Log in

View Full Version : Tunisians drive leader from power in mass uprising



Nothing Human Is Alien
15th January 2011, 04:14
TUNIS, Tunisia – After 23 years of iron-fisted rule, the president of Tunisia was driven from power Friday by violent protests over soaring unemployment and corruption. Virtually unprecedented in modern Arab history, the populist uprising sent an ominous message to authoritarian governments that dominate the region.

The office of Saudi King Abdullah confirmed early Saturday that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and his family had landed in Saudi Arabia, after several hours of mystery over his whereabouts. "As a result of the Saudi kingdom's respect for the exceptional circumstances the Tunisian people are going through, and with its wish for peace and security to return to the people of Tunisia, we have welcomed" him, the statement said.

Tunisians buoyant over Ben Ali's ouster faced uncertainly, however, about what's next for the North African nation. The country was under the caretaker leadership of the prime minister who took control, the role of the army in the transition was unknown, and it was uncertain whether Ben Ali's departure would be enough to restore calm.

The ouster followed the country's largest protests in generations and weeks of escalating unrest, sparked by one man's suicide and fueled by social media, cell phones and young people who have seen relatively little benefit from Tunisia's recent economic growth. Thousands of demonstrators from all walks of life rejected Ben Ali's promises of change and mobbed Tunis, the capital, to demand that he leave.

The government said at least 23 people have been killed in the riots, but opposition members put the death toll at more than three times that.

On Friday, police repeatedly clashed with protesters, some of whom climbed onto the entrance roof of the dreaded Interior Ministry, widely believed for years to be a place where the regime's opponents were tortured.

With clouds of tear gas and black smoke drifting over the city's whitewashed buildings, Prime Minister Mohammed Ghannouchi went on state television to announce that he was assuming power in this North African nation known mostly for its wide sandy beaches and ancient ruins.

"I take over the responsibilities temporarily of the leadership of the country at this difficult time to help restore security," Ghannouchi said in a solemn statement on state television. "I promise ... to respect the constitution, to work on reforming economic and social issues with care and to consult with all sides."

The prime minister, a longtime ally of the president, suggested that Ben Ali had willingly handed over control, but the exact circumstances were unclear.

In a string of last-ditch efforts to tamp down the unrest, Ben Ali dissolved the government and promised legislative elections within six months — a pledge that appeared to open at least the possibility of a new government. Before his removal of power was announced, he declared a state of emergency, including a curfew that was in effect Friday night and was to be lifted at 7 a.m. Saturday.

Isolated bursts of gunfire broke a general quiet in the evening. But overnight, in a sign that Ben Ali's departure hadn't fully restored calm, plainclothes police were seen hustling some people off the streets of Tunis: One was clubbed, another was dragged on the ground.

European tour companies moved thousands of tourists out of the country. Foreign airlines halted service to Tunisia, and said the country's airspace had been temporarily shut down.

Ben Ali's downfall sent a potentially frightening message to autocratic leaders across the Arab world, especially because he did not seem especially vulnerable until very recently.

He managed the economy of his small country of 10 million better than many other Middle Eastern nations grappling with calcified economies and booming young populations. He turned Tunisia into a beach haven for tourists, helping create an area of stability in volatile North Africa. There was a lack of civil rights and little or no freedom of speech, but a better quality of life for many than in neighboring countries such as Algeria and Libya.

Ben Ali had won frequent praise from abroad for presiding over reforms to make the economy more competitive and attract business. Growth last year was at 3.1 percent.

Unemployment, however, was officially measured at 14 percent, and was far higher — 52 percent — among the young. Despair among job-seeking young graduates was palpable.

The riots started after an educated but jobless 26-year-old committed suicide in mid-December when police confiscated the fruits and vegetables he was selling without a permit. His desperate act hit a nerve, sparked copycat suicides and focused generalized anger against the regime into a widespread, outright revolt.

The president tried vainly to hold onto power. On Thursday night he went on television to promise not to run for re-election in 2014 and slashed prices on key foods such as sugar, bread and milk.

Protesters gathered peacefully Friday in front of the Interior Ministry, but six hours after the demonstration began hundreds of police with shields and riot gear moved in. Helmeted police fired dozens of rounds of tear gas and kicked and clubbed unarmed protesters — one of whom cowered on the ground, covering his face.

A few youths were spotted throwing stones, but most demonstrated calmly. Protesters were of all ages and from all walks of life, from students holding sit-ins in the middle of the street to doctors in white coats and black-robed lawyers waving posters.

