Die Neue Zeit
8th January 2011, 17:37
Although this is a year old, here's some sort of founding statement for a Participatory Socialist Party in Romania:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cpofpakistan/message/961
On the other hand as we know" only who is not working is not making mistakes".From this reason a new communist party in our country , if is called "the Romanian Participatory Socialism Party" because the actual legislation do not permit to use the name of " communist party", has to come with some improvements in his internal political life , for avoiding the lacks from the past and because have to act as a legal political party, respectively to be officially registered and for this reason we have to use also some terminology which have to escape to the internal jurisdiction exigencies imposed by the capitalist Romanian system.This is the reason for what instead to mention in the party programmatic documents " the socialization of the means of production" I mentioned " the socialization of the economic and social activities",and instead to mention that " the power has to be taken by revolution " I mentioned " we have to put in practice the idea of revolution only when is proved that there is no other possibility" as mentioned also Che Guevara. The society which I promote in my theory "is a participatory socialist , post-capitalist , society, of working people".This is a prove that I do not promote a compromise with the capitalist society,but by promoting the "participatory socialism" we can prepare legally our members and all "the working people" to act together for a better organization, solidarity and concrete participation in replacing the present capitalist society with a "participatory socialism,post-capitalist society of working people".
[...]
Albert Einstein in his study called "Why Socialism" is mentioning:
In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjust production to the needs of community, could distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman and child. The education of the individual, addition to promoting his own abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Nevertheless, it is necessary to remember that a planned economy is not yet socialism. A planned economy as such may be accompanied by the complete enslavement of the individual. The achievement of socialism require the solution of some extremely difficult socio-politico problems for preventing a too much centralization of the economic and politic power, for preventing as the bureaucracy to become all-powerful, for protecting the individual rights reducing the power of bureaucracy by democratic measures.
[...]
After abandoning the revolutionary way to socialism , from "the social€“democracy" raised another branch which advocates for replacing capitalism with socialism, but using "the representative parliamentary democracy", not the revolution.
These are known as "the Democratic Socialists".
After the fall of "the representative socialism, post-feudal of State", in Europe, on 1989, in some of the former socialist system countries "the democratic socialists€ putted the bases of two different branches:
- one branch of them have remained adepts of replacing capitalism with socialism by promoting "the representative parliamentary democracy "in the social life and "the democratic centralism" into the political life.
These are known at present as €œthe Representative Democratic Socialists".
- the militant branch of "the democratic socialists" acts, at present, for replacing "the democratic centralism" with " the participatory centralism" on the political life and " the representative democracy" with " the participatory democracy" into the social and economic life, considering that "the idea of revolution should be achieved only when was demonstrate that there are no other possibility".
These militants are known as €œthe Participatory Democratic Socialists
[...]
The Romanian Participatory Socialism Party, is continuator of the progressive theory and practice of the workers', left socialist and communist parties and movements from Romanian and all over the world , and apply on his political activity Karl Marx statement that: the philosophers did not done more than to give different interpretations of the world, it is important to change it!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cpofpakistan/message/961
On the other hand as we know" only who is not working is not making mistakes".From this reason a new communist party in our country , if is called "the Romanian Participatory Socialism Party" because the actual legislation do not permit to use the name of " communist party", has to come with some improvements in his internal political life , for avoiding the lacks from the past and because have to act as a legal political party, respectively to be officially registered and for this reason we have to use also some terminology which have to escape to the internal jurisdiction exigencies imposed by the capitalist Romanian system.This is the reason for what instead to mention in the party programmatic documents " the socialization of the means of production" I mentioned " the socialization of the economic and social activities",and instead to mention that " the power has to be taken by revolution " I mentioned " we have to put in practice the idea of revolution only when is proved that there is no other possibility" as mentioned also Che Guevara. The society which I promote in my theory "is a participatory socialist , post-capitalist , society, of working people".This is a prove that I do not promote a compromise with the capitalist society,but by promoting the "participatory socialism" we can prepare legally our members and all "the working people" to act together for a better organization, solidarity and concrete participation in replacing the present capitalist society with a "participatory socialism,post-capitalist society of working people".
[...]
Albert Einstein in his study called "Why Socialism" is mentioning:
In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjust production to the needs of community, could distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman and child. The education of the individual, addition to promoting his own abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Nevertheless, it is necessary to remember that a planned economy is not yet socialism. A planned economy as such may be accompanied by the complete enslavement of the individual. The achievement of socialism require the solution of some extremely difficult socio-politico problems for preventing a too much centralization of the economic and politic power, for preventing as the bureaucracy to become all-powerful, for protecting the individual rights reducing the power of bureaucracy by democratic measures.
[...]
After abandoning the revolutionary way to socialism , from "the social€“democracy" raised another branch which advocates for replacing capitalism with socialism, but using "the representative parliamentary democracy", not the revolution.
These are known as "the Democratic Socialists".
After the fall of "the representative socialism, post-feudal of State", in Europe, on 1989, in some of the former socialist system countries "the democratic socialists€ putted the bases of two different branches:
- one branch of them have remained adepts of replacing capitalism with socialism by promoting "the representative parliamentary democracy "in the social life and "the democratic centralism" into the political life.
These are known at present as €œthe Representative Democratic Socialists".
- the militant branch of "the democratic socialists" acts, at present, for replacing "the democratic centralism" with " the participatory centralism" on the political life and " the representative democracy" with " the participatory democracy" into the social and economic life, considering that "the idea of revolution should be achieved only when was demonstrate that there are no other possibility".
These militants are known as €œthe Participatory Democratic Socialists
[...]
The Romanian Participatory Socialism Party, is continuator of the progressive theory and practice of the workers', left socialist and communist parties and movements from Romanian and all over the world , and apply on his political activity Karl Marx statement that: the philosophers did not done more than to give different interpretations of the world, it is important to change it!