Log in

View Full Version : America’s War on Libya



The Vegan Marxist
6th March 2011, 23:03
America’s War on Libya
by Stephen Lendman
March 6, 2011

Since WW II alone, America waged direct and proxy wars against Korea, Southeast Asia, Central and South American countries, African ones, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, and now Egypt and Libya. One down, one to go, besides dozens of attempted and successful coups, as well as numerous other interventions to control world markets, resources and people. Imperial America doesn’t sleep. It plots, deciding where next to strike.

Despite popular passion for democratic change, uprisings in Egypt and Libya were externally orchestrated, funded and armed by Washington to replace one despot with another. Democracy won’t be tolerated. It’s never been at home.

America’s media go along, especially when Washington goes to war or plans one. In the lead: The New York Times, the nation’s equivalent of an official information and propaganda ministry, posing as independent journalism.

It’s February 28 editorial headlined, “Qaddafi’s Crimes and Fantasies” made baseless accusations, then called on the International Criminal Court to investigate potential war crimes. Indeed it should – against America and Western co-conspirators, not Libya, for instigating regional aggression, a reality The Times ignored, besides previously against Afghanistan, Iraq, and other US targets.

On March 4, writer David Kirkpatrick headlined, “Qaddafi Brutalizes Foes, Armed or Defenseless,” saying:

Gaddafi attacked “unarmed protesters….His militia’s actions seemed likely to stir renewed debate over international intervention to limit his use of military power against his own citizens, possibly by imposing a no-flight zone.” If established, it’s an act of war ahead of aggressive air attacks against a defenseless country, America’s latest imperial target.

Kirkpatrick’s article read more like bad fiction than real journalism, borrowing a page from now disgraced former Times writer Judith Miller, who functioned as a Pentagon press agent, promoting America’s planned Iraq conquest and occupation. Now it’s Libya, struggling to defend itself against naked aggression, covert so far but not for long, claiming “humanitarian intervention.”

US warships are now positioned in the Mediterranean close by. About 1,200 Marines went to Greece for “Operation Libya.” “Rebels” are being sent military and other supplies. Armed intervention is coming, colonial subjugation planned. Libya’s “humanitarian crisis” was made in the USA. The pattern by now is familiar, used against many past targets.

On March 4, hinting about what’s already begun, Obama said:


So what I want to make sure of is that the United States has full capacity to act potentially rapidly if the situation deteriorated in such a way that you had a humanitarian crisis on our hands, or a situation in which civilians were – defenseless civilians were finding themselves trapped and in great danger.

He already called on Gaddafi to step down. Among his options, he included a no-fly zone, saying:


I don’t want us hamstrung. I want us to be making our decision based on what’s going to be best for the Libyan people in consultation with the international community.

In Geneva, Hillary Clinton called intervention “an option we are actively considering,” referring to a no-fly zone and other measures. Stiff economic sanctions were also imposed, effective 8:00 PM EST February 25.”

The die is cast. Colonizing Libya is planned to exploit its vast energy reserves, other resources, and people, doing what’s best for Washington, not Libyans, what’s always top priority.

Major Media Suppressed Independent Voices

On August 13, 2011, Fidel Castro will be 85. An elder statesman, he remains active, thoughtful and incisive, now writing commentaries on world issues. On March 3, the Havana Times headlined, “Fidel Castro Forecasts War on Libya,” publishing his full article in English.

Until America intervened, Libya “occupie(d) the first spot on the Human Development Index for Africa,” including the continent’s highest life expectancy. Authorities gave special attention to health care and education. Poverty is low. “The cultural level of the population is without a doubt the highest. The population wasn’t lacking food and essential social services.” Employment was plentiful, including for “hundreds of thousands of workers from Egypt, Tunisia, China and other countries (to) carry out ambitious plans for production and social development.”

America plans naked aggression to halt them. “The colossal campaign of lies, unleashed by the mass media,” distorts reality on the ground, including by Al Jazeera. Its daily commentaries feature misinformation and distortions based on unverified reports, including about alleged bombings that Russian satellite imagery proved untrue. Nonetheless, Gaddafi is falsely called an aggressor, not victim, his regional despot status notwithstanding.

Telesur Journalists Targeted

Reporting from Libya, Pan American broadcaster Telesur’s Jordan Rodriguez said members of his team were threatened, assaulted, and arrested for trying to report events accurately, including about pro-Gaddafi rallies in Tripoli’s Green Square.