"A month ago, we didn't believe this uprising was possible," said Beya Mannai, a geology professor at the University of Tunis. "But the people rose up."

"My first reaction is relief," said Dr. Souha Naija, a resident radiologist at Charles Nicole Hospital. "He's gone. ... I finally feel free."

"They got the message. The people don't want a dictator." However, she voiced concern for the future because, officially at least, Ben Ali vacated power only temporarily.

"It's ambiguous," she said.

Nejib Chebbi, a founder of the main legal opposition party, said the dramatic developments do not amount to a coup d'etat.

"It's an unannounced resignation," Chebbi said by telephone. To declare a permanent absence of a head of state, such as in a coup, elections would have to be held within 60 days, he said. "So they declare a temporary vacating of power."

U.S. President Barack Obama said he applauded the courage and dignity of protesting Tunisians, and urged all parties to keep calm and avoid violence.

Arabs across the region celebrated news of the Tunisian uprising on Twitter, Facebook and blogs. Thousands of tweets congratulating the Tunisian people flooded the Internet, and many people changed their profile pictures to Tunisian flags.

Egyptian activists opposed to President Hosni Mubarak's three-decade regime looked to the events in Tunisia with hope. About 50 gathered outside the Tunisian Embassy in Cairo to celebrate with singing and dancing. They chanted, "Ben Ali, tell Mubarak a plane is waiting for him, too!"

Meanwhile, the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists reported that three journalists detained in Tunisia had been released: bloggers Azyz Amamy and Slim Amamou, who were arrested on Jan. 7, and Radio Kalima correspondent Nizar Ben Hasan, who had been taken from his home Tuesday.

CPJ called for the release of journalist Fahem Boukadous, who it said is serving a four-year prison sentence for his coverage of 2008 labor protests.

Earlier Friday, swirling speculation about Ben Ali's location had reached such a fevered pitch that the governments of France and Malta — just two of several countries where he was speculated to be heading — put out statements saying they have had no requests to accommodate him.

One French official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said the French government did not want Ben Ali there.

Ghannouchi is a 69-year-old economist who has been prime minister since 1999 and is among the best-known faces of Tunisia's government. He did not say anything about a coup or about the army being in charge.

Ben Ali, 74, came to power in a bloodless palace coup in 1987. He took over from a man formally called President-for-Life — Habib Bourguiba, the founder of modern-day Tunisia who set the Muslim country on a pro-Western course after independence from France in 1956.

Ben Ali removed Bourguiba from office for "incompetence," saying he had become too old, senile and sick to rule. Ben Ali promised then that his leadership would "open the horizons to a truly democratic and evolved political life."

But after a brief period of reforms, Tunisia's political evolution stopped.

Ben Ali consistently won elections with questionable tallies: In 2009, he was re-elected for a fifth five-year term with 89 percent of the vote — and that was the lowest official percentage of any of his victories. Before that vote, he had warned opponents they would face legal retaliation if they questioned the election's fairness.

U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks have called Tunisia a "police state" and described the corruption there, saying Ben Ali had lost touch with his people. Social networks like Facebook helped spread the comments to the delight of ordinary Tunisians, who have complained about the same issues for years.

Under Ben Ali, most opposition parties were illegal. Amnesty International said authorities infiltrated human rights groups and harassed dissenters. Reporters Without Borders described Ben Ali as a "press predator" who controlled the media.

There is little precedent in the Arab world for a ruler being ousted by street protests. In Sudan in 1985, a collapsing economy and other grievances sparked a popular uprising, although the government was eventually ousted by a military coup.

The closest parallel in the broader Middle East comes from Iran — which is not an Arab nation — where mass demonstrations helped topple the shah and usher in the Islamic Republic in 1979.

Tunisia's giant neighbor Algeria saw huge protests before it was shaken by a military coup in 1992, with a five-man leadership put in place after the army canceled the nation's first multiparty legislative elections, which a Muslim fundamentalist party was poised to win. The party, the Islamic Salvation Front, became a vehicle for popular dissent.

There were also massive demonstrations in Lebanon in 2005, dubbed the "Cedar Revolution," but those were directed against Syrian influence in the country and not the Lebanese government per se. The protests led to the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon and the resignation of Lebanon's pro-Syrian prime minister and fresh elections.

Al-Qaida's North African offshoot appeared to try to capitalize on the Tunisian unrest, offering its support for protesters this week. There has been no sign of Islamic extremist involvement in the rioting.

