Log in

View Full Version : The Antisemitism to Come? Hardly



freepalestine
27th December 2010, 23:53
The Antisemitism to Come? Hardly

</U>Susan Abulhawa


</B>

</U></I></B></STRONG>December 26, 2010

Bernard-Henri Levy, the French pop star of philosophy and intellectual elitism, authored an essay (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bernardhenri-levy/post_1373_b_791632.html) that featured my novel, Mornings in Jenin, as one of three distressing developments that led him to ask "is there no end to the demonization of Israel?" It was titled: "The Antisemitism to Come." The other two happenings that concern him, he says, are the growing boycott of Israel and an acclaimed documentary film called Tears of Gaza.
First, a look at Mr Levy's targets:
1) Mornings in Jenin is a work of historic fiction, where fictional characters live through real history; and I encourage anyone to do their own research to verify the accuracy of the historic events that form the backdrop for the novel. 2) Tears of Gaza is a documentary film by Vibeke Lokkeberg, in which she reveals the horrific impact of Israel's bombing of Gaza in 2008 to 2009, especially on children and women. 3) The activists participating in and encouraging an economic boycott of Israel are ordinary citizens all over the world who are heeding the call of their conscience to take a moral stand against a grave injustice that has gone on far too long against the indigenous population of Israel and Palestine; namely, the Palestinian people.
Rather than offer an intelligent analysis of any one of these three things that trouble him, Levy essentially resorts to name-calling. He simply slaps on the word "antisemitism" to discredit any negative portrayal of Israel. This word -- with its profound gravity of marginalization, humiliation, dispossession, oppression, and ultimately, genocide of human beings for no other reason but their religion -- is so irresponsibly used by the likes of Levy that it truly besmirches the memory of those who were murdered in death camps solely for being Jewish. And I thank Kurt Brainin, a Holocaust survivor who wrote a touching letter expressing exactly that in response to Levy.
Nowhere in Levy's essay does he identify anything truly antisemitic in any of the three elements to which he refers. Because he cannot. If he could, I think he would. In fact, the people who today are being marginalized, humiliated, dispossessed, and oppressed for the sole reason of their religion are Palestinian Christians and Muslims. That is the real antisemitism of today.
Israel has been wiping Palestine off the map, expelling us and stealing everything we have. All that remains to us is less than 11 percent of our historic homeland, now in the form of isolated Bantustans, surrounded by menacing walls, snipers, checkpoints, settler-only roads and the ever-expanding Jewish-only settlements built on confiscated Palestinian property. We have no control over our own natural resources. The amount of water one receives is based on one's religion, such that Palestinians must share bathing water, while their Jewish neighbors water their lawns and enjoy private swimming pools. According to Defence for Children International (http://www.dci-pal.org/english/display.cfm?DocId=1731&CategoryId=1), in Jerusalem alone, Israel has imprisoned 1,200 Palestinian children this year, who are routinely abused and forced to sign confessions in Hebrew, which they do not understand. Israel routinely targets Palestinian schools and has created a full generation of lost souls in Gaza, who are growing up knowing only fear, insecurity, and hunger. Documents (http://www.gisha.org/index.php?intLanguage=2&intItemId=1904&intSiteSN=113)pertaining to Israel's brutal siege of Gaza and its merciless attacks on that civilian population show the cold mathematical formulas designed intentionally to produce food shortages (http://www.medialens.org/alerts/10/101117_put_the_palestinians.php) and hunger in Gaza. Christian Palestinians have all but been wholly removed from the place of Jesus' birth. And on goes the inhumanity -- the constant expulsions, home demolitions, systematic theft, destruction of livelihoods, uprooting of trees -- especially olive trees which are so precious to Palestinian culture -- curfews, closures, institutional discrimination, and on and on.
Instead of upholding the best of Jewish ideals that champion justice and the uplifting of the oppressed, Mr. Levy rushes to Israel's defense, repeating the tired mantra of "the only democracy in the Middle East." Apartheid South Africa, too, called itself a democracy, while it mowed down little boys in Soweto (with arms, incidentally, supplied by Israel). So did the United States, during a time when at least 20 percent of its population lived as slaves, bought and sold like cattle.
Equally outrageous is Mr. Levy's wholesale labeling of anyone who criticizes Israel as "antisemitic". For exposing Israel's extensive crimes, we must face the defamation that we are immoral, racist, and hateful. In the case of Vibeke Lokkeberg, Levy makes it a point to inform the reader that she is a former model, ignoring her accomplishments as an experienced filmmaker and author. Apparently, in addition to suggesting she is racist, he perhaps wants readers to think she is also not intellectually qualified to create anything of merit. This tactic of attacking and trying to discredit the messenger rather than address the actual message is an age-old propaganda method.
Mr. Levy accuses us of "demonizing Israel", when in fact, all we do is pull back the curtain, however slightly, to show a dark truth he wishes to keep hidden. I suspect that Mr Levy feels, as most Jewish supporters of Israel do, that he is more entitled to my grandfather's farms than I am. After all, that is really the foundation of Israel, isn't it? The question that should be asked is "why?" and "how?" Why should Jews from all over the world be entitled to enjoy dual citizenship, both in their own homeland and in mine, while we, the natives of Palestine, languish in refugee camps, a diaspora, or patrolled ghettos and bantustans? How is it that a country with one of the most powerful militaries in the world, that has been committing well-documented war crimes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Fact_Finding_Mission_on_the_Gaza_Co nflict) against a principally unarmed civilian native population for six decades now, is depicted as the victim? And worse, the real victims, who are trying to resist their own extinction, are depicted as the aggressors?
Nelson Mandela once said: "We know all too well, that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians." Now, in addition to such notable personalities speaking out, people all over the world are slowly joining the struggle for justice and freedom for Palestinians; and it seems inevitable that Israel's systematic ethnic cleansing will at last be opposed by a critical mass of people that will compel Israel to abandon its institutional racism, such that the native non-Jewish population might at last live with the same legal and human rights as Jews in the Holy Land. This is clearly what really worries Mr. Levy.
Susan Abulhawa is the author of Mornings in Jenin (Bloomsbury 2010)


