Log in

View Full Version : Uruguayan ship chased 6400 kms by Australians



Ella
30th August 2003, 13:12
since i cant post in the news forum i'll post this here instead. this artical shows how stupid my goverment is, a Uruguayan ship was fishing in Australia's waters and they chased it, there are people starving in South America, i can't believe it, why would they bother honestly, i bet they wernt gonna use the fish

After a three-week chase through icebergs in the Antarctic, Australian and South African officials seized a Uruguayan fishing boat they say was loaded with 85 tons of rare and illegally-caught Patagonian toothfish. Now, they find themselves embroiled in a diplomatic dispute with Uruguay.

In the dead of night, in sub-Antarctic waters, Australian and South African officers boarded the Uruguayan-flagged fishing boat, the Viarsa, believed to be loaded with an estimated $2 million worth of the endangered fish.

For three weeks, Australian customs and fisheries officers, backed by armed South African enforcement officers, had chased the Viarsa across 6,400 kilometers of ferocious seas between Africa and South America. The Australians charge that the ship had been fishing illegally in Australian waters.

The Viarsa, with 40 crew on board, repeatedly ignored orders to stop for a search, and often dodged through dangerous icebergs to shake off its pursuers.

Finally, the ship was surrounded, and armed officials climbed aboard and arrested the crew.

Australia's minister for fisheries, Ian MacDonald, says a huge catch of Patagonian toothfish, better known as Chilean sea bass, was discovered on board the Viarsa.

"So far, we have the captain's log, which indicates that the vessel is carrying about 85 tons of fish, suspected of being toothfish," he said.

To the surprise of the Australian and South African pursuers, a Uruguayan government observer was also found on board. The Uruguayan government has demanded that the official, and the ship, be turned over to Uruguay.

Mr. MacDonald says the request will be considered, but he says the ship is headed for the west coast of Australia, after being refueled in South Africa, and the trip to Australia could take a month.

Under Australian law, the ship and the catch can be confiscated by the government. The crew members, mostly from Uruguay, Chile and Spain, could face a year in jail and fines of at least $350,000, if they are convicted of poaching.

Mr. MacDonald says Australia is determined to stamp out poaching of the fish.

"This operation will send a very clear message to illegal operators that the Australian government will go to the ends of the earth, literally, to apprehend those suspected of fishing illegally," said Australia's minister for fisheries.

The highly-valued fish, also known as "white gold," is a favorite in restaurants in the United States and Japan, but poaching has pushed the species close to extinction.

Son of Scargill
30th August 2003, 21:56
Patagonian toothfish?Chilean sea bass?Sounds as though the Uruguayans were just rounding up some strays.
Seriously though,overfishing the seas is a big problem here in the UK.Fish are usually protected for a reason,I just hope they use what was found on board,rather than the UK practice of dumping it overboard.The fish are dead!Too late to protect them now.Yet they just dump illegal catches because they don't have the organisational ability to take it to market :rolleyes:

Bolshevika
30th August 2003, 21:59
The government in Uruguay is useless. I want to shoot Baittle in the head.

Ian
30th August 2003, 22:39
The issue here is that the starving Australian people won't get the Patagonian toothfish for dinner (it's obviously a staple considering how much I personally know about it). Those plump Uruguyans are stealing from one of the poorest countries in the world!

Stupid Australian Government, I mean what are they going to do? Throw the fish carcasses overboard hoping that they will rise from the dead in the Ocean once you catch up with the other boat? Why not just put a big sign up in Australian Antarctic waters saying "Don't try it!" and if they do then we can like complain to them, but it's no big deal. Fishing is pretty big in Australia I think so I guess they wanna make as much profit as possible without some Uruguyans nicking the fishes

MiNdGaMe
31st August 2003, 14:38
These are conflicts of single issues, on the one hand as Ella mentioned you have the poverty in South America and for the most part the World. And on the other endangered wildlife, conflicts in a Capitalist System.

Hatchet
1st September 2003, 11:04
It's a fucking copout to say that they're just conflicts in a capatilist system- we need to deal with the fucking poachers. The Australian Government also has to deal with the fact that we give shit in aid to developing countries, and we need to do more. Fuckin Howard is so balless.

apathy maybe
1st September 2003, 11:18
It is like hunting Blue Whales, do you support the hunting of blue whales?
Why not? Do you support the hunting of rare and endangered fish? If you do, well then you are a stupid person.

Basicly, these fish fetch so much on the market because they are so rare. The Australians chase the poachers because if they didn't everyone would be fishing for these fish and they would soon go bye byes.

The Aus Gov maybe a bunch of right-wingers but they do some good things. (Not many I will admit).




The highly-valued fish ... has [been] pushed ... close to extinction.

FistFullOfSteel
1st September 2003, 12:35
fuck australia :o

IHP
2nd September 2003, 01:06
What a strange thing to say, Hugo. Fuck Sweden.

Why 'fuck Australia'? I am as much anti-nationalist as anyone on this board, but I don't see what Australia, as a whole, has to do with the coast guard.

--IHP

Ctisphonics
14th September 2003, 23:50
Oh God, on any other board on the net decussing this topic (I doubt there are many), only here can a discussion of Capitalism vs. Socialism possibly emerge. This is just too much for me! Ha HA HA HA HA

hHhHhHHhDUGASBFDLBpsegh[auhreg[haghrp[a

Okay, I recovered a little, I may start breaking out laughing later though. F*ck Australia on this basis? Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa!

Having a heart attack!!!!!!!! Haaa ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!

Ok, seriously though.

This reminds me of a while back when the United Nations allowed a couple of African Nations to sell old Ivory reserves since it wouldn't cause the death of any new elephant and help themout economically. The opposition claimed it would only wet the desires of those who ant it, and cause increase demand in the future for new good, demand not able to keep up with the reserve.

I support the latter group, thinking it's a bad idea. They should support the Endangered species. I'm not thrilled with greenpeace, I made a joke once that I was boycotting Dolphine Meat because innocent Tuna was getting caught in the nets, so you know I'm not some militant conservationalist. However, I don't support the extention of any form of life, even if it's a virus (keep it in a lab and release it back into the animal population once the last human leaves the planet).

The capture and confication of the ship is standard. Look up the Trent Affair on the net during the American Civil War.