Log in

View Full Version : Battle Line Drawn in Wisconsin (LRP statement)



RedTrackWorker
9th March 2011, 07:58
http://www.lrp-cofi.org/statements/wisconsin_030811.html
March 8, 2011

Stop the War on the Working Class!
Battle Line Drawn in Wisconsin

The massive protests against union busting and vicious cutbacks in Wisconsin – the occupation of the capitol building, the rallies of up to 100,000, the teacher sick-outs and the student walk-outs – have excited people around the globe. This struggle shows that real potential exists for building mass working-class actions that could actually stop the decades-long assault on workers and oppressed people in the U.S.

Many of the protesters have been inspired by this winter’s uprisings in the Arab world. Scenes of American demonstrators chanting “We are all Egyptians” signify a sense of solidarity and identification with the struggles of the Arab working people and youth. The confrontations in Wisconsin reflect a shift in class consciousness: the “one-sided class war” that labor leaders have been lamenting since the 1970’s is becoming a genuine battle. But as we will show, no credit is due to the national union officials and Democratic Party politicians who rushed to Madison to show their solidarity – and to convince the newly energized class fighters not to go too far.

Austerity Attacks and Union-Busting
Across the country, Democratic politicians as well as Republicans are demanding major wage and benefit concessions from public-sector workers, along with horrific cutbacks in social services that will hit all working and poor people. The politicians justify their attacks on the grounds that state budgets have been crimped by the unfolding of the world economic crisis. Indeed, the Great Recession and the threat of an all-out Depression is real, even though Republican and Democratic politicians have worsened the budget deficits by granting tax breaks to the rich and corporations, on top of the huge bailouts to Wall Street. World capitalism has been stagnating for four decades; gains in profit rates have been achieved only by deepening the exploitation of workers in the economically advanced countries like the U.S. as well as expanding the imperialist super-exploitation of workers and peasants in the poor countries.

In Wisconsin, Governor Walker has taken the attack to a new level: he insists on the abrogation of public-sector union rights to negotiate over anything but small variations in wages. In effect, he wants government bosses to be able to dictate job conditions to destroy pensions and benefit packages without even consultation. This is out-and-out union-busting.

The nationwide public-sector austerity attack is a classical divide-and-conquer technique. It aims to convince workers in the private sector, as well as other beleaguered sectors of the population, that public workers, not the capitalist system, are the root of the problems with state and municipal budgets, the quality of education, etc. The capitalist class and its politicians hope to set back public-worker unions and use that precedent to take back more from private-sector workers and other already suffering sectors of the population. Walker & Co. go further: they want to crush unions as defensive organizations of the working class as a step in a longer term effort to further slash the wages and conditions of all workers, union and non-union.

The Democratic (and some Republican) politicians who do not favor all-out union busting at this time are not heroes – they simply understand that the current union labor leadership is totally loyal to the capitalist system and can be depended upon to keep the rank and file upsurge within limits that don’t rock the boat. They want to keep the union leaders in their “seat at the table” in order to protect the image of fairness. They fear the class explosions that could occur and spread under the impact of union-busting.

The strategy of the Democrats and union bureaucrats is clear in Wisconsin. The union officials are taking a strong stand against the attempted abrogation of collective bargaining and other union rights; and rank and file workers are absolutely right to resist angrily and forcefully against this assault on collective bargaining. But at the same time the union leaders and politicians who claim to be on the side of the unions and the workers are conceding to all Walker’s wage and benefit cutbacks without a fight.

On the national level, the austerity attack is joined by Democrats like Governor Cuomo in New York, Governor Brown in California and Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa (himself a former union organizer). And the leadership comes from the top: President Obama’s hostility to teachers’ unions (including his Race to the Top campaign, the championing of non-union charter schools and the firings of teachers in Rhode Island) and his freezing of federal workers’ wages are measures that have provided cover for the anti-worker attacks on the state level. Obama’s broken promises of “change we can believe in” led to a feeling of letdown among workers and people of color; many of those who had voted for Obama in 2008 did not participate in the midterm elections, a major factor in the Democrats’ defeat in 2010. The Republican victory encouraged the right wing to go for the kill.

