Log in

View Full Version : Alan Woods answers the enemies of the Venezuelan Revolution



MarxistMan
22nd March 2011, 05:19
Toronto: Alan Woods answers the enemies of the Venezuelan revolution (http://www.revleft.com/toronto-alan-woods-answers-enemies-of-venezuelan-revolution.htm)

Written by Camilo Cahis Monday, 21 March 2011
[/URL]

[URL]http://www.marxist.com/toronto-alan-woods-answers-enemies-of-venezuelan-revolution/print.htm (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#)

The past few months have seen the return of right-wing attacks on the Venezuelan government and Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez. Also implicated in these attacks has been Alan Woods, the founder of the international Hands Off Venezuela campaign (http://www.handsoffvenezuela.org/) and editor of the popular Marxist website In Defence of Marxism (http://www.revleft.com/undefined/). We were fortunate to have Alan speak at Casa Romero in Toronto’s west-end via video-link, where he answered the lies of the world’s corporate press, as well as why they have attacked him and the HOV campaign personally.
http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/thumbnails/10573_toronto_meeting_alan_woods_13_March.jpg (http://www.revleft.com/images/stories/canada/toronto_meeting_alan_woods_13_March.jpg)

The Venezuelan revolution has been ongoing for 12 years and through its duration, very important changes have occurred in the lives of poor and working class people in Venezuela. The vast majority of Venezuelans see the revolution embodying their existence. The turnout of millions of ordinary Venezuelans in the face of a military coup d’état in 2002 show the significance that the revolution has had in their day-to-day lives.

This being said, Alan also emphasized that the basic tasks of the socialist revolution had yet to be completed in Venezuela, and the delay in carrying out these tasks was endangering the future of the revolution. “All is not well,” said Alan. “The National Assembly elections (on 26th September) are a warning to the friends of the revolution. Why did the counterrevolutionaries achieve what they did?”

Alan outlined some of the difficulties that Venezuela has been facing recently — high inflation, the closure of factories, the loss of jobs. All of this can lead to a certain level of disillusionment amongst the masses who support the revolution. The National Assembly elections were notable not for the amount of votes that the opposition gained, but the number of votes that the PSUV lost. Many did not see enough of a reason to go vote.

Alan warned the audience, “The victory of the revolution is not assured.” He gave a recent example of how the counterrevolutionaries in Venezuela are becoming increasingly emboldened; opposition students, the sons and daughters of the Venezuelan oligarchy, had recently organized a hunger strike outside of the OAS offices in Venezuela, attempting to portray the Venezuelan government as being dictatorial.

Obviously, there is no dictatorship in Venezuela, especially given the lies that the right-wing opposition is allowed to get away with. Alan mentioned how in many other countries, including countries like Canada and Britain, would shut down any media outlet that advocated violence and the overthrow of the government. Furthermore, the opposition has now used the corporate media to spread lies about Alan Woods, the Marxists within the PSUV, and the Hands Off Venezuela campaign. Incidentally, these same lies have been picked up by the international corporate press, including the Economist, the Daily Telegraph, the BBC, and even Canada’s own Globe and Mail.

The oligarchy and their allies in the bourgeois press have attempted to portray Alan Woods as “Hugo Chávez’s Welsh Trotskyist advisor,” as the Globe and Mail had labelled him. As such, the opposition were trying to scare people into believing that Hugo Chávez and his Marxist allies were going to destroy all private property, expropriating every last barbershop and ice cream stand.

First of all, Alan emphasized that at no point was he an adviser to President Chávez or anyone else in the Venezuelan government, although Alan has met and discussed with him on several occasions, and President Chávez had recommend Alan’s latest book, Reformism or Revolution: Marxism and Socialism in the 21st Century, on his television show.

More importantly, however, Alan cleared up the lies of the right-wing. “It is necessary to finish the job — to finish the basic tasks of the Bolivarian Revolution,” said Alan. This does not mean the nationalization of every minute detail of the economy. This was an unfortunate Stalinist caricature of what Marxists genuinely stand for. Alan outlined what the basic tasks were: the nationalization of the land, the nationalization of the banks, and the nationalization of the leading factories. “What is necessary is the expropriation of the oligarchy, not the middle class.” Alan underlined the importance of this basic program for the revolution by saying, “You cannot plan what you don’t own.”

Despite the limitations of the technology allowing for the video conference, a number of questions were posed of Alan. One person asked about the links between the Cuban and Venezuelan revolutions, which led into a bit of discussion on the challenges facing the Cuban revolution.

There was also significant interest in Alan’s opinion regarding Venezuela’s position towards Muammar Gaddafi and the revolutionary movements in Libya and the rest of the Arab world. Alan replied that he was in full agreement with Chávez that any imperialist intervention in the region must be opposed, and that foreign imperialists were looking to take advantage of the situation. But, it would be wrong to portray the likes of Gaddafi or Ahmadinejad as revolutionaries or anti-imperialists. Alan said it is necessary to maintain economic links with other OPEC countries, but this is different than giving these regimes a revolutionary character, especially when they are so oppressive against their own masses. The real allies of the Venezuelan revolution are the workers and poor in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Iran, and other countries of the region, who have looked to the Venezuelan revolution as an example of what is possible and have revolted against tyrannical regimes, who incidentally, have worked hand-in-hand with imperialism to institute mass cuts, privatizations, and austerity against their own people. Alan commented on how a number of polls had shown that President Chávez is one of the most popular political leaders in the Arab region.

