Log in

View Full Version : Starbucks workers win MLK day as holiday



syndicat
19th November 2010, 18:43
For Immediate Release:
IWW Starbucks Workers Union
November 18, 2010
Contact: Aaron Kocher, 612-220-6454
Starbucks Baristas Win Equal Treatment for MLK Day After Three Year Union Fight
Employees that Work on Dr. King's Holiday will Receive Time-and-One-Half Holiday Pay
New York, NY- Starbucks baristas across the United States for the first time next year will begin receiving a time-and-one-half holiday premium for working on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. The move comes after a spirited three-year initiative of the IWW Starbucks Workers Union (SWU) which made public the company's second-class treatment of Dr. King's birthday and called on the coffee giant to pay the same premium that it pays workers on six other federal holidays. After Starbucks refused to change its policy, union workers and their supporters launched a determined campaign of grassroots actions in Starbucks stores and communities all across the country in support of equal treatment for MLK Day.
Starbucks Union members say this is an especially emotional victory, given that the SWU has long-cited the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as a major inspiration. Dr. King, who was assassinated in Memphis while supporting the effort of striking sanitation workers to form a union, was a staunch and outspoken defender of workers' rights including the right to a living wage and the right to join a labor union.
"We're deeply moved to have been able in our modest way to increase respect for Dr. King's legacy while ensuring that Starbucks employees who work on his holiday are fairly compensated," said Anja Witek, a Starbucks barista and SWU member in Minnesota. "This is a great example of what baristas and all low-wage workers can achieve by getting organized and taking direct action in support of workplace justice issues."
While Starbucks claims to 'embrace diversity', it doggedly resisted the SWU's call for equal treatment of MLK Day for three years. The company based its refusal on the claim that its holiday policy was in line with the (abysmally low) standards of the food service sector. The SWU made the case that Starbucks' commitment to diversity was illusory, citing the disproportionate number of workers of color in the lowest-paid positions in the company and its intense exploitation of coffee farmers including the Ethiopian workers who grew some of Starbucks' most expensive beans but received just 2.2% of the retail price.
"This is a great step forward and a moving victory yet we're mindful that there is much work to be done to make Starbucks a living wage employer that offers reliable work hours and respects the right of workers to join the union," said Daniel Gross, a former Starbucks barista and SWU member in New York City. "We're thrilled to continue building the SWU and demonstrating just how compelling a model solidarity unionism is for fast food workers and all working people."
Commonly misunderstood by the news media and denounced by corporate executives frightened by its effectiveness, solidarity unionism is a simple and powerful method of organizing outside of the government certification bureaucracy. In a solidarity union, workers simply self-organize and come to an agreement on workplace justice issues to pursue like fair raises, affordable health care, and respectful treatment from management. The workers' group then creates a strategic plan and leads workplace actions, community solidarity, and grassroots advocacy to win the desired job improvements.
The Industrial Workers of the World union effort at Starbucks is the first time a labor organization in the United States has succeeded in building a base of organized baristas at the company. With over 300 worker-organizers across the country and growing, the SWU has consistently chalked up victories at Starbucks including across-the-board raises, more secure work hours, and respectful treatment from previously abusive managers whose conduct improved due to union pressure campaigns. The SWU has repeatedly prevailed against Starbucks in the legal arena across multiple cities including in a lengthy New York City trial over pervasive illegal union-busting, the first time the company had to square off against baristas in open court regarding unfair labor practices.
Founded in 2004, the IWW Starbucks Workers Union is a grassroots organization of baristas, bussers, and shift supervisors at the world's largest coffee chain united for a living wage, secure work hours, and a voice on the job. Starbucks employees interested in improving their jobs through collective action can get connected at http://www.StarbucksUnion.org (http://www.starbucksunion.org/). Founded in 1905, the Industrial Workers of the World is a dynamic and member-driven union committed to workplace democracy and global solidarity.
Background Information:
a) Massive E-mail Action in Support of the SWU's Initial Call on Starbucks for Holiday Pay on MLK Day:
http://www.starbucksunion.org/node/1918 (http://www.starbucksunion.org/node/1918)
b) Starbucks' Initial Denial of the SWU's Demand-
http://www.starbucksunion.org/node/1928 (http://www.starbucksunion.org/node/1928)
c) Essay on the Launch of the Campaign and its Background- http://www.counterpunch.org/gross01192008.html (http://www.counterpunch.org/gross01192008.html)
d) 2010 SWU Protest in Support of Equality for MLK Day (one of countless actions across the country over the last three years)-
http://www.starbucksunion.org/node/2236 (http://www.starbucksunion.org/node/2236)