Prior to Mubarak’s ouster, Egypt’s military junta detained and interrogated its Cairo team, preventing them from reporting the same way. Other independent journalists were also accosted. Dozens of incidents were reported.

Telesur’s Rodrigo Hernandez said he and his colleagues were bullied face down on the pavement, left there for hours, then “forced into an armored police vehicle, with armed personnel inside, and blindfolded,” en route to a military barracks for questioning.

They were also threatened with imprisonment, deportation, or “something much worse” if they kept reporting and were detained again. Similar tactics are ongoing in Libya to prevent accurate reports coming out. Imperial Washington wants none of its plans exposed.

Accurate Independent Journalism

Keith Harmon Snow is an independent journalist, war correspondent, human rights investigator, photographer, lecturer, and longtime observer of African country events. On March 1, his article (http://www.consciousbeingalliance.com/2011/03/petroleum-empire-maps-for-north-africa/) titled, “Petroleum & Empire in North Africa: Muammar Gaddafi Accused of Genocide? NATO Invasion Underway” provided detailed Libyan information. Access it through the following link:

Key points he stressed included:

– In 2004, America’s sanctions were dropped “in exchange for Gaddafi’s (limited) collaboration, (paving) the way for a new era of US-Libyan bilateral trade.” America’s main interest is Libya’s vast oil, gas and other mineral reserves. The Oil and Gas Journal estimates 46.4 billion barrels of oil and around 55 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, producing 95% of Libya’s 2010 export earnings. Its petrodollars “were reportedly invested in US Equity and Big Banks, including JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and others, and into (companies) like the Carlyle Group, one of America’s most seedy arms dealers.”

– the CIA “long wanted” Gaddafi removed and replaced.” In 1986, Reagan-ordered air strikes tried to kill him. His infant daughter was murdered instead. “The CIA (downed) Pan Am 103,” not Gaddafi who had nothing to do with it.

– Libya’s “opposition” includes “unspecified, unnamed, unidenfied ‘rebels’ of the National Front for the Salvation of Libya (NFSL). These are not innocent ‘pro-democracy’ protesters….” They seemingly “appeared out of thin air.” Who they are isn’t explained. NFSL, in fact, was established in 1981 by Sudan’s Colonel Jaafer Nimieri, a US puppet dictator from 1971 – 1985.

– For decades, CIA front groups have been operating in Libya, “backing armed insurgents and interventions” portrayed as “pro-democracy” movements.

– Western media is reporting misinformation about events on the ground, including alleged bombings, massacres, and possible nerve gas used. None of it is credible. Libya, in fact, is being attacked. It’s responding in self-defense.

– Vicious propaganda is being used to enlist support for imperial intervention. “US troops have already moved ashore….joining the ‘opposition….The US, France and Britain have already set up Bases in Libya.” British and American Special Forces are operating out of Benghazi and Tobruck. Other covert US forces have been on the ground for weeks. Nothing humanitarian is planned.

– More than oil and gas is wanted. So are valued mineral deposits. “Libya has a huge land mass with massive untapped mineral potential (including uranium),” besides known energy resources.

– Accusing Gaddafi of genocide is malicious and untrue, like other major media fabrications. Their “disinformation frenzy and hysteria knows no bounds.” No verifiable evidence exists, but there’s plenty proving US genocides in Iraq, Afghanistan, and earlier in other targeted countries, causing many millions of deaths for decades. Western media air brushed them out, including The New York Times, America’s lead propaganda instrument.

In “Libya, Getting it Right: A Revolutionary Pan-African Perspective,” Gerald Perreira wrote:

The conflict in Libya is not a revolution, but a counter-revolution. (It’s) fundamentally a battle between Pan-African forces on the one hand, who are dedicated to the realization of Qaddafi’s vision of a united Africa, and reactionary racist Libyan Arab forces who reject (his) vision of Libya as part of a United Africa.

For those of us who have lived and worked in Libya, there are many complexities to the current situation that have been completely overlooked by the Western media and ‘Westoxicated’ analysts who have nothing other than a Eurocentric perspective to draw on….Libya’s system and the battle now taking place on its soil, stands completely outside the Western imagination.

As a result, all Western government and media reports lack credibility. They’re malicious imperial agitprop, including from top officials, BBC and Al Jazeera, each with its own agenda, all serving Western interests, harmful to Libyans.

