Personality Test (Myers Brigg)

[Rousedruminations]

I don't really know if this post should be in this category, and it isn't relevant to a leftist political philosophy or website, however i am 'engaging in a serious discussions regarding to any sort of content on the internet'. Therefore, for those who are interested, give it a try and see how revealing it is for you. Personally it has been a very revealing tool for me, an aid to know myself more intimately, realizing occasionally and now more frequently the conflicts i may have with other personality types ! Some may even know the theory behind this quiz however for those who don't, this could be useful to you in a personal way.

In every individual there under goes an incredible amount of self analysis or physco analysis in private at least or when they are by themselves, some may not be able to admit it even on this forum but I'm sure everyone does.

Note: Even though there are 16 personality types, there maybe very subtle difference with in each group because we are all different !

Therefore I'll give you a rough summary of how the theory works.

Introversion



Think/reflect first, then Act
Regularly require an amount of "private time" to recharge batteries
Motivated internally, mind is sometimes so active it is "closed" to outside world
Prefer one-to-one communication and relationships

Extroversion



Act first, think/reflect later
Feel deprived when cutoff from interaction with the outside world
Usually open to and motivated by outside world of people and things
Enjoy wide variety and change in people relationships


The Sensing (S) side of our brain notices the sights, sounds, smells and all the sensory details of the PRESENT. It categorizes, organizes, records and stores the specifics from the here and now. It is REALITY based, dealing with "what is." It also provides the specific details of memory & recollections from PAST events.




The Intuitive (N) side of our brain seeks to understand, interpret and form OVERALL patterns of all the information that is collected and records these patterns and relationships. It speculates on POSSIBILITIES, including looking into and forecasting the FUTURE. It is imaginative and conceptual.


Sensing Characteristics



Mentally live in the Now, attending to present opportunities
Using common sense and creating practical solutions is automatic-instinctual
Memory recall is rich in detail of facts and past events
Best improvise from past experience
Like clear and concrete information; dislike guessing when facts are "fuzzy

Intuitive Characteristics



Mentally live in the Future, attending to future possibilities
Using imagination and creating/inventing new possibilities is automatic-instinctual
Memory recall emphasizes patterns, contexts, and connections
Best improvise from theoretical understanding
Comfortable with ambiguous, fuzzy data and with guessing its meaning.

The Thinking (T) side of our brain analyzes information in a DETACHED, objective fashion. It operates from factual principles, deduces and forms conclusions systematically. It is our logical nature.

The Feeling (F) side of our brain forms conclusions in an ATTACHED and somewhat global manner, based on likes/dislikes, impact on others, and human and aesthetic values. It is our subjective nature.

While everyone uses both means of forming conclusions, each person has a natural bias towards one over the other so that when they give us conflicting directions - one side is the natural trump card or tiebreaker.




Thinking Characteristics



Instinctively search for facts and logic in a decision situation.
Naturally notices tasks and work to be accomplished.
Easily able to provide an objective and critical analysis.
Accept conflict as a natural, normal part of relationships with people.

Feeling Characteristics



Instinctively employ personal feelings and impact on people in decision situations
Naturally sensitive to people needs and reactions.
Naturally seek consensus and popular opinions.
Unsettled by conflict; have almost a toxic reaction to disharmony.

A Judging (J) style approaches the outside world WITH A PLAN and is oriented towards organizing one's surroundings, being prepared, making decisions and reaching closure and completion.

A Perceiving (P) style takes the outside world AS IT COMES and is adopting and adapting, flexible, open-ended and receptive to new opportunities and changing game plans.

Judging Characteristics


Plan many of the details in advance before moving into action.
Focus on task-related action; complete meaningful segments before moving on.
Work best and avoid stress when able to keep ahead of deadlines.
Naturally use targets, dates and standard routines to manage life.


Perceiving Characteristics



Comfortable moving into action without a plan; plan on-the-go.
Like to multitask, have variety, mix work and play.
Naturally tolerant of time pressure; work best close to the deadlines.
Instinctively avoid commitments which interfere with flexibility, freedom and variety


I guess this is a rough guide to know what type you are.

The 16 types: ISTJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISTJ) ISFJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISFJ) INFJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INFJ) INTJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTJ) ISTP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISTP_%28personality_type%29) ISFP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISFP) INFP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INFP) INTP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTP) ESTP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESTP) ESFP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESFP)ENFP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENFP)ENTP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENTP) ESTJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESTJ) ESFJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESFJ) ENFJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENFJ) ENTJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENTJ)

The link to the Wikipedia theory of it developed by Carl Jung and Isabel Myers is here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator

Quiz/Test: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp

I'm an INFP id like to know your types if you would be willing. As a general rule of thumb after much research i believe most of you would be the NF's the idyllic or NT's the rationale. Overall the theory allows me to attain greater tolerance for the different personality types around the world, fathoming people's fundamental tendencies in their character has been a source of enlightenment, as there is always a reason why people 'act' the way they do even though it may be extremely irrational or at least odd at first. With a greater amount of tolerance i believe that through this a possible and deeper understanding of fraternity among everyone can be achieved.