:: Article nr. 73297 sent on 27-dec-2010 03:38 ECT


www.uruknet.info?p=73297 (http://www.uruknet.info/?p=73297)</I>

Link: www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-abulhawa/bernardhenri-levy-a-new-k_b_799651.html</I> (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-abulhawa/bernardhenri-levy-a-new-k_b_799651.html)

Dimentio
28th December 2010, 14:45
The mother of all bad arguments, namely that criticism of Israel should be silenced because of the Holocaust.

Like all bad arguments, this one is also tremedously efficient.

Che a chara
28th December 2010, 15:39
I'd hit back at Mr.Levy that Arabs are semitic too so he is being anti-semitic himself. It's a typical Zionist ploy to hijack terms and use past atrocities as a guilt trip to play on people's emotions and justify their own ethnic cleansing and barbaric war crimes.

It seems that for a country who has the 4th or 5th largest military in the world and defence missiles and 100's of nuclear bombs they feel the need to open fire on children collecting wood and bricks for building purposes that they portray themselves to be under attack and defending their security. Well the hypocrisy astounds me, are Palestine not allowed to defend their national security ? Are they not allowed to economically develop or allow their children to grow up free from oppression, occupation and Nazi like polices inflicted on them by the terrorist and racist Zionist Israeli regime ?

Mr. Levy would do well to remember that in a time of crisis in the future, Israel may depend on their neighbouring countries for some help, but Palestinians, the Lebanese etc wont forget the hell the Zionists have put them through.

The world is beginning to waken up to Zionist lies and propaganda.

hatzel
28th December 2010, 16:22
I'd hit back at Mr.Levy that Arabs are semitic too so he is being anti-semitic himself. It's a typical Zionist ploy to hijack terms and use past atrocities as a guilt trip to play on people's emotions and justify their own ethnic cleansing and barbaric war crimes.

Quick question...why does everybody feel obliged to keep bringing up the Holocaust? Why does this article bring it up, spin it in and use it almost as a weapon to discredit Levy's article? I mean...I've read it through, again and again, searching for the reference to the Holocaust, or to historical anti-Semitism, and I'm really not seeing it. Maybe I'm not seeing it. So if we could maybe all stop guilt-tripping ourselves and blaming it on somebody else, I'd be very grateful...

And I hate to play the Devil's advocate, but considering the very word 'antisemitism' was, as we all surely know, devised as a more scientific-sounding term for 'Jew-hatred' or whatever, it would technically be, to use your accusation, 'hijacking terms' to claim that anti-Arab sentiment constitutes antisemitism. Despite the elements that the word itself is made up of, we can't just break it down and decide for ourselves what it means. In such case we'd have to stop saying 'homophobia', too, as that makes literally no sense. If you're not happy with the term, and it's persistent and accepted usage over the last 130 years, I heartily recommend you write a letter to Wilhelm Marr or somebody and suggest that 'Antisemitismus' isn't a suitable replacement for 'Judenhass'. Not our fault he wasn't a stickler for accuracy.

Che a chara
28th December 2010, 16:36
Quick question...why does everybody feel obliged to keep bringing up the Holocaust? Why does this article bring it up, spin it in and use it almost as a weapon to discredit Levy's article? I mean...I've read it through, again and again, searching for the reference to the Holocaust, or to historical anti-Semitism, and I'm really not seeing it. Maybe I'm not seeing it. So if we could maybe all stop guilt-tripping ourselves and blaming it on somebody else, I'd be very grateful...