A Final Comment

Ongoing events in Libya are familiar. Like many of his past counterparts, Gaddafi’s been targeted for removal. For weeks or much longer, covert CIA and Special Forces operatives recruited, funded and armed so-called “opposition forces.” They, not Gaddafi, instigated violence, heading for civil war. He responded in self-defense. Doing less would be irresponsible.

Western media portray instigators as victims, saying Gaddafi’s waging war on his people. America and Western nations are called white knights, offering “humanitarian intervention” when, if fact, imperial colonization is planned. The longer violence continues, the more false media reports will exaggerate it, enlisting support for another nation to be destroyed to save it.

Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Pakistanis, and many other oppressed people understand, victimized by imperial aggression, occupation, exploitation, immiseration, and regular drone attacks murdering innocent men, women and children called militants.

The latest in Afghanistan were nine young children, aged seven to 12, gathering wood in the mountains near their village. They were murdered in cold blood, what’s escalating in Libya, being softened up in preparation for colonization and greater harshness.

http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/03/americas-war-on-libya/

Os Cangaceiros
7th March 2011, 00:25
Despite popular passion for democratic change, uprisings in Egypt and Libya were externally orchestrated, funded and armed by Washington to replace one despot with another.

Is the author of this privy to information that we're unaware of? I see very little evidence that the uprising in Egypt was "orchestrated" by Washington (the fact some individual activists were on friendly relations w/ Washington notwithstanding.) That theory doesn't make any sense at all. Mubarak was an American toady, marching in lockstep with Israel and the USA on most issues, especially Iran.

The rest of the article isn't worth much either, going as far as to say that part of the reason that the uprising in Libya is bad relates somehow to the colonel's grand plan to build a glorious pan-African empire.

Dimentio
7th March 2011, 00:46
This is starting to get disturbing.

Dimentio
7th March 2011, 00:56
Let us be contrafactual.

Imagine that Germany never united, and that Prussia lost against Austria in 1866 or against France in 1871.

In 1933, a guy named Adolph Hitler installs a nationalist dictatorship in Bavaria and calls for the unification of Germany, under an ideology named "National Socialism", while rallying against "French imperialism".

Would you support Hitler just because German unification against French Imperialism is something "progressive"?

Sinister Cultural Marxist
7th March 2011, 02:12
I'm anti-Imperialist and it is clear that the US has Imperial interests which it pursues around the world. But I think it would be better than partaking in rational criticism of US Imperialism than rabid conspiracy theorizing whenever some odious anti-American tyrant experiences protests against his rule.

I mean, do they really think the military, the mainstream media and the bourgeois have big council meetings where they plan out their grand conspiracy to overthrow Libya? Do they think the CIA, MI5 and Mossad are omnipotent forces and the media their public arms and legs? It's like people are trying to see the Gulf of Tonkin around every corner, and when they can't, they make up some convoluted tale.

If this rebellion was a CIA plot, and not caused by the utter failure of Gaddhafi to institute constructive economic and social policies in the "East", then the masses would not have been so easily mobilized. If everything was great, and Gaddhafi was a crazy wizard from the libyan sahara that brought housing, health care and education to his people, then his own army wouldn't be defecting and shooting his posters.

Jose Gracchus
7th March 2011, 07:45
“The CIA (downed) Pan Am 103,” not Gaddafi who had nothing to do with it.

New brand truther bullshit. Can you provide any evidence this is true?

Luís Henrique
8th March 2011, 00:50
Despite popular passion for democratic change, uprisings in Egypt and Libya were externally orchestrated, funded and armed by Washington to replace one despot with another. Democracy won’t be tolerated. It’s never been at home.

In fact, what uprisings have ever been not orchestrated by imperialism? Even the Russian revolution was an evident scheme funded and armed by German imperialism. In fact, it is a myth that people can actually take history in their hands. Whatever we do, we are always pawns for counter-revolution.

Let's give up these foolish notions or revolution, and stick to whatever tyrant we have at hand, because the future will be obviously worse and even more controlled by imperialism.

... or perhaps, let's stop lionising idiotic third world petty dictators just because they dress in red (or, in a ridiculous parody, green, like Gaddafy, or not even that, like Mubarak).

Just because Washington hates the guts of these people, it doesn't mean we should support them.

Luís Henrique

L.A.P.
8th March 2011, 01:05
Some people just can't let go. Face it, you were wrong, Gaddafi is not a Socialist especially not one worth supporting nor is he an Anti-Imperialist. And if he is an Anti-Imperialist, then he really sucks at it.

