robbo203
12th December 2010, 09:55
DOGS, CATS & WAGE SLAVES
Dogs, specifically domesticated kind, are nature's sycophants. They beg. They
perform tricks upon command. Their tails wag upon the merest pat from their
masters. They are ever loyal. They know their place.
Dogs do not reject their masters. As a canine Lenin might have observed, the
dog is incapable of reaching an independent consciousness. Urging dogs to stand
up for their dignity is as pointless as distributing cleanliness manuals to
rats.
Cats, on the other hand, are remarkably sensitive to their own needs. These are
nature's materialists, ever heading to where food and shelter is available and
there settling for as long as their needs are satisfied and their human
providers leave them alone. Try as they might, humans will fail to train cats to
beg or jump through hoops or pretend to sing the national anthem. Cats purr when
they get what they want and they depart when they don't. You will rarely see a
cat on a lead.
Now, with all due excuses in advance for the implied anthropomorphism of all
this, there is a conclusion which merits a few moments of the reader's political
contemplation. Capitalist culture is based the expectation that the working
class can be turned into dogs. The good wage slave is essentially a well-trained
pup whose loyalty to the master who holds the lead is undying and whose bark is
reserved for anyone threatening to invade the masters' property. Workers are
educated as pups are trained, with a few bones on offer to the graduates best
able to jump to the appropriate orders of their future bosses. BBC's One Man And
His Dog could well be a documentary about job training, except for the obvious
fact that most "job-seekers" (as the unemployed have now been reclassified) are
denied such splendid rural scenery as the back-drop for their
exploitation-seeking. In capitalist culture the tail-wagging wage slave, content
in a squalid kennel, running to fetch the sticks which the master throws and
fearful of the stick which the master wields, is the most ideal of dehumanised
creatures of the profit system.
Of course, some capitalists tend to become strangely sentimental when it comes
to pet dogs in ways that rarely extend to their employees. The billionaire
inhabitant of Buckingham Palace, for example, is reputed to have quite a soft
spot for a corgi with a belly-ache after eating too much lunch (which is perhaps
why she reserves the British beef for visiting heads of state), but is not known
for her concerns about workers dying as they wait in queues for hospital
appointments. Other capitalists patronise charities concerned with animal
welfare (usually excluding the welfare of the defenceless suckers whom they
chase and shoot for sport) while resenting every penny they are forced to pay
towards the welfare of their wage slaves. Cruelty to domestic pets is a crime.
If the dogs of the rich and famous were transported in conditions which have
become customary for rush-hour users of the buses and underground trains there
would soon be a campaign formed to put an end to it.
Now, the great unconscious fear of the bosses is that workers become rather more
like cats. At the very least, cats are like high-class prostitutes, sitting on
their owners' laps and purring, with one eye on the smoked salmon and the other
on their claws should the would-be owner make a single false move. At their
best, cats are animals who know their place in a way that dogs never will: in
the sun, near the food and drink, never far from the open air and long leisure
hours of idle roaming, peaceful napping and hot sex. What characteristics do
capitalists less admire in their workers than those?
Dogs are pack animals. Humans (with the exception of Millwall supporters and
marching Orangemen) are social, but not pack animals. In short, we are socially
interdependent, but we have sufficient consciousness to survive and prosper
alone as well as in groups. Dogs survive either by total dependence upon the
pack or by domesticated submission to an owner. Cats are not pack animals and
are never quite owned by those who imagine themselves to be cat-owners.
The revolutionary socialist is the lion of the capitalist jungle. Not content to
hunt the pack or be trained into the domesticity of wage slavery, the socialist
looks at the world from a position of strength. There are more workers than
there are capitalists. We are stronger than them. We are the ones they depend on
to protect them as a class from one another and, above all, from us. We are
intelligent enough to know our way round the jungle and find our way out to the
other end. And our capacity to rise up scares the hell out of those who would
like the working class to be forever weak and bowed.
Freedom does not depend upon humans becoming more like cat - just less like
dogs. Like cats, we might learn that there is more dignity in walking away from
tyranny into the unknown than putting up with lousy treatment forever. But the
message of this rather strange piece is not that SOCIALISTS SAY WORKERS SHOULD
BECOME MORE LIKE CATS. Rather, SOCIALISTS SAY WORKERS SHOULD BECOME MORE LIKE
HUMANS. This means refusing to adopt the political posture of the dependent
canine and resting satisfied with the reformers' offers of bigger bones.
Instead, let those who think they can own us learn soon that our bite is as bad
as our bark - and our bark can become a roar.