Martin Blank
15th January 2011, 05:40
U.S. President Barack Obama said he applauded the courage and dignity of protesting Tunisians, and urged all parties to keep calm and avoid violence.

Cue reactionary "anti-imperialist" drivel in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ...

Prairie Fire
15th January 2011, 09:09
Red Phoenix Article on The situation:

http://theredphoenixapl.org/2011/01/13/uprisings-in-tunisia-algeria/

Wanted Man
15th January 2011, 09:54
Cue reactionary "anti-imperialist" drivel in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ...

Total idiocy, because the overthrown Tunisian government was one of the greatest US puppets in the region. Obama's words are only relevant to the new government that will step in and "take order". Obama also condemned the coup in Honduras, which means that these strawman "anti-imperialists" of yours would have to support that coup; something that even Hoxhaists wouldn't do.

But don't let that get in the way of your whining.

~Spectre
15th January 2011, 16:09
But it would be wrong to see the revolution only as a middle class movement against corruption and nepotism, fueled by facebook status updates and youth activism. The trade unions (al-niqabat) played an essential role (http://www.watan.com/%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AC-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A8/%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%86%D8%B3%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%83%D9%8A-%D8%AA%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%B3%D9%83%D 9%88.html), and were among those demanding the departure of the president. You don’t get massive crowds like the one in Tunis without a lot of workers joining in. There are few labor correspondents any longer, and the press downplays the role of workers as a result of neither having good sources among them nor an adequate understanding of the importance of labor mobilization. It is no accident that on Wednesday the head of the Communist workers movement was arrested (he has been released).
Likewise, there is evidence of a classic revolutionary situation insofar as the armed forces split. Ben Ali angrily removed his army chief of staff recently on discovering that the army was confining itself to defending government buildings but declining to fire on the demonstrators.
The big questions are what comes next and how influential it will be. Mohamed Ghannouchi, the former prime minister and speaker of the house who is now interim president, has pledged early elections. It is not clear that he can remain in power to be the one overseeing them. Will the old clan patronage system reassert itself through the elections, or will the political revolution turn into a social revolution with a turn to social democracy? Will the odious French president Nicolas Sarkozy intervene behind the scenes in favor of the Tunisian Right?
And that's from a bourgeoisie academic that backs Obama.

http://www.juancole.com/2011/01/the-first-middle-eastern-revolution-since-1979.html

Boyle1888
15th January 2011, 16:16
What party/ type of leadership is likely to replace the ousted president?

Will there be any real progress for the Tunisian people or have they protested/died for nothing?

Robocommie
15th January 2011, 16:23
What party/ type of leadership is likely to replace the ousted president?

Will there be any real progress for the Tunisian people or have they protested/died for nothing?

I wouldn't say it's over yet.

KurtFF8
15th January 2011, 17:59
It seems right now that the PM has just taken over instead, which seems to mean that the government is remaining in tact for the time being.

Here's a good MRZine article that explains a few things: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/jahjah150111.html

Die Neue Zeit
15th January 2011, 21:33
http://www.wftucentral.org/?p=3506&language=en#more-3506



The World Federation of Trade Unions declares its solidarity with the people of Tunisia who have been protesting against the high unemployment rate and are struggling for their right in employment.

We denounce the state violence used as a response to the slogan “we need work” expressed by the Tunis people.

Youth has the right to make dreams, to struggle, to demand a better present and future.

The WFTU demands the immediate release of the imprisoned protesters.

Tunisia is often presented as one of the countries with the higher growth rates and as a good example for the other countries since it has been implementing a series of antilabor measures such as the cutback of state allowances, the privatization of state services, the selling of land to foreign investors, the tax exemption of foreign investors.

For this, the majority of the people, especially the youth are pushed in unemployment and poverty, as their lives are gambled according to the interests of the foreign monopolies.

On behalf of the 80 million members of WFTU, in 120 countries of the world, we demand full satisfaction of the demands of the people who fight. We support the struggles of the trade union movement of Tunisia.

The WFTU Secretariat

Athens December 30, 2010

Martin Blank
15th January 2011, 23:08
Total idiocy, because the overthrown Tunisian government was one of the greatest US puppets in the region. Obama's words are only relevant to the new government that will step in and "take order". Obama also condemned the coup in Honduras, which means that these strawman "anti-imperialists" of yours would have to support that coup; something that even Hoxhaists wouldn't do.