Your views are welcome;

Thank you.

[F9]

ENTP it seems...
is that good? :p or is the one for the crazy people? :lol:

[Rousedruminations]

lol here is the link to find out if you are !

http://typelogic.com/entp.html

I think NF's are more crazy they probably exhibit more oddities and thus their idiosyncrasies shine through a lot more than high Thinking types just because they feel a lot more intensely than others so i think not lol :):cool:

http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/ - here is a forum for those than can relate more to others and your types.

[GPDP]

I'm an INTJ.


You are:

slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality




INTJs are one of the rarest of the sixteen personality types, and account for about 1–4% of the population.


INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake ... INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play ... Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel ... This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals ... Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense.


INTJs are strong individualists who seek new angles or novel ways of looking at things. They enjoy coming to new understandings. They tend to be insightful and mentally quick; however, this mental quickness may not always be outwardly apparent to others since they keep a great deal to themselves. They are very determined people who trust their vision of the possibilities, regardless of what others think. They may even be considered the most independent of all of the sixteen personality types. INTJs are at their best in quietly and firmly developing their ideas, theories, and principles.

Welp, now I know why I'm so shit at getting a girlfriend. :laugh:

[#FF0000]

INTP


Precise about their descriptions, INTPs will often correct others (or be sorely tempted to) if the shade of meaning is a bit off

Oh holy fuck that is me to a T

[Aurora]

INTJ apparently, although I'm pretty much the opposite of everything it says lol

To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence.

...

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability.
Im indecisive, self-conscious and am notoriously unreliable. Not sure about imagination but im not creative at all

[Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk]

Your Type is
INFP

Pretty spot on, actually.

[RedAnarchist]

I'm very much an INTP, and I actually post on another forum about the MBTI called PersonalityCafe - http://personalitycafe.com/forum/, and I am a member of TypeC but don't really go on that forum much anymore. I would say that most people here are probably Introverts as they tend to use forums more than Extroverts. On that forum INFPs are the most common.

I would say with a lot of certainty that there will be no ESFJs on this forum, or at most only a couple - ESFJs tend not to use forums so much. My sister is an ESFJ, my three brothers are INTJ, ISTJ and ESFP (not sure about the last one).

[Rjevan]

I'm also an INTJ, so much for being the "rarest of the sixteen personality types". ;)

The characterisation is very accurate, just the Sensing/Intinuitive Characteristics Rousedruminations lists are muddled up for me. "Comfortable with ambiguous, fuzzy data and with guessing its meaning." - lol, hell no!

[NecroCommie]

INTP. And according to a handful of tests too, taken on different times of year so I'd say it's somewhat accurate. (as accurate as these tests can get that is).

My god I was surprised when I took this the first time! It practically read my mind and all my life based on few seemingly unrelated questions. So yes, I don't only score as an INTP, but I also feel it is a pretty accurate description.

[9]

I remember taking this test in a computer lab when I was a freshman in high school and scoring either ENFP or INFP. I never thought it was very accurate. It's been almost ten years though; I'd try taking it now to see how it measures up, but I'm on my way out the door. Maybe later, if I remember.

[Widerstand]

I used to be ENTP (close ENFP) for ages, but since about a year or so I'm constantly INFP. :|

[Aesop]

INTJ, although i doubt that me and donald rumsfeld has the same personality(seeing as he is listed as INTJ) http://typelogic.com/intj.html

[NecroCommie]

INTJ, although i doubt that me and donald rumsfeld has the same personality(seeing as he is listed as INTJ) http://typelogic.com/intj.html
It is not supposed to tell any tastes or preferences, or even personality in the sense it is used in everyday language. The test is supposed to describe the method in which you gain information, the way in which you process it and how do you relate your conscious in relation to other people and the material world.

These often result in similar tastes and skills, but I cannot stress that "often" part enough. Besides, the qualities previously mentioned are not everything there is to an individual. People continuously learn to act against their personality types, and with most people the type even shifts slowly from one to another. This typology is more about what is the behaviour which you (presumably) seek to attain.

