armed_resistance
5th November 2010, 09:12
Comrades, i ask as a fellow socialist because i see internationalism as damaging to the socialist plight. Why must the proletariat wait for the exploited third worlders to reach adequate living standards to stop unfair competition when we could organize with fellow countrymen to establish socialism in our own nations, rather than attempting to direct efforts to foreigners.
I'm not a traditional socialist in that i reject cultural Marxism and multiculturalism. It's cultural marxism that drives away the proletariat, seeing socialists caring more for the fate of various ethnic miniorities instead of the race of the established nation. I embrace nationalism as a means to establish socialism and overthrow the capitalist wage slave establishment. I also advocate for a racially homogeneous nation as racial tensions can be the only result of mass third world immigration and as a mean to fight capitalism. Even noam Chomsky would agree anti-racism is a haven for capitalists.
"...capitalism is not fundamentally racist—it can exploit racism for its purposes, but racism isn't built into it. Capitalism basically wants people to be interchangeable cogs, and differences among them, such as on the basis of race, usually are not functional. I mean, they can be functional for a period, like if you want a super-exploited workforce or something, but those situations are kind of anomalous. Over the long term, you can expect capitalism to be anti-racist—just because it's anti-human. And race is in fact a human characteristic—there's not reason why it should be a negative characteristic, but it is a human characteristic. So therefore identifications based on race interfere with the basic ideal that people should be available consumers and producers, interchangeable cogs who will purchase all of the junk that's produced—that's their ultimate function, and any other properties they might have are kind of irrelevant and usually a nuisance."
To me, racial socialism is the way forward.
Thanks for reading comrades, and long live socialism.
I'm not a traditional socialist in that i reject cultural Marxism and multiculturalism. It's cultural marxism that drives away the proletariat, seeing socialists caring more for the fate of various ethnic miniorities instead of the race of the established nation. I embrace nationalism as a means to establish socialism and overthrow the capitalist wage slave establishment. I also advocate for a racially homogeneous nation as racial tensions can be the only result of mass third world immigration and as a mean to fight capitalism. Even noam Chomsky would agree anti-racism is a haven for capitalists.
"...capitalism is not fundamentally racist—it can exploit racism for its purposes, but racism isn't built into it. Capitalism basically wants people to be interchangeable cogs, and differences among them, such as on the basis of race, usually are not functional. I mean, they can be functional for a period, like if you want a super-exploited workforce or something, but those situations are kind of anomalous. Over the long term, you can expect capitalism to be anti-racist—just because it's anti-human. And race is in fact a human characteristic—there's not reason why it should be a negative characteristic, but it is a human characteristic. So therefore identifications based on race interfere with the basic ideal that people should be available consumers and producers, interchangeable cogs who will purchase all of the junk that's produced—that's their ultimate function, and any other properties they might have are kind of irrelevant and usually a nuisance."
To me, racial socialism is the way forward.
Thanks for reading comrades, and long live socialism.