∞
2nd October 2010, 02:33
Degradation of society into the subjective theory of value.
The problem with with a real supply and demand system in a capitalist country is blatant. The forced adherence into the subjective theory of value. The amount or kind of goods one may want or acquire depends on how much purchasing power one has. By purchasing power I mean the ability of one individual to be able to consume in goods he/she may want. Through this, I have calculated the power -behind-the dollar for everybody living in a true free market without taxes or regulation. I have deduced a monthly wage by subtracting necessities such as food, clothes(standard set), shelter, and their bills.
http://www.revleft.com/vb/album.php?albumid=633&pictureid=6692
Class 4(20 million people) accumulates $70 in purchasing power
Class 3(10 million people) accumulates $380-1,000$ in purchasing power
Class 2(5 million people) can accumulate $5,750-$12,780 in purchasing power
Class 1 (idk) The wealth was so great, my simple comprehension of mathematics couldn't calculate it.
So if there is more poor people then their massive need can be met right?
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSgOvmfm45OVIFowtybGcbSFuvO2emIm MYh11JAMxUPG5-Tmuo&t=1&usg=__FFN5pOgBSufohW4O-kkQC5j1-aA=
1. The wants of the poor are bigger, more diverse, manufacturing things for them is less profitable.
2. The wants of the rich are less diverse and there is less people to apply variation.
The very idea of creative capitalism is wrong.
The theory of subjective value therefore applies methods like scarcity to provide natural resources that either are
1.primitive for our time.
2. almost useless.
Countless innovations have been de-legitimized because of subjected goods. (Jet-Packs, Hydrogen-to-oxygen machines, alternative fuel,) all compete with the monopoly of scarce objects.
If a class system were not to exist, the needs of all society would be met individually and accumulate a sustainable growth in doing so.
Therefore one can actually see the potential in Socialism in regards to innovation.
When the wants of society are being met by society itself, a different speculation of the labor theory of value would emerge.
The labor theory of value well then be realized when society has no other motive besides innovation, improvision, and the demand of each and those around him.
Therefore a demand that steers the laborer into more labor is entirely abolished.
In a true communal society one would not be able to demand directly without the labor of another worker being met.
This sociological unity, is indeed the method can concoct itself to a by a voucher system. The number of one's time and effort spent on producing a good not only make cost+labor=price but enhances the economics far beyond the state of marginalism.
The economy will then be based solely on human initiative, not vertical statistics, but distribution of said static equilibrium.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSP-crYjeoE
The problem with with a real supply and demand system in a capitalist country is blatant. The forced adherence into the subjective theory of value. The amount or kind of goods one may want or acquire depends on how much purchasing power one has. By purchasing power I mean the ability of one individual to be able to consume in goods he/she may want. Through this, I have calculated the power -behind-the dollar for everybody living in a true free market without taxes or regulation. I have deduced a monthly wage by subtracting necessities such as food, clothes(standard set), shelter, and their bills.
http://www.revleft.com/vb/album.php?albumid=633&pictureid=6692
Class 4(20 million people) accumulates $70 in purchasing power
Class 3(10 million people) accumulates $380-1,000$ in purchasing power
Class 2(5 million people) can accumulate $5,750-$12,780 in purchasing power
Class 1 (idk) The wealth was so great, my simple comprehension of mathematics couldn't calculate it.
So if there is more poor people then their massive need can be met right?
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSgOvmfm45OVIFowtybGcbSFuvO2emIm MYh11JAMxUPG5-Tmuo&t=1&usg=__FFN5pOgBSufohW4O-kkQC5j1-aA=
1. The wants of the poor are bigger, more diverse, manufacturing things for them is less profitable.
2. The wants of the rich are less diverse and there is less people to apply variation.
The very idea of creative capitalism is wrong.
The theory of subjective value therefore applies methods like scarcity to provide natural resources that either are
1.primitive for our time.
2. almost useless.
Countless innovations have been de-legitimized because of subjected goods. (Jet-Packs, Hydrogen-to-oxygen machines, alternative fuel,) all compete with the monopoly of scarce objects.
If a class system were not to exist, the needs of all society would be met individually and accumulate a sustainable growth in doing so.
Therefore one can actually see the potential in Socialism in regards to innovation.
When the wants of society are being met by society itself, a different speculation of the labor theory of value would emerge.
The labor theory of value well then be realized when society has no other motive besides innovation, improvision, and the demand of each and those around him.
Therefore a demand that steers the laborer into more labor is entirely abolished.
In a true communal society one would not be able to demand directly without the labor of another worker being met.
This sociological unity, is indeed the method can concoct itself to a by a voucher system. The number of one's time and effort spent on producing a good not only make cost+labor=price but enhances the economics far beyond the state of marginalism.
The economy will then be based solely on human initiative, not vertical statistics, but distribution of said static equilibrium.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSP-crYjeoE