[revolution inaction]

it says i'm

ENTP
Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences
% 11 75 25 33

[9]

I actually remembered to take it:



ENFP
Extraverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
11 75 88 89


You are:

*slightly expressed extravert
*distinctively expressed intuitive personality
*very expressed feeling personality
*very expressed perceiving personalityI'm pretty sure this is what I scored eight or nine years ago when I originally took the test (the letters anyway; I have no idea about the percentages).
I'm not done reading the description, but a lot of it is actually pretty accurate, and basically can be summarized as:



IRL troll

[Bright Banana Beard]

ESFP
Extraverted Sensing Feeling Perceiving
1 1 25 22

[Communist]

.

I'm an INFJ (http://keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=3&c=counselor). Supposedly only 1% of the population are that type.
And the world is all the worse for it, let me tell you.
:lol:

[originofopinion]

My Type is INTJ


moderately expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
distinctively expressed judging personality

[Kevin1a]

I'm an INTP, I try to retest myself every six months, but the most change I've ever noticed is that my I became a little weaker, and then returned to it's former strength. I wouldn't want to be anything else, I'm lucky enough to have received what I view as the best personality type out there. Though I make up for being that awesome by doing other really stupid things. :D

I'm just stating a hypothesis here, so don't get mad, but I think ISTJ would be really common among teabaggers.

[ContrarianLemming]

Im an INFJ

, classic cliche shy poetic sort, plays the piano, introverted, has female friends, activist, probably left wing, loves reading and writing and being a general sensitive young man who cares about the whole earth.

a real ponce.

[ContrarianLemming]

.

I'm an INFJ (http://keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=3&c=counselor). Supposedly only 1% of the population are that type.
And the world is all the worse for it, let me tell you.
:lol:


I love you.

[Rousedruminations]

Rousedruminations lists are muddled up for me. "Comfortable with ambiguous, fuzzy data and with guessing its meaning." - lol, hell no!

Taking the test will give you an insight as to how intuitive you are, as there might be a bit of sensing in you as well. Your 'N' can have all 4 points according to the list except for the last one. So by taking the test, you may get 70 % intuition and 30 % sensing. The more dominant factor gives you N as you are an INTJ yet mixed with the N function you might have a bit of Sensing as well.

I guess the lits are just a rough guide. Therefore for further analysis, doing the test perhaps would provide a better answer for you and everyone else.

[Quail]

I'm INFP

Strength of the preferences:
% 78 50 12 22

Reading the description, it does sound quite a lot like me.

[Agnapostate]

IIRC, I keep scoring between ENTP and ESTP. There's a lot of introverts on this forum; I hope you're not just staying online and not going outside and talking to people about turning red. :D

[meow]

has any one used this to explain themselfs to others? i just had a argument with my partner. and tried to explain that i am how am just bcause i am. am?

anyway 2 different test give me as intp. so i guess i am?

[Meridian]

What should I check here if it is true that I am almost never late? Yes or no:

You are almost never late for your appointments
YES NO

On one hand, 'yes' would be indicating that I agree with the statement. But at the same time, 'yes' could signify that I object to the negative in the statement. And 'no' would be what you say if you agree with someone with a negative assertion. :confused:

[ContrarianLemming]

What should I check here if it is true that I am almost never late? Yes or no:

You are almost never late for your appointments
YES NO

On one hand, 'yes' would be indicating that I agree with the statement. But at the same time, 'yes' could signify that I object to the negative in the statement. And 'no' would be what you say if you agree with someone with a negative assertion. :confused:

maybe

[Nolan]

Intp.

[The Red Next Door]

i am ENFP


slightly expressed extravert
slightly expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality

[Ele'ill]

EIFJ or ENFJ

You are:
slightly expressed extravert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed judging personality


Yes, I like big crowds- but I like them because I'm anonymous in them- wearing black. I like lots of friends- I like getting to know people individually first- a whole bunch of people go to a whatever- camping or to a river to hang out- my friend invites me but I don't know anyone- I thrive on situations where myself and someone else that I don't know will go on a beer run together- get lost- solve problems together- chitchat- etc. I cannot go and just start talking to everyone and be the center of attention when everyone knows eachother- I hate that- and it's only happened in some rare situations that I do ok socially.

Which is why I don't like cliquish spokes councils.

I also hate small talk.


Fucking shit I'm negative today-

[Jazzratt]

INT and then either P or J dependng on the phase of the moon when I take the test, my choice of socks that morning or some other arcane and unfathomable criterion. Seriously, my results on most of these tests have always come up as INTP 50% of the time and INTJ the other half.