The heightened attacks were encouraged by the belief that the working class would not threaten too much resistance. What enabled the right wing to go for blood was not only the economic crisis but also the refusal of the working-class leaderships – union officials, heads of immigrant rights and other social justice organizations – to mount a mass resistance against the anti-worker attacks, highlighted by Reagan’s smashing of the air traffic controllers’ union, PATCO, in 1981. The decades of sellouts by union leaders over contracts and many other issues has in turn been based on their support of the capitalist system, and in particular their loyalty to the Democratic Party.

For a General Strike!
In Wisconsin, it was not the union leaders but young protesters, workers and students, who sparked the mass struggle by occupying the capitol building. Since then the local labor leaders have played a more active and leading role in the resistance. But their strategy is dangerously limited: workers need to fight back not just against the abrogation of collective bargaining but also against all the cuts to their contracts and public services that will severely affect the working class and poor as a whole. This is the only way to defend the unions, protect the livelihood of workers and their families, and to reach out to the rest of the working class and poor by championing their needs for quality education, healthcare, and other essential services.

Nor can the struggle rely on the Democratic state senators who have left the state to delay the vote, or in any way count on Democrats as trustworthy friends of the working class. The long record of Democratic Party betrayals of unions, workers and oppressed people tells the real story. (See for example A Dialogue on the Democrats, in Proletarian Revolution No. 70.) Instead, the unions need to take decisive action.

Talk of a general strike has already surfaced: a February 21 resolution by the Wisconsin South Central Federation of Labor favored a general strike. A top South Carolina labor leader, Kenny Riley of the Charleston local of the International Longshoremen’s Association, argued for a nationwide general strike: “I don't see any other way than a general workers strike. I would actually want to have a call for a general strike before the bill is passed.” (www.southcarolinasc.com/2011/03/union-leader-wants-general-strike.html.)

Riley and others who advocate a general strike are right, but this talk needs to be made concrete. The LRP advocates a general strike to stop all of Walker’s attacks: “For a General Strike to Stop Union Busting and Cutbacks – Kill the Bill!”

A general strike in Wisconsin would likely be started by public workers, but it would be essential to reach out to the private sector. There is truth to the argument that public-sector workers get pensions and benefits that others don’t have. The private sector unions have been decimated – Obama, for example, dealt a crippling blow to the UAW, once the forerunner in winning gains for workers on the U.S. scene. Many non-unionized workers, especially immigrants, get few if any benefits on top of their sub-standard pay. Workers striking to stop union-busting must make clear that they are fighting for the interests of all.

The answer is not to lower the living standards and rights of public workers but to fight together to raise everyone up. A general strike in Wisconsin would invariably inspire further struggle in other states and cause other governors and legislatures to think twice about pursuing the copycat actions that are now taking place in Ohio, Indiana and elsewhere.

That is, a general strike could decisively shift the balance of forces between the capitalists and their politicians on the one side, and the workers and oppressed on the other. However, if the resistance is left on the level of legislative lobbying, even when done massively, it will be defeated – a result that will not only cause great suffering to the working people of Wisconsin but will be used as a precedent against workers across the country.

We note that some police organizations have endorsed the protests. We warn our fellow workers that cops are not workers – they are agents of the capitalist state. The temporary support that some of them display must not be allowed to fool anyone. When push comes to shove, they will be ready with tear gas and worse. Any kind of alliance with or reliance on the cops or correction officers could literally be a death trap for the workers and youth. Cops out of the workers' movement!

Break with the Democrats
The union officials (and in Wisconsin, many of the protesters) have been hailing the role of the Democratic politicians in backing the mass protest. Their “heroism” comes at the cost of their capitulation to the governor’s economic demands. The Democrats are amply demonstrating their loyalty to the dictates of capitalism, a system which says the working class must pay for the crisis. Soon they will tell the mobilized workers to let up on the struggle for now and instead organize for the next elections. This has already happened in Ohio, where the union leaders refused to carry out the kind of mobilization that would have been necessary to stop Governor Kasich from signing a bill with major attacks on union rights. Instead they are telling workers to focus on gathering signatures to get the bill repealed through a referendum in November.

