Does Anyone Feel Like Posting Their Rep to Posts Ratio?

[¿Que?]

Mine's .38. Which is pretty pathetic.

But you guys are just a bunch of arrogant snobs anyway. Nah, just kidding, you guys are ok.

So, if you feel like showing off your mad reppage, post your ratio here. Remember to put your rep in the numerator, and your post count in the denominator. I find this is better than the other way around in that probably everyone will get a number less than one. The closer to one your ratio is, the more people like what you post!:)

[Martin Blank]

Mine is 0.67, as of this post.

[¿Que?]

Mine is 0.67, as of this post.
I thought chitchat posts didn't get counted.

[Martin Blank]

I thought chitchat posts didn't get counted.

They don't. But the ratio remains the same.

[AK]

0.6

[ContrarianLemming]

I think above .5 is decent enough, .6 aswell for me, I think I'm doing something right..

[Quail]

0.86666...

[Widerstand]

1.012

[Il Medico]

ummm....I really bad at math, how do I figure this?

[Devrim]

ummm....I really bad at math, how do I figure this?

Rep/posts, in your case 1046/1610=0.65.

Devrim

[Il Medico]

Rep/posts, in your case 1046/1610=0.65.

Devrim
ah. Now I feel dumb. :blushing:

[AK]

ummm....i really bad at math, how do i figure this?
1046/1610=0.65
edit: ninja'd

[revolution inaction]

mine is .5949

[Nolan]

.87

[Bad Grrrl Agro]

No, I don't feel like it thanks for asking though. I hate doing math.

[revolution inaction]

no, i don't feel like it thanks for asking though. I hate doing math.

,2576

[ContrarianLemming]

maybe do an average after a good few pages

[Widerstand]

I'm clearly the most productive poster so far :lol:

[Quail]

I'm clearly the most productive poster so far :lol:
Or you post the best one-liners :p

[Panda Tse Tung]

0,3671875

[ContrarianLemming]

more likely Un posts quick short posts first at the OP before anyone else and posts sectarian news most.

I mean, we could all have amazing rep if all we did was post witty one liners as the first reply to topics and news from socialist websites

not that that's what anyone does....

[Luisrah]

let me see

0.514

Haha, more than half the things I say are appreciated by atleast one person!

[¿Que?]

maybe do an average after a good few pages
Yes, I wanted to do this. I have some basic understanding of stats, and could even correlate it with other variables such as gender, geography and even tendency. But I don't think I have enough responses for that yet. Maybe I'll do an average though, sometime tonight. :thumbup1:

[this is an invasion]

1.75

[Invincible Summer]

hmmm... 1515 / 2200 (as of this post) = .688

[Widerstand]

more likely Un posts quick short posts first at the OP before anyone else and posts sectarian news most.

I mean, we could all have amazing rep if all we did was post witty one liners as the first reply to topics and news from socialist websites

not that that's what anyone does....

I don't even post news.

I don't even visit socialist news websites.

Mb I should do that.


1.75

quality poster detected

[A Revolutionary Tool]

0.73
Pretty good for a newb like me.

[fa2991]

Mine is 0.82.

[Bad Grrrl Agro]

,2576
I'm going to try and look smart by pretending to understand.

[graymouser]

1.12, which I hope reflects on quality.

[¿Que?]

1.12, which I hope reflects on quality.
Probably not. But it's still fun!

[the last donut of the night]

1.17

half of my rep comes from bcbm

[The Douche]

1.1%

[Axle]

.83

Now, if I had the patience to divide the rep between substance and snark...lol

[Sir Comradical]

It's 410/535 = 0.77

[Q]

0,67

[Widerstand]

0,67

3635 rep?

[it_ain't_me]

1.67

[revolution inaction]

1.1%

no its 1.1 no % if it was in percent it would be 110% but be percent for this doesn't really makes sense

[AK]

1.17

half of my rep comes from bcbm
You are a Stalinist... how is this possible?

[Widerstand]

You are a Stalinist... how is this possible?

closet anarchist

[Q]

3635 rep?

3619 currently, but yeah.

[Bilan]

Edit: 0.47050512

[Guerrilla]

2.54, I win! :sleep:

[AK]

2.54, I win! :sleep:
Only because of that communist motivational posters thread.

[anticap]

I have some basic understanding of stats, and could even correlate it with other variables such as gender, geography and even tendency.

0.6; male; USA; "Anti-Capitalists"

Question: Would it be higher if I didn't have an infraction (i.e., are infraction points deducted from reputation points)?

[Os Cangaceiros]

You are a Stalinist... how is this possible?

He's one of the good ones.

Him and bailey.

[AK]

Him and bailey.
Troll detected.

[Os Cangaceiros]

big fans of broseph stalin, they are.

[fa2991]

Make that 0.84 :thumbup1: A slight boost.

[NoOneIsIllegal]

1.22


The punx has been upped.

[¿Que?]

I was going to take an average, but then it occurred to me that we're not even considering rep power. Now rep power is something I don't necessarily understand. I've seen people with little rep but with high rep power, and I've read explanations of it before, but I still don't quite get it.

Anyway, how should we take into account rep power? The first step to answering this question is to ask, what are we trying to measure? Rep to posts ration basically measures your likability level. It doesn't really say anything about how good your posts are, just that people tend to like them. It is also worth considering, as some have noted, where most of the rep is coming from, although that's just too much of a hassle to even consider.

But rep power says a lot, because it is basically a measure of how important your input is. I may be taking this thread way too seriously, at this point, but I'm havin' a good time, so if anyone wants to enlighten me on any of this, please don't hesitate.

[Weezer]

0.82626262...

[the last donut of the night]

You are a Stalinist... how is this possible?

bcbm reps everyone

[the last donut of the night]

he's one of the good ones.

Him and bailey.

<3333

[thriller]

.888 repeated.

Because I'm new and other such things...

[anticap]

I was going to take an average, but then it occurred to me that we're not even considering rep power. Now rep power is something I don't necessarily understand. I've seen people with little rep but with high rep power, and I've read explanations of it before, but I still don't quite get it.

Anyway, how should we take into account rep power? The first step to answering this question is to ask, what are we trying to measure? Rep to posts ration basically measures your likability level. It doesn't really say anything about how good your posts are, just that people tend to like them. It is also worth considering, as some have noted, where most of the rep is coming from, although that's just too much of a hassle to even consider.

But rep power says a lot, because it is basically a measure of how important your input is. I may be taking this thread way too seriously, at this point, but I'm havin' a good time, so if anyone wants to enlighten me on any of this, please don't hesitate.

My rep power is 7, whatever that means. (Doesn't it just mean that when you click the scales to give someone rep it gives them that many points instead of just one?)

I'd say there's no way to take it into account because you don't know how much of a person's rep was given through thanks or through the actual rep system. Besides, I don't see how it matters unless you want the ratio to represent thanks per post instead of rep point per post. I think thanks per post would be more interesting, but it's practically impossible to determine.

[Taikand]

61 posts, but can't find out how much reputation.
Edit, it's 37, so it's under 0.5.

[Obs]

Mine is okay, I guess... 1.2037037037037037037037037...

Wait, how the hell does that happen?!

[Queercommie Girl]

0.5671111