Log in

View Full Version : Muammar Gaddafi, tyrant of Tripoli by Robert Fisk



freepalestine
22nd February 2011, 03:34
Cruel. Vainglorious. Steeped in blood. And now, surely, after more than four decades of terror and oppression, on his way out?


Robert Fisk on Muammar Gaddafi, tyrant of Tripoli

Tuesday, 22 February 2011





http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/dynamic/00561/gaddafi-fisk_561702t.jpg (http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/cruel-vainglorious-steeped-in-blood-and-now-surely-after-more-than-four-decades-of-terror-and-oppression-on-his-way-out-2221687.html?action=Gallery)
GETTY



A comedy actor who had turned to serious tragedy in his last days, desperate for the last make-up lady, the final knock on the theatre door.

http://www.independent.co.uk/independent.co.uk/images/i_photos.gif More pictures (http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/cruel-vainglorious-steeped-in-blood-and-now-surely-after-more-than-four-decades-of-terror-and-oppression-on-his-way-out-2221687.html?action=Gallery)
So even the old, paranoid, crazed fox of Libya – the pallid, infantile, droop-cheeked dictator from Sirte, owner of his own female praetorian guard, author of the preposterous Green Book, who once announced he would ride to a Non-Aligned Movement summit in Belgrade on his white charger – is going to ground. Or gone. Last night, the man I first saw more than three decades ago, solemnly saluting a phalanx of black-uniformed frogmen as they flappered their way across the sulphur-hot tarmac of Green Square on a torrid night in Tripoli during a seven-hour military parade, appeared to be on the run at last, pursued – like the dictators of Tunis and Cairo – by his own furious people.


The YouTube and Facebook pictures told the story with a grainy, fuzzed reality, fantasy turned to fire and burning police stations in Benghazi and Tripoli, to corpses and angry, armed men, of a woman with a pistol leaning from a car door, of a crowd of students – were they readers of his literature? – breaking down a concrete replica of his ghastly book. Gunfire and flames and cellphone screams; quite an epitaph for a regime we all, from time to time, supported.


And here, just to lock our minds on to the brain of truly eccentric desire, is a true story. Only a few days ago, as Colonel Muammar Gaddafi faced the wrath of his own people, he met with an old Arab acquaintance and spent 20 minutes out of four hours asking him if he knew of a good surgeon to lift his face. This is – need I say it about this man? – a true story. The old boy looked bad, sagging face, bloated, simply "magnoon" (mad), a comedy actor who had turned to serious tragedy in his last days, desperate for the last make-up lady, the final knock on the theatre door.


In the event, Saif al-Islam al-Gaddafi, faithful understudy for his father, had to stand in for him on stage as Benghazi and Tripoli burned, threatening "chaos and civil war" if Libyans did not come to heel. "Forget oil, forget gas," this wealthy nincompoop announced. "There will be civil war."
Above the beloved son's head on state television, a green Mediterranean appeared to ooze from his brain. Quite an obituary, when you come to think of it, of nearly 42 years of Gaddafi rule.

Not exactly King Lear, who would "do such things – what they are, yet I know not, but they shall be the terrors of the earth"; more like another dictator in a different bunker, summoning up non-existent armies to save him in his capital, ultimately blaming his own people for his calamity. But forget Hitler. Gaddafi was in a class of his own, Mickey Mouse and Prophet, Batman and Clark Gable and Anthony Quinn playing Omar Mukhtar in Lion of the Desert, Nero and Mussolini (the 1920s version) and, inevitably – the greatest actor of them all – Muammar Gaddafi.

He wrote a book – appropriately titled in his present unfortunate circumstances – called Escape to Hell and Other Stories and demanded a one state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which would be called "Israeltine".
Shortly thereafter, he threw half the Palestinian residents of Libya out of his country and told them to walk home to their lost land. He stormed out of the Arab League because he deemed it irrelevant – a brief moment of sanity there, one has to admit – and arrived in Cairo for a summit, deliberately confusing a lavatory door with that of the conference chamber until led aside by the Caliph Mubarak who had a thin, suffering smile on his face.


And if what we are witnessing is a true revolution in Libya, then we shall soon be able – unless the Western embassy flunkies get there first for a spot of serious, desperate looting – to rifle through the Tripoli files and read the Libyan version of Lockerbie and the 1989 UTA Flight 722 plane bombing; and of the Berlin disco bombings, for which a host of Arab civilians and Gaddafi's own adopted daughter were killed in America's 1986 revenge raids; and of his IRA arms supplies and of his assassination of opponents at home and abroad, and of the murder of a British policewoman, and of his invasion of Chad and the deals with British oil magnates; and (woe betide us all at this point) of the truth behind the grotesque deportation of the soon-to-expire al-Megrahi, the supposed Lockerbie bomber too ill to die, who may, even now, reveal some secrets which the Fox of Libya – along with Gordon Brown and the Attorney General for Scotland, for all are equal on the Gaddafi world stage – would rather we didn't know about.


