Sabocat
22nd August 2003, 12:18
This was sent to me in a PM and I decided to post it here. I suppose you could consider it like a trial and when the party is found guilty, he usually has a chance to address the court before sentencing. Well here it is. (I just know I'm gonna get endless shit for this)
At the very least, it should make for some enjoyable and witty repartee.
....and now, will the convicted please rise and address the court....
Why don't they seem to understand that they only make themselves appear to be weaklings when they ban some of their most outspoken opposition. I would like to continue the good fight, if they will change their minds and rectify their decision.
It's easy to take one thing that somebody has said out of context, and then use that one line to get a bunch lemmings to agree that a ban should be imposed, much easier than actually debating the points that I raise. I would wager that most of the carbon copy clones that agreed to ban me don't posess the intelligence necessary to understand my more serious posts. However, they do understand my underlying tone, and that I am an enemy of their collosal stupidity. Therefore, when the hive mind targets me directly its all to easy for these insects to quash somebody who is constantly asking them to question their collective ignorance.
You must realize that anyone could be their next target. The only form of opposition these communists twits wish to have within the OI forum is their friends the Stalinists. After all, they are only trying to hide the fact that given the nature of their ideology, they are, by default, Stalinistic or Hitleresque in nature. What better evidence than their unrelenting use of their power to ban. Maybe this is only a message board. Maybe this isn't a communist country. Maybe in real life this sort of desire to eliminate conflicting ideas fails to carry over as political murder. However, I think this behavior does speak volumes about the character of these people. They are disgusting human beings, and I am hardly convinced that given the opportunity that they would not behave in this same manner, if given a country/economy to run. In fact, all the evidence suggests that I am right.
This is the same behavior that led to my previous explosion of insults and spam that led to my first and subsequent bans. When those who are less than me started editing and deleting my posts, I got furious and reacted. Now they try to rewrite history and pretend that I am some evil monster that went ape-shit without provocation. Anybody who has read enough to know who I am will most certainly understand that claim to be a lie. I would rather debate the points. That is what I am about. Perhaps you don't like my methods, perhaps I can be brash. I am only disrespectful to those who don't deserve my respect. If that happens to be the majority of those who frequent Che-lives.com, then I make no apology. Tell me if surrepticious bans are respectable? How about editing work that is not your own? What about deleting people's work outright? I don't think so.
I called this move on the part of the administrators when they first changed the name of Socialism vs. Capitalism to Opposing Ideologies. Of course, I rightfully predicted the accelerating decline of Che-lives.com, and the ultimate removal of any capitalist representation. Tell me I didn't see the writing on the wall. Communists are all to predictable. It is easy to understand why they hate competition in the realm of debate, as it is the same for any human endeavor. Most of the people that follow Marx are mediocre in every way. Therefore, the only way they can prop themselves up is to eliminate their betters.
Instead, why don't you post this e-mail in it's entirety, and we can see if the cowards who started this move to ban be, the lemmings who went along with it, or the administrator who carried it out wish to take credit for their rather pathetic display of poor sportsmanship.
Your Opponent,
Stormin Norman
At the very least, it should make for some enjoyable and witty repartee.
....and now, will the convicted please rise and address the court....
Why don't they seem to understand that they only make themselves appear to be weaklings when they ban some of their most outspoken opposition. I would like to continue the good fight, if they will change their minds and rectify their decision.
It's easy to take one thing that somebody has said out of context, and then use that one line to get a bunch lemmings to agree that a ban should be imposed, much easier than actually debating the points that I raise. I would wager that most of the carbon copy clones that agreed to ban me don't posess the intelligence necessary to understand my more serious posts. However, they do understand my underlying tone, and that I am an enemy of their collosal stupidity. Therefore, when the hive mind targets me directly its all to easy for these insects to quash somebody who is constantly asking them to question their collective ignorance.
You must realize that anyone could be their next target. The only form of opposition these communists twits wish to have within the OI forum is their friends the Stalinists. After all, they are only trying to hide the fact that given the nature of their ideology, they are, by default, Stalinistic or Hitleresque in nature. What better evidence than their unrelenting use of their power to ban. Maybe this is only a message board. Maybe this isn't a communist country. Maybe in real life this sort of desire to eliminate conflicting ideas fails to carry over as political murder. However, I think this behavior does speak volumes about the character of these people. They are disgusting human beings, and I am hardly convinced that given the opportunity that they would not behave in this same manner, if given a country/economy to run. In fact, all the evidence suggests that I am right.
This is the same behavior that led to my previous explosion of insults and spam that led to my first and subsequent bans. When those who are less than me started editing and deleting my posts, I got furious and reacted. Now they try to rewrite history and pretend that I am some evil monster that went ape-shit without provocation. Anybody who has read enough to know who I am will most certainly understand that claim to be a lie. I would rather debate the points. That is what I am about. Perhaps you don't like my methods, perhaps I can be brash. I am only disrespectful to those who don't deserve my respect. If that happens to be the majority of those who frequent Che-lives.com, then I make no apology. Tell me if surrepticious bans are respectable? How about editing work that is not your own? What about deleting people's work outright? I don't think so.
I called this move on the part of the administrators when they first changed the name of Socialism vs. Capitalism to Opposing Ideologies. Of course, I rightfully predicted the accelerating decline of Che-lives.com, and the ultimate removal of any capitalist representation. Tell me I didn't see the writing on the wall. Communists are all to predictable. It is easy to understand why they hate competition in the realm of debate, as it is the same for any human endeavor. Most of the people that follow Marx are mediocre in every way. Therefore, the only way they can prop themselves up is to eliminate their betters.
Instead, why don't you post this e-mail in it's entirety, and we can see if the cowards who started this move to ban be, the lemmings who went along with it, or the administrator who carried it out wish to take credit for their rather pathetic display of poor sportsmanship.
Your Opponent,
Stormin Norman