with his shotgun, wife and seven children its hero. The Tea Party movement encourages stratification between the “hard working, countryside” population, and the “decadent, urban” population, believing the latter will eventually kill itself through its deviant lifestyle.
The Tea Party gathers most of its support from middle America and rural areas, where supporters see the movement as representing “real America,” and those who do not believe are not patriotic or in line with the causes of “freedom,” and “justice.” The movement reaches out to a specific group of people, mostly lower-middle-class working folks who feel disenfranchised, but excludes workers such as undocumented laborers, intellectuals, and anyone who belongs to a minority category not in line with Tea Party values.
The Tea Party is a collection of groups whose membership is made up of anywhere from a few people to a thousand. What keeps these groups weak is that the connections that exist between them are often vague and disorganized. The biggest of these remain at the top, out of focus, funneling money no doubt, but without a direct battle plan.
Extremists such as Tea Partier Rand Paul (R-Ky.) oppose abortion even in cases of incest and rape. It’s going to be an uphill battle to include birth control as preventive care that should be covered under the new health-care bill. And it doesn’t end within the government’s arbitrary borders. According to Jodi Jacobsen, Editor-in-Chief of the Reproductive Health Reality Check website, “We will see almost immediately a range of efforts to focus on restricting reproductive and sexual health and rights. They will try to pass a law codifying a global gag rule, try to reinforce and strengthen abstinence-only until marriage funding in U.S. global AIDS funding.”

A cornerstone of a fascist regime is herding women into traditional roles, as wife and mother, rearing large families and being homemakers, with no voice for family planning and no chance for sexual freedom. After the election The Tea Party movement has been put on the back burner in most traditional media outlets, but it’s still there, slowly simmering, much like its European counterparts, gathering its base of supporters, fine-tuning its dogma, and waiting.
In April of last year, Noam Chomsky was giving a speech on both major U.S. political parties kneeling to the demands of corporations, but digressed to make a fearful prediction about the Tea Party movement. He stated, “’I’m just old enough to have heard a number of Hitler’s speeches on the radio, and I have a memory of the texture and the tone of the cheering mobs, and I have the dread sense of the dark clouds of fascism gathering.”
What to do about Tea baggers in your community:
Tea baggers love to set up shop at community and traditionally “patriotic” events such as regional and county fairs, parades, and local farmers markets. Shut them down, counter-demonstrate, and do not allow them to operate in public.
Many tea baggers make a point of writing daily to their local newspaper just to spew their misguided views on society, many of which get published in the opinion pages; most go unanswered. But go one step further: Create your own media to combat what the tea baggers are saying in your community. Put posters, stickers, and signage in high traffic areas.
Act in solidarity when tea baggers attack the homeless, undocumented workers, or women’s services and abortion clinics. Cross the barriers placed upon the various sections of the exploited by capitalism and build counter-power.
Fight The Tea Party!http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20110405205207672

Os Cangaceiros
6th April 2011, 20:01
hoo-boy. Another attempt to make parallels to history where none should be made. :rolleyes:

The Tea Party is not the freikorps or the brownshirts or the Falange...they're just conservative paper tigers that have been built up by the media, and some leftists (unsuprisingly) have dutifully lapped it up.

RadioRaheem84
6th April 2011, 20:39
Think Tim Robbin's Bob Roberts and you have the Tea Party.

Agent Ducky
6th April 2011, 20:42
"Belief that both socialism and free market capitalism are bad"

... Yeah, the Tea Party hates socialism, but I thought they worshiped the free market?

Dunk
6th April 2011, 20:59
I think the Tea Party has, at it's base, a bunch of stupid and confused assholes. For example, contrary to what you posted, they love the free market - they just don't know what it is. It might be fair to label them proto-fascist, but I'm unconvinced it's fair to be label them a fascist movement or organization.

Maybe during and after the coming crises, they'll be more of an immediate threat, but I also think the left stands to experience a huge revival after the next crises, and hopefully such a possible growth in the left crushes any astroturfed propaganda movement.

graymouser
6th April 2011, 21:11
Fascism, in its rise, sounded more like a leftist movement than a rightist. It was their intense nationalism and in the case of German fascism, their fervent anti-Semitism, that distinguished them from the left. They talked not about free markets but about corporatism. The Tea Party is more the outpouring of the loony libertarian fringe than the fascists, who exist in America but are small and in diffuse groups. White nationalists, not Tea Party members, are the fascist threat here. Leonard Zeskind recently published a tremendous study of white nationalism called Blood & Politics; I suggest you read it before you run around yelling on about fascists.