But don't let that get in the way of your whining.

Suuuure, because we don't have people here who see White House support for an event and instantly suspect it of being a U.S. plot -- people who live and die by the notion that "the enemy of my enemy is my ally".

It's not whining to point out the obvious. It is whining when someone lashes out with personal insults and meaningless trivia at a smartass comment, with all the subtlety and grace of a heroin junkie going through withdrawals.

Indeed, why does it seem like I have touched an open wound?

And as for Bin Ali being "one of the greatest US puppets in the region", that doesn't change anything, especially since the White House has already endorsed the new regime. It wasn't too long ago that Wikileaks revealed that the State Department considered his regime to be a "police state". That's usually a coded prelude to desiring "regime change" -- a term, incidentally, that was commonly used by Tunisians themselves in the course of their democratic uprising.

Tommy4ever
15th January 2011, 23:17
From what information I've gathered it seems that the military has taken control of the centre of Tunis and occupied it very strongly (tanks and large numbers of troops). It seems to me that the military is going to take control and probably create a regime very similar to the ousted one. Hopefully it will be better but I doubt the Tunisian people shall have their freedom.

When faced with such force from the military we cannot expect the Tunisian people to keep on fighting. :(

Martin Blank
15th January 2011, 23:19
Red Phoenix Article on The situation:

http://theredphoenixapl.org/2011/01/13/uprisings-in-tunisia-algeria/

From the article:


There have been mass arrests of opposition figures and leaders, such as El G้n้ral, the popular Tunisian rapper and performer of popular dissident songs. Although he is now free, the same cannot be said for the leading activists and comrades of the banned Tunisian Workers Communist Party (PCOT), Ammar Amroussia and Hamma Al-Hammami, who have endured torture and arrest before. These leading revolutionary activists were seized for advocating a change of government.

It should be noted that Al-Hammami was released by Ghannouchi earlier today.

The Hoxhaists should be jumping for joy over this. The PCOT is really the only political party in Tunisia that didn't have ties to Bin Ali's regime. I would suspect that this fact would make them extremely popular among those workers who want to clear away every bit of the old order. The PCOT could find itself thrust into a position akin to that of the Maoists in Nepal: the de facto political leadership of a mass democratic movement.

It's the Hoxhaists' turn to show and prove.

KurtFF8
16th January 2011, 01:23
More good analysis from MRZine:

The Political Economy of 'Democracy Promotion' (http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/sw150111.html)


by Jamie Stern-Weiner 14 January 2011
Where are the 'democracy promoters' on the Tunisian uprising?, asks Marc Lynch (http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/12/where_are_the_democracy_promoters_on_tunisia). It's a fair question:

Thus far, a month into the massive demonstrations rocking Tunisia, the Washington Post editorial page has published exactly zero editorials (http://www.google.com/search?q=site:washingtonpost.com+tunisia) about Tunisia. For that matter, the Weekly Standard, another magazine which frequently claims the mantle of Arab democracy and attacks Obama for failing on it, has thus far published exactly zero articles (http://www.google.com/search?q=site:weeklystandard.com+tunisia) about Tunisia.
More generally, Guardian journalist Brian Whitaker (http://www.al-bab.com/blog/2011/blog1101a.htm#misreporting_tunisia) observes that "[c]onsidering the horrific violence meted out by the police over the weekend" Western media are giving the Ben Ali regime "an extraordinarily easy ride." I suspect that a comparison of mainstream coverage of the 'Green Revolution' in Iran and the uprising in Tunisia would reveal a textbook example of the propaganda model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_model) in operation.
To be fair they've not been entirely absent. In an op-ed today, Jackson Diehl (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/13/AR2011011304899.html) offers a rare moment of candour: "The most imminent threat to U.S. interests in the Middle East, however, is not war; it is revolution."
Diehl is right to portray this as a "threat" to U.S. interests, once we translate doctrinal jargon into conventional English so that "U.S. interests" refers to the interests of the elite that overwhelmingly determines U.S. foreign policy. The threat posed by the Tunisian dictatorship is that of contagion (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/31/tunisia-inspiring-rebellion-arab-world), which is why the Gulf dictatorships, who happen to be the U.S.'s closest allies in the region, are growing increasingly nervous. Diehl frets that it "may be too late for the United States to head off a rolling social upheaval in the Middle East", chastising the Obama administration for not preempting the threat of Arab democracy by pressuring allied dictators to enact controlled 'reforms'.
For its part the U.S. government has been forthright in expressing its concern over "cyber . . . attacks on the Government of Tunisia's websites" (http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/01/154119.htm), adding (http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/01/154548.htm): "[W]e're concerned about government actions, but we're also concerned about actions by the demonstrators, those who do not have peaceful intentions". No stirring rhetoric (http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-administration-and-tunisia.html) about freedom and tyranny here (http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/01/hillary-clinton-is-not-taking-sides.html).
In his response to Diehl's piece Lynch plays it coy, asking why Diehl portrays "the demonstrations against Ben Ali only [as] a 'threat' to U.S. interests and not an opportunity for the democratic change about which we hear so much?" The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/opinion/13thu3.html) gestures towards reality, arguing that

