View Full Version : Would sex be important in a communist country?
mEds
10th September 2003, 04:52
The one thing I do like about capitalism is that sex (at least now) is much more accepted. I believe we should give into biological urges like that. I mean who knows somebody who does not want a pretty partner or who wants to have sex every day? I dont? DO YOU? Anyways, reproduction will have to be high because we need to instill a good mindset amongst our youth. (BTW im not a communist because I dont like accepting or joining political parties like Che, it makes you more resistant to freedeom of expression and thought.)
Goldfinger
10th September 2003, 06:02
wtf
why should anyone interfere with what goes on in a couple's (or group's) bedroom, as long as no-one's getting hurt (against their will)?
Comrade Marcel
10th September 2003, 10:41
Sex is much more accepted??? Your nuts.
I think you need to read the The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/sw/progress-publishers/volume03.htm) by Engels. Pay attention to his critique of monogomy and how it developed as a part of the "traditional" family structure.
crazy comie
10th September 2003, 14:54
the one thing that wuld need to hapen though is for the state to have policys to make a society with 0 population growth.so as to allaw ery one to have inof food.
mEds
10th September 2003, 15:48
I never said that communist regime (new one) wouldnt allow it. All I was ASKING is would it be MORE or LESS important.
crazy comie
10th September 2003, 18:31
i never said they shouldn't
mEds
10th September 2003, 21:45
sex is ver beneficial. good mentally, good physically and pleasurably ;) . To much freud on the mind-- Good ideas but still a peeeevert
suffianr
10th September 2003, 22:34
Your avatar just gave me a panic attack, Dominant.
mEds
11th September 2003, 01:33
whats so bad about it? i kind of like it!! why dont you like it?
Sasafrás
11th September 2003, 03:50
It's peanut butter jelly time..
Personally, I wonder why this thread is even in practice. :unsure:
suffianr
11th September 2003, 03:59
whats so bad about it? i kind of like it!! why dont you like it?
Of course, I like it. It's hilarious. :lol:
crazy comie
11th September 2003, 15:17
you still got to make sure pepole don't breed like bunnys
mEds
11th September 2003, 17:08
free love and pregnancy by the age of 13 would be a must.
YKTMX
12th September 2003, 00:17
Originally posted by Comrade
[email protected] 10 2003, 10:41 AM
Sex is much more accepted??? Your nuts.
I think you need to read the The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/sw/progress-publishers/volume03.htm) by Engels. Pay attention to his critique of monogomy and how it developed as a part of the "traditional" family structure.
Haha, old Freddy was biased. He was a bloody sexual deviant :D
crazy comie
12th September 2003, 15:24
you would need social population control.
YKTMX
12th September 2003, 19:35
Originally posted by crazy
[email protected] 12 2003, 03:24 PM
you would who ever need social population control.
Well, contraception and abortion would be free for all obviously, I don't think anything like restricted numbers of births per women would be introduced.
crazy comie
13th September 2003, 16:21
yeah i think i agrre with that
bluerev002
13th September 2003, 23:08
Mate, not to sound old fashioned but I think sex would be better if it was saved till after marriage, if everyone did so anyways. Although I still havent figured out how Athiest marry :o
But itll spare a lot of problems, like HIVs or AIDs or anything like that. Teen pregnancy n shit like that too. Plus, if you suck at it, your wife or husband cant devourse you for being bad in bed since they cant compare ^_^
truthaddict11
14th September 2003, 00:49
how would sex be better if everyone waited for marriage? sex is sex no matter if you are 15 or 85 I dont see whats the problem with people having sex whenever. btw I am an Atheist and I dont believe in marriage.
FistFullOfSteel
14th September 2003, 16:20
only if u like that person that matters..no need to marriage or something
mEds
14th September 2003, 19:13
procreation is fun!
crazy comie
15th September 2003, 15:22
I think i agree with hugo on this one
Anarchist Freedom
15th September 2003, 22:20
sex isnt isnt a huge deal people now if the people in our country breed like bunnies then we have a problem but i would think people be moderate sex in my opinion is something that is just there now i dont agree with sleeping with someone you dont know every other night someone different cuz of STD's but anyways its no big deal
:che:
crazy comie
16th September 2003, 15:15
i suppose so.
