Unrelenting Steve
21st August 2003, 22:52
I am going on a job shadow from my school, my history teacher got a local MP to take me on. So while im there i figured i might aswell say my piece and all, but since the public cant actualy say nething in parliment (u have to convert an MP to ur cause and ask him to repeat ur complaint or watever) I am going to spam them with my a document I made yesterday. You guys got nething to add? (It would help if u had a general idea about South African politics- but general rants about nehting would be fine, like consice extremely coherant anarchist arguments that I could just throw on the back, I dont mind if its conflicting with my orginal missive, as long as its disruptive), well here is what it stands at so far:
What I would say to Parliament:
There is a great problem with our system. I shall now articulate it: All the resources used to run the country minus those that are used to fund the judiciary is allocated through this house and the parties represented here.
The government is supposed to uphold the constitution; it has evidently failed in that task as it does not provide essential food and shelter for South Africa’s citizens; nor will these objectives be met with current existing programs in place that are supposed to combat these scourges- that is extremely wrong, and unacceptable. What is worse is that this house does not recognise this fact, it lives in denial seeing other things as more important and worthy of resources other than basic instructions set to the government laid out in the constitution.
There perhaps is an argument that the resources that are accessible to the government are just not sufficient to combat these great problems faced when trying to fulfil these instructions we find in the constitution. Sadly this falls away when we are building roads when people are starving and buying jets when people are ravaged by the elements, that makes this rebuttal worse than feeble but simply an atrocity to the truth.
And if you still feel the economics are still not sufficient; then maybe it is our economic policy that lacks the courage. How can we have our constitution, a thing that must be considered higher than political will in the hearts of politicians limited by in comparison such a feeble thing as an economic policy- this is sheer rude absurdity- how can you justify this to the poor, how can you placate yourselves to the disposed, in the long run we will be better off perhaps with your 5 year economic plans, but that cession made when you produce your plans that in turn delays the fulfilment of the one certainty, the one ultimate truth that should be instilled in all our politicians minds; is not your concession to make, you have no right to tarnish our constitution and yet this is what you practice daily without remorse.
Feel shame, shame that you did not derive what I have had to formulate- you have perverted a meek state, a state that if you had the smallest decency in you, you would make strong with processes so that ones such as your current selves would not be able to whore to your seemingly bourgeois whims.
Communism is called for in the constitution, communism can fulfil what are the most basic and essential things asked for in the construction. It is disgusting that capitalism is perceived as a credible screen to cover your extreme failures in the way of your constitutional responsibilities. The time grows short when you will be allowed to discover freely by yourselves that our economic system should not limit the implementation of our constitution, but instead our constitution must determine our economics, when that is necessary to keep to what should be our government’s obligations and most certainly not the subject of their excuses.
Reform or Revolution!
What I would say to Parliament:
There is a great problem with our system. I shall now articulate it: All the resources used to run the country minus those that are used to fund the judiciary is allocated through this house and the parties represented here.
The government is supposed to uphold the constitution; it has evidently failed in that task as it does not provide essential food and shelter for South Africa’s citizens; nor will these objectives be met with current existing programs in place that are supposed to combat these scourges- that is extremely wrong, and unacceptable. What is worse is that this house does not recognise this fact, it lives in denial seeing other things as more important and worthy of resources other than basic instructions set to the government laid out in the constitution.
There perhaps is an argument that the resources that are accessible to the government are just not sufficient to combat these great problems faced when trying to fulfil these instructions we find in the constitution. Sadly this falls away when we are building roads when people are starving and buying jets when people are ravaged by the elements, that makes this rebuttal worse than feeble but simply an atrocity to the truth.
And if you still feel the economics are still not sufficient; then maybe it is our economic policy that lacks the courage. How can we have our constitution, a thing that must be considered higher than political will in the hearts of politicians limited by in comparison such a feeble thing as an economic policy- this is sheer rude absurdity- how can you justify this to the poor, how can you placate yourselves to the disposed, in the long run we will be better off perhaps with your 5 year economic plans, but that cession made when you produce your plans that in turn delays the fulfilment of the one certainty, the one ultimate truth that should be instilled in all our politicians minds; is not your concession to make, you have no right to tarnish our constitution and yet this is what you practice daily without remorse.
Feel shame, shame that you did not derive what I have had to formulate- you have perverted a meek state, a state that if you had the smallest decency in you, you would make strong with processes so that ones such as your current selves would not be able to whore to your seemingly bourgeois whims.
Communism is called for in the constitution, communism can fulfil what are the most basic and essential things asked for in the construction. It is disgusting that capitalism is perceived as a credible screen to cover your extreme failures in the way of your constitutional responsibilities. The time grows short when you will be allowed to discover freely by yourselves that our economic system should not limit the implementation of our constitution, but instead our constitution must determine our economics, when that is necessary to keep to what should be our government’s obligations and most certainly not the subject of their excuses.
Reform or Revolution!