Log in

View Full Version : American Official Said Dumping Toxic Waste In Third-World Countries Is A Great Idea



Rakhmetov
22nd September 2010, 18:35
"Dirty Industries" controversy

Further information: Summers memo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_memo)
In December 1991, while at the World Bank, Summers wrote a memo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_memo) on trade liberalization that was leaked to the press. It included a section that promoted dumping toxic waste in third-world countries for economic reasons, which drew widespread criticism. Jose Lutzenberger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Lutzenberger) wrote to Summers that his proposal was “perfectly logical but totally insane”, and showed how out-of-touch with reality economists could be.
When Summers became President at Harvard, Harvard Crimson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Harvard_Crimson) later satirized it, saying that Summers would dump waste in the Kennedy School Courtyard as it had the lowest endowment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment). Afterwards, Lant Pritchett (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lant_Pritchett) claimed that he was primary author of the memo, which he claimed was satire. By Summers' second year at Harvard, both authors claimed that the report was intended as sarcasm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm). There is no documentation that the report was meant as humorous until that time, and it remains the only claim Summers has ever made about satirical authorship. The memo stated that "the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that . . . I've always thought that under-populated countries in Africa (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa) are vastly underpolluted."[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers#cite_note-5)

[/URL]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers#.22Dirty_Industries.22_controversy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers#cite_note-5)


[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers#cite_note-5"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_memo
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers#cite_note-5)

RadioRaheem84
22nd September 2010, 18:46
Old news, but still relevant enough to show the thinking of officials.

And this is coming from the liberal establishment! The Economist agreed with him too.

GreenCommunism
22nd September 2010, 19:26
what! they don't even live long enough for pollution to affect them!

Thirsty Crow
22nd September 2010, 21:30
His proposition was "perfectly logical but totally insane"??
Oh my do I love such irony. Unbelievable, some stupid capitalist apologist/functionary briefly explained how insane is the dominant economic logic.
Oh, and that part about sarcasm...sarcasm or not, he's got it right.

RadioRaheem84
22nd September 2010, 23:51
The worst part is he is chief economic advisor for Obama. He is head of the National Economic Council. A reall Wall Street insider mogul and Democratic hawk,.

Klaatu
23rd September 2010, 02:03
I say we dump the toxic waste in Summers' back yard.

As for smokers who toss their butts on the ground, and out of car windows, dump a truckload of used butts into their living rooms.

Pollute the polluters!

Rusty Shackleford
23rd September 2010, 02:34
I say we dump the toxic waste in Summers' back yard.

As for smokers who toss their butts on the ground, and out of car windows, dump a truckload of used butts into their living rooms.

Pollute the polluters!
what about rollies or filterless ciggies?
honest question.

Lenina Rosenweg
23rd September 2010, 02:59
Summers has a history of saying stuff like that. He was basically pushed out of Harvard a few years ago for a sexist speech saying that women's intellectual inferiority explains why we are under represented in the sciences.

RadioRaheem84
23rd September 2010, 03:04
And he is a liberal democrat! A very prominent one at that with deep political connections.

Him and Robert Rubin were instrumental in pushing the Dems to the right under Clinton.

Peace on Earth
23rd September 2010, 03:36
If only I could believe he was joking...

Klaatu
23rd September 2010, 04:59
what about rollies or filterless ciggies?
honest question.

Probably biodegradable. But no one I know smokes filterless or roll-your-own.

I know this is a bit off topic, but I think some smokers think they are cool bad-asses or something by tossing their butt. But if they only realize how much non-smokers resent them for this... At my college, they are considering a full ban, not so much from the air pollution, but because of the ground litter. You cannot walk three feet across campus without seeing butt litter on the ground; it's everywhere! :thumbdown: