Log in

View Full Version : The Three Phases of Class Struggle.



rararoadrunner
20th October 2010, 07:41
Class struggle involves a number of forms: political action, unionization, boycotts, strikes, foundation of worker-owned cooperatives…is there any relation between these forms of struggle?

Let me submit that class struggle exists in three distinct phases: engaging in the class struggle, embracing the class struggle, and transcending the class struggle.

1) Engaging in the class struggle.

The first phase consists of workers engaging capitalists in class struggle: prior to this, workers struggle only in the private sphere as consumers…and in the public sphere as voters: that is, in spheres they share with capitalists (and therefore, in a competition they can never win).

The minute workers struggle as workers, however…that is to say, when they organise into unions to collectively struggle against capitalists…they already elevate the level of struggle from competition to conflict. They have already begun to transcend capitalist relations of production…but in an unconscious, reactive way.

2) Embracing the class struggle.

This next phase involves putting the struggles of individual unions together, first by sweeping aside the craft unionism that was inherited from medieval guilds in favour of industrial unions…then by combining these industrial unions, such as was the original concept of the IWW, CIO, etc. (and that unions that refused to follow the CIO into its amalgamation with the craft-union based AFL, such as the UE, still follow).

Already, with industrial unionism, workers are at an advantage: they confront competing capitalists with united unions (which is why capitalists sided with AFL against CIO, and later supported the amalgamation, in which one shaking hand was “more equal” than the other).

When such industrial unions are combined…workers move from defensively engaging in class struggle that is imposed upon them by capitalists, to embracing the project of class struggle as their own.



3) Transcending the class struggle.

In this final phase of class struggle, workers move from being proletarians…that is to say, workers who own no means of production…to becoming the universal working class…that is, workers who own everything, hence transcending capitalist relations of production.

One way forward is the foundation of worker-owned enterprises, such as cooperatives: however, such cooperatives, competing against capitalist firms, still find themselves like Pinocchio, awaking on strings not of their own making.

In order for capitalist relations to be completely transcended, they must be utterly sundered: that is, there must be a general strike resulting in the replacement of capitalist with socialist relations of production (economic democracy, eliminating once and for all the conflict between capitalism and democracy with the triumph of the latter over the former).

Capitalists insist that only the workers go on strike…yet what is an economic crisis but a general strike of capital?

When workers go on strike, capitalists move to break it by forcibly reasserting the core capitalist employer-employee relation of production, by any means necessary.

Now that capitalists are going on strike via economic crisis, we workers, too, can move to smash this general strike…by smashing capitalist relations of production!

It is via this road…the road to economic democracy…that we can…and must…recover, not only economically, but everything we have lost to capitalism.

And: any attempt to “transcend” class struggle that doesn’t first pass through engagement, then embrace, of class struggle, is merely class collaboration: that is, our abject surrender to capital.

Therefore, by linking concrete examples of these three phases of class struggle…engagement, embrace, and then transcendence, together in their proper relation to one-another…we workers can, and must, advance on the road to the victory of economic democracy…and the end of class struggle via the triumph of the universal working class. We dare not stop until we achieve this!

ckaihatsu
20th October 2010, 09:20
Tomorrow we will know the fate of the French Movement.

I believe the government is voting on the issue, and Sarkozy said he didnt care what the protesters wanters, he was going to do it to "ensure the future for retirees and pensioners" so it doesnt go broke or something like that.


The entire *world* of workers should not hesitate in the least to be in the streets right now.

The fundamentals underlying the nation-states of the entire world point directly to being in hock to private capital interests. This is financial imperialism like we've never seen it before.





This is a list of countries by external debt, the total public and private debt owed to nonresidents repayable in foreign currency, goods, or services,[1] where the public debt is the money or credit owed by any level of government, from central to local, and the private debt the money or credit owed by private households or private corporations based in the country under consideration.

For informational purposes several non-sovereign entities are also included in this list. Note that this list is gross debt, not net debt.[citation needed]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt





The euro convergence criteria (also known as the Maastricht criteria) are the criteria for European Union member states to enter the third stage of European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and adopt the euro as their currency. The 4 main criteria are based on Article 121(1) of the European Community Treaty.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_convergence_criteria





A sovereign default is a failure by the government of a sovereign state to pay back its debt in full.

If potential lenders or bond purchasers begin to suspect that a government may fail to pay back its debt, they may demand a high interest rate in compensation for the risk of default. A dramatic rise in the interest rate faced by a government due to fear that it will fail to honor its debt is sometimes called a sovereign debt crisis. Governments may be especially vulnerable to a sovereign debt crisis when they rely on financing through short-term bonds, since this creates a situation of maturity mismatch between their short-term bond financing and the long-term asset value of their tax base. They may also be vulnerable to a sovereign debt crisis due to currency mismatch if they are unable to issue bonds in their own currency, as a decrease in the value of their own currency may then make it prohibitively expensive to pay back their foreign-denominated bonds (see original sin).

Since a sovereign government, by definition, controls its own affairs, it cannot be obliged to pay back its debt. Nonetheless, a government which defaults may be excluded from further credit; some of its overseas assets may be seized; and it may face political pressure from its own domestic bondholders to pay back its debt. Therefore governments rarely default on the entire value of their debt. Instead, they often enter into negotiations with their bondholders to agree on a delay or partial reduction of their debt payments, which is often called a debt restructuring. The International Monetary Fund often assists in sovereign debt restructurings.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_default

Die Neue Zeit
20th October 2010, 14:33
Too much agitation and reliance on the general strike, not enough education or political action proper.

RED DAVE
20th October 2010, 14:41
The OP is a bizarre combination of Luxemburgism and social democracy. Whatever happened to the formation of a mass revolutionary party and REVOLUTION?

RED DAVE

Vladimir Innit Lenin
20th October 2010, 14:56
This is all good and well, but it doesn't really address the issue that, in many parts of the world, the workers are nowhere near even the stage of, as the OP puts it, 'engaging in the class struggle'.

What we really need is a plan, agreed upon by all leftists willing to leave their sectarian baggage behind, over how to raise the spectre of class consciousness amongst the working populace.

RED DAVE
20th October 2010, 15:46
This is all good and well, but it doesn't really address the issue that, in many parts of the world, the workers are nowhere near even the stage of, as the OP puts it, 'engaging in the class struggle'.

What we really need is a plan, agreed upon by all leftists willing to leave their sectarian baggage behind, over how to raise the spectre of class consciousness amongst the working populace.Don't get your hopes up. The differences are deep and are real. They are fundamentally about the role of the working class in revolution.

RED DAVE