And who knows what the Green Book Archives – and please, O insurgents of Libya, do NOT in thy righteous anger burn these priceless documents – will tell us about Lord Blair's supine visit to this hideous old man; an addled figure whose "statesmanlike" gesture (the words, of course, come from that old Marxist fraud Jack Straw, when the author of Escape to Hell promised to hand over the nuclear nick-nacks which his scientists had signally failed to turn into a bomb) allowed our own faith-based Leader to claim that, had we not smitten the Saddamites with our justified anger because of their own non-existent weapons of mass destruction, Libya, too, would have joined the Axis of Evil.


Alas, Lord Blair paid no heed to the Gaddafi "whoops" factor, a unique ability to pose as a sane man while secretly believing oneself – like miss-a-heart-beat Omar Suleiman in Cairo – to be a light bulb. Only days after the Blair handshake, the Saudis accused Gaddafi of plotting – and the details, by the way, were horribly convincing – to murder Britain's ally, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.

But why be surprised when the man most feared and now most mocked and hated by his own vengeful people wrote, in the aforesaid Escape to Hell that Christ's crucifixion was a historical falsehood and that – as here I say again, a faint ghost of truth does very occasionally adhere to Gaddafi's ravings – a German "Fourth Reich" was lording it over Britain and America? Reflecting on death in this thespian work, he asks if the Grim Reaper is male or female. The leader of the Great Libyan Arab People's Popular Masses, needless to say, seemed to favour the latter.


As with all Middle East stories, a historical narrative precedes the dramatic pageant of Gaddafi's fall. For decades, his opponents tried to kill him; they rose up as nationalists, as prisoners in his torture chambers, as Islamists on the streets of – yes! – Benghazi. And he smote them all down. Indeed, this venerable city had already achieved its martyrdom status in 1979 when Gaddafi publicly hanged dissident students in Benghazi's main square. I am not even mentioning the 1993 disappearance of Libyan human rights defender Mansour al-Kikhiya while attending a Cairo conference after complaining about Gaddafi's execution of political prisoners.
And it is important to remember that, 42 years ago, our own Foreign Office welcomed Gaddafi's coup against the effete and corrupt King Idriss because, said our colonial mandarins, it was better to have a spick-and-span colonel in charge of an oil state than a relic of imperialism. Indeed, they showed almost as much enthusiasm as they did for this decaying despot when Lord Blair arrived in Tripoli decades later for the laying on of hands.


As a Libyan opposition group told us years ago – we didn't care about these folks then, of course – "Gaddafi would have us believe he is at the vanguard of every human development that has emerged during his lifetime".
All true, if now reduced to sub-Shakespearean farce. My kingdom for a facelift. At that non-aligned summit in Belgrade, Gaddafi even flew in a planeload of camels to provide him with fresh milk. But he was not allowed to ride his white charger. Tito saw to that. Now there was a real dictator.





http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/cruel-vainglorious-steeped-in-blood-and-now-surely-after-more-than-four-decades-of-terror-and-oppression-on-his-way-out-2221687.

Dimentio
22nd February 2011, 15:33
That blathering was initially interesting but eventually turned into something looking so tedious it might been have written by the guy it's about.

punisa
22nd February 2011, 21:59
At that non-aligned summit in Belgrade, Gaddafi even flew in a planeload of camels to provide him with fresh milk. But he was not allowed to ride his white charger. Tito saw to that. Now there was a real dictator.

Bullshit !
There were only 2 NAM summits in Belgrade.
1. Belgrade, September 1–6, 1961 (Gaddafi came to power in 1969)
2. Belgrade, September 4–7, 1989 (Tito was already dead, since 1980)

And btw, stop comparing Tito with this Gaddafi guy. Tito was a true revolutionary, this camel lover is a joke.

Omsk
22nd February 2011, 22:03
And not to mention Tito was a man who would never isue orders like Gaddafi,he cared for the people of Yugoslavia and the 'Братство и јединство'.He was not a murdering dictator.

Decolonize The Left
22nd February 2011, 22:45
And btw, stop comparing Tito with this Gaddafi guy. Tito was a true revolutionary, this camel lover is a joke.

You can be pissed off, but please try to avoid these sorts of racial slurs.

- August

Crux
22nd February 2011, 23:33
And not to mention Tito was a man who would never isue orders like Gaddafi,he cared for the people of Yugoslavia and the 'Братство и јединство'.He was not a murdering dictator.
Then what was the prison in Goli otok for?
But we're getting off topic.

Toppler
23rd February 2011, 00:31
Then what was the prison in Goli otok for?
But we're getting off topic.

