Log in

View Full Version : Pennsylvania allows dumping of toxic waste into drinking supply rivers and streams



Nothing Human Is Alien
3rd January 2011, 20:23
The natural gas boom gripping parts of the U.S. has a nasty byproduct: wastewater so salty, and so polluted with metals like barium and strontium, that most states require drillers to get rid of the stuff by injecting it down shafts thousands of feet deep.

Not in Pennsylvania, one of the states at the center of the gas rush.

There, the liquid that gushes from gas wells is only partially treated for substances that could be environmentally harmful, then dumped into rivers and streams from which communities get their drinking water.

In the two years since the frenzy of activity began in the vast underground rock formation known as the Marcellus Shale, Pennsylvania has been the only state allowing waterways to serve as the primary disposal place for the huge amounts of wastewater produced by a drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

State regulators, initially caught flat-footed, tightened the rules this year for any new water treatment plants but allowed any existing operations to continue discharging water into rivers.

At least 3.6 million barrels of the waste were sent to treatment plants that empty into rivers during the 12 months ending June 30, according to state records. That is enough to cover a square mile with more than 8 1/2 inches of brine.

Researchers are still trying to figure out whether Pennsylvania's river discharges, at their current levels, are dangerous to humans or wildlife. Several studies are under way, some under the auspices of the Environmental Protection Agency.

State officials, energy companies and the operators of treatment plants insist that with the right safeguards in place, the practice poses little or no risk to the environment or to the hundreds of thousands of people who rely on those rivers for drinking water.

But an Associated Press review found that Pennsylvania's efforts to minimize, control and track wastewater discharges from the Marcellus Shale have sometimes failed.

For example:

• Of the roughly 6 million barrels of well liquids produced in a 12-month period examined by The AP, the state couldn't account for the disposal method for 1.28 million barrels, about a fifth of the total, because of a weakness in its reporting system and incomplete filings by some energy companies.

• Some public water utilities that sit downstream from big gas wastewater treatment plants have struggled to stay under the federal maximum for contaminants known as trihalomethanes, which can cause cancer if swallowed over a long period.

• Regulations that should have kept drilling wastewater out of the important Delaware River Basin, the water supply for 15 million people in four states, were circumvented for many months.

In 2009 and part of 2010, energy company Cabot Oil & Gas trucked more than 44,000 barrels of well wastewater to a treatment facility in Hatfield Township, a Philadelphia suburb. Those liquids ultimately were discharged into a creek that provides drinking water to 17 municipalities with more than 300,000 residents. Cabot acknowledged it should not have happened.

People in those communities had been told repeatedly that the watershed was free of gas waste.

"This is an outrage," said Tracy Carluccio, deputy director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, an environmental group. "This is indicative of the lack of adequate oversight."

The situation in Pennsylvania is being watched carefully by regulators in other states, some of which have begun allowing some river discharges. New York also sits over the Marcellus Shale, but Gov. David Paterson has slapped a moratorium on high-volume fracking while environmental regulations are drafted.

Industry representatives insist that the wastewater from fracking has not caused serious harm anywhere in Pennsylvania, in part because it is safely diluted in the state's big rivers. But most of the largest drillers say they are taking action and abolishing river discharges anyway.

Cabot, which produced nearly 370,000 barrels of waste in the period examined by the AP, said that since the spring it has been reusing 100 percent of its well water in new drilling operations, rather than trucking it to treatment plants.

"Cabot wants to ensure that everything we are doing is environmentally sound," said spokesman George Stark. "It makes environmental sense and economic sense to do it."

All 10 of the biggest drillers in the state say they have either eliminated river discharges in the past few months, or reduced them to a small fraction of what they were a year ago. Together, those companies accounted for 80 percent of the wastewater produced in the state.

The biggest driller, Atlas Resources, which produced nearly 2.3 million barrels of wastewater in the review period, said it is now recycling all water produced by wells in their first 30 days of operation, when the flowback is heaviest. The rest is still sent to treatment plants, but "our ultimate goal is to have zero surface discharge of any of the water," said spokesman Jeff Kupfer.

How much wastewater is still being discharged into rivers is unclear. Records verifying industry claims of a major drop-off will not be available until midwinter.