Alan finished his talk by telling the audience that revolutionaries in Venezuela and the rest of Latin America are not alone. We are witnessing the glorious revolutionary struggle of the Arab masses; we have seen the workers and youth of Western Europe rise up; and now, we are watching the possible development of a general strike in Wisconsin, in the heart of the United States. Alan warned the Canadian ruling class that it was only a matter of time, probably fairly short time, before capitalism was being threatened in Canada itself.


.

pranabjyoti
22nd March 2011, 05:48
I am now thinking and worried that whether US and it's NATO allies can also attack Venezuela or not. The way they are making attack on Libya without any care to world opinion, is very much alarming. What will happen, if such things will happen to Venezuela like Libya. I prefer to make an international brigade and defend Venezuela.

MarxistMan
22nd March 2011, 06:01
You are right, and given that most people in USA are so politically apathetic (translation= americans even let a Hitler rise to power). It means that we are doomed in USA to create anti-war riots in the streets of USA to force the US government into quit waging fascist wars.

i mean we are doomed because the percentage of people in the USA who have common sense and rationality is very little as opposed to the drugged majority, drugged by work, by hobbies etc.

Well, and about what you said about the axis of evil (USA, UK, France, Europe, NATO) attacking and invading Venezuela, i don't think that the axis of imperialist evil has a plan for that. Because about 70% of the population of Venezuela support the Venezuelan Government.

However since US Government is so evil and so tricky and dirty. What it could do is to fund opposition groups there, and newspapers to wage a propaganda depicting Chavez as an evil dictator, and since Americans, and Europeans are so brainwashed by BBC, CNN, Univision and TVE (Spain TV), they will believe in the Chavez being a dictator propaganda.

But we'll just have to wait what happens

.


I am now thinking and worried that whether US and it's NATO allies can also attack Venezuela or not. The way they are making attack on Libya without any care to world opinion, is very much alarming. What will happen, if such things will happen to Venezuela like Libya. I prefer to make an international brigade and defend Venezuela.

neosyndic
24th March 2011, 11:47
x

FSL
24th March 2011, 11:59
“It is necessary to finish the job — to finish the basic tasks of the Bolivarian Revolution,” said Alan. This does not mean the nationalization of every minute detail of the economy. This was an unfortunate Stalinist caricature of what Marxists genuinely stand for. Alan outlined what the basic tasks were: the nationalization of the land, the nationalization of the banks, and the nationalization of the leading factories. “What is necessary is the expropriation of the oligarchy, not the middle class.”
So, marxists stand for the nationalization of the leading factories?
The non-leading factories are owned by the middle class?

The malls, the international trade, the construction companies? Who owns those?

neosyndic
25th March 2011, 13:38
x

pranabjyoti
25th March 2011, 16:22
Venezuela is not an industrialised country. the program that applies to the developed north does not apply to a recently neo-colonial nation state. to use ''jargon'' it is a situation of combined and uneven development. in the bolivarian model; exprorpriation are not nationalisations. the workplaces in question are expropriated and then the production is placed in the hands of the workers. the main challenge for venezuela (and for the rest of the ALBA states) is to develop an industrial base and industrialisation of agriculture. these processes are under way in context of a intense class conflict with a recalcitrant opposition funded by USA imperialism. the bolivarian government is under fire from within and along with the other ALBA states exists in a state of international conflict with the northern hegemon. from the perspective of consolidating popular democracy there is a concerted effort to organise popular and working class action around the consejos comunales, the consejos campesinos and workers organisations like FRETECO. there is also the inter-alia organising acitivty of Far Left tendencies from a variety of backgrounds like Lucha de Clases (associated with Alan Woods), Corriente Clasista Cruz Villegas (associated with the PCV), the Frente Campesino Ezequiel Zamora, anarcho-syndicalist collectives in Caracas etc who do important ''revolution within the revolution'' organising work inside and outside the PSUV. together all these efforts constitute the aggregate that is ''the bolivarian revolution'', which in turn is a subset of La Segunda Independencia (the second independence) which is represented in core by the ALBA (Cuba-Venezuela-Bolivia-Ecuador-Nicaragua). Comandante Chavez and his government preside over the process in Venezuela, but it is the people on the ground all over the ALBA states who make the revolution, the second independence, and the revolution inside the revolution every day.
/ Miguel.
I want to add one point. Rapid industrialization is agriculture is also very much necessary for Venezuela to become an industrialized nation. I am curious what steps Venezuela is taking in this regard. Recently, I have heard that it's trying to built agri-machinery industries with help from Belarus and Iran. How far this scheme has been advanced and where and how they are planning to use the agri-machinery?

neosyndic
26th March 2011, 14:40
The Venezuelan Effort to Build a New Food and Agriculture System (http://www.monthlyreview.org/090824shiavoni-camacaro.php)


Venezuela: Democracy, Development, and the Bolivarian Process (http://www.dickinson.edu/academics/distinctive-opportunities/community-studies-center/content/Venezuela---Democracy,-Development,-and-the-Bolivarian-Process/)