It was closed in 1956, did not involve actual mass murder, and it was mainly for Stalin kiddies (except those "kiddies" were ruthless Stalinists who could have overtaken the country):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goli_otok

Stalinists in other countries have built not 1, but fuckton of such camps. Good that Tito made them taste their own medicine. In 1950s CSSR, "Titoites" were not just sent to a camp, but outright sentenced to death.

Also, Americans have a fuckton of such "nice camps", and worse, NSFW http://www.rotten.com/library/crime/prison/abu-ghraib/ .

Toppler
23rd February 2011, 00:40
I see that you have a Trotsky quote in your profile. So no flame, but just: Kronstadt.

Wanted Man
23rd February 2011, 00:40
It was closed in 1956, did not involve actual mass murder, and it was mainly for Stalin kiddies (except those "kiddies" were ruthless Stalinists who could have overtaken the country):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goli_otok

Stalinists in other countries have built not 1, but fuckton of such camps. Good that Tito made them taste their own medicine. In 1950s CSSR, "Titoites" were not just sent to a camp, but outright sentenced to death.

Also, Americans have a fuckton of such "nice camps", and worse, NSFW http://www.rotten.com/library/crime/prison/abu-ghraib/ .

According to your link, they also sent communists to the camp who simply disagreed with Tito slightly on relations with the Soviet Union, as well as non-communist political prisoners and non-political criminals. The death penalty was applied as well.

Toppler
23rd February 2011, 00:48
According to your link, they also sent communists to the camp who simply disagreed with Tito slightly on relations with the Soviet Union, as well as non-communist political prisoners and non-political criminals. The death penalty was applied as well.

I agree that this was bad, but face it; every regimes kills some people.
Death penalty was applied, but I said no mass murder, it was definitely not a Gulag/Nazi style extermination camp.
Especially in a time when you are confronted with a threat of domination from one of the worst mass murdering dictators in History; Stalin.
And every other communist nation has done worse, plus many capitalist nations, the 1950s globally were not exactly a happy time when it came to repression.
He has saved much more lives than he killed, as shown in this post http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.php?p=2028099&postcount=14 .

Yugoslavia before Tito as you see was a monarchist, then fascist shithole.

I "love" you idealists from pampered rich countries. He killed some people, so he is a despicable dictator even if he gave a very good quality of life to almost everybody and killed after all far less than imperialist nations kill in a month. Why is this forum full of "it's okay that Mao killed 80 million people because the life expectancy improved" and "every communist nation was state capitalist and every leader who built a single prison camp is a despicable dictator". people? Too many people are either hard Stalinists who deny tie 1932-33 USSR famine or anarchists who condemn every communist regime.

And Wikipedia is not exactly not unbiased against socialism either

Honggweilo
23rd February 2011, 00:57
I "love" you idealists from pampered rich countries

oh you

Kiev Communard
23rd February 2011, 20:07
While Tito was not exactly faultless, in comparison with Gaddafi, he would have obviously looked like a true socialist democrat. But we are staying off-topic there.

The fact is, the criticism of Gaddafi in this article is from the right, not from the left. The author implies that the New Labour support for Gaddafi has more to do with their (especially that of Jack Straw) "Marxist" sympathies for "anti-imperialism", conveniently ignoring the interests of British-based multinationals in exploiting Libya's oil riches, as well as the pro-Gaddafi policies of "good old" conservative governments of G.W. Bush in the U.S. and especially Silvio Berlusconi of Italy.

Ravachol
24th February 2011, 15:43
I "love" you idealists from pampered rich countries. He killed some people, so he is a despicable dictator even if he gave a very good quality of life to almost everybody

The standard of life in the US is far higher, so Obama must be 'OK' because he somehow 'gave' such a standard of life to the people.... Dude what are you even doing on a revolutionary leftist forum if you think material conditions are given or taken by individual leaders...

Wanted Man
24th February 2011, 17:59
I agree that this was bad, but face it; every regimes kills some people.

Oh well OK then. That's the sound of all your future humanitarianism-based arguments on this forum flying out of the window.


Death penalty was applied, but I said no mass murder, it was definitely not a Gulag/Nazi style extermination camp.

What, you're comparing prison camps (however brutal) to the industrialised genocide of 6 million people just for being Jewish? Wow, sick little Khrushchevites really will stoop to anything, they learned it from the great bald man himself after all.


Especially in a time when you are confronted with a threat of domination from one of the worst mass murdering dictators in History; Stalin.

Yeah terrorist threats justify anything, George W. Bush agrees.

There is not much to respond to in your post otherwise, because you have no idea about me or my positions on any of these things that you mention. You're just throwing your toys out of the pram because someone criticised your beloved leader.

By the way, aren't you the one from a bourgeois family? That's usually the case for people who use that kind of "Oh you privileged kid" argument first, but it's pretty funny to be proven right (http://www.revleft.com/vb/demonization-communism-t148770/index.html?p=1999911#post1999911).