Michael De Panama
16th September 2003, 20:21
Originally posted by
[email protected] 9 2003, 11:52 PM
The one thing I do like about capitalism is that sex (at least now) is much more accepted. I believe we should give into biological urges like that. I mean who knows somebody who does not want a pretty partner or who wants to have sex every day? I dont? DO YOU? Anyways, reproduction will have to be high because we need to instill a good mindset amongst our youth. (BTW im not a communist because I dont like accepting or joining political parties like Che, it makes you more resistant to freedeom of expression and thought.)
"Capitalism" has nothing to do with that, you crazy fuck.
bluerev002
17th September 2003, 04:26
Couldnt have said it better meself Michael de Panama^_^
Truthaddict, yes it does matter, people are generally more mature when they are older and ready for a life partner. Even if I am Athiest, I still belive in setteling down with only one parter for the rest of my life, be that with marriage or whatever. If a 15 year old gets pregnant it does make a big diffrence over a mauter one. If everybody is sleeping w/everybody their gonna end up catching a HIV. It does matter very much, I dont know, maybe you just have to have it pounded into your mind year after year like we do at our school since our valley is lke #3 with people most infected with HIVs. :o
truthaddict11
17th September 2003, 20:31
i think you misunderstood me blurev, all because people arent "settled down" or "mature"(even though you dont give one example of this what is your definition of "mature") doesnt mean that they have sex with anyone anywhere or dont care about the consequences. I believe that people should be able to have sex when they think they are ready and that no state or religous sanctions of "no sex before marriage" should stop that.
crazy comie
18th September 2003, 17:26
Originally posted by
[email protected] 17 2003, 08:31 PM
i think you misunderstood me blurev, all because people arent "settled down" or "mature"(even though you dont give one example of this what is your definition of "mature") doesnt mean that they have sex with anyone anywhere or dont care about the consequences. I believe that people should be able to have sex when they think they are ready and that no state or religous sanctions of "no sex before marriage" should stop that.
i think that is correct
RyeN
19th September 2003, 03:34
Although sex is great fun and can be one of the best things between consenting people, it also caries a great deal of responsibility. You should be minful of how your actions affect others. There is a great deal of emotion created when people have sex along with attachment issues. Not to mention potentialy reciving an STD.
crazy comie
19th September 2003, 15:06
I also agree with that.
Anarchist Freedom
20th September 2003, 02:52
werd to you
:che:
crazy comie
20th September 2003, 10:27
what
bluerev002
22nd September 2003, 03:43
Originally posted by
[email protected] 17 2003, 12:31 PM
i think you misunderstood me blurev, all because people arent "settled down" or "mature"(even though you dont give one example of this what is your definition of "mature") doesnt mean that they have sex with anyone anywhere or dont care about the consequences. I believe that people should be able to have sex when they think they are ready and that no state or religous sanctions of "no sex before marriage" should stop that.
To be mature is to know the consequenses of sex and be able to handle the responsibilities. If you have sex impregnate the woman and leave her to bear the child all by herslef, taht is certanly NOT mature. I too belive that peoople should have sex when they are ready, but the thing is that people these days think they are ready whne they really are not. People should have sex when they think they are ready, but most dont care to think they are ready. They just go around like sex craved monkeys fucking the first whore they can get their hands on to brag with their buddies the next day. Is this ready? Is this mature? I think not. Only when they are ready they can have sex, but like I said, they are not ready.
And I dont think I have to give examples of what it means to be mature enough, your not dumb, you can figure it out.
Although sex is great fun and can be one of the best things between consenting people, it also caries a great deal of responsibility. You should be minful of how your actions affect others. There is a great deal of emotion created when people have sex along with attachment issues. Not to mention potentialy reciving an STD.
Exactly
truthaddict11
22nd September 2003, 12:02
why do think think anyone who doesnt live up to your standards for sex go out and have sex with the first "whore" they come across? I believe that a person can make can make the intelligent decision to have sex as a teenager and dont think the majority of them would become womanizers or "sex crazed monkeys" in any sense.
crazy comie
22nd September 2003, 16:23
that is true.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.