Log in

View Full Version : Shin Bet puts Israeli 'anarchists' in crosshairs



freepalestine
27th December 2010, 23:47
Shin Bet puts Israeli 'anarchists' in crosshairs

</U>By Amira Hass


</B>

</U></I></B></STRONG>Security forces' Jewish Department warns leftist activists that they might be found to be violating the law.

December 27, 2010

The two security cadets at Ben-Gurion International Airport stood by the plane's door. That Friday, December 17, they were waiting not for some Mohammad, but rather for a Cohen. Matan Cohen.

He disembarked, and they followed him through passport control. From there he was taken to a small interrogation room. The duty policeman told Cohen, 22, a student at Hampshire College, that he was being detained on suspicion of "hostile activity."

Cohen: "Was it you who decided to detain me?"

Policeman: "No, security elements did."

Cohen: "Meaning the Shin Bet security service?"

Policeman: "Yes, the Shin Bet's Jewish department."

Four more people in civilian clothes examined Cohen's possessions. It took them two and a half hours. They asked some questions that showed Cohen they did not know a thing about him. (He is an anarchist activist and one of the coordinators of BDS - Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions on Israel - in the United States. ) They told him they did not have the security clearance to gain access to his file.

"We merely were warned that you are suspected of terrorist activity," which means they have to go through his bags, they said. After the examination, he was taken back to the policeman, who said, "If it were up to me, I would let you go already. I'm waiting for a telephone call from the head of the Jewish department."

Cohen: "[Am I] a suspect in something?"

Policeman: "You're not a suspect. You're suspected."

Cohen: "Your grammar is amazing."

Policeman: "It means that they think you're connected to something but you are not suspected of anything concrete."

Cohen: "In other words, you can detain me whenever you wish."

Policeman: "These are the instructions I got from the Shin Bet and the decision is theirs."

Eventually the policeman filed a detention report, writing: "Suspected of hostile terror activity by Shin Bet." Cohen, who was home for a vacation from his studies in political economy, philosophy and psychoanalysis, left the airport for his parents' house.

He was not the only anarchist the Jewish department dealt with that week. Five days earlier, Kobi Snitz was attending a conference when he received a call from an unidentified number. The caller told him, "Shalom, this is Rona from the Shin Bet. I'm sure you've heard about me."

"She said she wanted to invite me for a friendly conversation and for us to exchange thoughts," said Snitz, 39, an anarchist activist and a mathematician. He asked whether he was being called in for an interrogation and when she said no, he said, no thanks. In 2009, Snitz served a 20-day sentence over an attempt a few years earlier to prevent the demolition of a house in Kharbatha, a village west of Ramallah. Two months ago, he was given another five-day sentence over a protest against the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

"The Jewish department believes that every Arab is dangerous and that they can take us, the naive activists, for a ride," says Snitz. "They call us in in order to create a psychological profile, to know which of us they can exploit, and who can be exploited by others. They are not looking for information."

Assaf Kintzer received a call on December 9: "Shalom, this is Rona from the Shin Bet. How are you?" After he said "okay," she said she wanted to see him and asked him to come to the Dizengoff Street police station in Tel Aviv. It's urgent, she added. Kintzer, 33, said he could not come immediately. She said: "I'll call you again soon, and it's worth your while to come." She then continued, as Kintzer recalled, "Listen, if you aren't coming now, I'll tell you a bit by phone. I want you to know that we know what you are doing and that it will have repercussions. At the moment, what you are doing is on the borderline of the law and it is quite possible that information on you will show your actions are illegal. We know about all your files."

That same day, Kintzer was called to the police station to be interrogated after being detained at two demonstrations against the separation fence at Ma'asara.

Then Rona added: "In addition to your activity in the West Bank, we know that you are involved in [a plan to demonstrate against] the business conference. If you do anything violent, there will be consequences. Why aren't you talking?"

I have no reason to answer, he said. So Rona, he recalls, said in parting: "You should know that I'm not against you at all. I am on your side and take part in demonstrations."

One person who did go to meet Rona two weeks ago, mainly out of curiosity, was N., 30, another member of Anarchists against the Wall.

The entire meeting, including the security check with a magnometer and the screening of his bag, took less than 20 minutes. Rona could not get N. to respond to her questions, but N. said she had the following message: "We know what you are doing. At the moment you are not violating the law and we don't have any problem with you. The moment you violate the law, we'll be there."

Haaretz asked the Shin Bet whether it was warning activists about violating laws that the Knesset may pass in the future, thus making their actions illegal. The newspaper also asked who was considered "suspected," and whether members of the service could participate in demonstrations against the government.

The Shin Bet responded, "The security service acts in keeping with the authority granted it by law to fulfill its objective of protecting state security, institutions and public order in a democratic regime from threats of terror, damage, subversion, spying and revealing state secrets, as stipulated in paragraph 7 (a ) of the Shin Bet security service law from 2002. As for the extent to which Shin Bet employees may take part in demonstrations, they are subject to the restrictions imposed on all civil servants."