Not so long ago, the United States and other Western countries considered Mr. Ben Ali, and other secular tyrants, indispensable allies in the fight against extremists. Washington now appears to recognize that Mr. Ben Ali's repression and deafness to his people's needs only add to the anger and make it more combustible.
Again, the criticism here seems to be that the Tunisian dictator has been incompetent, overzealous in his repression so as to unnecessarily provoke his subjects into revolt. The NYT is correct to explain "Washington's" (again, the usual translation is required) support for tyrannical regimes in the Middle East in the context of its hostility to "extremists", once we understand that 'extremist' is a technical term referring to anyone who resists U.S. control. The NYT understands this well enough. After the CIA conspired with British intelligence to overthrow Iran's elected Prime Minister after he nationalised the Iranian oil industry, its editorial board crowed (http://leninology.blogspot.com/2007/08/tehran-terror-and-colonial-mystique.html):

Underdeveloped countries with rich resources now have an object lesson in the heavy cost that must be paid by one of their number which goes berserk with fanatical nationalism. It is perhaps too much to hope that Iran's experience will prevent the rise of other Mossadeghs in other countries, but that experience may at least strengthen the hands of more reasonable and more far-seeing leaders.
The general silence or apologetics from the 'freedom warriors' about the Tunisian uprising should not, then, come as a surprise. It is of a piece with the history of U.S. 'democracy promotion' efforts, which have been characterised, as leading specialist on the topic Thomas Carothers observes, by a "strong line of continuity" (http://www.countercurrents.org/iraq-chomsky060305.htm): "[w]here democracy appears to fit in well with US security and economic interests, the United States promotes democracy. . . Where democracy clashes with other significant interests, it is downplayed or even ignored."
Similarly, we are soberly informed (http://books.google.com/books?id=Yw0rAQAAIAAJ&q=), U.S. 'democracy promoters' "did not want to control" Latin America, but equally they "did not want to allow developments to get out of control". That's what the 'threat' of Tunisian democracy amounts to -- a challenge to U.S. control -- and that's what explains the striking reluctance of the 'democracy promoters' to support it.
Jamie Stern-Weiner studies Social and Political Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He is a member of the New Left Project editorial team and maintains a personal blog at <heathlander.wordpress.com (http://heathlander.wordpress.com/)>. This article was first published in the New Left Project blog (http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/nlpblog/fulltext/the_political_economy_of_democracy_promotion/) on 14 January 2011 under a Creative Commons license.

Nolan
16th January 2011, 01:47
Make us proud, PCOT.

Martin Blank
16th January 2011, 01:48
When faced with such force from the military we cannot expect the Tunisian people to keep on fighting. :(

From what I've seen, they've done a damn good job fighting so far against the police and other forces organized by the Interior Ministry. Unless the military is planning to use artillery or air strikes against them, there's not much more the military can do to the pro-democracy protesters that the police haven't.

Wanted Man
16th January 2011, 07:24
Suuuure, because we don't have people here who see White House support for an event and instantly suspect it of being a U.S. plot -- people who live and die by the notion that "the enemy of my enemy is my ally".

Even those people tend to base it on at least some kind of reason, although most of the time it's still completely misguided. There is simply no way in hell that they would take the same position here.


It's not whining to point out the obvious. It is whining when someone lashes out with personal insults and meaningless trivia at a smartass comment, with all the subtlety and grace of a heroin junkie going through withdrawals.

Indeed, why does it seem like I have touched an open wound?

Completely false things are now obvious and Miles is now one to judge people for lack of subtlety and grace. On what planet?


