Log in

View Full Version : Russia's richest man found guilty, again - U.S. and Germany cry foul



Nothing Human Is Alien
27th December 2010, 16:55
MOSCOW (AFP) – A Moscow court on Monday found tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky guilty in his second fraud trial, a judgement seen as a pivotal moment in Russia's post-Soviet history that rang alarm bells in the West.

Khodorkovsky and co-accused Platon Lebedev were convicted of embezzlement and money laundering, said judge Viktor Danilkin, dashing the hopes of Russian liberals the trial would show a new approach from Russian courts.

In a stinging reaction from the West, the German foreign minister said the verdict was a step backwards for Russia while US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it would have a negative effect on the country's reputation.

The pair were charged with embezzling 218 million tonnes of oil from Khodorkovsky's Yukos oil giant between 1998 and 2003 and laundering 487 billion rubles (16 billion dollars) and 7.5 billion dollars received from the oil.

"This is an unjust verdict by a court that is not free," Khodorkovsky's lead lawyer Vadim Klyuvgant told journalists.

"It is shameful for the country. We will appeal the verdict."

Amid chaotic scenes, only a handful of reporters were allowed into the courtroom for the verdict and judge Danilkin then requested even those journalists to leave as the rest of the verdict was read out.

"The court has established that M. Khodorkovsky and P. Lebedev committed embezzlement acting in collusion with a group of people and using their professional positions," said Danilkin in the judgement.

Both reacted impassively to the judgement in the glass-fronted defendants' cage in the packed courtroom, Khodorkovsky leafing through papers and looking into the air while Lebedev appeared to be reading a book.

Hundreds of supporters gathered outside the court shouted "Russia without Putin" and "down with the police state" and an AFP correspondent saw police arresting 20 people.

The court adjourned Monday evening until 0700 GMT Tuesday and it was not clear when the final sentence would be delivered. Defence lawyers expressed hope it would come by the end of the year.

Once the country's richest man and now its most prominent prisoner, Khodorkovsky, 47, is already serving an eight-year sentence for fraud on charges his supporters insist were trumped up by the authorities.

But with his release scheduled for 2011, Khodorkovsky was put on trial last year on charges of money laundering and embezzlement that could see the head of the now-defunct Yukos oil giant stay in jail until 2017.

The verdict was watched as a possible indicator of Russia's future direction under Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev, amid speculation that Putin is planning a return to the Kremlin in 2012 polls.

Liberals had hoped an acquittal would send a signal to the West that Russia was serious about reform and displaying the independence of its judiciary.

"The judge would have had to have been a hero to have given an acquittal verdict," Lyudmila Alexeyeva, one of Russia's best known rights defenders, told the Interfax news agency.

Chief US diplomat Clinton said the conviction raises questions "about the rule of law being overshadowed by political considerations."

"This and similar cases have a negative impact on Russia's reputation for fulfilling its international human rights obligations and improving its investment climate," she added.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said that "the way the trial has been conducted is extremely dubious and a step backward on the road toward a modernisation of the country."

The Moscow stock market fell briefly on the news but analysts said the verdict had been long priced in and indexes climbed back to former levels.

Moscow's Khamovnichesky court had been due to start reading the verdict on December 15, but unexpectedly postponed the announcement without giving an explanation.

The next day Putin compared Khodorkovsky to US fraudster Bernard Madoff, jailed for 150 years, and observed that a "thief must be in prison".

Khodorkovsky hit back against Putin in a newspaper article on Friday, saying he pitied a man who could only feel love for dogs.

The pursuit of Khodorkovsky has been the most controversial legal action of the post-Soviet era in Russia.

Like many other billionaires, Khodorkovsky made his fortune in controversial loans-for-shares privatization in the 1990s but his supporters say he turned Yukos into Russia's most transparent company.

ed miliband
27th December 2010, 17:16
I'm going to put some money on this guy winning the Nobel Peace Prize next year.

erupt
27th December 2010, 18:13
I say chop the fucker's head clean off. Let's hear the Liberals talking about that.

Die Neue Zeit
27th December 2010, 18:45
This is how Caesarian leaders and their governments in the Third World should deal with even "national bourgeois" elements in their own countries.

ZeroNowhere
27th December 2010, 18:54
I say chop the fucker's head clean off. Let's hear the Liberals talking about that.
Indeed, and such would be the position of a Claudio Gentileist ruler-populist leader, but unfortunately one is lacking. This is clearly a result of the travesties of revolutionary decorationism, and a failure to apply the lessons of the struggles of 1982. As such, the government is forced into a position of Cullinanism in opposition to the bourgeoisie's Warneocracy, which may only be solved through the imposition of labour-partying camps for criminal elements, and a death penalty for money laundering and bourgeois decapitationism. The slogan of the left should be not, "Law and Order!", but, "Law and Proletariorder!"

Die Neue Zeit
27th December 2010, 19:02
The slogan of the left should be not, "Law and Order!", but, "Law and Proletariorder!"

Apart from Caesarian cases, I disagree with your inclusion of "law" in the slogan. Rule of Law is a bourgeois concept:

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/article.php?article_id=1004207

Kaze no Kae
27th December 2010, 19:09
Police brutality against anti-capitalists is fine, but convicting a billionaire of fraud "would have a negative effect on the country's reputation"? Fuck off Clinton

Nolan
28th December 2010, 06:32
Chief US diplomat Clinton said the conviction raises questions "about the rule of law being overshadowed by political considerations."

