Log in

View Full Version : Royal wedding in the UK



mossy noonmann
17th November 2010, 22:36
This time they are really taking the piss

Do they really think a royal wedding is going to sort things out?

this is an out and out provocation, when peole see this they should go mental!



do you like my avatar, for the occasion , like

Who?
17th November 2010, 22:39
The British should follow the example of their French neighbors.

http://www.solarnavigator.net/history/explorers_history/French_Revolution_Louis_XVI_Execution.jpg

Dimentio
17th November 2010, 22:40
It's too early.

They should have married in 2014, to create royalist euphoria enough to make the people vote in David Cameron's government again.

That's the reason why I think they arranged a wedding for 1982, when Thatcher wasn't that popular.

Noinu
17th November 2010, 22:45
Are they seriously getting married just so that they'd do something? (I mean think that they're doing something).
I kinda thought they'd get married when they want to spend the rest of their lives together....

Ocean Seal
17th November 2010, 22:47
It's too early.

They should have married in 2014, to create royalist euphoria enough to make the people vote in David Cameron's government again.

That's the reason why I think they arranged a wedding for 1982, when Thatcher wasn't that popular.
I agree with the OP though, I don't think that it'll work this time. Not when people are destroying the conservative headquarters. I don't think that they'll take too well to this.

Dimentio
17th November 2010, 22:51
Well, they tried this trick in Sweden this year, and it was evidently successful. But Sweden a little better off economically than the UK.

Rakhmetov
17th November 2010, 23:30
I'd love to crash that party with several scores of hardcore Black Bloc radicals.


:thumbup1:

Sugar Hill Kevis
17th November 2010, 23:56
About time. I think it is indecent that they've been together for so long outside of wedlock.

Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk
18th November 2010, 00:05
I hope that there's gonna be some action against this. Its another point for our propaganda in the sense that people are paying for the cuts with their services, jobs and education, yet the tax payer funds those parasites' wedding as if we have some obligation to do so.

Let's go and kill the mother fuckers.

brigadista
18th November 2010, 00:19
the media has been vomit inducing in its sycophancy since this nonsense was announced - going to try to get away when it happens

El Rojo
18th November 2010, 00:28
i sure love paying for through the nose -with my fucking tax- for the lavish bourgoeis bullshit that they're gonna get up to for this thing

gorillafuck
18th November 2010, 00:46
Isn't the wedding estimated to cost about 80 million dollars?


Yep no money here no sirry looks like we'll have to make some cuts.

Ocean Seal
18th November 2010, 01:50
Isn't the wedding estimated to cost about 80 million dollars?


Yep no money here no sirry looks like we'll have to make some cuts.
Yes, its these parasite union workers. The poor are taking everyone's money that's why they are so rich.

RedScare
18th November 2010, 02:17
Obnoxious waste of money on an anachronism. Not much else to say about it.

the last donut of the night
18th November 2010, 02:39
i think we should all crash really drunk and high

whos with me

TwoSevensClash
18th November 2010, 02:53
Whens the divorce party?

redmarxist90
18th November 2010, 07:12
Beats the possibility of a state funeral for Thatcher. That would definitely be a disgrace.

Demogorgon
18th November 2010, 07:30
It's too early.

They should have married in 2014, to create royalist euphoria enough to make the people vote in David Cameron's government again.

That's the reason why I think they arranged a wedding for 1982, when Thatcher wasn't that popular.
More or less. Royal Weddings are often used to distract attention from unfortunate political events. There is a whole bunch of stuff going on here just now that is putting the Government under pressure, so it is the perfect time for a royal marriage announcement.

It is particularly clever actually. In recent weeks Cameron has had to do some stuff that has upset his own right wing base (giving prisoners the vote, compensating torture victims, trying to push the AV referendum through the Lords etc), so a Royal Wedding announcement to get the right wing idiots excited is precisely what he needed.

Long Dong Silver
18th November 2010, 07:42
Isn't the wedding estimated to cost about 80 million dollars?.

We're lucky over here in Australia, we don't have to pay for the Royalty - we get the inbred fucks free of charge

rednordman
18th November 2010, 23:17
Yes, because this wedding is really going to take away the pain of the recession....

This is really funny to behold. For the last two days, it has totally dominated the media and its not even the wedding yet. FFs, On UK living (second tier uk tv channel) they even had a replay of the skynews footage. If it was the wedding, than fair enough, but its was only the announcment for gods sake!