Sasha
8th March 2011, 01:22
Some people just can't let go. Face it, you were wrong, Gaddafi is not a Socialist especially not one worth supporting nor is he an Anti-Imperialist. And if he is an Anti-Imperialist, then he really sucks at it.

This, let's admit it; we all had an softspot for the harlekin, the joker, the epic troll but lwts also admit the joke went sour a long time ago, esp for the libyans.

Luís Henrique
8th March 2011, 04:33
This, let's admit it; we all had an softspot for the harlekin, the joker, the epic troll but lwts also admit the joke went sour a long time ago, esp for the libyans.

One of the first threads about the Libyan uprising here in RevLeft focused on the idea that Gaddafy was going to "join the protests". And yes, given to his past record of dwelling in confusion and divisiveness, that seemed possible: that he would join the protests, and help to topple "a government that he was not part of", as he sometimes has said, or convince people that there was nothing to topple, as Libya is a "Stateless State", as he brags in other occasions.

But the threat to his power was earnest, and he realised it was no time for jokes, and he is being as brutal as any petty tyrant with an undermanned, ill armed, and ill trained army can be.

So it is time to any dellusions to be shed, and any deluded people to get back into reality. The man is, and has long been, just a third world opera buffa dictator, as socialist as Mussolini, as sympathetic as Somoza, as pro-working class as Franco, as funny as Salazar.

Luís Henrique

Sinister Cultural Marxist
8th March 2011, 06:01
So it is time to any dellusions to be shed, and any deluded people to get back into reality. The man is, and has long been, just a third world opera buffa dictator, as socialist as Mussolini, as sympathetic as Somoza, as pro-working class as Franco, as funny as Salazar.


Good way of putting it

Also, if this is true, it's another scary story out of the "Jamahiriya (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7QwHffIJaU&feature=player_embedded)"

t.shonku
8th March 2011, 06:55
It seems that western media is working hard to create a popular opinion for carrying out air-strikes against Libya .

Also the agenda of the protesters remain very much unclear to me, some of them look like pro-western while some look confused and some look like anarchist ...........this is all very confusing. Are there any presence of any Islamic Resistance ?

Sinister Cultural Marxist
8th March 2011, 08:33
t shonku-it seems the protesters are a diverse bunch, ranging from obviously anti-american al qaeda types (gaddafi isn't totally full of shit), to pro-american types, probably to some leftwing types, as well as students and deserted soldiers. Perhaps one ideological minority will hijack it, who knows?

Sentinel
8th March 2011, 10:48
Indeed, while imperialists may have their supporters amongst the protesters and obviously are trying to make the best of the situation in any country with a revolution, by attempting to steer it towards the right, it's nothing but pathetic to claim that they are 'engineered' 'proxy revolutions' and whatnot. Especially the claim that not only the Libyan one but also the one in Egypt would have been such really shot down the entire idea in flames.

I mean, while the controversy about Gaddafi is at least somewhat more understandable due to the confusion caused by his past rhetoric (or is it?), the sheer thought of the imperialists having organised the popular overthrow of an openly loyal subject of theirs like Mubarak is an absurd joke. Really.

Salyut
8th March 2011, 11:18
The authors of these articles need to learn how to reference things. If they want to make claims about the CIA blowing up Pan Am 103, then they need to cite a source/evidence/whatever the fuck. Same goes with special forces being present in Libya as far back as February - if I pulled this shit with a college essay I'd be eaten alive.


I mean, while the controversy about Gaddafi is at least somewhat more understandable due to the confusion caused by his past rhetoric (or is it?), the sheer thought of the imperialists having organised the popular overthrow of an openly loyal subject of theirs like Mubarak is an absurd joke. Really.
Thats what the Mossad WANT you to think comrade!

edit: Doesn't Gaddafi's attempted seizure of the Aouzou strip count as imperialism? To quote wiki:


Libya argued that the territory was inhabited by indigenous people who owed vassalage to the Senoussi Order (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanusiya_Order) and subsequently to the Ottoman Empire (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire), and that this title had been inherited by Libya. It also supported its claim with an unratified 1935 treaty between France (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France) and Italy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italy) (the Mussolini (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini)-Laval (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Laval) Treaty), the colonial powers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_power) of Chad and Libya, respectively, that confirmed the possession of the strip by Italy. After consolidating its hold on the strip, Libya annexed it in 1976.


That doesn't look like something a anti-imperialist state would say...