el_chavista
15th February 2011, 18:57
The 21st century socialism has been so associated to the Venezuelan Bolivarian revolution that in this Stalinist Spanish forum "Todo sobre el comunismo" (http://www.forocomunista.com/) , any post about 21cSoc is moved to the Venezuelan sub-forum :lol:
It is because of utopian socialist Heinz Dieterich's 1996 book by the same name and his support until a couple of years ago to Chávez.
Actually, the 21st century socialism is an ideological reaction of leftist intellectuals to the fall of the USSR and its consequent neo-liberal hegemony.
Just anti-neo-liberalist seem to be some 21st century socialists like R. Burbach, O. Nuńez y B. Kagarlitsky (authors of Globalization and its Discontents. The Rise of Postmodern Socialism. London and Chicago, 1997), who merrily stated that any movement may be considered socialist just if it demands limits to the market and if it pursues the redistribution of the incomes. So, by this token even keynesianists may be considered socialists.
But don't get misled, there are real Marxist Socialists of the 21st century. Michael Lebowitz and Scottish economic school members, for example, are fully aware that there is no socialism without people taking control of the means of production.
It is because of utopian socialist Heinz Dieterich's 1996 book by the same name and his support until a couple of years ago to Chávez.
Actually, the 21st century socialism is an ideological reaction of leftist intellectuals to the fall of the USSR and its consequent neo-liberal hegemony.
Just anti-neo-liberalist seem to be some 21st century socialists like R. Burbach, O. Nuńez y B. Kagarlitsky (authors of Globalization and its Discontents. The Rise of Postmodern Socialism. London and Chicago, 1997), who merrily stated that any movement may be considered socialist just if it demands limits to the market and if it pursues the redistribution of the incomes. So, by this token even keynesianists may be considered socialists.
But don't get misled, there are real Marxist Socialists of the 21st century. Michael Lebowitz and Scottish economic school members, for example, are fully aware that there is no socialism without people taking control of the means of production.