Natural gas drilling has taken off in several states in recent years because of fracking and horizontal drilling, techniques that allow the unlocking of more methane than ever before.

Fracking involves injecting millions of gallons of water mixed with chemicals and sand deep into the rock, shattering the shale and releasing the gas trapped inside. When the gas comes to the surface, some of the water comes back, too, along with underground brine that exists naturally.

It can be several times saltier than sea water and tainted with fracking chemicals, some of which can be carcinogenic if swallowed at high enough levels over time.

The water is also often laden with barium, which is found in underground ore deposits and can cause high blood pressure, and radium, a naturally occurring radioactive substance.

In other places where fracking has ignited a gas bonanza, like the Barnett Shale field in Texas, the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana, and deposits in West Virginia, New Mexico and Oklahoma, the dominant disposal method for drilling wastewater is to send it back down into the ground via injection wells.

In some arid states, wastewater is also treated in evaporation pits. Water is essentially baked off by the sun, leaving a salty sludge that is disposed of in wells or landfills.

Operators of the treatment plants handling the bulk of the Pennsylvania waste say they can remove most of the toxic substances without much trouble, including radium and barium, before putting the water back into rivers.

"In some respects, its better than what's already in the river," said Al Lander, president of Tunnelton Liquids, a treatment plant that discharges water into western Pennsylvania's Conemaugh River.

The one thing that can't be removed easily, except at great expense, he said, is the dissolved solids and chlorides that make the fluids so salty.

Those substances usually don't pose a risk to humans in low levels, said Paul Ziemkiewicz, director of the West Virginia Water Research Institute at West Virginia, but large amounts can give drinking water a foul taste, leave a film on dishes and give people diarrhea. Those problems have been reported from time to time in some places.

Those salts can also trigger other problems.

The municipal authority that provides drinking water to Beaver Falls, 27 miles northwest of Pittsburgh, began flunking tests for trihalomethanes regularly last year, around the time that a facility 18 miles upstream, Advanced Waste Services, became Pennsylvania's dominant gas wastewater treatment plant.

Trihalomethanes are not found in drilling wastewater, but there can be a link. The wastewater often contains bromide, which reacts with the chlorine used to purify drinking water. That creates trihalomethanes.

The EPA says people who drink water with elevated levels of trihalomethanes for many years have an increased risk of cancer and could also develop liver, kidney or central nervous system problems.

Pennsylvania's multitude of acid-leaching, abandoned coal mines and other industrial sources are also a major source of the high salt levels that lead to the problem.

Beaver Falls plant manager Jim Riggio said he doesn't know what is keeping his system off-kilter, but a chemical analysis suggested it was linked to the hundreds of thousands of barrels of partially treated gas well brine that now flow past his intakes every year.

"It all goes back to frackwater," he said.

Sendo
4th January 2011, 02:44
I dont mean to hijack your thread, but this is all extremely relevant to New Yorkers, too:

I saw Mark Ruffalo speak at the University at Albany about the very possible very near future of hydrofracturing in New York state.

In addition to the 2005 EPA exemptions (leaving all regulation to underfunded states, and the secret formulas Halliburton concocted, and the tens of millions of gallons of water needed for each frack, the financial impossibility of paying for all of the damages generated......

New York City could very well die. After Paterson's moratorium on new permits ends in 2011, and they start drilling in Sullivan County, the whole downstate will be drinking water filled with uranium (a lot of that in NY but safely underground until hydrofracking makes it creep back up).

Dimock, Pennsylvania, has become the poster child for what could happen to New York.

To all reading, never believe natural gas is a cleaner transition fuel away from oil.

Everything NHIA is saying could very well happen to New York. And there is precious little coverage and none at the national level. Unfortunately, rural poverty makes the land leasers vulnerable and desperate. Many want the money and don't want urban elite, tree-hugging hypocrites to tell them what to do, and it wouldnt be the first time that this has happened (know any hybrid drivers who eat beef?).

What the leasers don't know, is that the $40,000 they might get may pay off the mortgage, but once they start drilling under property, it could send bubbles of methane up through your soil and your house's foundation. The $40,000 is now just less than adequate blood money.

Nothing Human Is Alien
4th January 2011, 04:02
Yea, I've watched fracking fuck up the natural environment in PA in only a few years in ways that could match decades of mining (which, for example causes foundations to crack from sinking ground -- as happened with my aunt -- and produces acid drainage that ruins whole water ways for humans and wildlife).