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

My results:

INTP

Introverted - Intuitive - Thinking - Perceiving

Strength of the preferences %:

I:89 N:38 T:62 P:33

A description of INTP from Kiersey, which I think has me down surprisingly well:


Architects need not be thought of as only interested in drawing blueprints for buildings or roads or bridges. They are the master designers of all kinds of theoretical systems, including school curricula, corporate strategies, and new technologies. For Architects, the world exists primarily to be analyzed, understood, explained - and re-designed. External reality in itself is unimportant, little more than raw material to be organized into structural models. What is important for Architects is that they grasp fundamental principles and natural laws, and that their designs are elegant, that is, efficient and coherent.

Architects are rare - maybe one percent of the population - and show the greatest precision in thought and speech of all the types. They tend to see distinctions and inconsistencies instantaneously, and can detect contradictions no matter when or where they were made. It is difficult for an Architect to listen to nonsense, even in a casual conversation, without pointing out the speaker's error. And in any serious discussion or debate Architects are devastating, their skill in framing arguments giving them an enormous advantage. Architects regard all discussions as a search for understanding, and believe their function is to eliminate inconsistencies, which can make communication with them an uncomfortable experience for many.

Ruthless pragmatists about ideas, and insatiably curious, Architects are driven to find the most efficient means to their ends, and they will learn in any manner and degree they can. They will listen to amateurs if their ideas are useful, and will ignore the experts if theirs are not. Authority derived from office, credential, or celebrity does not impress them. Architects are interested only in what make sense, and thus only statements that are consistent and coherent carry any weight with them.

Architects often seem difficult to know. They are inclined to be shy except with close friends, and their reserve is difficult to penetrate. Able to concentrate better than any other type, they prefer to work quietly at their computers or drafting tables, and often alone. Architects also become obsessed with analysis, and this can seem to shut others out. Once caught up in a thought process, Architects close off and persevere until they comprehend the issue in all its complexity. Architects prize intelligence, and with their grand desire to grasp the structure of the universe, they can seem arrogant and may show impatience with others who have less ability, or who are less driven.

[NGNM85]

INTJ


"INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake ... INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play ... Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel ... This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals ... Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense.

—[12] (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#cite_note-11)
INTJs are analytical (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Analytical). Like INTPs (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/INTP), they are most comfortable working alone and tend to be less sociable (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Social) than other types. Nevertheless, INTJs are prepared to lead if no one else seems up to the task, or if they see a major weakness in the current leadership. They tend to be pragmatic (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Pragmatic), logical (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Logical), and creative. They have a low tolerance for spin or rampant emotionalism (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Emotionalism). They are not generally susceptible to catchphrases (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Catch_phrase) and do not recognize authority based on tradition, rank, or title.

INTJs are strong individualists who seek new angles or novel ways of looking at things. They enjoy coming to new understandings. They tend to be insightful and mentally quick; however, this mental quickness may not always be outwardly apparent to others since they keep a great deal to themselves. They are very determined people who trust their vision of the possibilities, regardless of what others think. They may even be considered the most independent of all of the sixteen personality types. INTJs are at their best in quietly and firmly developing their ideas, theories, and principles.
—[15] (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#cite_note-14)
Hallmarks of the INTJ include independence of thought and a desire for efficiency. They work best when given autonomy and creative freedom. They harbor an innate desire to express themselves by conceptualizing their own intellectual designs. They have a talent for analyzing and formulating complex theories. INTJs are generally well-suited for occupations within academia, research, consulting, management, science, engineering, and law. They are often acutely aware of their own knowledge and abilities—as well as their limitations and what they don't know (a quality that tends to distinguish them from INTPs). INTJs thus develop a strong confidence in their ability and talents, making them natural leaders.
In forming relationships, INTJs tend to seek out others with similar character traits and ideologies. Agreement on theoretical concepts is an important aspect of their relationships. By nature INTJs can be demanding in their expectations, and approach relationships in a rational manner. As a result, INTJs may not always respond to a spontaneous infatuation (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Infatuation) but wait for a mate who better fits their set criteria. They tend to be stable, reliable, and dedicated. Harmony in relationships and home life tends to be extremely important to them. They generally withhold strong emotion and do not like to waste time with what they consider irrational social rituals. This may cause non-INTJs to perceive them as distant and reserved; nevertheless, INTJs are usually very loyal partners who are prepared to commit substantial energy and time into a relationship to make it work.
As mates, INTJs want harmony and order in the home and in relationships. The most independent of all types,[16] (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#cite_note-WMP-15) INTJs trust their intuition when choosing friends and mates—even in spite of contradictory evidence or pressure from others. The emotions of an INTJ are hard to read, and neither male nor female INTJs are apt to express emotional reactions. At times, INTJs seem cold, reserved, and unresponsive, while in fact they are almost hypersensitive to signals of rejection from those they care for. In social situations, INTJs may also be unresponsive and may neglect small rituals designed to put others at ease. For example, INTJs may communicate that idle dialogue such as small talk is a waste of time. This may create the impression that the INTJ is in a hurry—an impression that is not always intended. In their interpersonal relationships, INTJs are usually better in a working situation than in a recreational situation."