ChrisK
6th April 2011, 21:14
Fascism is a Bonapartist movement. The Tea party is in no way Bonapartist.

RadioRaheem84
6th April 2011, 21:34
Tea Party movement seems to mirror the economic policies of the CSA during the American Civil War.

The idiots in the Tea Party movement really believe that a truly free enterprise system will bring in more jobs and that we'll still have all the social services too.

agnixie
6th April 2011, 23:01
Fascism is a Bonapartist movement. The Tea party is in no way Bonapartist.

The Bonapartism to Fascism connection has largely been overdone, and seemingly tends to only observe the fascist movements that had success rather than every one of them; Integralism is not particularly Bonapartist, for one.

That said; fascists tend to vary on economics; while the Strasserists in Germany appealed a lot to the working class (of Germany), the rest of fascism largely stressed the superiority of private property, allied very quickly with the upper classes, and generally coopted the revolutionary message for the reactionary right.

The early actions of most fascist governments (union busting, pawning off public property and services to cronies, often merely to be able to pay for military toys while cutting taxes) is not particularly left, no, but of course the propaganda may be different. Some scholars largely think that the economics of fascism are more or less a smokescreen (Paxton thinks so, since you can't trust the fascist programmes to be what they're necessarily going to do; the German "Nadi" of today are not particularly pretending to be a worker's party anymore; and Arendt seems to consider them to be a consequence/result of racist imperialism).

Nolan
6th April 2011, 23:06
Not fascist, never will be.

Nolan
6th April 2011, 23:10
The Bonapartism to Fascism connection has largely been overdone, and seemingly tends to only observe the fascist movements that had success rather than every one of them; Integralism is not particularly Bonapartist, for one.

That said; fascists tend to vary on economics; while the Strasserists in Germany appealed a lot to the working class (of Germany), the rest of fascism largely stressed the superiority of private property, allied very quickly with the upper classes, and generally coopted the revolutionary message for the reactionary right.

The early actions of most fascist governments (union busting, pawning off public property and services to cronies, often merely to be able to pay for military toys while cutting taxes) is not particularly left, no, but of course the propaganda may be different. Some scholars largely think that the economics of fascism are more or less a smokescreen (Paxton thinks so, since you can't trust the fascist programmes to be what they're necessarily going to do; the German "Nadi" of today are not particularly pretending to be a worker's party anymore; and Arendt seems to consider them to be a consequence/result of racist imperialism).

All fascist movements appealed to workers. They only talked to the upper classes in private.

Completely different from anything the tea party does.

agnixie
6th April 2011, 23:12
All fascist movements appealed to workers. They only talked to the upper classes in private.

Completely different from anything the tea party does.

They appealed to masses and numbers - the tea party actually likes to tout its great numbers and how it's the american majority. They also do appeal to workers in some of their material, they just don't seem to think that union workers are real workers.

That workers sided with all of them is true, though; petty bourgeois anger of course, but also nationalist workers were caught into it. People who benefitted from imperialism before it started to show cracks. And not every fascist movement even at the origins went for direct appeals to workers in a pale ultranationalist imitation of the communists. D'annunzio, for one, was clearly being an elitist with a very strong belief in hierarchy in most of what he wrote.

HEAD ICE
6th April 2011, 23:13
A better question of "is the Tea Party fascist" is "does the Tea Party still exist?" It looks like the Tea Party has fully fallen off the side of the earth. The Tea Party wasn't fascist, more like a very clever marketing ploy.

agnixie
6th April 2011, 23:19
A better question of "is the Tea Party fascist" is "does the Tea Party still exist?" It looks like the Tea Party has fully fallen off the side of the earth. The Tea Party wasn't fascist, more like a very clever marketing ploy.

That's actually a good point; I'm for waiting and seeing, I think they still sort of exist, in that there's a rather strong undercurrent in America intent on using them, the birchers, the militias, the "patriots", the minutemen, etc. Then there's attempts in the political class to use it. I think we'll see during the republican party presidential primaries.

Honestly, I'd basically thank the clowns at this point; it seems like every time a politician who calls himself a tea party member does anything, it just discredits capitalism further.