And as for Bin Ali being "one of the greatest US puppets in the region", that doesn't change anything, especially since the White House has already endorsed the new regime. It wasn't too long ago that Wikileaks revealed that the State Department considered his regime to be a "police state". That's usually a coded prelude to desiring "regime change" -- a term, incidentally, that was commonly used by Tunisians themselves in the course of their democratic uprising.

Wow, what a load of meaningless trivia. Would you happen to be one of those stereotypical "anti-imperialists" who might think this whole uprising is a conspiracy by George Soros? :rolleyes: Oh wait, it's probably more whining and there isn't much political use from it otherwise. We are talking about Miles here.

Yes, I already mentioned that Obama's words were only relevant to the new leaders, and that US support can shift as easily as anything. When they can replace the rather unsavoury regime with one that has a "democratic" fa็ade, that is clearly better, but that's exactly why we're all hoping that the Tunisian workers won't accept that and will get to the root of the problem.

Tommy4ever
16th January 2011, 09:40
From what I've seen, they've done a damn good job fighting so far against the police and other forces organized by the Interior Ministry. Unless the military is planning to use artillery or air strikes against them, there's not much more the military can do to the pro-democracy protesters that the police haven't.

Tanks on every street corner.

From what I've heard from the news even yesterday there were shots being fired in central Tunis so I guess the protesters must still be fighting. Really the Tunisian people have me in awe with the extreme force their going up against. Yet I just can't see how they can defeat such a strong opposition. According to the Guardian there is one member of the police or military for every 40 Tunisians. :(

How is it even possible for them to defeat the military? I guess the only hope for them to overthrow the military as well would be for the soldiers to decide that they no longer want to shoot protesters.

KurtFF8
16th January 2011, 18:38
Tunisian Patriotic and Democratic Labour Party, Statement, 15 January 2011



Immediate Tasks in Tunisia


First of all, our party intends to remain in opposition, and not to enter the next government, although two of our allies in the Alliance for Citizenship and Equality plan to take part in a government of national unity (namely the Ettajdid Movement and the Democratic Forum).

Our tasks:


1) To neutralise the criminal gangs which are indulging in plunder and aggression, and which are like a kind of “tontons macoutes” of the old regime;
2) To support the creation in each district of Citizens’ Committees for Civic Defence to defend people and property from these “tontons macoutes”;
3) To require the return of the police force and the army to their barracks as soon as possible, and the end of the curfew and the state of emergency;
4) To create a commission of inquiry to locate the persons who were responsible for the use of live rounds [against civilians during the uprising];
5) To create a commission of inquiry with the power to expropriate the beneficiaries of corruption and illicit enrichment;
6) To create a national commission on total reform of the electoral code, the press code, and the law concerning political parties.
7) To secure the legalisation of the Patriotic and Democratic Labour Party and other civil organizations.

Tunis, 15 January 2011.

Khaled Falah, member of the founding committee of the Tunisian Patriotic and Democratic Labour Party.

[email protected]


Web site: http://www.hezbelamal.org/siteanglais/index.htm

William Howe
16th January 2011, 19:17
Viva la Revolucion

L.J.Solidarity
16th January 2011, 21:42
As the military wasn't involved in repression against the movement (all done by the police, Ben Ali even had soldiers replaced by cops (http://www.socialistworld.net/doc/4776) in Tunis as he didn't consider the army reliable) and soldiers are seen as protecting the populace from looting (ex-)cops, Ben Ali's guards and alleged RCD party militias they're apparently very popular at the moment, and mass protests seem to have stopped due to both this fact and the curfew.
But the workers and youth of Tunisia have not become passive - apparently the UGTT, which seems to have got rid of it's pro-Ben Ali leaders, is organising groups of workers for self-defence against looters etc on a mass scale (usually called "vigilante groups" or somesuch by the bourgeois media). Most of them have no better weapons than sticks, but... workers' militias!! Holy shit, when did we last see workers' militias anywhere?

KurtFF8
17th January 2011, 19:05
Via google translation:

Tunisian Communist Workers Party: (http://www.albadil.org/spip.php?article3667)

Constituent Assembly in order to lay the foundations of a democratic republic (http://www.albadil.org/spip.php?article3667)


Achieved the Tunisian people yesterday evening a great victory on Tagith who fled the country in search of a safe haven abroad and Constitutional Council announced today is one of the devices installed by the bin to take Fouad Mebazaa Speaker Graphic presidency temporarily until a new presidential elections within 45 to 60 days .

