OCCUPATION BLUES No. 21

[redstar2000]

Life span shortens for Iraqi quislings...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/middle_east/3177987.stm

Hungarian training camp for quisling cops...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/middle_east/3181089.stm

Cost of empire rises faster than expected...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/business/3182339.stm

U.S. death toll now surpasses "war" losses...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/middle_east/3182157.stm

Bechtel romps with new lucrative contracts...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/business/3189175.stm

An army of lackeys...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/middle_east/3187133.stm

"We" Americans love it when "we" can find suckers willing to die in the defense of "our" empire.

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas

[Loknar]

Are you saying we are losing? In fact we are far from it. Resistance where there is occupation is a natural occurrence.

[Invader Zim]

Yes Redstar you are happy that they are being killed, that does not supprise me, then you must be very happy that 80 civillians were killed in one car bomb.

Im sure they really hate occupation, just about enough to kill 80 Shi'a muslims, who were not part of the occupation.

However dont let me detain you your champaign will be getting warm, after all this is a victory for Iraq, the quisling Shi'a must be destroyed right, after all they did try and oust Saddam in a revolution, that must make them quislings.

SOURCE (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3191137.stm)

[redstar2000]

Your BBC correspondent suggests that the cleric who was killed was "critical of the Americans but willing to work with them".

That's like saying that some French archbishop was "critical of the Germans but willing to work with them" during World War II.

Should quislings be allowed to escape justice under the cloak of religion?

Evidently, the Iraqi resistance doesn't think so.

I agree with them.

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas

[Invader Zim]

Originally posted by [email protected] 30 2003, 04:16 AM
Your BBC correspondent suggests that the cleric who was killed was "critical of the Americans but willing to work with them".

That's like saying that some French archbishop was "critical of the Germans but willing to work with them" during World War II.

Should quislings be allowed to escape justice under the cloak of religion?

Evidently, the Iraqi resistance doesn't think so.

I agree with them.

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas
I see you forget the other 79 victims, or is all fair in love and war redstar?


You really are a sick fucker, to defend this action.

[redstar2000]

I see you forget the other 79 victims, or is all fair in love and war redstar? You really are a sick fucker, to defend this action.

I would surmise that the others who were killed were his supporters...that is, other quislings.

When Reinhard Heydrich, Nazi governor of occupied Czechoslovakia was assassinated, would you have shed tears for the driver of his car, who was also killed?

For you, Colonel Blimp, resistance to imperialism must always appear "sick".

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas

[Invader Zim]

Originally posted by [email protected] 30 2003, 04:46 AM
I see you forget the other 79 victims, or is all fair in love and war redstar? You really are a sick fucker, to defend this action.

I would surmise that the others who were killed were his supporters...that is, other quislings.

When Reinhard Heydrich, Nazi governor of occupied Czechoslovakia was assassinated, would you have shed tears for the driver of his car, who was also killed?

For you, Colonel Blimp, resistance to imperialism must always appear "sick".

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas
You are to fucked up for words.

Of course the Shi'a fucking support him, he was their leader. They had suffered terribly under the previous regime, they have every right to want change.

So I ask you again do you support this action?

[redstar2000]

So I ask you again do you support this action?

Isn't it fascinating how supporters of imperialism like Colonel Blimp apply their "high moral standards" only to those who resist imperialism?

These standards are never applied to themselves, of course. The 7,000+ Iraqi civilian deaths resulting from imperialist aggression by the U.S. and the U.K. were "nasty but necessary".

Well, Colonel Blimp, it works both ways!

If the Iraqi resistance happens to kill some innocent people while attempting to execute quislings, I'm sure they'd say that it was "nasty but necessary" as part of their struggle to drive out the occupation forces.

And who am I to say otherwise?

And who the fuck are you to even open your hypocritical mouth on the subject?

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas

[Blackberry]

If the Iraqi resistance happens to kill some innocent people while attempting to execute quislings, I'm sure they'd say that it was "nasty but necessary" as part of their struggle to drive out the occupation forces.

:redstar2000:

[Invader Zim]

Originally posted by [email protected] 30 2003, 05:07 AM
So I ask you again do you support this action?

Isn't it fascinating how supporters of imperialism like Colonel Blimp apply their "high moral standards" only to those who resist imperialism?

These standards are never applied to themselves, of course. The 7,000+ Iraqi civilian deaths resulting from imperialist aggression by the U.S. and the U.K. were "nasty but necessary".

Well, Colonel Blimp, it works both ways!

If the Iraqi resistance happens to kill some innocent people while attempting to execute quislings, I'm sure they'd say that it was "nasty but necessary" as part of their struggle to drive out the occupation forces.

And who am I to say otherwise?