(THE SOCIALIST STANDARD, AUGUST 1996)
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/standardonline/index.html
Dogs, specifically domesticated kind, are nature's sycophants. They beg. They
perform tricks upon command. Their tails wag upon the merest pat from their
masters. They are ever loyal. They know their place.
Dogs do not reject their masters. As a canine Lenin might have observed, the
dog is incapable of reaching an independent consciousness. Urging dogs to stand
up for their dignity is as pointless as distributing cleanliness manuals to
rats.
Cats, on the other hand, are remarkably sensitive to their own needs. These are
nature's materialists, ever heading to where food and shelter is available and
there settling for as long as their needs are satisfied and their human
providers leave them alone. Try as they might, humans will fail to train cats to
beg or jump through hoops or pretend to sing the national anthem. Cats purr when
they get what they want and they depart when they don't. You will rarely see a
cat on a lead.
Now, with all due excuses in advance for the implied anthropomorphism of all
this, there is a conclusion which merits a few moments of the reader's political
contemplation. Capitalist culture is based the expectation that the working
class can be turned into dogs. The good wage slave is essentially a well-trained
pup whose loyalty to the master who holds the lead is undying and whose bark is
reserved for anyone threatening to invade the masters' property. Workers are
educated as pups are trained, with a few bones on offer to the graduates best
able to jump to the appropriate orders of their future bosses. BBC's One Man And
His Dog could well be a documentary about job training, except for the obvious
fact that most "job-seekers" (as the unemployed have now been reclassified) are
denied such splendid rural scenery as the back-drop for their
exploitation-seeking. In capitalist culture the tail-wagging wage slave, content
in a squalid kennel, running to fetch the sticks which the master throws and
fearful of the stick which the master wields, is the most ideal of dehumanised
creatures of the profit system.
Of course, some capitalists tend to become strangely sentimental when it comes
to pet dogs in ways that rarely extend to their employees. The billionaire
inhabitant of Buckingham Palace, for example, is reputed to have quite a soft
spot for a corgi with a belly-ache after eating too much lunch (which is perhaps
why she reserves the British beef for visiting heads of state), but is not known
for her concerns about workers dying as they wait in queues for hospital
appointments. Other capitalists patronise charities concerned with animal
welfare (usually excluding the welfare of the defenceless suckers whom they
chase and shoot for sport) while resenting every penny they are forced to pay
towards the welfare of their wage slaves. Cruelty to domestic pets is a crime.
If the dogs of the rich and famous were transported in conditions which have
become customary for rush-hour users of the buses and underground trains there
would soon be a campaign formed to put an end to it.
Now, the great unconscious fear of the bosses is that workers become rather more
like cats. At the very least, cats are like high-class prostitutes, sitting on
their owners' laps and purring, with one eye on the smoked salmon and the other
on their claws should the would-be owner make a single false move. At their
best, cats are animals who know their place in a way that dogs never will: in
the sun, near the food and drink, never far from the open air and long leisure
hours of idle roaming, peaceful napping and hot sex. What characteristics do
capitalists less admire in their workers than those?
Dogs are pack animals. Humans (with the exception of Millwall supporters and
marching Orangemen) are social, but not pack animals. In short, we are socially
interdependent, but we have sufficient consciousness to survive and prosper
alone as well as in groups. Dogs survive either by total dependence upon the
pack or by domesticated submission to an owner. Cats are not pack animals and
are never quite owned by those who imagine themselves to be cat-owners.
The revolutionary socialist is the lion of the capitalist jungle. Not content to
hunt the pack or be trained into the domesticity of wage slavery, the socialist
looks at the world from a position of strength. There are more workers than
there are capitalists. We are stronger than them. We are the ones they depend on
to protect them as a class from one another and, above all, from us. We are
intelligent enough to know our way round the jungle and find our way out to the
other end. And our capacity to rise up scares the hell out of those who would
like the working class to be forever weak and bowed.
Freedom does not depend upon humans becoming more like cat - just less like
dogs. Like cats, we might learn that there is more dignity in walking away from
tyranny into the unknown than putting up with lousy treatment forever. But the
message of this rather strange piece is not that SOCIALISTS SAY WORKERS SHOULD
BECOME MORE LIKE CATS. Rather, SOCIALISTS SAY WORKERS SHOULD BECOME MORE LIKE
HUMANS. This means refusing to adopt the political posture of the dependent
canine and resting satisfied with the reformers' offers of bigger bones.
Instead, let those who think they can own us learn soon that our bite is as bad
as our bark - and our bark can become a roar.
(THE SOCIALIST STANDARD, AUGUST 1996)
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/standardonline/index.html