Red Commissar
20th November 2010, 20:22
Heh, a joint that tries to present the illusion of being "progressive" never had MLK observed in the first place.

This is withstanding the other labor abuses that Starbucks already does. The IWW crew is doing good here to stand up, hold out, and secure a victory. I just wish the liberal types who patronise starbucks would realise the true face of the corporation they've been swooned by.

Sosa
20th November 2010, 20:37
Good news :thumbup1:

RED DAVE
20th November 2010, 21:29
Beautiful old labor song:

Step by Step


Step by step, the longest march,
Can be won, can be won.
Many stones can form an arch,
Singly none, singly none.
And in union what we will,
Can so be accomplished still.
Drops of water turn a mill,
Singly none, singly none.RED DAVE

Morpheus
25th November 2010, 07:25
Wonderful news. This shows the effectiveness of non-contract based unionism.

RED DAVE
25th November 2010, 22:48
Wonderful news. This shows the effectiveness of non-contract based unionism.It's important to note that as far as I know, the current position of the IWW is to seek legal union recognition and contracts wherever possible. However, they do not rely on these as exclusive strategies.

RED DAVE

syndicat
25th November 2010, 23:02
Not quite, Dave. The position of the IWW is that its constituent unions may seek a contract. But there is an internal difference of opinion among IWW members on whether "contractualism" is the way to go. There is also an internal difference of opinion on whether to pursue NLRB elections. In either case it's up to the workers to decide.

YSR
30th November 2010, 07:22
Red Dave, I don't know where you're getting your information, but your statement is, as far as I'm aware, incorrect. As Syndicat indicates, the choice is for workers to decide between NLRB and non-contractual methods of struggle in the IWW. We do not "seek legal union recognition and contracts wherever possible." I, among many other IWW members, do not encourage workers to pursue NLRB strategies for many reasons.

RED DAVE
30th November 2010, 18:29
I may have interpreted them wrongly, but in various email communications I've had with the IWW people involved in the Jimmy John's struggle in Minneapolis, I thought they had decided that contracts and NLRB elections were the way to go.

RED DAVE

syndicat
30th November 2010, 19:08
as i said before, the IWW position is that it is up to the workers to decide. in this case, there was a discussion in the JJ workers union on the NLRB strategy. some favored it, some did not. a majority decided for NLRB election and that's why that tactic was pursued. but that doesn't mean the IWW has position of always pursuing NLRB elections and contracts.

when i corrected Dave before it was because he said, erroneously, that the IWW has a position against contracts. again, the IWW position is that it's up to the workers to decide.

Ocean Seal
30th November 2010, 22:49
Heh, a joint that tries to present the illusion of being "progressive" never had MLK observed in the first place.

This is withstanding the other labor abuses that Starbucks already does. The IWW crew is doing good here to stand up, hold out, and secure a victory. I just wish the liberal types who patronise starbucks would realise the true face of the corporation they've been swooned by.
This is what I was thinking, MLK day is a widely celebrated and is an off day for most workplaces. Look at these progressive liberal types, they don't even remember MLK, I guess that its because he was a syndicalist who wouldn't fall for Starbucks' bullshit like most liberals.

crashcourse
24th December 2010, 06:25
Dave, the others here are right, you got it wrong. The JJ's campaign here decided to go with an election once. That's the only decision they made about this and it was only a decision for their campaign, not for our all of our branch or all of the IWW. The IWW as a whole has no position on elections, contracts, etc.