From recent issues of Working People's Advocate:

--------------

Fracked Up: New 'Green Energy' Scam Threatens Health, Environment

ALBANY, N.Y., Nov. 30 — As we go to press, the State Assembly is preparing to vote on a moratorium on a new and controversial method of exploring and drilling for natural gas.

Known formally as Horizontal Slick Water Hyraulic Fracturing, called “hydrofracking” or “fracking,” for short, has been touted as a new, environmentally-friendly means of extracting natural gas from shale deposits.

Getting oil or natural gas from shale formations has historically been very costly and time-consuming. Fracking was designed as a way to reduce cost and time, thus making extraction a more viable avenue for drilling.

Designed mainly by Halliburton, fracking involves 24-hour drilling into the ground about 8,000 feet into a shale deposit, then more drilling, horizontally into the deposit another 8,000 feet. The drilling breaks up the shale and releases the natural gas. Drillers then pump water, sand and “fracking chemicals” into the deposit to trap the gas, then pump the whole slurry out of the deposit.

The “frack water” is then stored in large, unguarded open-air pits lined with plastic tarp.

Among the more well-known chemicals used in fracking are benzene (a carcinogen — cancer-causing item) and hydrochloric acid.

The pits for the frack water only have orange plastic snow fence as protection, meaning wildlife, pets and kids can easily get to it.

Several states other than N.Y. have experienced fracking. Pennsylvania, W. Virginia and Colorado have active fracking in their state. North Dakota is experiencing a boom based on fracking, with many small towns literally overwhelmed by those seeking jobs.

In those states, there are already instances when frack water leaked out of the pits and into the local supply. Pennsylvania has had several instances of frack water leaking into local rivers and waterways. Colorado has seen the slurry of frack water seep through tears in the tarps into water runoff and local ponds.

In any petroleum drilling operation, there is the fear of hitting a methane gas pocket.

More to the point, there is the fear that a spark from the drill bit will set off a methane explosion that will travel to the surface. With fracking, there is a second danger: methane leaking through the shale deposit and into either the frack water or the local supply.

Failures in the extracting process have allowed methane to leak into the local water supply near one Penn. drilling operation.

Residents reported methane explosions in wells and flaming water from faucet taps.

Even the federal government has taken note of the concerns about fracking. The EPA held hearings over the late summer as part of their review of the process. In those hearings, they heard statements from residents in all of the states where fracking is used. Many of them talked of their experience living in a community near a drill site,
and the effects that fracking has had there.

Scientists from N.Y and Penn. presented the results of their examinations of soil and water samples in affected regions, which included the revelation that many samples contained radioactive particles in amounts far above the accepted levels of tolerance.

While one is inclined to dismiss Halliburton’s claims of fracking being a “green” alternative as cynical and opportunistic, it has to be said that the entire “green” industry is filled with shameless profiteers and opportunists.

Indeed, under any capitalist arrangement, such elements will be always present.

That Halliburton was faster and more capable of getting out in front of its competitors by recognizing the profit to be made in creating a “green energy” scam, that the “profiteer we know” was able to get the rights from politicians to frack (near) these communities, speaks volumes about how the ruling classes view the questions of public health and the environment in relation to the bottom line.

The environment is a workers’ issue. It is our health and safety, and that of our communities and loved ones, that suffers most when capitalism chews up the planet for its profits. This planet is not theirs to destroy.

--------------------

Again on Fracking

To the Editor:

I am writing in response to the aptly-titled article “Fracked” (Dec. 1, 2010). The true extent of the man-made disaster being created by hydraulic fracturing is difficult to fathom.

Pennsylvania, now being called “little Texas” by some, is leading the way in the industry, and the social and natural catastrophe it has brought with it. Drilling companies prey on the desperation of small farmers and other landowners unable to make ends meet through traditional means. But they don’t stop there. All sorts of shady deals have left parks and game lands ostensibly “protected” for public use covered with countless wells and makeshift access roads. The economic
benefits are continually lauded in the capitalist media, but the real cost is never mentioned.