Revolutionary socialists have always held that the working class needs to organize its own class party, independent of and in confrontation with the pro-capitalist Republicans and Democrats. We in the LRP believe that that party must be a revolutionary party, that workers' socialist revolution is the only solution. It is not just spineless or greedy politicians but the operation of the capitalist system as a whole that demands deeper exploitation of the working class.

The Revolutionary Solution
One demand that some union officials, liberal politicians, and leading activists are raising is “tax the rich.” At first glance, this slogan seems to make sense, since the top capitalists and bankers have been bailed out hand over fist and have gotten outrageous tax breaks, contributing to the budget deficits for which the workers are now being asked to pay. As the very rich have been handed further tax cuts recently, the slogan “cancel the tax cuts for millionaires” is understandably popular. But this will not solve the crisis. The small taxes on the wealthy that are under discussion would decrease but not resolve the immediate budget problems – if they were ever seriously enforced, which is highly unlikely. The capitalists have always found loopholes to avoid too much taxation in the past. Further, a modified tax plan would not come close to addressing the vast economic and social disasters that capitalism is delivering.

The real solution can only begin to be fought for through a massive social upheaval where workers come to see that we have the power to demand what we really need, including quality education and nationalized healthcare for all, a national universal pension plan, equal rights for all immigrant workers, and a major jobs program providing good wages and benefits and the right to unionize. The tax cuts being considered are a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions of dollars of bank bailouts handed to Wall Street or to the public spending that these needs demand.

The way to get what is needed is to nationalize the banks without compensation, in order to put finances at the disposal of society to benefit the masses, not a few private owners of wealth. As well, rather than accepting the idea that government budgets should be balanced on the backs of workers, the real answer for the working class is to reject further payments of the debts to Wall Street altogether. Workers should fight for their unions to take up the demand to “Repudiate the Debts to the Banks!” With the working class in every city and state facing budget cuts, the big struggles ahead need to denounce the federal government’s policy of handing trillions to Wall Street in bailout money, and continually paying massive interest rates on loans, instead demanding “Nationalize the Banks!”

We revolutionary socialists say further that the economic assault on workers and the poor will continue for as long as the capitalist state rules our society. Only a workers' state created by the overthrow of capitalism can be counted on to act in the interest of the working class and oppressed people. It would overcome the crises and miseries of capitalism by seizing the banks and key industries from their profiteering owners. It would end the imperialist wars. And it would start a massive public works program to carry out the vitally necessary work that capitalism neglects – rebuilding the decaying infrastructure, rescuing the environment, building and staffing the housing, schools, hospitals, etc. that people need – and ending the racist treatment suffered by Blacks, Latinos and immigrants.

The deepening and spreading of the movement that has opened up in Wisconsin could be the start of something really big. Through intensified struggle, we expect that more workers and youth will come to understand that revolutionary goals are necessary, and that creating a society without union-busting, unemployment, racism, imperialist wars and all the other miseries of life today is impossible within the system of capitalism. Those workers and youth who already see the need for socialist revolution to end capitalism have to join together to build the revolutionary working-class party that can lead the working class in the upheavals ahead and advance its consciousness to make such a revolution possible.

http://www.lrp-cofi.org/

RED DAVE
9th March 2011, 15:05
There is much good in this statement. Here are my criticisms for what they are worth. They are meant to be constructive.

(1) Language: The language is inflated and jargonistic, in my opinion. We on the Left need to retain our beliefs and analysis without using 3rd Period Stalinist language.

(2) Organization: While the call for a general strike is objectively correct and opportune, what is also needed is a call for independent organization. The labor bureaucrats are only acting because of the more-or-less spontaneous action of the rank-and-file. This needs to be concretized into some kind of organization. Discussion is needed as to what form this might take, appropriate slogans, strategy, tactics, etc.