But the really think that makes me laugh is how there is talk of it being a bank holiday. Even the David Cameron has agreed to this. I bet everything that this going to be one of these bank holidays that you end up having to work on.

Dr Mindbender
18th November 2010, 23:38
roll on the Parisian tunnel chase n Crash part 2

Princess Middleton 1982-2017 ftw! :thumbup1:

Futility Personified
19th November 2010, 00:41
I never heard a more depressing thing in my life, hearing people moaning about "how awful it is everything is being cut" to then going "Oh it's so lovely they're getting married, it'll be wonderful" without putting the dots together makes me want to hit my head with a brick. So much money is going to be pissed up the wall on this :crying:

A.J.
19th November 2010, 14:33
i sure love paying for through the nose -with my fucking tax- for the lavish bourgoeis bullshit that they're gonna get up to for this thing

An interesting thing I read somewhere a while back was that the bourgeois Kate Middleton is sneered at and looked down upon by the royal family's aristoctratic courtiers and hangers-on for being too "low born" and not "blue blooded" enough.

Britain is perhaps the only country in the contemporary western world where the multi-millionaire capitalists are the victims social snobbery! :lol:

A.J.
19th November 2010, 14:40
I never heard a more depressing thing in my life, hearing people moaning about "how awful it is everything is being cut" to then going "Oh it's so lovely they're getting married, it'll be wonderful" without putting the dots together makes me want to hit my head with a brick. So much money is going to be pissed up the wall on this :crying:

Sort of like the Pope's recent visit to Britain.

An obvious(that is, obvious to people like us) attempt to create a distraction at a time of economic woe.

Opiate of the people, indeed.

empiredestoryer
19th November 2010, 15:45
im sure it wont be a big flashly wedding i mean the british royals can barely pay their rent

scarletghoul
19th November 2010, 16:15
as an anti-capitalist i am overwhelmed with joy for prince william + the other royals and am very excited for the event. the remnents of the feudal order is one of our last defenses against capitalism, if it wanst for the queen the banks would be running this country, so i say three cheers for his royal highness hip hip hoorayyyyy yetc

Tifosi
19th November 2010, 17:06
roll on the Parisian tunnel chase n Crash part 2

Princess Middleton 1982-2017 ftw! :thumbup1:

Why do royals always die in France?

Honeymoon in France please:lol:

Invader Zim
19th November 2010, 18:42
God, you just can't escape it. It is literally everywhere you turn? What I find bizarre is the assertion that Kate Middleton, who went to one of the most prestigious private schools in the country, lives in a fucking mansion and whose patents are multi-millionaires, is 'middle class'. This might have been the case in the 19th century when the notion of the gentry was defined by title, and the upper classes frowned on the Nouveau riche as dirty upstarts, but this is 2010 not 1810.

scourge007
19th November 2010, 19:59
This wedding is just a distraction to keep the proletariat from rising up against the British government.

Antifa94
19th November 2010, 20:11
This is CLEARLY a pathetic attempt to lull the British masses, just like in 1981 with Princess Diana. Hopefully we'll see the riots of that summer as well.

Dr Mindbender
20th November 2010, 03:22
Why do royals always die in France?

Honeymoon in France please:lol:

What do Princess Diana and Pink Floyd have in common?

Their last great hit was the Wall! :lol:

L.A.P.
20th November 2010, 04:11
As much as Western countries want to talk about other countries and how underdeveloped they are and how "backwards" they are don't any of you find it a bit backwards that people in this modern day are still willing to pay for all these monarchs' shit. At least the CEOs and top 100 people on Forbes don't insult our intelligence and instead indirectly steal the money from the American people but wow, it's zero bullshit when it comes to stealing money form the British.

A.J.
21st November 2010, 13:32
God, you just can't escape it. It is literally everywhere you turn? What I find bizarre is the assertion that Kate Middleton, who went to one of the most prestigious private schools in the country, lives in a fucking mansion and whose patents are multi-millionaires, is 'middle class'. This might have been the case in the 19th century when the notion of the gentry was defined by title, and the upper classes frowned on the Nouveau riche as dirty upstarts, but this is 2010 not 1810.

Yes, but certain key features of Britain's superstructure(monarchy, house of lords, privvy council etc.) has retained the appearance and form of a feudal state(although obviously not in content and essence).

So in a purely formalistic sense members of the bourgeoisie in Britain are still "middle class".