[Il Medico]

When I take these test I always get ENPT, it is some what accurate, but you can't put people into nice little acronym labeled boxes.

[kitsune]

Depending on the test, I get I or E, NF, and favor P by a slight margin.

[Trigonometry]

Entj

[Axle]

ENFP

%: 33, 25, 12, 44

moderately expressed extravert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality


Eh. My scores always somewhat fluctuate with my moods. I kind of take Myers-Brigg with a grain of salt...its like pseudo-science's answer to Astrology.

[Panda Tse Tung]

I get ENTP 50% of the time (when i take such tests) otherwise it's INTP, so i'll just assume i'm an NTP.
Also it strongly depends on the emphasis placed, for example if they ask if meeting new people energizes me. It does. But whether it is easy for me to meet new people, it is not. It's pretty uncomfortable for at least a couple of minutes.

Edit:
Well... thats... interesting...
Now i'm an ENFP....

You are:

slightly expressed extravert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality

I read the description, but thats not me...

[Taikand]

INTJ , AKA Mastermind.

[F9]

I am ESFP. It says that my personality type is an artist, but my drawings look like mutated stick ppl. :(

art contains a lot more things other than drawing.

[Summerspeaker]

INFP, both this time and usually. Sometimes borderline ENFP. So maybe xNFP.

[Ocean Seal]

I'm also an INTJ, so much for being the "rarest of the sixteen personality types". ;)

The characterisation is very accurate, just the Sensing/Intinuitive Characteristics Rousedruminations lists are muddled up for me. "Comfortable with ambiguous, fuzzy data and with guessing its meaning." - lol, hell no!
Hey add me to the list.
INTJ

Lol rarest, I feel as if they support one another.

[kitsune]

I prefer the type of analysis given by this sort of test (http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/mmdi/questionnaire/), which presents the results as a range of values rather than a specific pigeonhole. It gives a better picture of what's actually going on.

ISTJ 33% ..... ISFJ 48% ..... INFJ 55% ..... INTJ 40%
ISTP 48% ..... ISFP 79% ..... INFP 82% ..... INTP 51%
ESTP 61% ..... ESFP 76% ..... ENFP 83% ..... ENTP 67%
ESTJ 34% ..... ESFJ 65% ..... ENFJ 68% ..... ENTJ 37%

[RedLeft]

I always test as INFP.

Somebody should set up a poll on this; I am curious to see what personality type we represent the most as a community.

[crazyirish93]

INTJ


moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality

i agree with redleft we should set up a poll to see what the breakdown is

second go when i wasn't drunk i got this

INTJ


distinctively expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality

[Decolonize The Left]

Your Type is INTJ


slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality



Neat...

- August

[F9]

Fuserg9 (http://www.revleft.com/vb/../member.php?u=14921), Panda Tse Tung (http://www.revleft.com/vb/../member.php?u=14347)

I can see a mistake there:lol::p

[apawllo]

Your Type is
INTJ


very expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality

[Manic Impressive]

ENFP

Idealist Champion I like the sound of that...... never fear the Champion of Idealists is here :cool:

[Panda Tse Tung]

Fuserg9 (http://www.revleft.com/vb/../member.php?u=14921), Panda Tse Tung (http://www.revleft.com/vb/../member.php?u=14347)

I can see a mistake there:lol::p
Hahaha, well as i said 50% ENTP 50% INTP. Only on this test i got EFTP >_>. So yeah, but i decided to go with ENTP anyway since it best fits my personality, not perfectly either. But yeah...

[CJCM]

Your Type is
ENTJ

Extraverted 11%
Intuitive 56%
Thinking 38%
Judging 56%

You are:
slightly expressed extravert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality
Alright weird quizz though :p

[Magón]

ENTP... Is this like the Horoscope=your destined Political Ideology thing? Was I born to be an Anarchist in both thinking and social settings? :D

[Nuvem]

http://typelogic.com/entp.html

ENTP- sounds pretty accurate except for the very last sentence of the description from the link above.

[WeAreReborn]

I'm INFJ only 1% judging awesome :D.
Question 31. You value justice higher than mercy.
Isn't mercy justice? I obviously answered no to the question but seems pretty objective to me.

[ContrarianLemming]

I'm INFJ only 1% judging awesome :D.


we should make a commune

[Nuvem]

Question 31. You value justice higher than mercy.
Isn't mercy justice? I obviously answered no to the question but seems pretty objective to me.