And I hate to play the Devil's advocate, but considering the very word 'antisemitism' was, as we all surely know, devised as a more scientific-sounding term for 'Jew-hatred' or whatever, it would technically be, to use your accusation, 'hijacking terms' to claim that anti-Arab sentiment constitutes antisemitism. Despite the elements that the word itself is made up of, we can't just break it down and decide for ourselves what it means. In such case we'd have to stop saying 'homophobia', too, as that makes literally no sense. If you're not happy with the term, and it's persistent and accepted usage over the last 130 years, I heartily recommend you write a letter to Wilhelm Marr or somebody and suggest that 'Antisemitismus' isn't a suitable replacement for 'Judenhass'. Not our fault he wasn't a stickler for accuracy.


No, the ploy being played by Zionists is that they are implying that Arabs are not semitic. This is false and just a blatant lie and using a term that has historical and profound meaning, as mentionied in the article that when one hears of anti-semitism, the first thing that springs to mind is the Holocaust. That is used as a guilt trip to play on emotions.

You don't need to mention the Holocaust when the slander "anti-semitism" is thrown around. It's been concocted together by Zionism through propaganda over the decades, which is why i said it's been 'hijacked' for exclusive use for Zionists only (i.e. denying that Arabs are semites)

Dimentio
28th December 2010, 16:42
Antisemitism shouldn't be interpreted as a literal term. It was actually coined by people who hated Jews specifically, and saw them as a race which threatened to infect host societies, like viruses. Thus, it is wrong to imply that oppression of Palestinians are antisemitic (though Islamophobia in Europe does have a few similarities).

Neither, it should be possible to do as Zionists and put all criticism of Israel or hatred of Jews up as antisemitism.

Antisemitism is a very particular kind of hatred. It means an irrational belief that Jews somehow are involved in conspiracies and either are in the pursuit of world domination or are in world domination. Statements that Jews look ugly or are thieves are racist and disgusting, but do hardly qualify as antisemitism.

#FF0000
28th December 2010, 20:14
hurr but arabs r semetic 2!!!

this is a stupid thing to say. stop saying it. Antisemitism refers specifically to racism and bigotry against Jews. You know it does. Don't be stupid.

Che a chara
29th December 2010, 10:48
Okie doke folks, I understand it's current historical context, but it's just that I know of one pretty pissed off Arab who has had the slur of anti-semitism used against him despite him referring to himself as semitic.

balaclava
30th December 2010, 12:08
He simply slaps on the word "antisemitism" to discredit any negative portrayal of Israel. This word -- with its profound gravity of marginalization, humiliation, dispossession, oppression, and ultimately, genocide of human beings for no other reason but their religion -- is so irresponsibly used


You complain about someone using/misusing a word ‘antisemetism’ to demonise the opposition.



Instead of upholding the best of Jewish ideals that champion justice and the uplifting of the oppressed, Mr. Levy rushes to Israel's defense, repeating the tired mantra of "the only democracy in the Middle East." Apartheid South Africa, too, called itself a democracy, while it mowed down little boys in Soweto


Then you use a word ‘apartheid’ to demonise the opposition.

And is it not a the case that, using such words (fascist, racists) to describe and thus demonise the opposition has become a widely adopted tactic?

freepalestine
30th December 2010, 16:08
You complain about someone using/misusing a word ‘antisemetism’ to demonise the opposition.



Then you use a word ‘apartheid’ to demonise the opposition.

And is it not a the case that, using such words (fascist, racists) to describe and thus demonise the opposition has become a widely adopted tactic?
who are you talking to??

#FF0000
30th December 2010, 21:24
Then you use a word ‘apartheid’ to demonise the opposition.

Yeah but I think "apartheid" is more accurate in describing the Israel/Palestine situation than "antisemitism" is in describing opponents of the Israeli government's brutal treatment of the Palestinians. Palestinians are systematically oppressed because they are Palestinian. On the other hand, there are plenty of anti-Zionists or anti-Israeli activists who are Jewish.

In fact it was a pamphlet from a Jewish organization that sort of shed light on the Palestinian struggle for me in the first place.

ComradeMan
2nd January 2011, 16:29
To say that the actions of the state of Israel/IDF (not all of whom are Jewish BTW) are some kind of motivation for anti-semitism, almost merging on justification, is nothing but an appeal to oppurtunism.

For example why did the PLO attack the Great Synagogue of Rome in 1982? Because of Israel? Or because of anti-semitism? The net result was dozens of injuries and a child of two years old being killed.