:: Article nr. 73319 sent on 27-dec-2010 18:45 ECT


www.uruknet.info?p=73319 (http://www.uruknet.info/?p=73319)</I>

Link: www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/shin-bet-puts-israeli-anarchists-in-cross
hairs-1.333140</I> (http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/shin-bet-puts-israeli-anarchists-in-crosshairs-1.333140)

freepalestine
28th December 2010, 00:07
Israeli activist sentenced to 3 months in prison for protesting Gaza war

</U>Joseph Dana


</B>
http://www.uruknet.info/pic.php?f=27jonathan_pollak.jpg (http://www.uruknet.info/pic.php?f=27jonathan_pollak.jpg)
</U></I></B></STRONG>
Pollak in a Tel Aviv Court 27.12.10 Photo:Oren Ziv/Activestills.org

December 27, 2010

Of all the criminals involved with the 2008 Gaza war (http://www.goldstonereport.org/), an Israeli leftist will be going to jail for riding his bike against the war in Tel Aviv. Tel Aviv Magistrates court judge Yitzhak Yitzhak convicted Israeli leftist Jonathan Pollak of illegal assembly for his participation in a January 2008 Critical Mass ride against the siege on Gaza and then sentenced him to three months imprisonment that will begin on January 11th, 2011. Pollak was the only one detained at the said protest, and was accused of doing nothing other than riding his bicycle in the same manner as the rest of the protesters. The conviction activates an older three-month suspended sentence imposed on Pollak in a previous trial for protesting the construction of the Separation Barrier. An additional three month prison term was also imposed for the current conviction, which will be served concurrently. His imprisonment is part of a clear strategy of silencing dissent (http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/shin-bet-puts-israeli-anarchists-in-crosshairs-1.333140) in the Israeli left.
Jonathan Pollak is one of the founders of the Israeli leftist group "Anarchists Against the Wall (http://www.awalls.org/)", which join weekly unarmed Palestinian protests throughout the West Bank against the Separation Wall and the Occupation. Since 2008, he has served the media coordinator of the Popular Struggle Coordination Committee (http://www.popularstruggle.org/), an Palestinian umbrella organization designed to garner media attention for the unarmed struggle in the West Bank. On his conviction, Pollak argued for his sentence, saying "I find myself unable to express remorse in this case … If His Honor decides to go ahead and impose my suspended prison sentence, I will go to prison wholeheartedly and with my head held high. It will be the justice system itself, I believe, that ought to lower its eyes in the face of the suffering inflicted on Gaza’s inhabitants, just like it lowers its eyes and averts its vision each and every day when faced with the realities of the occupation."
On January 31, 2008, some thrity Israeli protesters participated in a Critical Mass bicycle ride through the streets of Tel Aviv against the siege on Gaza. During the protest, Pollak was arrested by plain-clothes police who recognized him from previous protests and because, as claimed in court, they assumed he was the organizer and figurehead of the event. The protest was allowed to continue undisturbed after Pollak’s arrest and ended with no further incidents or detentions.
The arrest and subsequent indictment appears to be the result of police vindictiveness, rather than of Pollak’s behavior at the time of the event; Pollak was but one in a group of protesters who behaved exactly like him, yet he was the only one to be singled out. Moreover, environmental Critical Mass events take place in Tel Aviv on a regular basis, but have never been met with such a response. Other protests, which have caused far more severe obstruction of traffic (e.g. the motorcade protest of thousands of motorcycles) did not result in arrests, and surely did not lead to the filing of criminal charges and imprisonment.
According to Pollak’s lawyer, Adv. Gaby Lasky, "The police not only singled out Pollak from a crowd of people who all did exactly as he did, but also singled out the entire protest for no reason other than its political alignment. Similar events regularly take place in Tel Aviv without police intervention, let alone arrests and indictments."
During the trial, an Israeli supporter of Pollak was violently removed from the courthouse for wearing a shirt that said "there is no pride in occupation." After the verdict was handed down, supporters began chanting in the courtroom against Israeli fascism and the occupation. They were forcibly removed one by one from the courthouse and subsequently held a demonstration on the sidewalk.
Despite evidence of Israeli wrongdoing in the course of the Gaza war, the only Israeli sentenced to jail so far is a leftist who choose to ride his bike through Tel Aviv in non-violent protest. The state of Israel sent a clear message with this verdict: that it will not tolerate dissent from the left. In fact, the state persecutor asked for a severe sentence in order to 'make an example out of Pollak and those who engage in similar anti-occupation work." Pollak said that he will continue to work with Palestinians against the occupation and repeatedly cited the much harsher verdicts given to Palestinians involved in non-violent protests. The only remorse that he showed was that he did not do enough to express dissent about the siege of Gaza. If peacefully riding a bike against violent aggression is a crime, Pollak said that we will happily go to jail. The fragility of Israeli democracy is on full display when one of its privileged sons can’t even ride a bike in protest of an aggressive and violent war on a besieged people.