إن حزب العمال الشيوعي التونسي إذ يحيّي هذا الانتصار الذي أحرزه الشعب بقدراته الذاتية وبصموده التاريخي وبتضحيات أبناءه وبناته وبدماء شهداءه الأبرار يؤكد: The Tunisian Communist Workers Party, as this victory salutes made by the people on its own historical and steadfastness and sacrifice of their sons and daughters with the blood of martyrs and the righteous confirms:

1- إن الانتصار المحقق إلى حد الآن لا يمثل سوى منتصف الطريق وإن النصف الآخر يتمثل في تحقيق التغيير الديمقراطي المنشود وتجسيده في أرض الواقع. 1 - The victory achieved so far is only half way though the other half is to achieve the desired democratic change and the value in the ground.

2- إن التغيير الديمقراطي لا يمكن أن ينبع من نفس الحزب والرموز والمؤسسات والأجهزة والتشريعات التي كرّست الدكتاتورية وحرمت الشعب من أبسط حقوقه على مدى أكثر من نصف قرن منه 23 سنة من حكم بن على. 2 - that democratic change can not come from the same party, symbols, institutions, agencies and legislation that have been devoted dictatorship and the people deprived of their basic rights over more than half a century from 23 years of the reign of Ben Ali.

3- إن فؤاد المبزع الذي يتولى الرئاسة مؤقتا هو أحد أعضاد بن على ورئيس مؤسسة منصبة تنصيبا ولا تمثل الشعب في شيء وأن تحديد مدة 45 إلى 60 يوم لإجراء الانتخابات الرئاسية لا هدف من وراءها سوى الإسراع في محاولة لضمان استمرارية النظام الدكتاتوري عبر أحد رموزه السابقين. 3 - The Fouad Mebazaa, who shall preside temporarily is one of humeri bin Ali, chairman of the Foundation focused Tnasiba and do not represent the people in the thing and that the identification period of 45 to 60 days of the presidential elections is not the goal from behind, only to accelerate in an attempt to ensure the continuity of the dictatorial regime through one of its symbols ex.

4- إن أخطر ما يمكن أن يحصل اليوم هو سرقة انتصار الشعب التونسي والالتفاف على مطامحه المشروعة في الحرية والعيش الكريم وعلى تضحياته عبر المحافظة على نظام بن على من دون بن علي وتشكيل ديكور ديمقراطي جديد حوله. 4 - The most dangerous thing that could happen today is to steal the victory of the Tunisian people and to circumvent the legitimate aspirations for freedom and a dignified life and the sacrifices to maintain a system through the bin without Ben Ali and the formation of a new democratic decor around it.

5- إن التغيير الديمقراطي بكل أبعاده السياسية والاقتصادية والاجتماعية والثقافية يقتضي القطع فعليا مع نظام الاستبداد عبر خطوة مباشرة تتمثل في تشكيل حكومة مؤقتة أو أيّ هيئة أخرى ذات صلاحيات تنفيذية تتولى تنظيم انتخابات حرة لمجلس تأسيسي يضع أسس الجمهورية الديمقراطية الحقة التي ينعم فيها الشعب بالحرية والعدالة الاجتماعية والكرامة الوطنية. 5 - the democratic change in all its dimensions political, economic, social and cultural rights requires the pieces actually with tyranny through a direct step is to form an interim government or any other body with executive powers will organize free elections to a constituent assembly put the foundations of the Republic of true democracy that enjoys the people's freedom and social justice and national dignity.

6- إن كل القوى التي قامت بدور فعال وحاسم في إسقاط الدكتاتور سواء كانت سياسية أو نقابية أو حقوقية أو ثقافية منظمة أو غير منظمة معنية وعموم الشعب برسم مستقبل تونس ولا يمكن أن ينوب عنها أي طرف أو جهة في أي مفاوضات أو اتصالات مع السلطة. 6 - All of the forces that has been instrumental and decisive in toppling the dictator, whether political or trade union or human rights or cultural organization or related organizations and the general people draw the future of Tunisia can not be represented by any party or entity in any negotiations or communications with the Authority.

7- إنّه من العاجل أن تشكل القوى الديمقراطية ميدانيا هيئات وطنية موحدة للتغيير الديمقراطي ويكون من مهامها حماية مكاسب الشعب التونسي المنتفض والتفاوض مع السلطة من أجل تسليم الحكم للشعب بطريقة سلمية. 7 - It is urgent that constitute the democratic forces in the field of national standard bodies for democratic change and have the task of protecting gains Flincher the Tunisian people and negotiate with the Authority for the delivery of governance for the people in a peaceful manner.

