Log in

View Full Version : Black teen charged with 'attempted lynching' for recording police beating



Property Is Robbery
28th January 2011, 23:59
Liberation News

http://www.pslweb.org/liberationnews/news/black-teen-videotapes-police.html

Jeremy Marks, an 18-year-old African American high school student, was arrested in May 2010 and charged with felony “attempted lynching” by Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley. What did Marks really do?
Marks witnessed and recorded video of an incident on May 5 involving a Los Angeles Unified School District Police officer and a 15-year-old African American student near Verdugo Hills High School. The police officer, Erin Robles, beat the student, pepper sprayed him and brutally smashed his head through a bus window because he had allegedly been smoking a cigarette. Many other students witnessed the incident.
Marks quietly recorded video of the incident. The L.A. District Attorney’s office claims he yelled, “Kick her a--,” and that amounted to trying to “incite a riot during an attempt to free a suspect from police custody.” The charge is baseless. Bystander videos of the incident show he said nothing.
Marks' mother, Rochelle Pittman, explained to [I]Liberation why she is fighting so hard to win justice for her son: “If any of you have seen the video you, see that Jeremy didn’t do anything wrong. I couldn’t stop there because they’re trying to set my son up for something that he didn’t do.”
For recording video of the officer beating a student, Marks was thrown into adult jail and left there to rot for nearly nine months. Although most of the young people who witnessed the incident were arrested, only Marks was held because he was on probation at the time. Even the student who was personally involved in the incident with the officer was released immediately.
Marks' bail was set at $155,000 after the D.A. falsely claimed that he was a gang member. He was only able to get out of jail in late December after his parents and supporters fought tooth-and-nail to get the word out and won support. The outrageous nature of the case compelled a Google engineer to put over $50,000 toward his bail.
Speaking about her son’s time in jail, Rochelle Pittman told Liberation: “Every time we go to court there has been something different. First, the police officer did not write her own police report. Then, they failed to appear in court two times. Then, they continue the case for a month or two. It was a total nightmare. Jeremy was in jail. All of this was new to us. He had just turned 18 three months before this took place.”
Now, Marks is facing up to seven years in prison—all for catching the police beating a student on camera.
Guilty of nothing
It is an outrage that Marks is facing any criminal charges whatsoever. The case has delayed his education and had a tremendous impact on his family. Marks did nothing wrong. He is guilty of nothing. In fact, he was absolutely right for trying to guarantee accountability by recording the police.
Pittman told Liberation: “You don’t do that to someone when they’re trying to do something right. You don’t just take their schooling from them and throw them into an adult jail system.”
This case illustrates the deeply-rooted institutional racism of the U.S. criminal “justice” system. Black and Latino youth are faced daily with police harassment, racial profiling and criminalization.
Prosecutors and police are also trying to “make an example” of Marks so that people will stop videotaping police brutality. Video recordings of police brutality have caught dozens of incidents of police beating and, in some cases, killing people. Oscar Grant’s case became known initially because cell phone footage showed the transit cop shooting him in the back while he was lying on the ground. It is our right to hold police accountable for their actions.
Community and progressive organizations are stepping up the fight for Marks. The Party for Socialism and Liberation has been working with the ANSWER Coalition (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) to support the case and demand that all charges be dropped immediately. ANSWER members spoke at a press conference hosted by the Congress on Racial Equality on Dec. 23—the day Marks was released from jail. This followed the dedication of part of a 50-mile march against the criminalization of youth to Marks by the Youth Justice Coalition. ANSWER is also circulating a petition to demand all charges be dropped (http://www.answercoalition.org/la/pages/jeremy-marks-petition.html). And more protests and press conferences are being organized.
Pittman’s tenacious spirit continues to shine through: “They’re afraid, and they need to be because we're not giving up and we're coming straight at them and we're going to fight this.”

Catmatic Leftist
29th January 2011, 00:08
Corporate Bosses get away with millions of dollars, and this guy gets the boot. :mad:

Dimentio
29th January 2011, 00:10
The world is more and more resembling a black comedy. Sometimes, it almost appears as believable that this world is a computer algorithm to test chaos theories.

The Douche
29th January 2011, 00:30
These things happen literally every single day. It amazes me the way that every now and then a case will get picked up (this one is no different from one my friends are personally facing charges for, and for whom we have a benefit tomorrow) and everybody gets outraged.

I'm not trying to downplay this stuff. But police brutality and over-charging are a things that go on all the time, and I think its wrong to make it about individuals.

StalinFanboy
29th January 2011, 02:33
A black friend of mine was arrested for lynching the other day at a critical mass thing. all the charges were dropped though.

If you try to de-arrest someone, they get you for lynching.

Robocommie
29th January 2011, 03:04
Pretty fucked up to use a lynching law against black folks.

PhoenixAsh
29th January 2011, 03:23
signed.

this is f* ridiculous. Police brutality is getting more and more of a problem. In NL there are now laws in place that make it possible for the DA to indict you in "super fast justice" :rolleyes: Basically meaning that some judicial procedure is suspended when you are suspected of a crime or misdemeanor towards a civil servant and the penalty when convicte will be significantly higher.

BS!

scarletghoul
29th January 2011, 04:07
These things happen literally every single day. It amazes me the way that every now and then a case will get picked up (this one is no different from one my friends are personally facing charges for, and for whom we have a benefit tomorrow) and everybody gets outraged.

I'm not trying to downplay this stuff. But police brutality and over-charging are a things that go on all the time, and I think its wrong to make it about individuals.
But surely you can see the tactical value in publicising a specific case to raise public consciousness.

PhoenixAsh
29th January 2011, 04:22
this one is no different from one my friends are personally facing charges for, and for whom we have a benefit tomorrow

Which you will offcourse not be attending because:



and I think its wrong to make it about individuals.

See what you are doing there?

S.Artesian
29th January 2011, 04:29
Of course it's about individuals, individuals who are treated a certain way because of color, class-- individuals who represent and experience what the collective represents and experiences.

Of course we publicize every one of these incidents so we can combat all these incidents, combat the system that thrives and survives on such systematic incidents.

Property Is Robbery
29th January 2011, 06:50
These things happen literally every single day. It amazes me the way that every now and then a case will get picked up (this one is no different from one my friends are personally facing charges for, and for whom we have a benefit tomorrow) and everybody gets outraged.

I'm not trying to downplay this stuff. But police brutality and over-charging are a things that go on all the time, and I think its wrong to make it about individuals.
We all know it happens multiple times every day. But your average American won't usually admit that. That's why the only cases that get mentioned are videotaped incidents. Also the reason this went more public is because his mom got involved :p

bcbm
29th January 2011, 13:03
in several states it is now illegal to tape police officers and in some where it isn't explicitly, it is illegal to tape people "without consent" which the police obviously use to their advantage. an artist in chicago is facing 15 years because of that... shits crazy

blake 3:17
30th January 2011, 23:05
also the reason this went more public is because his mom got involved

do not underestimate the power and will of mothers

crazyirish93
30th January 2011, 23:10
i know i have completely lost my sanity now because noway this could happen in the real world:(