Log in

View Full Version : Coca-Cola terrorists



RGacky3
29th September 2010, 21:09
http://www.killercoke.org/crimes,

The US supports terrorist States, one of which is Columbia, which aids and abets terrorists, i.e. coca-cola.


But its terrorism against workers and union organizers, so I guess it does'nt count.

Bud Struggle
29th September 2010, 21:43
7 Up drinker here--I take no responsibility for any of this. :D

Havet
29th September 2010, 21:43
Guess all commies will have to drink Pepsi now

Bud Struggle
29th September 2010, 21:49
I suppose all us RevLefters will equally denounce the FARC who do even more evil thing in the same forests:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Armed_Forces_of_Colombia

Kidnapping, murder, drug trade, violence against indigenous people, land mines, child soldiers, the list goes on.

Red Poplar
29th September 2010, 21:49
-

Reznov
29th September 2010, 21:54
I can only imagine what Dr. Pepper Cherry supports :laugh:

Robert
29th September 2010, 23:29
Guess all commies will have to drink Pepsi now

Quelle horreur!

Imposter Marxist
29th September 2010, 23:48
I suppose all us RevLefters will equally denounce the FARC who do even more evil thing in the same forests:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Armed_Forces_of_Colombia

Kidnapping, murder, drug trade, violence against indigenous people, land mines, child soldiers, the list goes on.


Yeah, Im glad I have no problem with Farc, besides the drug trade thingy. But thats been disproven, so, im at peace with it Bud. ;D

Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk
30th September 2010, 00:06
The left really is full of smug bell-ends.

Carry on.

Lt. Ferret
30th September 2010, 01:21
i cut soda out of my diet, its amazing how much better youll feel when you arent chugging sugar water.

now my binge drinking, however...

Conquer or Die
30th September 2010, 08:00
You've taught me a new word, Laird. For that, I award you one point.

#FF0000
30th September 2010, 08:59
I suppose all us RevLefters will equally denounce the FARC who do even more evil thing in the same forests:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Armed_Forces_of_Colombia

Kidnapping, murder, drug trade, violence against indigenous people, land mines, child soldiers, the list goes on.

Yeah that's p. dumb.

The child soldiers apparently join on their own, though.

Lt. Ferret
30th September 2010, 09:26
youre fucking kidding me about the child soldiers right?

RGacky3
30th September 2010, 10:37
I suppose all us RevLefters will equally denounce the FARC who do even more evil thing in the same forests:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolut...es_of_Colombia (http://www.anonym.to/?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Armed_Forces_of_Colombia)

Kidnapping, murder, drug trade, violence against indigenous people, land mines, child soldiers, the list goes on.

I alwasy denounce FARC, but they get plenty of attention, for some reason when Capitalists do it no one cares in the media.

Farc gets enough denunciation.

Dean
30th September 2010, 15:35
I can only imagine what Dr. Pepper Cherry supports :laugh:

Dr Pepper is independent. I forget the exact incidence, but during the Arab boycott of Israel & goods, Dr Pepper was seen to uphold the boycott or something - and Coke was seen as the worst transgressor.

Don't know enough about it to make a definitive point however.

#FF0000
30th September 2010, 15:36
youre fucking kidding me about the child soldiers right?

Hey I'm just going off what the source I was given says.


Forcible recruitment of children, by either side, is rare in Colombia; most of the children join of their own accord without any threats of force to themselves or their families. They join for a variety of reasons including poverty, lack of educational opportunities, avoiding work in the coca processing plants (which is dangerous), escaping from domestic violence, offers of money (mostly from paramilitaries, who pay their soldiers), and other reasons

Lt. Ferret
30th September 2010, 16:45
workers going to work because of poverty is bad, but child soldiers going to fight and die because of poverty is a-ok?

Scary Monster
30th September 2010, 22:31
workers going to work because of poverty is bad, but child soldiers going to fight and die because of poverty is a-ok?

The point was that child soldiers do not become so due to force. Rather, it is due to their conditions (obviously brought upon them by US imperialism), which we seek to end, of course.

#FF0000
1st October 2010, 04:20
workers going to work because of poverty is bad, but child soldiers going to fight and die because of poverty is a-ok?

people being forced to do things under the threat of poverty is only bad if hurts the establishment I guess.

Demogorgon
1st October 2010, 08:54
The media turns a blind eye to all of this of course because one does not upset big corporations; after all, someone has to purchase advertising time. Much easier to focus on much less significant groups who can be painted as an ideological enemy.

I am allergic to these Cola drinks anyway, so there was never any chance of me drinking coke, but I have to say I am proud to live in what is allegedly the only city in the world where coke is readily available where it is not the biggest selling soft drink. We prefer our local produce of Irn Bru, which incidentally has tasted disgusting to me since the moment I left childhood, but plenty of people here like it.

RGacky3
1st October 2010, 13:25
people being forced to do things under the threat of poverty is only bad if hurts the establishment I guess.

Thats the problem, obviously I'm against farc using child soldiers, no matter what the circumstances, but I'm also against right wing hypocricy, which is blatent.