That's situationally subjective. It's justice if you show mercy to a street rat who stole a loaf of bread from your convenience store and let him go with a freebie. It's not justice if you show mercy during the Nuremburg trials. I had trouble with that question too and I answered "Yes" on the conclusion that justice means showing mercy to those who deserve it and none for those who do not.

[WeAreReborn]

we should make a commune
Sound good to me. :)


That's situationally subjective. It's justice if you show mercy to a street rat who stole a loaf of bread from your convenience store and let him go with a freebie. It's not justice if you show mercy during the Nuremburg trials. I had trouble with that question too and I answered "Yes" on the conclusion that justice means showing mercy to those who deserve it and none for those who do not. Hmm point taken, I suppose I didn't think too much into it.

[maskerade]

intp. am i the only one who feels this is a bit megalomaniacal?

[∞]

INTP

Includes:
CHARLES DARWIN,
Socrates,
Renee Descartes,
Socrates,
Isaac Newton,
BERTRAND RUSSELL,
ALBERT EINSTEIN,
DR. House,
and Filbert from Rocko's modern life (lolwut).

Who here can name some INTPs?

[BeerShaman]

Your Type is
ENFP Extraverted 44% Intuitive 50% Feeling 12% Perceiving 22 % Strength of the preferences


moderately expressed extravert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality

[BeerShaman]

Like Meg Ryan! Oh I knew this! I always liked her! :P:lol:

ENFPs hate bureaucracy, both in principle and in practice; they will always make a point of launching one of their crusades against some aspect of it.

That's why! :P

[StoneFrog]

INTJ

lol i think that 1% of the population which is INTJ come here, we seem to be thriving here. :cool:

Introverted -89%
Intuitive -88%
Thinking -62%
Judging -56%

[BeerShaman]

Oh! They just banned Contrarian Lemming! Not nice!

[Ovi]

I am INFP, also known as hippie.

[∞]

I'm pretty sure Marx would be INTP:D

[timbaly]

I've been consistently getting INTP since 2004 but I think I'm more of a INTJ.

[IronLion]

Took this test in 2007. Results still hold up:

http://www.mypersonality.info/badge/0/6/63269.png

Interesting to see so many INTJs and INTPs on RevLeft, considering the two types combined make up only 4% of the general population. There must be some kind of trend or common denominator here...

[Manic Impressive]

I'm pretty sure Marx would be INTP:D

No way man Marx :marx: was an extrovert. How many intraverts do you know who would drunkenly race donkeys through the streets of Bremen? :w00t:

[Panda Tse Tung]

No way man Marx :marx: was an extrovert. How many intraverts do you know who would drunkenly race donkeys through the streets of Bremen? :w00t:
Alcohol can make anyone extraverted.

[RedAnarchist]

All the admins who have voted in the poll have "NT" personality types. I wonder if most of the admins are NT, although I know one isn't because they took a test on Facebook and the type they got matches them perfectly, at least in my opinion.

I think the more active members are much more likely to be INTJ or INTP, because they tend to be two of the most commonly found types online.

[∞]

No way man Marx :marx: was an extrovert. How many intraverts do you know who would drunkenly race donkeys through the streets of Bremen? :w00t:
As Panda said, he was drunk. However, he was very much an intp, maybe injp.
But he was able to differentiate himself with contemporary scholars at his time, so I say INTP. Deep philosopher, amazing economist, outstanding sociologist, innovative in every way, definitely INTP.

[∞]

Friedrich Nietzsche and George Carlin should be considered ENTP.

[Stand Your Ground]

I'm INTJ, seems to be alot of those on here.

[Armchair War Criminal]

Interesting to see so many INTJs and INTPs on RevLeft, considering the two types combined make up only 4% of the general population. There must be some kind of trend or common denominator here...
The common trend is "the sort of people who would embrace a philosophy most of their peers would find repugnant or irrelevant and then argue on the internet about 19th century economists." The trend is nerds.

I suspect the personality demographics among ultra-reactionaries - or at least among extreme right-libertarians - is very similar, although I'm sure a detailed look at the differences would be fascinating (and, quite possibly, useful.)

[Apoi_Viitor]

Well, I'm usually much more 'feeling', than 'thinking'...but I'm pretty much always an INFP.

Which is awesome, because so was George Orwell.

INFP - The "Dreamer"
Temperament: NF (Visionary) Primary Function: Introverted Feeling
Population: 2% (1.5% male, 2.5% female) INFP Overview
(info, people, careers...)

Introverted
63%

Intuition
89%

Feeling
53%

Perceiving
100%

[iwwforever]

Enfj

[Lobotomy]

Yet another INTJ here. There's a lot of politicians on that list of INTJs. That freaks me out.