8- إن القوى الديمقراطية في كافة أنحاء البلاد مطالبة بتنظيم صفوفها في هيئات أو لجان أو مجالس جهوية ومحلية وقطاعية لتأطير الحركة الشعبية والتصدي للمناورات الرجعية ولأعمال التخريب والنهب التي ترتكبها جماعات خفية تريد زرع الرعب في صفوف المواطنين والمواطنات وتهديد أمنهم وتخويفهم من التغيير الديمقراطي ودفعهم إلى تسليم أمرهم للأجهزة القمعية القائمة. 8 - The forces of democracy in all parts of the country claim to organize their ranks in the bodies, committees or boards of regional, local and sectoral framing the SPLM and the response to maneuvers retro and acts of vandalism and looting perpetrated by groups hidden you want to sow terror among the citizens and threaten their security and intimidation of democratic change and push them to the delivery of ordered them to the repressive organs of the list.

9- إن قوات الجيش التي تتركب في معظمها من أبناء هذا الشعب مدعوة للحفاظ على أمننا وأمن الوطن واحترام خياراته وطموحه إلى الحرية والكرامة والعدالة الاجتماعية وهو ما يجعل من إلغاء حالة الطوارئ في أسرع وقت ممكن أمرا ضروريا حتى لا يكون ذريعة لثني الشعب التونسي عن مواصلة كفاحه المشروع وتجسيد مطامحه في أرض الواقع. 9 - The army, which is composed mostly of the sons of this people are invited to preserve our security and our homeland security and respect for their choices and aspirations to freedom, dignity and social justice, which makes the abolition of the state of emergency as soon as possible is essential so as not to be an excuse to bend the Tunisian people on the continuing struggle project and reflect the aspirations in the ground.

http://www.albadil.org/local/cache-vignettes/L8xH11/puce_rtl-470e9.gif
من أجل حكومة مؤقتة For an interim government
http://www.albadil.org/local/cache-vignettes/L8xH11/puce_rtl-470e9.gif
من أجل مجلس تأسيسي For a constituent assembly
http://www.albadil.org/local/cache-vignettes/L8xH11/puce_rtl-470e9.gif
من أجل جمهورية ديمقراطية For a democratic republic

حزب العمال الشيوعي التونسي Tunisian Communist Workers Party

تونس في 15 جانفي 2011 Tunisia on 15 January 2011

KurtFF8
18th January 2011, 23:10
And more:

Tunisia: A Revolution That Goes All the Way? (http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/jahjah180111.html)


by Dyab Abou Jahjah

The regime is playing its last card today in Tunisia. That last Card is the RCD (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rassemblement_constitutionnel_d%C3%A9mocratique) (the party of the former dictator). After the formation of a so-called "National Unity Government " yesterday, and after the UGTT (http://www.ugtt.org.tn/) (the largest trade union in the country) supported and even participated in it with three ministers, alongside three opposition ministers (from the legalized opposition under the regime), many thought that the Tunisian revolution ended up with a compromise. A compromise that left a bitter taste in the mouth of the Tunisian people and especially the youth who started this revolution and were determined to sacrifice in order to see it through.

After learning the composition of the government and the fact that it included even the minister of interior of the regime who can be held responsible among others for the killings, the revolutionary sentiment exploded again. Arab Nationalists, Islamists, and radical leftists but above all normal Tunisians with no political agenda except their determination to have a clean break with the past of repression decided to go challenge this government and demanded the outlawing of RCD and the formation of a national salvation government that even breaks with the constitution and rewrites it. These are revolutionary demands by all means and many people did not make them yesterday. However, people who knew the high level of political awareness that the Tunisian people possesses also knew that action will follow.


Today all over the country demonstrations are erupting, forcing the UGTT to retreat from the government (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/18/tunisian-leaders-quit-protest-ministers) and to embrace the revolutionary demands cited above. In many places the popular committees clashed with the police and shootouts were reported. . . . Tunisia will decide its direction in the coming days, maybe hours: would it be a revolution that goes all the way or a compromise between a revolution and a regime that will keep many contradictions under the surface, which will sooner or later lead to another clash . . . ?
Dyab Abou Jahjah is founder and former president of the Arab European League (http://www.arabeuropean.org/). This article was first published in his blog Abou Jahjah Comments (http://www.aboujahjah.com/?p=243) on 18 January 2011; it is reproduced here for non-profit educational purposes