And who the fuck are you to even open your hypocritical mouth on the subject?

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas
Isn't it fascinating how supporters of imperialism like Colonel Blimp apply their "high moral standards" only to those who resist imperialism?


Ohh and to the US when they go into far east countrys, set up factorys, pay the worker 1 doller a day to make sneekers, which then get sold on at £150 at some sports shop in London.

The 7,000+ Iraqi civilian deaths resulting from imperialist aggression by the U.S. and the U.K. were "nasty but necessary".

It all depends on how many Saddam would have killed, but hawarameen said it best.

He said words to the effect of, you can add another "0" on to the end of 7,000 to get the number Saddam would have killed had he stayed in power.


If the Iraqi resistance happens to kill some innocent people while attempting to execute quislings, I'm sure they'd say that it was "nasty but necessary" as part of their struggle to drive out the occupation forces.

But the fact is, they were never trying to take him out specifically, they planted a massive car bomb, those things are designed to kill and maim large numbers of people, in one go, so I doubt it was planted just to kill the one individual. A snipers Bullet would have done just as well.

So what do you think of 9/11? Was that "nasty but nessesary" to kill imperilaists? Or how about the Bali bombings, after all the targets at least were western, even if the vast majority of the victims were locals.

And who the fuck are you to even open your hypocritical mouth on the subject?

You are calling me a hypocrit... LOL, there is you making massive threads about Iraqi civillians killed in the US invasion, but suddenly then its the lot you support killing the civillians, its OK by you.

What an idiot.

[redstar2000]

He said words to the effect of, you can add another "0" on to the end of 7,000 to get the number Saddam would have killed had he stayed in power.

Would have? What I said to him was that if you're going to talk about imaginary corpses, you can make up any number you like...no one can dispute it.

I was talking about actual deaths. You know, where the bodies rot and stink.

So what do you think of 9/11? Was that "nasty but necessary" to kill imperialists? Or how about the Bali bombings, after all the targets at least were western, even if the vast majority of the victims were locals.

It's not my call...and it's absolutely not yours. As a supporter of U.S. and British imperialism, you have no right to even express an opinion on the tactics of those who resist U.S. and British imperialism.

If the resistance movement asked my advice, I would offer it freely but with the understanding that the decisions are theirs.

Since they have not asked my advice on the subject, I see no reason to satisfy your curiosity. My opinions of their tactics are none of your business just as their tactics themselves are none of your business.

As a servile lackey of U.S. and British imperialism, your motives for even asking such questions could only be viewed with the most profound suspicion.

Suffice it to say that your "moral views", like those you support, reek of hypocrisy...and worse. The main objective is not to "change your mind", it is to inflict a crushing defeat on those you support.

That will be "good enough" for me.

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas

[Invader Zim]

Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2003, 04:37 AM
He said words to the effect of, you can add another "0" on to the end of 7,000 to get the number Saddam would have killed had he stayed in power.

Would have? What I said to him was that if you're going to talk about imaginary corpses, you can make up any number you like...no one can dispute it.

I was talking about actual deaths. You know, where the bodies rot and stink.

So what do you think of 9/11? Was that "nasty but necessary" to kill imperialists? Or how about the Bali bombings, after all the targets at least were western, even if the vast majority of the victims were locals.

It's not my call...and it's absolutely not yours. As a supporter of U.S. and British imperialism, you have no right to even express an opinion on the tactics of those who resist U.S. and British imperialism.

If the resistance movement asked my advice, I would offer it freely but with the understanding that the decisions are theirs.

Since they have not asked my advice on the subject, I see no reason to satisfy your curiosity. My opinions of their tactics are none of your business just as their tactics themselves are none of your business.

As a servile lackey of U.S. and British imperialism, your motives for even asking such questions could only be viewed with the most profound suspicion.

Suffice it to say that your "moral views", like those you support, reek of hypocrisy...and worse. The main objective is not to "change your mind", it is to inflict a crushing defeat on those you support.

That will be "good enough" for me.

http://www.sawu.org/redgreenleft/YaBBImages/smoking.gif
___________________________

U.S. GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
___________________________

"...a disgusting and frightening website"
The RedStar2000 Papers (http://www.sawu.org/redstar2000)
A site about communist ideas
Weezling now are we? Dont want to answer the question because you dont want the rest of the community to see your real views? Cold it be because a person was banned for supporting 9/11?

The true opinions of Redstar, begin to raise their ugly heads, I cant pretend I am supprised by what I see!

Would have? What I said to him was that if you're going to talk about imaginary corpses, you can make up any number you like...no one can dispute it.

What about all the people Saddam DID kill. All the 100's of thousands, if not millions of them. By removing him, he can no longer kill people. Or do you not do elementary logic, as well as not doing common sense?