Bud Struggle
1st October 2010, 18:29
Thats the problem, obviously I'm against farc using child soldiers, no matter what the circumstances, but I'm also against right wing hypocricy, which is blatent.

Hipocracy is NOT fighting inequality EVERYWHERE it's found. Understand that point, Brother! Fighting it selectively--well your just being one of them--just on the other side, and that's you isn't it, Brother?

RGacky3
1st October 2010, 18:37
Fighting it selectively--well your just being one of them--just on the other side, and that's you isn't it, Brother?

I oppse inequality everywhere, I fight it where I can.

You CAN fight the US's support for Isreal, exploitation of immigrants, big buisinesses and big finance destorying of democracy, corporate exploitation, war, and so on, and maybe you do.

But if you don't and yet you yell about oppression done by guys who are not on "Your team" (The US or Capitalists), then your a hypocrite, and from what I've seen, your a hypocrite.

Bud Struggle
1st October 2010, 18:42
I oppse inequality everywhere, I fight it where I can.


You CAN fight the US's support for Isreal, exploitation of immigrants, big buisinesses and big finance destorying of democracy, corporate exploitation, war, and so on, and maybe you do.

But if you don't and yet you yell about oppression done by guys who are not on "Your team" (The US or Capitalists), then your a hypocrite, and from what I've seen, your a hypocrite.

Gee.

None of those are my positions. Hmmm--maybe you are using me as a strawman?

I'm not interested in being part of you particular "agenda," Gack. Maybe it's time you are part of my agenda. :) :ninja:

RGacky3
1st October 2010, 18:47
Maybe it's time you are part of my agenda.

Whats your agenda?


None of those are my positions. Hmmm--maybe you are using me as a strawman?

What are your positions?

Bud Struggle
1st October 2010, 20:17
What are your positions?

On top.:D

Revolution starts with U
1st October 2010, 20:26
Lame! It's all about standing up for this revolutionary
.. we are talking about sex right?

Bud Struggle
1st October 2010, 21:00
Lame! It's all about standing up for this revolutionary
.. we are talking about sex right?

I'm a capitalist, keep your dirty mind to yourself. :)

RGacky3
1st October 2010, 21:04
On top.:D

Ok, so you have none.

Bud Struggle
1st October 2010, 21:17
Ok, so you have none.

Joke. :D But at least I'm honest about my beliefs.

Revolution starts with U
1st October 2010, 21:26
Oh, you're a capitalist. Well, rape is easiest to perform from the top, for sure ;)
I kid, I kid

Bud Struggle
1st October 2010, 21:29
Oh, you're a capitalist. Well, rape is easiest to perform from the top, for sure ;)
I kid, I kid The army of the Soviet Union always knew best about such things.

Revolution starts with U
1st October 2010, 21:40
"And that is why (they) fail(ed)" Yoda

Nolan
1st October 2010, 21:45
On top.:D

You dirty, dirty man. I shall purge you at once.

#FF0000
1st October 2010, 21:59
this thread took a creepy turn real quick

Red Poplar
1st October 2010, 22:00
this thread took a creepy turn real quick

And for the first time, it's not my fault. I don't even have to contribute. :D

#FF0000
2nd October 2010, 00:31
You never contribute.

badum psh

RGacky3
2nd October 2010, 15:34
Joke. :D But at least I'm honest about my beliefs.

I still don't know what they are.

Havet
2nd October 2010, 19:00
I still don't know what they are.

live and let live, for a small fee of 0.4%/year

RGacky3
2nd October 2010, 21:30
live and let live, for a small fee of 0.4%/year
:laugh:

Bud Struggle
2nd October 2010, 21:39
I still don't know what they are.


I'm a Christian Socialist.

RGacky3
3rd October 2010, 14:55
I'm a Christian Socialist.

Ok, if thats what your positions are, i.e. you follow the teachings of Christ, and you believe in the democratic control of the economy, then be consistant. You can't just have your beliefs when they are convenient, and get rid of them when they arn't.

Bud Struggle
3rd October 2010, 23:44
Ok, if thats what your positions are, i.e. you follow the teachings of Christ, and you believe in the democratic control of the economy, then be consistant. You can't just have your beliefs when they are convenient, and get rid of them when they arn't.

The issue is that believing in the teaching of Christ and RGacky's version of the teachings of Christ--are two completely different things.

If you believe that Jesus speaks through you--you have a problem. And I certainly believe that the US economy is democratically controled (it could be better of course) but I also believe in checks and balanced to prevent mob rule. Without those checks and balances--we'd still have Jim Crow.

RGacky3
4th October 2010, 09:40
And I certainly believe that the US economy is democratically controled (it could be better of course)

If the US economy is democratically controlled then Stalin was democratically controlled, the US economy is not at all democratically controlled, hell, the US government is'nt either.


If you believe that Jesus speaks through you--you have a problem.

You mean like the pope?


The issue is that believing in the teaching of Christ and RGacky's version of the teachings of Christ--are two completely different things.

Its not just me that thinks "There is no right and wrong only winners and loosers" is not a teaching of christ, thats pretty much the absolute opposite of what almost everyone understands the gospels to preach.