(3) Transitional Demands and Taxing the Rich: While the critique of the effect of such taxes is correct, I think the utility of such a demand is under-rated. Also, more transitional demands should be raised. Demands like "No Cuts," "Decrease Class Size," "Free Quality Medical Benefits for All," etc., should be considered.

(4) The Wars: Part of any analysis should be a discussion of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I am putting forward this critique in a tentative and comradely manner. I hope it is taken as such.

RED DAVE

RedTrackWorker
9th March 2011, 21:51
There is much good in this statement. Here are my criticisms for what they are worth. They are meant to be constructive.

(1) Language: The language is inflated and jargonistic, in my opinion. We on the Left need to retain our beliefs and analysis without using 3rd Period Stalinist language.

(2) Organization: While the call for a general strike is objectively correct and opportune, what is also needed is a call for independent organization. The labor bureaucrats are only acting because of the more-or-less spontaneous action of the rank-and-file. This needs to be concretized into some kind of organization. Discussion is needed as to what form this might take, appropriate slogans, strategy, tactics, etc.

(3) Transitional Demands and Taxing the Rich: While the critique of the effect of such taxes is correct, I think the utility of such a demand is under-rated. Also, more transitional demands should be raised. Demands like "No Cuts," "Decrease Class Size," "Free Quality Medical Benefits for All," etc., should be considered.

(4) The Wars: Part of any analysis should be a discussion of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I am putting forward this critique in a tentative and comradely manner. I hope it is taken as such.

RED DAVE

I appreciate the honest feedback Red Dave. I don't strongly disagree with anything you bring up.
I agree on the need for organizing the struggle. I'm not sure why that isn't mentioned in the statement. Perhaps an oversight but also could be the nature of the statement and that the forms it could take are very tactical and being removed from the scene right now, unclear to us from a distance. In the opening days of the struggle, during the sickouts and youth walkouts and capitol occupation, the capitol and the schools could've been turned into organizing centers and had mass meetings that passed resolutions. If in the early days mass meetings had passed resolutions to, say, continue the occupation until victory, it would've been harder for the union leaders to work with police to wind down the occupation and weaken it.

On other transitional demands and the wars, I'm certainly not opposed to including such, but I wonder if it were all there if you'd say, "Comrade, the article is much too long!" I kid (mostly). More seriously, (and this relates to the lack of stuff on how to organize the struggle as well), I think it's a question of what this statement is trying to do, which is draw the big political lessons of the struggle. If we could have someone on the ground and were agitating, a perspective on how to organize the struggle, for instance, would be absolutely necessary. But the bigger question is what way forward, to which we proposed a general strike to kill the bill, and the only other groups to propose such as far as I've found are the IWW and the Internationalist Group. The CWI, as I think you know, is proposing this one-day general strike gimmick and the ISO's Sustar is sort of calling for "job actions and limited strikes" (http://socialistworker.org/2011/03/04/how-can-we-defeat-walker) and Sustar notes people are talking about a general strike, but nowhere does the ISO take responsibility for calling or not calling for a general strike to kill the bill. Really, if you read the Sustar article, you can see I'm being generous as the only thing he immediately calls for is "[wearing] union buttons and T-shirts to coordinated break-time walkouts, informational pickets and more." That he says that could build to "job actions" "later". Oy.

On the language, you'd have to be more specific or better, point to what you think is a good example for me to really evaluate the criticism.

HEAD ICE
9th March 2011, 21:58
The LRP are probably my favorite Trotskyist group

syndicat
10th March 2011, 01:04
(1) Language: The language is inflated and jargonistic, in my opinion. We on the Left need to retain our beliefs and analysis without using 3rd Period Stalinist language.

(2) Organization: While the call for a general strike is objectively correct and opportune, what is also needed is a call for independent organization. The labor bureaucrats are only acting because of the more-or-less spontaneous action of the rank-and-file. This needs to be concretized into some kind of organization. Discussion is needed as to what form this might take, appropriate slogans, strategy, tactics, etc.