Since drilling started, several workers have been killed in the western half of the state alone. In 2007, a 26-year-old man was killed in an explosion in Greene County. In June of this year, two more workers were killed in a blowout in Clearfield County. Those lucky enough to survive can look forward to the future, when there will be no more wells to install, rendering their positions superfluous.

Even those who have no direct contact with the industry can’t escape its enormous environmental impact. Hydraulic fracturing fluid is suspected in the 2007 Dunkard Creek fish kill that wiped out once-abundant fish and aquatic life over a 30-mile stretch of water along the Pennsylvania-West Virginia border. Just this November, an estimated 13,000 gallons of fracking fluid was spilled in Lycoming County near a spring, a stream and two drinking water wells. I wish I could tell you exactly what that fluid contained, but the “Halliburton Loophole” exempts companies involved in hydraulic fracturing from the Safe Drinking Water Act, which means they can keep their noxious recipe a secret.

As the ongoing practices of hydraulic fracturing and mountain-top removal have clearly demonstrated, neither those in power nor private or non-profit organizations can be trusted with the stewardship of nature.

Nothing short of a thoroughgoing revolutionary transformation, which has as key features the abolition of private property, commodity production and the profit motive, can lead us to end the mindless plunder of the world we live in. The duty to carry out this revolution falls squarely upon the shoulders of the working class. It’s a monumental task, but humankind depends on it.

Nothing Human Is Alien
4th January 2011, 04:06
Everything NHIA is saying could very well happen to New York. And there is precious little coverage and none at the national level. Unfortunately, rural poverty makes the land leasers vulnerable and desperate. Many want the money and don't want urban elite, tree-hugging hypocrites to tell them what to do, and it wouldnt be the first time that this has happened (know any hybrid drivers who eat beef?).I don't think this sort of thing is much help. Making this a "lifestyle" or "choice" issue focuses too much on the "consumer" instead of the underlying relations of production that have created this whole situation (from the drive for new, cheaper sources of fuel without thinking about the future to driving people into situations that cause them to celebrate the introduction of methods like fracking to their areas).

Sendo
7th January 2011, 09:23
I don't think this sort of thing is much help. Making this a "lifestyle" or "choice" issue focuses too much on the "consumer" instead of the underlying relations of production that have created this whole situation (from the drive for new, cheaper sources of fuel without thinking about the future to driving people into situations that cause them to celebrate the introduction of methods like fracking to their areas).

That's not how I wanted to frame it.

The problem, from those I've talked to, is that they don't want to listen to the negatives or don't believe them. Some people just see the dollar signs and so to prevent cognitive dissonance will not listen to the negatives.

Lifestylism is the very problem, since untilvery recently, the only groups who have been fighting it have been urban people. I know from family--some of whom will take criticism of hydro-fracking as yet another case of hypocrites placing furry animals above humans.


Relations to the means of production is secondary for the moment. You can't frame this issue as a lack of worker's democracy at first. People need to know why hydro-fracking is bad, and THEN channel that frustration into demanding democratic control over how our economy will dole out its money and how it will find its energy.

But easier said than done. i chatted with some people from Sullivan County who organized some bus trips to the capital to protest. The issue is poverty, and poor, rural New Yorkers aren't too trusting of people who come along and tell them to turn down offers of cash. I know these are people who have often farmed their land for decades and took good care of it, but see the littering and mass waste of cities.

No one wants to listen to a hypocrite.

The best way to spin this all around is to show that capitalism that offers no real solutions and that a managed economy is the only way to make efficient use of limited resources. A lot of anger over our dependence on foreign oil is quickly channeled in to anger over liberals not letting us exploit existing resources. Arguments about the end of oil are ignored when people cite the untapped resources in national parks or the options in natural gas.

Events like BP in the gulf will get people thinking. Notice how that generated anger against wealth and power of capital over government and the lack of punishment the rich endure? The first order of business was to publicize the damage to working people. People were angered when they lost their sources of income and had oily beaches. Means of production is rarely the first talking point.

traditional forms of labor organizing won't help too much here. The people need to have some sort of grassroots organization to fight for them, some social capital, some network besides church.

Thank you very much for the articles though. Useful stuff. And the points about this being another nail in the coffin for green capitalism a fill in the larger picture.

Illuminati
8th January 2011, 10:05
There is also large amounds of flouride in American tap water, which is very toxic.