Tim Finnegan
6th April 2011, 23:23
All fascist movements appealed to workers. They only talked to the upper classes in private.
Actually, I'd say that the mass appeal of fascism was to the petty bourgeoisie, the managerial class, and to bourgeoisified workers (i.e. salaried professionals), which can be broadly termed the "middle class". Support among the "working class", which is to say that majority of the proletariat, was marginal, and to the extent which it did exist relied on the employment of false conciousness of nationalism, race and gender, rather than of an appeal to proletarian class interests. All of which is pretty much true of the Tea Party, too.

Nolan
6th April 2011, 23:32
Actually, I'd say that the mass appeal of fascism was to the petty bourgeoisie, the managerial class, and to bourgeoisified workers (i.e. salaried professionals), which can be broadly termed the "middle class". Support among the "working class", which is to say that majority of the proletariat, was marginal, and to the extent which it did exist relied on the employment of false conciousness of nationalism, race and gender, rather than of an appeal to proletarian class interests. All of which is pretty much true of the Tea Party, too.

Well in Germany they weren't so successful as in Italy in appealing to labor, so they ended up appealing to rural areas:


Surprisingly, the first electoral breakthroughs enjoyed by the Nazis came in Protestant rural areas, such as Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony, where peasant voters had earlier registered discontent with their traditional representatives from the DNVP (German National People's Party or Nationalists). In fact this was more than a little ironical, as Nazi propaganda had initially targeted urban workers, and the Nazi agrarian programme developed in 1928 was only in response to the expansion of support in these areas. Subsequently the constituencies with the highest proportion of Nazi voters were in Protestant farming communities; and by 1932 the stream of peasant deserters to Hitler's party had become a torrent. Many rural labourers, often influenced by the estate managers, voted for the NSDAP in July 1932. Indeed, the scale of agrarian support for the party in that election suggests the Nazis were able not only to win the support of peasants and rural labourers but also that of some large landowners.
Voters in large urban centres were less susceptible to Nazi electoral propaganda. In July 1932, the NSDAP's support in the Grosstadte (over 100,000 inhabitants) was 10 per cent lower than the national average. Though there had been a significant increase in support among German workers between 1930 and 1932, this was less marked in the larger cities; and nearly half the working-class newcomers to the party ranks between 1925 and 1932 came from villages of under 5,000 inhabitants. And proportionally few of the working-class storm-troopers of the SA came from the big cities.
In part this pattern reflects the point that Hitler and his followers were able to build support in small provincial towns and rural areas more effectively than in the large cities precisely because political mobilisation was less developed in the provinces and the countryside. SPD (Social Democrat) and KPD (Communist) support had been and was still concentrated in the big cities, and the electoral drive of the NSDAP encountered powerful traditions and loyalties there. This urban/rural divide was reinforced by another factor: the Nazis were relatively unsuccessful in gaining the electoral support of the unemployed, who were also concentrated in Germany's largest cities.

Mindtoaster
7th April 2011, 01:09
Tea Party movement seems to mirror the economic policies of the CSA during the American Civil War.



.... Slavery?

What do you mean?

Rusty Shackleford
7th April 2011, 01:14
The tea party still exists(maybe not in name). they come out to counter-protest occasionally and they are planning a string of tax day rallies nation wide.

there is still a core of the movement organizing and demonstrating and meeting.

as for whether its fascist or not, it has elements of a fascistic movement but it has not yet become one. it does have the potential to generate stronger fascist movements though.

Salyut
7th April 2011, 01:57
The tea party still exists(maybe not in name). they come out to counter-protest occasionally and they are planning a string of tax day rallies nation wide.

there is still a core of the movement organizing and demonstrating and meeting.

as for whether its fascist or not, it has elements of a fascistic movement but it has not yet become one. it does have the potential to generate stronger fascist movements though.

Have you ever read Robert Paxton's stuff on fascism?

RadioRaheem84
7th April 2011, 02:11
.... Slavery?

What do you mean?

No, in that they were against a mercantalist economy of the North and favored extreme free trade.

Tim Finnegan
7th April 2011, 02:26
No, in that they were against a mercantalist economy of the North and favored extreme free trade.
I wouldn't say that they favoured free trade in and of itself, but, rather, opposed protectionism, because their economic success relied largely on foreign market, particularly British markets. The very fact that they were willing to impose heavy restrictions on cotton exports in an attempt to pressure Britain to join the war on their side demonstrates this.

Jose Gracchus
7th April 2011, 06:40
They overestimated the continued utility of slave cotton to the reproduction of early industrial capitalism in the textile manufacturing economy of England. A harshly imposed lesson of the materialist conception of history.