Log in

View Full Version : Tony Blair urges West to take action on Iran



Che a chara
21st January 2011, 20:34
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70K05H20110121?pageNumber=1


http://www.reuters.com/resources/r/?m=02&d=20110121&t=2&i=312607301&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=2011-01-21T084818Z_01_BTRE70K0OGL00_RTROPTP_0_BRITAIN-IRAQ-BLAIR
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair arrives at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, in central London January 21, 2011. Blair will appear on Friday before an inquiry into the Iraq War, headed by former civil servant John Chilcot, for a second public grilling to clarify earlier evidence detailing his reasons for joining the controversial invasion.
Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

By Michael Holden
LONDON | Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:03pm EST

(Reuters) - Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair made a passionate plea on Friday for the West to use force if necessary against Iran over its disputed nuclear program.

Speaking at a London inquiry into the Iraq War where he was having to explain his decision to join the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, Blair said the time had now come to "get our heads out of the sand" and take action against Iran.

"I say this with all the passion I possibly can," said Blair, now an envoy for the Quartet of Middle East peacemakers -- the United States, Russia, the EU and the United Nations.

The West had to stop believing it was responsible for the actions of Iran or extremists, he said.

"The fact is they are doing it because they disagree fundamentally with our way of life and they'll carry on doing it unless they are met by the requisite determination and, if necessary, force."

Talks are being held in Istanbul between western leaders and Iran over a standoff about its nuclear aims. [nLDE70K0AF].

Blair said he saw Iran's negative influence everywhere, supporting terrorism and impeding progress in the Middle East peace process. U.S. President Barack Obama's offer of a hand of friendship in 2009 had been roundly rejected, he said.

BLAIR'S BACKING FOR BUSH

Earlier, Blair told the inquiry he had promised to back the United States in taking action against Saddam Hussein almost a year before the 2003 invasion.

While Blair stopped short of saying he had promised U.S. President George W. Bush unconditional military support in early 2002 as critics have accused him of doing, he said he had always agreed that Saddam had to be dealt with.

"What I was saying to President Bush was very clear and simple, you can count on us, we are going to be with you in tackling this. But there are difficulties," he said, describing conversations between himself and Bush in summer 2002.

The timing of the decision for military action is important to opponents of the war, who accuse Blair and Bush of being set on it whether or not it was legal or had United Nations backing.

Critics say Blair, who sent 45,000 British troops, deliberately misled the public over the reason he gave for war -- Saddam's illegal possession of weapons of mass destruction, which were never found.

Friday's hearing was his second appearance, after being recalled to clarify evidence he gave in January last year following discrepancies with other witnesses' testimony.

He gave another generally assured performance in the face of far more rigorous questioning, although he sometimes appeared uncomfortable, stuttering over answers, or frustrated.

The decision to go to war was one of the most controversial episodes of Blair's 10-year premiership which ended in 2007, and about 50 anti-war protesters staged a vocal demonstration outside the inquiry's venue near parliament in central London.

Blair tried to soothe the anger of relatives of the 179 British soldiers killed in Iraq, incensed by remarks in his first appearance that he had no regrets about the invasion.

"I regret deeply and profoundly the loss of life, whether from our own armed forces, those of other nations, the civilians who helped people in Iraq or the Iraqis themselves," he said at the end of Friday's hearing.

"It's too late," a woman in the public gallery shouted back.

Che a chara
21st January 2011, 20:35
What the fuck like and him currently up in front of a tribunal for possible war crimes. What a disgusting putrid creature.

Fabrizio
21st January 2011, 20:56
what a prick.



"The fact is they are doing it because they disagree fundamentally with our way of life"

This might be true of the clerics, but he should ask himself why so many ordinary people supprot them, and whether western historic "use of force" might have contributed...

Obzervi
21st January 2011, 20:56
Put an ak47 in his hands and let him go fight his own wars.. Let's see how brave he is then when he's putting his own life on the line instead of thousands of others.

Che a chara
21st January 2011, 21:05
Blair said he saw Iran's negative influence everywhere, supporting terrorism and impeding progress in the Middle East peace process. U.S. President Barack Obama's offer of a hand of friendship in 2009 had been roundly rejected, he said.

What is he referring too here anyone know ?


"The fact is they are doing it because they disagree fundamentally with our way of life..."

:laugh: What poo. Anyone would think it's the other way about, as it's the West who seems jealous of the Middle East/Muslim lands and their way of life as they keep bombing them without reason or warning. Bliar is deeply envious of the Muslim life and it's tradition. Seriously though, how can this be used as an excuse anymore ?

Havet
21st January 2011, 21:10
...Talks are being held in Istanbul between western leaders and Iran over a standoff about its nuclear aims....

I only expect Iran to carry out its first nuclear test somewhere around 2013.

Of course, if that ever happens, Israel's economy would go into a freefall

ComradeMan
21st January 2011, 21:38
Reactionary theatre.

Dimentio
21st January 2011, 21:46
Funny thing is that his sister in law is a fervent supporter of Ali Khamenei.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Booth

Bud Struggle
22nd January 2011, 01:50
Funny thing is that his sister in law is a fervent supporter of Ali Khamenei.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Booth

Welcome to the post-rational world.

Kind of a joke but that is really the state of human intelectual dementia in the world today. One moron insulting another. I just don't see us building something reasonable out of such nonsense, And these are the people in power, educated, well heeled.

It gets worse as you dig deeper.

Baseball
22nd January 2011, 02:28
what a prick.



This might be true of the clerics, but he should ask himself why so many ordinary people supprot them, and whether western historic "use of force" might have contributed...

One of Blair's comments was that the West had to stop seeing itself as responsible for the acts of Iran.

And indeed, when will the infantilizing of Iran end? Certainly not on revleft, judging from the posts of this thread.

It remains mysterious why revlefters should be so anti-anti spread of Islamic theocracy. One would think that revlefters would see a great threat from a country which embraces the "invisible sky wizard" as national policy. If not to other countries, then certainly to the revleft project.

danyboy27
22nd January 2011, 02:31
who give a fuck about this lunatic anymore?

Lt. Ferret
22nd January 2011, 04:13
I miss the Shah.

#FF0000
22nd January 2011, 04:48
because losing in afghanistan just isn't enough

TheCultofAbeLincoln
22nd January 2011, 07:51
The west is taking action in Iran, whether it's creating worms to completely fuck nanatz or sending in special forces units to kill Iranian nuclear scientists, both of which have happened and no doubt more is on the way. Just saying.

Manic Impressive
22nd January 2011, 09:01
There is only one thing that the ruling class ever wanted, everything


"The fact is they are doing it because they disagree fundamentally with our way of life and they'll carry on doing it unless they are met by the requisite determination and, if necessary, force."

Everyone said that you were in the wrong party Tony but they meant the Tories not the EDL