RadioRaheem84
16th November 2010, 19:27
I've been reading a lot of Gramsci lately and he answers most of the junk peddled by the right wing libertarians on how capitalism enriches people but provides a service.
How is it that Friedman can still be considered a serious scholar and a philosophical proponent of capitalism with Gramsci still out there countering a lot of his BS?
Most of this junk was discussed by Marx too in his analysis of the bourgeois.
Do these people not read Marx? Not read Marxist writers?
At least Marxists always read their opponents work and most of the study focuses on countering capitalist myths. Can these lazy guys at least read a Marxist book once in a while?
How is it that Friedman can still be considered a serious scholar and a philosophical proponent of capitalism with Gramsci still out there countering a lot of his BS?
Most of this junk was discussed by Marx too in his analysis of the bourgeois.
Do these people not read Marx? Not read Marxist writers?
At least Marxists always read their opponents work and most of the study focuses on countering capitalist myths. Can these lazy guys at least read a Marxist book once in a while?