Analyse this

[Dimentio]

Humans are evil bastards to
claim that a god is all-powerful
when it is impossible for a male
queer god to give birth to a baby
or breast-feed it - a power that
only a Mother posseses. Humans
are Evil bastards to claim that a
god is all knowing - when the
queer bastard is too stupid to
comprehend that 4 simultaneous
corner 24 hour days and 4 Earth
rotations occur within a single
24 hour rotation of CubedEarth.
It is impossible for an academic deified Queer ONE god to give
birth to, or breast-feed a Baby.
Bible fraud will destroy fools,
and they will eat one another.
Adam and Eve never existed.
Without profit, there is no god.
Believers will actually eat dung
before they will ever measure
their queer Godism for Cubic
Creation Truth. Just the other
Day in the NEWS, they were
worshipping their god image
in Vomit. Is there no limit to
just how putrid their godism mentality will dwell in stupor.
Forced integration created a
new race of human - a light
black race bridge from the black-black to the white-white.
Doom descends upon Whites
as with all past civilizations.
Like a God- like a Queer.
You think trained dog Oneism.

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Timecube = undiluted crazy.

[Manic Impressive]

Well the first thing that really stands out is the emphasis on the word Queer an obvious sign that the person (I assume a male) has issues with homosexuality. This is probably due to his own repressed feelings I would go further and say that there is a good chance that the person has acted on these repressed feelings and participated in homosexual acts if this is not the case then I would assume that he semi-regularly masturbates to images of men. He is ashamed of what he has done and as a former christian brought up in a strict household blames god for making him feel the way he does.

He also has a breast fetish which usually links back to his relationship with his mother. Which may at first seem like a close relationship and in many ways is, however there is an underlying feeling of alienation. He may also try to represent himself as knowledgeable and assertive person but there is a desire to regress into a child like state again.

His faux intellectualism masks a feeling of inferiority due to a poor education. He also longs for respect and authority although rarely achieves either.

The whole passage is about blaming others for what he perceives as his own inadequacies.

[Vanguard1917]

I was hoping this might be a thread on one of the best comedy films ever.

[Sasha]

what you think of this psycho-analist (pun intendet) wet dream (pun intendet):


If men and women are profoundly different—and both science and common sense tell us they are—then an all-female couple is even more different from an all-male couple than either homosexual bond differs from a heterosexual union. This distinction helps explain the oft-noted quirk in public attitudes that sees stronger opposition and denunciation, in the Old Testament and elsewhere, to a physical relationship between two males and intimacy between two females. A physical connection between a female couple, like a physical connection between man and woman, is based primarily on acts of affection. The most common sexual practice between two men involves an act of aggression—inflicting more pain than pleasure for at least one of the parties. Even decisions by Congress, equating homosexual and heterosexual relationships, or erasing distinctions between the interaction between lesbians on the one hand and gay males on the other, cannot repeal politically incorrect realities.
http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=321&sid=407160

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

So much wrong with this.


If men and women are profoundly different—and both science and common sense tell us they are—then an all-female couple is even more different from an all-male couple than either homosexual bond differs from a heterosexual union.

I get the impression here that the author believes that the differences between men and women are fundamentally biological in nature, rather than being primarily social. Most likely the author had a conservative upbringing.


This distinction helps explain the oft-noted quirk in public attitudes that sees stronger opposition and denunciation, in the Old Testament and elsewhere, to a physical relationship between two males and intimacy between two females.

An inability to recognise simple hypocrisy (except on the part of one's enemies) seems to be a common conserative trait.


A physical connection between a female couple, like a physical connection between man and woman, is based primarily on acts of affection.

This person appears to be ignorant of both heterosexual and homosexual relationships.


The most common sexual practice between two men involves an act of aggression—inflicting more pain than pleasure for at least one of the parties.

The author is a homophobe. It is a highly typical trait of homophobes to focus on anal sex with regards to homosexual relationships. It's as if they can't think of any other way two men can make love with each other.


Even decisions by Congress, equating homosexual and heterosexual relationships, or erasing distinctions between the interaction between lesbians on the one hand and gay males on the other, cannot repeal politically incorrect realities.

"I reject your reality, and substitute my own!"

[Sasha]

two chick making out, thats an sin i can dig but ZOMG!! butsex!! painfull butsex!!

[Widerstand]

So much wrong with this.



I get the impression here that the author believes that the differences between men and women are fundamentally biological in nature, rather than being primarily social. Most likely the author had a conservative upbringing.



An inability to recognise simple hypocrisy (except on the part of one's enemies) seems to be a common conserative trait.



This person appears to be ignorant of both heterosexual and homosexual relationships.



The author is a homophobe. It is a highly typical trait of homophobes to focus on anal sex with regards to homosexual relationships. It's as if they can't think of any other way two men can make love with each other.



"I reject your reality, and substitute my own!"

I find it interesting that you completely beat around the sexist / gendertyping assumption of his that female love is inherently "affectionate" and male love inherently "aggressive."

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

I find it interesting that you completely beat around the sexist / gendertyping assumption of his that female love is inherently "affectionate" and male love inherently "aggressive."

I thought that was implicit in "the differences between men and women ... being primarily social" and "This person appears to be ignorant of both heterosexual and homosexual relationships".