Log in

View Full Version : Dutch police is tough on street terrorists



Q
16th November 2010, 18:35
oCplqla9RtM

My taxes are so wasted :(

RedStarOverChina
16th November 2010, 18:38
Disgusting pig :mad:

Catillina
16th November 2010, 20:20
what the fuck? He probably got his ass beaten by some Anarchist, so he had to get rid of his anger on a smaller guy then himself. Probably he got his ass beaten REALY hard, so he had to choose a target as helpless ass possible.

Comrade Wolfie's Very Nearly Banned Adventures
16th November 2010, 20:52
to protect and serve

Das war einmal
16th November 2010, 21:03
oCplqla9RtM

My taxes are so wasted :(


Well to be frank, he did call the cop a 'cancerous faggot'

Comrade Wolfie's Very Nearly Banned Adventures
16th November 2010, 21:40
Well to be frank, he did call the cop a 'cancerous faggot'

Well to be frank, that is the cop's title.

Das war einmal
16th November 2010, 22:34
Well to be frank, that is the cop's title.


You're a douche.

Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk
16th November 2010, 22:37
What the fuck. Someone should bounce a glass bottle off of that mother fucker's head.

Pirate Utopian
16th November 2010, 23:16
Kankersmerissen. Of niet?

Widerstand
16th November 2010, 23:41
Kankercops.

Tablo
17th November 2010, 00:33
What the fuck. Someone should bounce a glass bottle off of that mother fucker's head.
I second that.

Ele'ill
17th November 2010, 03:15
Bricks for kicks.

Das war einmal
17th November 2010, 13:51
You talk the talk, you walk the walk. If you call someone a cancerous faggot you deserve to get smacked. Cop or no cop. Btw calling someone a fag here results in a ban. Double moral standards here are making me sick.

Widerstand
17th November 2010, 14:11
You talk the talk, you walk the walk. If you call someone a cancerous faggot you deserve to get smacked. Cop or no cop. Btw calling someone a fag here results in a ban. Double moral standards here are making me sick.

A ban for saying fag (and afaik you won't get banned just for saying fag) is not even remotely similar to beating up a person. Especially given that I doubt saying fag is "illegal" in the Netherlands, whereas it sort of is here and in most leftist circles.

Also, I am against the notion of cooperating with the police, even - especially - to enforce our values or views. There is no double standard here. The double standard would be to protest police force while calling for police to enforce what we want. Emancipation cannot be forced upon anyone. People can't be emancipated by oppressing others. Emancipation, of homosexuals in this case, can only happen through a structural change in society that includes change in those who (aware or not) act as oppressors. Everything else is a farce.

All of this is rather irrelevant to this issue though, because this forum is designed to be a place for like-minded individuals - the streets, the "outside world" are not.

Q
17th November 2010, 14:20
You talk the talk, you walk the walk. If you call someone a cancerous faggot you deserve to get smacked. Cop or no cop. Btw calling someone a fag here results in a ban. Double moral standards here are making me sick.

Well, there is a double moral here, like it or not. Leftists are supposed to be aware of LGBTQ issues. Ten year old boys, who've grown up with the lingo, cannot be expected the same standard. Your post smacks of petty moralism and siding with the cop indicates your thoroughly wrong position.

mykittyhasaboner
17th November 2010, 14:24
You talk the talk, you walk the walk. If you call someone a cancerous faggot you deserve to get smacked. Cop or no cop. Btw calling someone a fag here results in a ban. Double moral standards here are making me sick.

There is no double standard here, only the standard that we (we, as in sane individuals) don't tolerate police brutality. i don't care what the kid said, he is just a kid playing in the street. The cop can't treat a kid like that, regardless if he broke a law or not. He's not even legally responsible for himself. If it was an adult calling the cop something, then maybe he would have gotten "resisting arrest" or the dutch equivalent and probably some roughing up--for a kid i really don't see how a cop could get so pissed over what a little kid says. In this case, the cop was too sick and incompetent to do a simple task properly (likely telling the kids to play somewhere else), instead he decided to shove and kick a little kid.