(3) Transitional Demands and Taxing the Rich: While the critique of the effect of such taxes is correct, I think the utility of such a demand is under-rated. Also, more transitional demands should be raised. Demands like "No Cuts," "Decrease Class Size," "Free Quality Medical Benefits for All," etc., should be considered.

(4) The Wars: Part of any analysis should be a discussion of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.



i tend to agree with Red Dave's comments here. the bit about independent organization is especially important. the bureaucracy have made it very plain they will be a road block to upping the ante and moving beyond their defeatist concessionary approach and their slavish subservience to the Dems.

PhoenixAsh
10th March 2011, 01:15
well...the war just got more serious:

GOP has run the bill through senate 21 miuntes ago without the democrats being present.

They did that by seperating the anti union laws from the budget in a hastily created committee and because if its not budget its doen't need a 20 senator presence could be voted for...which it was...

It now has to go through the assembly.

(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41996994/ns/politics-more_politics/)

S.Artesian
10th March 2011, 01:17
BTW according to CNN, etc. The state senate stripped the collective bargaining elimination from the old bill into a separate bill, eliminating the need for a quorum as no money is now involved, and voted to approve the anti-collective bargaining bill.

Sounds legal to me. Don't know what happens next, but I would imagine people are going to be very upset, and the police are going to be called upon to be the police.

RedTrackWorker
10th March 2011, 02:28
Yeah, I just saw the updates on them splitting the bill and passing the collective bargaining part (which had been talked about from near the beginning as being possible).

We can be sure there will be loud and angry protests in response Thursday. I hope we see job actions and a re-occupation as well. All of those things will raise the question of the general strike and the need for forms of self-organization of the struggle to the center stage, as well as the need not to have any illusions in the cops. To use some of that third-period Stalinist language: Victory to the Wisconsin workers!

S.Artesian
10th March 2011, 02:35
posted this elsewhere... but this is what I think needs to be done, in a nutshell:

Man, now's the time to go to Madison... and not with any agenda, or "vanguardism" -- just to percolate the situation, just to bring up the notion of developing working class organizations that don't discriminate being union/non-union, private/public, unemployed/employed-- organizations of the whole class planning as a class for a struggle that involves all of society..... mobilizes workers, students, poor people in Milwaukee who are going to be cut off from Medicaid.. raising issues about community based health clinics tailored to the specific maladies of the population, developing preventative solutions, run by professionals but answering for the results to these general organizations of the class; same thing with public schools... run by the professionals to meet the needs of the youth, and adults, but responsible to the collective for the results.

That's a transitional program I could really get behind.

Paulappaul
10th March 2011, 02:55
General Working Class organizations need to be formed as S. Artesian says which do not discriminate against or draw lines between Union/Non Union, Employed or Unemployed, Student or not and most importantly between Public and Private Sector Workers.

Political Parties are out of the question in such a situation. Both for their limited capacity to impose change and furthermore because their isn't any election.

Unions too, are out of the question as they leave out large portions of some of the most revolutionary elements of the lower class. Furthermore, because their form is limited to change and because their leaders are part of system which regurgitates the whole Capitalist System.

With so much Political Consciousness in the air, the action now to both real in both the Unions and the Capitalist system, if not to destroy both, is to Wildcat Strike, through the principle means of a Workers' Council. Such Councils do not form along trades or by union, but along genuine class lines incorporating all elements of the lower class, worker, student, unemployed, whatever.

Such a thing will be a true shock to whole nation and naturally set up a set of tactics for workers all over the region.

Victus Mortuum
10th March 2011, 07:22
Anyone in wisconsin or have contact with those in wisconsin? Workers assemblies combined with a seizure of the capitol building (which is already done) and establishment of community assemblies and a delegate system should be strongly encouraged up there.

bcbm
10th March 2011, 07:49
the capitol hasn't really been "seized" the police are allowing protesters for the time being.