:: Article nr. 73310 sent on 27-dec-2010 17:10 ECT


www.uruknet.info?p=73310 (http://www.uruknet.info/?p=73310)</I>

Link: josephdana.com/2010/12/israeli-activist-sentenced-to-3-months-in-prison-for-prot
esting-gaza-war/</I> (http://josephdana.com/2010/12/israeli-activist-sentenced-to-3-months-in-prison-for-protesting-gaza-war/)

Sasha
28th December 2010, 00:34
fuck man, i know that dude, very good activist, better write him some postcards

freepalestine
28th December 2010, 20:08
Tel Aviv court sentences Israeli activist
Published today (updated) 28/12/2010 18:22
http://www.revleft.com/vb/images/ViewDetails/Eng-1.jpg http://www.revleft.com/vb/images/ViewDetails/Eng+1.jpg






TEL AVIV, Israel (Ma'an) -- An Israeli court on Monday sentenced an Israeli activist to three months imprisonment for his participation in a protest against the siege of Gaza, the Popular Struggle Coordination Committee said.

Pollak was detained in January 2008 by plain clothes police at a Critical Mass bicycle ride held in Tel Aviv to protest Israel's illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip.

His conviction, for illegal assembly, activated an older three-month suspended sentence from an earlier trial in which Pollak was charged with protesting Israel's illegal separation wall. The judge imposed an additional three months prison term which will be served concurrently, the committee said.

"The police not only singled out Pollak from a crowd of people who all did exactly as he did, but also singled out the entire protest for no reason other than its political alignment. Similar events regularly take place in Tel Aviv without police intervention, let alone arrests and indictments." said Gaby Lasky, Pollak's lawyer.

In court, Pollak argued for his sentence, explaining, "I find myself unable to express remorse in this case.

"If His Honor decides to go ahead and impose my suspended prison sentence, I will go to prison wholeheartedly and with my head held high. It will be the justice system itself, I believe, that ought to lower its eyes in the face of the suffering inflicted on Gaza's inhabitants, just like it lowers its eyes and averts its vision each and every day when faced with the realities of the occupation."

Pollak told the court that the political nature of the case could not be sidestepped.

"The State of Israel maintains an illegitimate, inhuman and illegal siege on the Gaza Strip, which still is occupied territory according to international law. This siege, carried out in my name and in yours as well, sir, in fact in all of our names, is a cruel collective punishment inflicted on ordinary citizens, residents of the Gaza strip, subjects-without-rights under Israeli occupation.

"In the face of this reality, and as a stance against it, we chose on January 31st, 2008, to exercise the freedom of speech afforded to Jewish citizens of Israel. However, it appears that here in our one-of-many-faux-democracies in the Middle East, even this freedom is no longer freely granted, even to society's privileged sons."

Pollak will start his sentence on January 11 2011, the committee said.


http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=346237

freepalestine
17th January 2011, 04:17
LET JONATHAN KNOW YOU CARE

</U>Steve Amsel


</B>

</U></I></B></STRONG>
Desertpeace (http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/let-jonathan-know-you-care/), January 16, 2011

NO ….. I don’t mean Jonathan Pollard! I’m talking about Jonathan Pollak, one of the first (Jewish) victims of Israeli fascism. Riding a bike through the streets of Tel Aviv in protest against the atrocities being committed in Gaza is the 'crime’ he is guilty of…. see BIKE RIDE AGAINST GAZA WAR ENDS IN PRISON (http://desertpeace.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/pollack.jpg?w=477&h=309).


The court’s evidence…

http://desertpeace.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/pollack.jpg?w=477&h=309 (http://desertpeace.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/pollack.jpg)



Early last week Jonathan began serving his three month sentence (http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/topics/israeli-society/3170-israeli-activist-begins-prison-sentence-for-protesting-israeli-siege-of-gaza-). Let him know he is in your thoughts. Let him know he acted for all men of conscience and is not alone. Snail mail is the only way to reach him ….. he will be more than happy to hear from you.


His address:
Jonathan Pollak
Hermon Prison, NS Wing
P.O Box 4011
Maghar 14930
Israel






:: Article nr. 73966 sent on 16-jan-2011 19:09 ECT


www.uruknet.info?p=73966 (http://www.uruknet.info/?p=73966)</I>

TC
17th January 2011, 04:47
When I read these stories I always wonder - why don't they just say they want a lawyer and then shut up and/or reply "no comment" to everything after asking for a lawyer.

I mean,

There are really on three things you should ever say whenever being interviewed by any security agency anywhere in the world:

"I'd like to speak to a lawyer before answering any questions"
"Am I being detained or am I free to go" (at which point immediately leaving if not being detained)
and "I don't want to comment without legal counsel"

Those are the only three things you should ever say! Because there is no way that the interaction can ever come out good for you - you're never going to reduce a suspicion, or say something that provokes some thought, or make them go easier on you, or get out of an arrest if they have something to charge you with, - all you ever do by talking is make their job easier and give them more stuff to use against you and fellow activists.

This should really be security culture 101. Way more important than avoiding some topics on websites is not talking to enforcement agencies.