[NecroCommie]

Interesting to see so many INTJs and INTPs on RevLeft, considering the two types combined make up only 4% of the general population. There must be some kind of trend or common denominator here...
I kind of predicted this. Communism kind of assumes that you are not interested in what other people think of your opinions (because they hate communism), also logical thinking and not falling into ad-hominem and strawman thinking is pretty much required from a communist. All of these features are strongest in the INTx types.

[RHIZOMES]

I'm an ENTP.

[∞]

I'm an ENTP.

Charismatic politician.

You are like me, if I had confidence. And if I wasn't socially awkward.

[Ligeia]

According to this I'm an ESTP: Extraverted Sensing Thinking and strongly Perceiving, whatever that means. A (artisan) promoter. Seems to be similar to an ENTP.

[Communist Pear]

ENTJ, same as Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, eh.
You are:

distinctively expressed extravert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
distinctively expressed judging personality

[DesertShark]

Your Type is
INFP


moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality


http://keirsey.com/images/headers/idealist_healer.jpg

[Rafiq]

I hate these personality tests.

I don't like being grouped in personality groups.


But anyway, I got INTP.

Einstein, Charles Darwin and Thomas Jefferson.

I guess I like personality tests when they are in my favor :)

[Enirehtac]

INTJ here!

You are:

very expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality
:)

[Garret]

INFP


moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality

Got it fairly right.

[Sarah Palin]

I see most of us are INTJ. curious. I thought some of the questions were repetitive though. whateva.
interesting quiz, one of my teachers was telling me about it the other day.

[psgchisolm]

Istp

[Knight of Cydonia]

my score : Extraverted iNtuitive Feeling Perceiving

[Nolan]

I am INTP.

[Iraultzaile Ezkerreko]

Your Type is
ENFJ
Extraverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
56 62 25 89

[Catmatic Leftist]

INFP. Describes me quite well.

[mark01]

Me too, Im an INTP, what should I do now??

[Princess Luna]

Your Type is
ISTP
Introverted 89 Sensin 25 Thinking 12 Perceiving 22

You are:
very expressed introvert
moderately expressed sensing personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality

[Agent Ducky]

INTP, and proud. I kinda knew that because I read a book about personality types and classified myself as an INTP, but I took the quiz and it gave me INTP anywais. I noticed that majority of people on here are INTP or INTJ according to teh poll. Maybe people with INT- type are more likely to be a revolutionary leftist? I guess INT- types are the analyzing thinking smart ppl types. And if you think about the world you realize that capitalism sucks? I'm not sure. It just seems like a weird trend.

[Decommissioner]

I'm an INTJ.









Welp, now I know why I'm so shit at getting a girlfriend. :laugh:

hm, I managed to get INTJ as well, I wonder how rare it could be afterall

[Dunk]

ENFJ.

According to these super-scientific websites, Ronald Reagan was an ENFJ. Greeaaaat. :glare:

[Le Libérer]

So true....
ENFJs are the benevolent 'pedagogues' of humanity. They have tremendous charisma by which many are drawn into their nurturant tutelage and/or grand schemes. Many ENFJs have tremendous power to manipulate others with their phenomenal interpersonal skills and unique salesmanship. But it's usually not meant as manipulation -- ENFJs generally believe in their dreams, and see themselves as helpers and enablers, which they usually are.

ENFJs are global learners. They see the big picture. The ENFJs focus is expansive. Some can juggle an amazing number of responsibilities or projects simultaneously. Many ENFJs have tremendous entrepreneurial ability.

ENFJs know and appreciate people. Like most NFs, (and Feelers in general), they are apt to neglect themselves and their own needs for the needs of others. They have thinner psychological boundaries than most, and are at risk for being hurt or even abused by less sensitive people. ENFJs often take on more of the burdens of others than they can bear. (I think RS2K can vouch for this, :) )

Definitely the politician and community leader.

[Bardo]

INTJ

Supposedly INTJ is suppose to be one of the rarer types. I wonder what makes leftists so prone to this type? (According to this poll anyway)

[RedAnarchist]

NTs as a whole - INTJs, INTPs, ENTPs and ENTJs - tend to be far more common on the Internet than other types. Even so, there does tend to be trends towards more left-wing politics amongst NTs, whilst the more tradtional SFs may prefer more conservative politics.

[OhYesIdid]

NTs as a whole - INTJs, INTPs, ENTPs and ENTJs - tend to be far more common on the Internet than other types. Even so, there does tend to be trends towards more left-wing politics amongst NTs, whilst the more tradtional SFs may prefer more conservative politics.

Seems that most people here are INTJ, including me.
Interesting.