Saying that that kid deserved to get smacked is tantamount to justification for police brutality, just because the victims don't want to just sit by and take it. If you ever dealt with the police before then clearly, you would understand why this is fucked up. Since it seems you haven't, i'd suggest you research the legality of what just happened and how to deal with the police in response to how they deal with you. The kid did nothing wrong.

Das war einmal
17th November 2010, 14:24
A ban for saying fag (and afaik you won't get banned just for saying fag) is not even remotely similar to beating up a person. Especially given that I doubt saying fag is "illegal" in the Netherlands, whereas it sort of is here and in most leftist circles.

Also, I am against the notion of cooperating with the police, even - especially - to enforce our values or views. There is no double standard here. The double standard would be to protest police force while calling for police to enforce what we want. Emancipation cannot be forced upon anyone. People can't be emancipated by oppressing others. Emancipation, of homosexuals in this case, can only happen through a structural change in society that includes change in those who (aware or not) act as oppressors. Everything else is a farce.

All of this is rather irrelevant to this issue though, because this forum is designed to be a place for like-minded individuals - the streets, the "outside world" are not.

I dont give a damn about this guy being an officer, it is disgusting to call people that way.

The double standard is that we rightfully condemn people here if they call eachother fags, but we seem to praise it if a police officer is called that way.

That's bizarre and furthermore hypocritical. It's the same if we should praise a neonazi calling a black policewoman a 'shitty whore' or something

Widerstand
17th November 2010, 14:36
I dont give a damn about this guy being an officer, it is disgusting to call people that way.

The double standard is that we rightfully condemn people here if they call eachother fags, but we seem to praise it if a police officer is called that way.

That's bizarre and furthermore hypocritical. It's the same if we should praise a neonazi calling a black policewoman a 'shitty whore' or something

Bullshit.

You seem to be unable to think in context. This is a leftist forum - and as Q noted, leftist are (supposed to be) aware of these issues. The average kid on the street is not aware of them. You agree to certain codes when joining this forum, you have been warned. This is not true for the streets however. If there exist laws forbidding the use of "fag" in the Netherlands punishable by beating, forgive my ignorance. If not, than the cops action is worthy nothing but condemnation. Fag is, sadly, a common slur in many cultures. People adopt it without reflexion of it's homophobic meaning, some of them may even be homophobes - this does NOT justify police brutality however.

Also, there is hardly any praise for the use of "fag" as an insult. There is however plenty of anger over a cop beating up a kid. I wouldn't pick sides between a Nazi and a cop in any case. Also, a Nazi has chosen his ideology. A little kid adopting slurs from his social surroundings most likely hasn't.

Das war einmal
17th November 2010, 14:36
Well, there is a double moral here, like it or not. Leftists are supposed to be aware of LGBTQ issues. Ten year old boys, who've grown up with the lingo, cannot be expected the same standard. Your post smacks of petty moralism and siding with the cop indicates your thoroughly wrong position.


Is that so? I knew perfectly well that it was not done to ever call people, at that age, these kinds of foul language.In the event that I did do so I was punished accordingly.

I am not siding with the cop because he's a cop. I condemn police brutality, but would you call this excessive? Did he do serious harm? I don't think so.

For the record, maybe the kid isn't to blame, more likely, it's his environment or our fucked up society as a whole. Fair enough, but I don't think you should tolerate this kind of language and there should be a form of punishment.

Pirate Utopian
17th November 2010, 16:27
The cop kicked him before he was called a kankerhomo.

Sasha
17th November 2010, 16:34
we can analise till kingdom comes but the fact remains that that cop was there in an profesional capacity.
yes i might have smacked that kid also in the back of the neck, but as an cops you are just not alowed to do so, let alone kick him.
long story short; cop was wrong no matter what, kid was propably an anoying litle fuck but that doesnt matter anymore..

Wanted Man
18th November 2010, 00:40
Agreed with the above. Even if we were to strip away all our ideas about the police, and somehow accepted the role that police play in capitalist society, it's still wrong. After all, pigs are supposed to be in control of themselves and the situation.

Obviously, the idea that pigs should be allowed to hit, kick, baton, tase and shoot whenever they feel provoked is gaining currency amongst so-called polite society (and obviously among the police themselves), but I'd say most of us would beg to differ.