Log in

View Full Version : The 'little guy' is losing in American politics



Klaatu
22nd October 2010, 02:07
The 'little guy' is losing in American politics

Last Updated: October 13. 2010 1:00AM
James P. Hoffa

If you understand politics as a battle between liberal and conservative, then you don't understand politics at all. The central political battle today is between the corporate billionaires on one side and the little guy on the other. The fight is about whether the government should protect corporate power to enrich a few billionaires, or restrict corporate power to protect the liberty and property of the average American.

I'll tell you who is winning: It isn't the little guy.

Corporate power explains why the U.S. hasn't made the transformation to renewable energy. It's why we can't trust our food, drugs or toys to be safe. It's why we're struggling to develop new industries. It's why workers' wages have stagnated or fallen over the past decade and why so many families are losing their homes.

It's why so many jobs moved offshore so quickly. U.S. multinationals now employ one-third of their work force overseas.

Here's an example of corporate power at work: FedEx has held up a funding bill for the Federal Aviation Administration. The company's billionaire chief executive, Fred Smith, hates a provision that would put FedEx back under the same labor law as his competitors. So he has held up funding for the entire agency that runs the nation's airspace.

Fred Smith is devious about masking his agenda. He claims his competitor is seeking a bailout — when it's FedEx that has long enjoyed special government treatment.

Similarly, corporations have been wily about disguising their plans to further concentrate their wealth and influence. They're adept at creating phony populist groups that claim to support individual freedom.

To understand how corporate billionaires do it, just turn on Fox News, owned by multi-billionaire Rupert Murdoch. Everything those talking heads on Fox advocate would be good for Rupert Murdoch: fewer taxes for the rich, less government regulation, weaker bargaining power for workers. You can bet most of those talking heads are getting fat paychecks from billionaire-funded think tanks and nonprofits. And yet Fox claims to be "fair and balanced."

For all those tea partiers who believe in individual freedom and smaller government, I have a message for you. Concentration of wealth in too few hands will lead to extraordinary abuses of power and the destruction of your property and liberty.

It's the banks, not the government, that are taking people's homes away from them without even making sure they have the right to foreclose on them. Last month, Jason Grodensky paid cash for a home in Florida, only to have the bank sell it out from under him in a foreclosure "mistake."

Just the other day, Nancy Jacobini was alone inside her Florida home when she heard someone breaking into her front door. She locked herself in the bathroom and called 911. It turns out the intruder was someone who worked for JP Morgan Chase. He was changing the locks on her home, something he had no legal right to do.

The corporate billionaires will say the banks can correct their own behavior. The little guy will say the government needs to make sure they don't do it again. It makes no sense to describe one as "liberal" and the other as "conservative." It's the many of us vs. the few of them.

We'll see which side prevails on Nov. 2.

James P. Hoffa is president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. E-mail comments to [email protected]
http://detnews.com/article/20101013/OPINION03/10130317/The-%E2%80%98little-guy%E2%80%99-is-losing-in-American-politics

Reznov
22nd October 2010, 02:11
I can already see that the writer of this is going to suggest Democrats.

As if the "little man" has ever won against the bourgeoisie in politics without revolution?

Klaatu
22nd October 2010, 02:14
I can already see that the writer of this is going to suggest Democrats.

Actually, he said "It makes no sense to describe one as "liberal" and the other as "conservative." It's the many of us vs. the few of them.

I don't really think Hoffa is a Democrat; I think he is a Socialist.

Pretty Flaco
22nd October 2010, 02:23
He doesn't sound like a democrat to me. The wording sounds like a socialist trying not to come off directly as a socialist because of the bad connotation it has in America.

Klaatu
22nd October 2010, 04:27
He doesn't sound like a democrat to me. The wording sounds like a socialist trying not to come off directly as a socialist because of the bad connotation it has in America.

I have described the "real socialism" to dozens of my students. When they realize that Socialism is a good thing, and not the demon that they have been programmed to think of it as, they actually decide that they think it is actually a good thing...

Of course this begs the question of "what do you mean 'demon?'"

I mean that radio and TV talking heads (most of which had dropped out of college anyway) demonize Socialism, while promoting Capitalism.
Well DUH! These people (A) make their living promoting capitalism, because (B) they make millions of dollars doing so!!!

Case in point: Rush Limbaugh admitted: "I do this for the money..."

Which begs the question: Does he really believe even half of the hyperbole which he broadcasts?