[Landsharks eat metal]

I'm an INFP, which mostly seems right from what I've read, except for that I've always read that INFPs are supposed to be ridiculously nice. I'm very kind-hearted, but that doesn't always show in my behavior. I tend to be a jerk to people unless they actually bother to be nice to me. It seems weird to believe that everybody in the world can be grouped into one of sixteen categories all on their ratings for four traits. My behaviors and feelings are highly variable, perhaps more so than most others. But I also feel that I would be a kinder person if others were more accepting of me, so maybe this test isn't really, at least for me, reflecting what I am at the moment, but what I could be.

[mosfeld]

I got INTJ now but INTP last time. Where can you read about these personality types?

[Landsharks eat metal]

I got INTJ now but INTP last time. Where can you read about these personality types?

Google "Keirsey" and the personality type you want to know more about, and it should be the first result. The site has a lot of information on each type and how they see the world, as well as how the different types can get along in career and romantic relationships.

[mosfeld]

Im actually surprised at how accurate these tests are.

http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/mastermind.asp

[mosfeld]

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn130/QuirkyPhotographer/INTJposter.jpg

[Roach]

How accurate are those texts really ?

According to it I am ENTJ, following the examples of great revolutionaries like Margaret Thatcher and Napoleon ( I know the text does not involve politics BTW).

[mosfeld]

Read a description of ENTJ (http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=ENTJ&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8) and see if it applies to you.

[Roach]

Read a description of ENTJ (http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=ENTJ&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8) and see if it applies to you.

I've done the text twice, but still not convinced. Its kind of too good to be true, at least in my case.Also, I dont think Human beings can be simply reduced to Acronyms.

[Red Commissar]

When I take these things I get INTJ and sometimes ISTJ (I know). With the test in the first post I got INTJ.

I think ISTJ's also share something with Ayn Rand :laugh: , though I guess it's cancelled out by Einstein. I know the "famous figures" thing is worthless here but it's good for a laugh.

[OhYesIdid]

I've done the text twice, but still not convinced. Its kind of too good to be true, at least in my case.Also, I dont think Human beings can be simply reduced to Acronyms.

http://cdn.newsone.com/files/2008/10/plumber.jpg See, that's your problem right there. From the get-go, you've decided not to be convinced. It is a perfectly valid opinion, but it don't sound too open minded to me...
It totally fits with being ENTJ, though.

[Landsharks eat metal]

Its kind of too good to be true, at least in my case.
I think most personality tests very much accentuate positive characteristics (perhaps to empower the test-takers). A more cynical explanation would be that it is due to the Barnum Effect, people's willingness to accept stock positive descriptions as true about themselves. This is why some people believe fortune tellers, but I don't believe it applies in this case, at least not for me, because I read through most of the profiles, and I see myself much less in any description than INFP (but I saw some of myself in ISFP.) If I were categorized as an extravert, I would think the test was bull.

[∞]

http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l329/artsnail/INTP.jpg

lol

[Ocean Seal]

NTs as a whole - INTJs, INTPs, ENTPs and ENTJs - tend to be far more common on the Internet than other types. Even so, there does tend to be trends towards more left-wing politics amongst NTs, whilst the more tradtional SFs may prefer more conservative politics.



At first I thought that and I was like cool.
But then I found that we INTJ's are among Ayn Rand, Donald Rumsfeld, Augustus Caesar, William Buckley, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Hannibal Lecter, and William J. Bennet. Yet at the same time we aren't among any famous leftists :glare:.

[Broletariat]

INFJ fo lyfe

[∞]

At first I thought that and I was like cool.
But then I found that we INTJ's are among Ayn Rand, Donald Rumsfeld, Augustus Caesar, William Buckley, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Hannibal Lecter, and William J. Bennet. Yet at the same time we aren't among any famous leftists :glare:.

Don't beat yourself up, you guys got Stephen Hawking.

[VeritablyV]

I'm an INFP, although I used to always get INTP. I'm actually surprised at the current poll number for INFPs though, didn't expect it. INTJ and INTP population makes sense though.

[Johnny Kerosene]

The first time I took it and I got ENTJ. I took it again and it said I was an ENTP. I got like, a 12 in J the first time, and 22 in P the second time. I'd say I fit ENTP better, and according to one website Mercutio from Romeo and Juliet is a an ENTP. Fuck Yeah.

[NewLeft]

I got INTJ. Seems to be common with lefties.

[Aloysius]

ISFP, but last year, I took a simplified version of the test and got INTJ.

[Kamos]

INTP, as it seems.

[CuriousWolf]

INTP as well, I've taken several tests and this has almost always been the result.

[Leftsolidarity]

I just took this the other day in class