The sheer irony of this statement.

If the "rule of law" truly meant anything in Russia, it would be devoid of capitalist oligarchs and politicians very quickly, but seeing as they're the ones with all the power...

I think we can pretty safely say that this man has a lot of friends in the west.

Obs
28th December 2010, 07:48
The sheer irony of this statement.

If the "rule of law" truly meant anything in Russia, it would be devoid of capitalist oligarchs and politicians very quickly, but seeing as they're the ones with all the power...

I think we can pretty safely say that this man has a lot of friends in the west.

Oh, the rule of law is very important in Russia. It just happens that the laws are in place to protect the interests of capitalists.

pranabjyoti
28th December 2010, 17:48
I'm going to put some money on this guy winning the Nobel Peace Prize next year.
Me too.:laugh:

Nolan
28th December 2010, 19:33
Oh, the rule of law is very important in Russia. It just happens that the laws are in place to protect the interests of capitalists.

Yes, but what I mean is the extreme corruption that exists there. This ruling is the exception to the rule. A capitalist is actually being charged for his fraudulent practices instead of paying a sum to the appropriate authorities and never hearing of it again. In the U.S. it's really the same, and Clinton is being a hypocrite in order to cover a friends ass.

Tavarisch_Mike
28th December 2010, 19:40
An oligarch claiming to be not-guilty...:lol:

Delenda Carthago
28th December 2010, 22:23
Oh, the rule of law is very important in Russia. It just happens that the laws are in place to protect the interests of capitalists.
Yes,and in this specific case, the monopolistic interest of Putin's regime.

Amphictyonis
28th December 2010, 22:45
The sheer irony of this statement.

If the "rule of law" truly meant anything in Russia, it would be devoid of capitalist oligarchs and politicians very quickly, but seeing as they're the ones with all the power...

I think we can pretty safely say that this man has a lot of friends in the west.

The western states role is to protect capitalists. Hell, all states role at this point. This is good news coming from Russia.

Nolan
29th December 2010, 02:12
It's good that one is gone, but others will simply take his place. Others more friendly to the Putin clique. Was this done out of a desire for justice and fairness? No.

Geiseric
30th December 2010, 06:17
I thought Putin was the richest man in russia... Oh well, kill this fucker! Life for dealing drugs but 8 years for embezzeling over 20 billion dollers? Bull shit.

ev
30th December 2010, 06:32
Oligarchs that don't conform to and support the states regime will be dealt with like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the Kremlin has done this to set an example, what I hate is the fact that other countries do the exact same thing with their own judicial system and when Russia does it they say "ohh your justice system sucks" - which it does, but the judicial system of another other country ESPECIALLY the united states is 10 fold worse..

Hypocrisy at it's finest.. but such is international politics

Hexen
31st December 2010, 21:26
Life for dealing drugs but 8 years for embezzeling over 20 billion dollers? Bull shit.

Unfortunately this is how the capitalist "justice" works because it's designed to punish workers (well actually the bourgeoisie's slaves/serfs which are treated accordingly which I think even the word "worker" is just a euphemism) harshly while patting on the back on those who control the means of production which are the wealthy (It's also the same reason why that proletariat prisons are shit holes while the bourgeoisie have resorts as prisons).

The Author
1st January 2011, 18:15
In a stinging reaction from the West, the German foreign minister said the verdict was a step backwards for Russia while US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it would have a negative effect on the country's reputation.

Of course it would be, because in this instance it was Russia acting as a capitalist imperialist superpower in its own right, and working in its own favor as opposed to what the West desires. It's like with the decision taken by Russia and the other capitalist imperialist superpower of the East, China, recently in exchanging their currencies without using the dollar as an intermediate. Favored their own monopoly capitalist and financial firms, and not those of the West. There was nothing remotely progressive in such an action at all.

erupt
1st January 2011, 19:10
I saw, in Time magazine, some sort of article. I didn't read it, but I got the gist that the article was trying to label Khodorkovsky as Putin's media opponent. Just goes to show he has more than "some" friends in the West.

ckaihatsu
2nd January 2011, 06:37
Of course it would be, because in this instance it was Russia acting as a capitalist imperialist superpower in its own right, and working in its own favor as opposed to what the West desires. It's like with the decision taken by Russia and the other capitalist imperialist superpower of the East, China, recently in exchanging their currencies without using the dollar as an intermediate. Favored their own monopoly capitalist and financial firms, and not those of the West.




There was nothing remotely progressive in such an action at all.


Well....

While readily acknowledging that the U.S., EU states, *and* Russia and China are *all* effectively ruling elite cliques of their own on the international stage, I think we'd have to favor a *multipolar* global power situation over that of a single capitalist imperialist superpower having sole hegemony.... So Russia and China cutting out the U.S. dollar and not getting bombed for it like Iraq did is a *positive*, progressive step....

ckaihatsu
2nd January 2011, 06:48
I saw, in Time magazine, some sort of article. I didn't read it, but I got the gist that the article was trying to label Khodorkovsky as Putin's media opponent. Just goes to show he has more than "some" friends in the West.


(imitating the voice of friends in the West) "Oh, that Khodorkovsky...! What a Kho-DORK-kovsky...! He and Putin are *always* getting into their little flame wars...! Everyone hang onto your seats for Round 2, coming soon on Pay-Per-View!"


= D

ckaihatsu
2nd January 2011, 09:09
(Eeen pawst-Stah-leen-eest Raw-sha, Pay-Per-View watches *you*!)

x D

x D