Log in

View Full Version : Lenin On So-Called "Pure Revolutions"



Rakhmetov
30th January 2011, 18:43
From Saturday's article by Alan Woods:

“Whoever expects a pure social revolution will never live to see it. Such a person pays lip service to revolution without understanding what revolution is….
“The socialist revolution in Europe cannot be anything other than an outburst of mass struggle on the part of all and sundry oppressed and discontented elements. Inevitably, sections of the petty bourgeoisie and of the backward workers will participate in it—without such participation, mass struggle is impossible, without it no revolution is possible—and just as inevitably will they bring into the movement their prejudices, their reactionary fantasies, their weaknesses and errors.
“But objectively they will attack capital, and the class- conscious vanguard of the revolution, the advanced proletariat, expressing this objective truth of a variegated and discordant, motley and outwardly fragmented, mass struggle, will be able to unite and direct it, capture power, seize the banks, expropriate the trusts which all hate (though for different reasons!), and introduce other dictatorial measures which in their totality will amount to the overthrow of the bourgeoisie and the victory of socialism, which, however, will by no means immediately purge itself of petty bourgeois slag.” (Lenin, The Irish Rebellion of 1916)

http://www.socialist.net/he-egyptian-revolution.htm

also available on www.marxist.com

Permanent Revolutionary
30th January 2011, 19:42
Lenin made a very good point then, and it's just as valid now. A socialist revolution can't be done in any other way.

Die Neue Zeit
31st January 2011, 02:06
What Egypt and the rest of the Arab world need is a Caesarean Socialist revolution. The DOTP can wait.